solidity/docs/yul.rst

1451 lines
66 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
.. _yul:
###
Yul
###
.. index:: ! assembly, ! asm, ! evmasm, ! yul, julia, iulia
Yul (previously also called JULIA or IULIA) is an intermediate language that can be
compiled to bytecode for different backends.
Support for EVM 1.0, EVM 1.5 and Ewasm is planned, and it is designed to
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
be a usable common denominator of all three
platforms. It can already be used in stand-alone mode and
for "inline assembly" inside Solidity
and there is an experimental implementation of the Solidity compiler
that uses Yul as an intermediate language. Yul is a good target for
high-level optimisation stages that can benefit all target platforms equally.
Motivation and High-level Description
=====================================
The design of Yul tries to achieve several goals:
1. Programs written in Yul should be readable, even if the code is generated by a compiler from Solidity or another high-level language.
2. Control flow should be easy to understand to help in manual inspection, formal verification and optimization.
3. The translation from Yul to bytecode should be as straightforward as possible.
4. Yul should be suitable for whole-program optimization.
In order to achieve the first and second goal, Yul provides high-level constructs
like ``for`` loops, ``if`` and ``switch`` statements and function calls. These should
be sufficient for adequately representing the control flow for assembly programs.
2020-07-02 11:14:31 +00:00
Therefore, no explicit statements for ``SWAP``, ``DUP``, ``JUMPDEST``, ``JUMP`` and ``JUMPI``
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
are provided, because the first two obfuscate the data flow
and the last two obfuscate control flow. Furthermore, functional statements of
the form ``mul(add(x, y), 7)`` are preferred over pure opcode statements like
``7 y x add mul`` because in the first form, it is much easier to see which
operand is used for which opcode.
Even though it was designed for stack machines, Yul does not expose the complexity of the stack itself.
The programmer or auditor should not have to worry about the stack.
The third goal is achieved by compiling the
higher level constructs to bytecode in a very regular way.
The only non-local operation performed
by the assembler is name lookup of user-defined identifiers (functions, variables, ...)
and cleanup of local variables from the stack.
To avoid confusions between concepts like values and references,
Yul is statically typed. At the same time, there is a default type
(usually the integer word of the target machine) that can always
be omitted to help readability.
To keep the language simple and flexible, Yul does not have
any built-in operations, functions or types in its pure form.
These are added together with their semantics when specifying a dialect of Yul,
2020-11-04 11:01:12 +00:00
which allows specializing Yul to the requirements of different
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
target platforms and feature sets.
Currently, there is only one specified dialect of Yul. This dialect uses
the EVM opcodes as builtin functions
(see below) and defines only the type ``u256``, which is the native 256-bit
type of the EVM. Because of that, we will not provide types in the examples below.
Simple Example
==============
The following example program is written in the EVM dialect and computes exponentiation.
It can be compiled using ``solc --strict-assembly``. The builtin functions
``mul`` and ``div`` compute product and division, respectively.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
{
function power(base, exponent) -> result
{
switch exponent
case 0 { result := 1 }
case 1 { result := base }
default
{
result := power(mul(base, base), div(exponent, 2))
switch mod(exponent, 2)
case 1 { result := mul(base, result) }
}
}
}
It is also possible to implement the same function using a for-loop
instead of with recursion. Here, ``lt(a, b)`` computes whether ``a`` is less than ``b``.
less-than comparison.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
{
function power(base, exponent) -> result
{
result := 1
for { let i := 0 } lt(i, exponent) { i := add(i, 1) }
{
result := mul(result, base)
}
}
}
2020-04-16 09:57:07 +00:00
At the :ref:`end of the section <erc20yul>`, a complete implementation of
the ERC-20 standard can be found.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Stand-Alone Usage
=================
You can use Yul in its stand-alone form in the EVM dialect using the Solidity compiler.
2020-03-16 15:48:32 +00:00
This will use the :ref:`Yul object notation <yul-object>` so that it is possible to refer
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
to code as data to deploy contracts. This Yul mode is available for the commandline compiler
(use ``--strict-assembly``) and for the :ref:`standard-json interface <compiler-api>`:
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: json
{
"language": "Yul",
"sources": { "input.yul": { "content": "{ sstore(0, 1) }" } },
"settings": {
"outputSelection": { "*": { "*": ["*"], "": [ "*" ] } },
"optimizer": { "enabled": true, "details": { "yul": true } }
}
}
.. warning::
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Yul is in active development and bytecode generation is only fully implemented for the EVM dialect of Yul
with EVM 1.0 as target.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Informal Description of Yul
===========================
In the following, we will talk about each individual aspect
of the Yul language. In examples, we will use the default EVM dialect.
Syntax
------
Yul parses comments, literals and identifiers in the same way as Solidity,
so you can e.g. use ``//`` and ``/* */`` to denote comments.
There is one exception: Identifiers in Yul can contain dots: ``.``.
Yul can specify "objects" that consist of code, data and sub-objects.
2020-03-16 15:48:32 +00:00
Please see :ref:`Yul Objects <yul-object>` below for details on that.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
In this section, we are only concerned with the code part of such an object.
This code part always consists of a curly-braces
delimited block. Most tools support specifying just a code block
where an object is expected.
Inside a code block, the following elements can be used
(see the later sections for more details):
2021-07-14 15:55:05 +00:00
- literals, i.e. ``0x123``, ``42`` or ``"abc"`` (strings up to 32 characters)
- calls to builtin functions, e.g. ``add(1, mload(0))``
- variable declarations, e.g. ``let x := 7``, ``let x := add(y, 3)`` or ``let x`` (initial value of 0 is assigned)
- identifiers (variables), e.g. ``add(3, x)``
- assignments, e.g. ``x := add(y, 3)``
- blocks where local variables are scoped inside, e.g. ``{ let x := 3 { let y := add(x, 1) } }``
- if statements, e.g. ``if lt(a, b) { sstore(0, 1) }``
- switch statements, e.g. ``switch mload(0) case 0 { revert() } default { mstore(0, 1) }``
- for loops, e.g. ``for { let i := 0} lt(i, 10) { i := add(i, 1) } { mstore(i, 7) }``
2021-12-05 07:58:03 +00:00
- function definitions, e.g. ``function f(a, b) -> c { c := add(a, b) }``
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Multiple syntactical elements can follow each other simply separated by
whitespace, i.e. there is no terminating ``;`` or newline required.
Literals
--------
As literals, you can use:
- Integer constants in decimal or hexadecimal notation.
- ASCII strings (e.g. ``"abc"``), which may contain hex escapes ``\xNN`` and Unicode escapes ``\uNNNN`` where ``N`` are hexadecimal digits.
- Hex strings (e.g. ``hex"616263"``).
In the EVM dialect of Yul, literals represent 256-bit words as follows:
- Decimal or hexadecimal constants must be less than ``2**256``.
They represent the 256-bit word with that value as an unsigned integer in big endian encoding.
- An ASCII string is first viewed as a byte sequence, by viewing
a non-escape ASCII character as a single byte whose value is the ASCII code,
an escape ``\xNN`` as single byte with that value, and
an escape ``\uNNNN`` as the UTF-8 sequence of bytes for that code point.
The byte sequence must not exceed 32 bytes.
The byte sequence is padded with zeros on the right to reach 32 bytes in length;
in other words, the string is stored left-aligned.
The padded byte sequence represents a 256-bit word whose most significant 8 bits are the ones from the first byte,
i.e. the bytes are interpreted in big endian form.
- A hex string is first viewed as a byte sequence, by viewing
each pair of contiguous hex digits as a byte.
The byte sequence must not exceed 32 bytes (i.e. 64 hex digits), and is treated as above.
2021-03-25 16:00:05 +00:00
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
When compiling for the EVM, this will be translated into an
appropriate ``PUSHi`` instruction. In the following example,
``3`` and ``2`` are added resulting in 5 and then the
bitwise ``and`` with the string "abc" is computed.
The final value is assigned to a local variable called ``x``.
The 32-byte limit above does not apply to string literals passed to builtin functions that require
literal arguments (e.g. ``setimmutable`` or ``loadimmutable``). Those strings never end up in the
generated bytecode.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2017-04-18 15:40:31 +00:00
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let x := and("abc", add(3, 2))
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Unless it is the default type, the type of a literal
has to be specified after a colon:
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
2021-07-05 17:38:41 +00:00
// This will not compile (u32 and u256 type not implemented yet)
let x := and("abc":u32, add(3:u256, 2:u256))
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Function Calls
--------------
Both built-in and user-defined functions (see below) can be called
in the same way as shown in the previous example.
If the function returns a single value, it can be directly used
inside an expression again. If it returns multiple values,
they have to be assigned to local variables.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
2021-07-05 17:38:41 +00:00
function f(x, y) -> a, b { /* ... */ }
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
mstore(0x80, add(mload(0x80), 3))
2021-07-05 17:38:41 +00:00
// Here, the user-defined function `f` returns two values.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let x, y := f(1, mload(0))
For built-in functions of the EVM, functional expressions
can be directly translated to a stream of opcodes:
You just read the expression from right to left to obtain the
opcodes. In the case of the first line in the example, this
is ``PUSH1 3 PUSH1 0x80 MLOAD ADD PUSH1 0x80 MSTORE``.
For calls to user-defined functions, the arguments are also
put on the stack from right to left and this is the order
in which argument lists are evaluated. The return values,
though, are expected on the stack from left to right,
i.e. in this example, ``y`` is on top of the stack and ``x``
is below it.
Variable Declarations
---------------------
You can use the ``let`` keyword to declare variables.
A variable is only visible inside the
``{...}``-block it was defined in. When compiling to the EVM,
a new stack slot is created that is reserved
for the variable and automatically removed again when the end of the block
is reached. You can provide an initial value for the variable.
If you do not provide a value, the variable will be initialized to zero.
Since variables are stored on the stack, they do not directly
influence memory or storage, but they can be used as pointers
to memory or storage locations in the built-in functions
``mstore``, ``mload``, ``sstore`` and ``sload``.
2020-09-14 10:52:15 +00:00
Future dialects might introduce specific types for such pointers.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
When a variable is referenced, its current value is copied.
For the EVM, this translates to a ``DUP`` instruction.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
{
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let zero := 0
let v := calldataload(zero)
{
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let y := add(sload(v), 1)
v := y
} // y is "deallocated" here
sstore(v, zero)
} // v and zero are "deallocated" here
If the declared variable should have a type different from the default type,
you denote that following a colon. You can also declare multiple
variables in one statement when you assign from a function call
that returns multiple values.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
2021-07-05 17:38:41 +00:00
// This will not compile (u32 and u256 type not implemented yet)
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
{
2021-07-05 17:38:41 +00:00
let zero:u32 := 0:u32
let v:u256, t:u32 := f()
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let x, y := g()
}
Depending on the optimiser settings, the compiler can free the stack slots
already after the variable has been used for
the last time, even though it is still in scope.
Assignments
-----------
Variables can be assigned to after their definition using the
``:=`` operator. It is possible to assign multiple
variables at the same time. For this, the number and types of the
values have to match.
If you want to assign the values returned from a function that has
multiple return parameters, you have to provide multiple variables.
The same variable may not occur multiple times on the left-hand side of
an assignment, e.g. ``x, x := f()`` is invalid.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let v := 0
// re-assign v
v := 2
let t := add(v, 2)
function f() -> a, b { }
// assign multiple values
v, t := f()
If
--
The if statement can be used for conditionally executing code.
No "else" block can be defined. Consider using "switch" instead (see below) if
you need multiple alternatives.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
2021-07-05 17:38:41 +00:00
if lt(calldatasize(), 4) { revert(0, 0) }
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
The curly braces for the body are required.
Switch
------
You can use a switch statement as an extended version of the if statement.
It takes the value of an expression and compares it to several literal constants.
The branch corresponding to the matching constant is taken.
Contrary to other programming languages, for safety reasons, control flow does
not continue from one case to the next. There can be a fallback or default
case called ``default`` which is taken if none of the literal constants matches.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
{
let x := 0
switch calldataload(4)
case 0 {
x := calldataload(0x24)
}
default {
x := calldataload(0x44)
}
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
sstore(0, div(x, 2))
}
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
The list of cases is not enclosed by curly braces, but the body of a
case does require them.
Loops
-----
Yul supports for-loops which consist of
a header containing an initializing part, a condition, a post-iteration
part and a body. The condition has to be an expression, while
the other three are blocks. If the initializing part
declares any variables at the top level, the scope of these variables extends to all other
parts of the loop.
The ``break`` and ``continue`` statements can be used in the body to exit the loop
or skip to the post-part, respectively.
The following example computes the sum of an area in memory.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
{
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
let x := 0
for { let i := 0 } lt(i, 0x100) { i := add(i, 0x20) } {
x := add(x, mload(i))
}
}
For loops can also be used as a replacement for while loops:
Simply leave the initialization and post-iteration parts empty.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
{
let x := 0
let i := 0
for { } lt(i, 0x100) { } { // while(i < 0x100)
x := add(x, mload(i))
i := add(i, 0x20)
}
}
Function Declarations
---------------------
Yul allows the definition of functions. These should not be confused with functions
in Solidity since they are never part of an external interface of a contract and
are part of a namespace separate from the one for Solidity functions.
For the EVM, Yul functions take their
arguments (and a return PC) from the stack and also put the results onto the
stack. User-defined functions and built-in functions are called in exactly the same way.
Functions can be defined anywhere and are visible in the block they are
declared in. Inside a function, you cannot access local variables
defined outside of that function.
Functions declare parameters and return variables, similar to Solidity.
To return a value, you assign it to the return variable(s).
If you call a function that returns multiple values, you have to assign
them to multiple variables using ``a, b := f(x)`` or ``let a, b := f(x)``.
The ``leave`` statement can be used to exit the current function. It
works like the ``return`` statement in other languages just that it does
not take a value to return, it just exits the functions and the function
will return whatever values are currently assigned to the return variable(s).
Note that the EVM dialect has a built-in function called ``return`` that
quits the full execution context (internal message call) and not just
the current yul function.
The following example implements the power function by square-and-multiply.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
{
function power(base, exponent) -> result {
switch exponent
case 0 { result := 1 }
case 1 { result := base }
default {
result := power(mul(base, base), div(exponent, 2))
switch mod(exponent, 2)
case 1 { result := mul(base, result) }
}
}
}
Specification of Yul
====================
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
This chapter describes Yul code formally. Yul code is usually placed inside Yul objects,
which are explained in their own chapter.
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: none
Block = '{' Statement* '}'
Statement =
Block |
FunctionDefinition |
VariableDeclaration |
Assignment |
2018-09-29 17:42:44 +00:00
If |
Expression |
Switch |
ForLoop |
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
BreakContinue |
Leave
FunctionDefinition =
2017-04-21 16:04:27 +00:00
'function' Identifier '(' TypedIdentifierList? ')'
( '->' TypedIdentifierList )? Block
VariableDeclaration =
2017-04-21 16:04:27 +00:00
'let' TypedIdentifierList ( ':=' Expression )?
Assignment =
2017-04-21 16:04:27 +00:00
IdentifierList ':=' Expression
Expression =
FunctionCall | Identifier | Literal
If =
'if' Expression Block
Switch =
'switch' Expression ( Case+ Default? | Default )
Case =
2017-05-19 22:15:07 +00:00
'case' Literal Block
Default =
'default' Block
ForLoop =
'for' Block Expression Block Block
BreakContinue =
'break' | 'continue'
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
Leave = 'leave'
FunctionCall =
Identifier '(' ( Expression ( ',' Expression )* )? ')'
Identifier = [a-zA-Z_$] [a-zA-Z_$0-9.]*
IdentifierList = Identifier ( ',' Identifier)*
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
TypeName = Identifier
TypedIdentifierList = Identifier ( ':' TypeName )? ( ',' Identifier ( ':' TypeName )? )*
Literal =
(NumberLiteral | StringLiteral | TrueLiteral | FalseLiteral) ( ':' TypeName )?
NumberLiteral = HexNumber | DecimalNumber
StringLiteral = '"' ([^"\r\n\\] | '\\' .)* '"'
2017-05-19 23:05:14 +00:00
TrueLiteral = 'true'
FalseLiteral = 'false'
HexNumber = '0x' [0-9a-fA-F]+
DecimalNumber = [0-9]+
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Restrictions on the Grammar
---------------------------
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Apart from those directly imposed by the grammar, the following
restrictions apply:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Switches must have at least one case (including the default case).
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
All case values need to have the same type and distinct values.
If all possible values of the expression type are covered, a default case is
not allowed (i.e. a switch with a ``bool`` expression that has both a
true and a false case do not allow a default case).
2017-04-21 16:49:04 +00:00
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Every expression evaluates to zero or more values. Identifiers and Literals
evaluate to exactly
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
one value and function calls evaluate to a number of values equal to the
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
number of return variables of the function called.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
In variable declarations and assignments, the right-hand-side expression
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
(if present) has to evaluate to a number of values equal to the number of
variables on the left-hand-side.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
This is the only situation where an expression evaluating
to more than one value is allowed.
The same variable name cannot occur more than once in the left-hand-side of
an assignment or variable declaration.
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Expressions that are also statements (i.e. at the block level) have to
evaluate to zero values.
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
In all other situations, expressions have to evaluate to exactly one value.
A ``continue`` or ``break`` statement can only be used inside the body of a for-loop, as follows.
Consider the innermost loop that contains the statement.
The loop and the statement must be in the same function, or both must be at the top level.
The statement must be in the loop's body block;
it cannot be in the loop's initialization block or update block.
It is worth emphasizing that this restriction applies just
to the innermost loop that contains the ``continue`` or ``break`` statement:
this innermost loop, and therefore the ``continue`` or ``break`` statement,
may appear anywhere in an outer loop, possibly in an outer loop's initialization block or update block.
For example, the following is legal,
because the ``break`` occurs in the body block of the inner loop,
despite also occurring in the update block of the outer loop:
.. code-block:: yul
for {} true { for {} true {} { break } }
{
}
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
The condition part of the for-loop has to evaluate to exactly one value.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
The ``leave`` statement can only be used inside a function.
Functions cannot be defined anywhere inside for loop init blocks.
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
2020-11-04 11:01:12 +00:00
Literals cannot be larger than their type. The largest type defined is 256-bit wide.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
During assignments and function calls, the types of the respective values have to match.
There is no implicit type conversion. Type conversion in general can only be achieved
if the dialect provides an appropriate built-in function that takes a value of one
type and returns a value of a different type.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Scoping Rules
-------------
Scopes in Yul are tied to Blocks (exceptions are functions and the for loop
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
as explained below) and all declarations
(``FunctionDefinition``, ``VariableDeclaration``)
introduce new identifiers into these scopes.
Identifiers are visible in
2021-08-02 07:58:20 +00:00
the block they are defined in (including all sub-nodes and sub-blocks):
Functions are visible in the whole block (even before their definitions) while
variables are only visible starting from the statement after the ``VariableDeclaration``.
2019-11-19 15:10:46 +00:00
2021-08-02 07:58:20 +00:00
In particular,
variables cannot be referenced in the right hand side of their own variable
declaration.
Functions can be referenced already before their declaration (if they are visible).
As an exception to the general scoping rule, the scope of the "init" part of the for-loop
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
(the first block) extends across all other parts of the for loop.
2021-08-02 07:58:20 +00:00
This means that variables (and functions) declared in the init part (but not inside a
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
block inside the init part) are visible in all other parts of the for-loop.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Identifiers declared in the other parts of the for loop respect the regular
syntactical scoping rules.
2019-11-19 15:10:46 +00:00
This means a for-loop of the form ``for { I... } C { P... } { B... }`` is equivalent
to ``{ I... for {} C { P... } { B... } }``.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
The parameters and return parameters of functions are visible in the
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
function body and their names have to be distinct.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
2021-08-02 07:58:20 +00:00
Inside functions, it is not possible to reference a variable that was declared
outside of that function.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Shadowing is disallowed, i.e. you cannot declare an identifier at a point
where another identifier with the same name is also visible, even if it is
2021-08-02 07:58:20 +00:00
not possible to reference it because it was declared outside the current function.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
Formal Specification
--------------------
We formally specify Yul by providing an evaluation function E overloaded
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
on the various nodes of the AST. As builtin functions can have side effects,
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
E takes two state objects and the AST node and returns two new
state objects and a variable number of other values.
The two state objects are the global state object
(which in the context of the EVM is the memory, storage and state of the
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
blockchain) and the local state object (the state of local variables, i.e. a
segment of the stack in the EVM).
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
If the AST node is a statement, E returns the two state objects and a "mode",
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
which is used for the ``break``, ``continue`` and ``leave`` statements.
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
If the AST node is an expression, E returns the two state objects and
as many values as the expression evaluates to.
2017-04-21 10:22:58 +00:00
The exact nature of the global state is unspecified for this high level
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
description. The local state ``L`` is a mapping of identifiers ``i`` to values ``v``,
denoted as ``L[i] = v``.
For an identifier ``v``, let ``$v`` be the name of the identifier.
We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: none
E(G, L, <{St1, ..., Stn}>: Block) =
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
let G1, L1, mode = E(G, L, St1, ..., Stn)
let L2 be a restriction of L1 to the identifiers of L
G1, L2, mode
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
E(G, L, St1, ..., Stn: Statement) =
if n is zero:
2017-08-07 14:28:10 +00:00
G, L, regular
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
else:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
let G1, L1, mode = E(G, L, St1)
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
if mode is regular then
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
E(G1, L1, St2, ..., Stn)
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
otherwise
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
G1, L1, mode
E(G, L, FunctionDefinition) =
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
G, L, regular
2019-09-12 17:36:37 +00:00
E(G, L, <let var_1, ..., var_n := rhs>: VariableDeclaration) =
E(G, L, <var_1, ..., var_n := rhs>: Assignment)
E(G, L, <let var_1, ..., var_n>: VariableDeclaration) =
let L1 be a copy of L where L1[$var_i] = 0 for i = 1, ..., n
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
G, L1, regular
2019-09-12 17:36:37 +00:00
E(G, L, <var_1, ..., var_n := rhs>: Assignment) =
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
let G1, L1, v1, ..., vn = E(G, L, rhs)
2019-09-12 17:36:37 +00:00
let L2 be a copy of L1 where L2[$var_i] = vi for i = 1, ..., n
G1, L2, regular
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
E(G, L, <for { i1, ..., in } condition post body>: ForLoop) =
if n >= 1:
let G1, L1, mode = E(G, L, i1, ..., in)
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
// mode has to be regular or leave due to the syntactic restrictions
if mode is leave then
G1, L1 restricted to variables of L, leave
otherwise
let G2, L2, mode = E(G1, L1, for {} condition post body)
G2, L2 restricted to variables of L, mode
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
else:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
let G1, L1, v = E(G, L, condition)
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
if v is false:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
G1, L1, regular
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
else:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
let G2, L2, mode = E(G1, L, body)
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
if mode is break:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
G2, L2, regular
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
otherwise if mode is leave:
G2, L2, leave
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
else:
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
G3, L3, mode = E(G2, L2, post)
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
if mode is leave:
G3, L3, leave
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
otherwise
E(G3, L3, for {} condition post body)
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
E(G, L, break: BreakContinue) =
G, L, break
E(G, L, continue: BreakContinue) =
G, L, continue
2019-10-28 14:25:02 +00:00
E(G, L, leave: Leave) =
G, L, leave
E(G, L, <if condition body>: If) =
let G0, L0, v = E(G, L, condition)
if v is true:
E(G0, L0, body)
else:
G0, L0, regular
2017-08-15 19:15:43 +00:00
E(G, L, <switch condition case l1:t1 st1 ... case ln:tn stn>: Switch) =
E(G, L, switch condition case l1:t1 st1 ... case ln:tn stn default {})
2017-08-15 19:15:43 +00:00
E(G, L, <switch condition case l1:t1 st1 ... case ln:tn stn default st'>: Switch) =
let G0, L0, v = E(G, L, condition)
// i = 1 .. n
// Evaluate literals, context doesn't matter
2017-08-16 10:29:12 +00:00
let _, _, v1 = E(G0, L0, l1)
2017-08-15 19:15:43 +00:00
...
2017-08-16 10:29:12 +00:00
let _, _, vn = E(G0, L0, ln)
2017-08-15 19:15:43 +00:00
if there exists smallest i such that vi = v:
E(G0, L0, sti)
else:
E(G0, L0, st')
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
E(G, L, <name>: Identifier) =
2017-08-07 14:28:10 +00:00
G, L, L[$name]
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
E(G, L, <fname(arg1, ..., argn)>: FunctionCall) =
G1, L1, vn = E(G, L, argn)
...
G(n-1), L(n-1), v2 = E(G(n-2), L(n-2), arg2)
Gn, Ln, v1 = E(G(n-1), L(n-1), arg1)
2017-04-21 10:22:58 +00:00
Let <function fname (param1, ..., paramn) -> ret1, ..., retm block>
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
be the function of name $fname visible at the point of the call.
2017-04-21 12:56:19 +00:00
Let L' be a new local state such that
2017-07-12 18:09:13 +00:00
L'[$parami] = vi and L'[$reti] = 0 for all i.
2017-08-07 14:28:10 +00:00
Let G'', L'', mode = E(Gn, L', block)
G'', Ln, L''[$ret1], ..., L''[$retm]
E(G, L, l: StringLiteral) = G, L, str(l),
where str is the string evaluation function,
which for the EVM dialect is defined in the section 'Literals' above
E(G, L, n: HexNumber) = G, L, hex(n)
where hex is the hexadecimal evaluation function,
which turns a sequence of hexadecimal digits into their big endian value
E(G, L, n: DecimalNumber) = G, L, dec(n),
where dec is the decimal evaluation function,
which turns a sequence of decimal digits into their big endian value
2017-04-18 12:41:16 +00:00
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
.. _opcodes:
EVM Dialect
-----------
The default dialect of Yul currently is the EVM dialect for the currently selected version of the EVM.
with a version of the EVM. The only type available in this dialect
is ``u256``, the 256-bit native type of the Ethereum Virtual Machine.
Since it is the default type of this dialect, it can be omitted.
The following table lists all builtin functions
(depending on the EVM version) and provides a short description of the
semantics of the function / opcode.
This document does not want to be a full description of the Ethereum virtual machine.
Please refer to a different document if you are interested in the precise semantics.
Opcodes marked with ``-`` do not return a result and all others return exactly one value.
Opcodes marked with ``F``, ``H``, ``B``, ``C``, ``I`` and ``L`` are present since Frontier, Homestead,
Byzantium, Constantinople, Istanbul or London respectively.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
In the following, ``mem[a...b)`` signifies the bytes of memory starting at position ``a`` up to
but not including position ``b`` and ``storage[p]`` signifies the storage contents at slot ``p``.
Since Yul manages local variables and control-flow,
opcodes that interfere with these features are not available. This includes
the ``dup`` and ``swap`` instructions as well as ``jump`` instructions, labels and the ``push`` instructions.
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Instruction | | | Explanation |
+=========================+=====+===+=================================================================+
| stop() | `-` | F | stop execution, identical to return(0, 0) |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| add(x, y) | | F | x + y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| sub(x, y) | | F | x - y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| mul(x, y) | | F | x * y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| div(x, y) | | F | x / y or 0 if y == 0 |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| sdiv(x, y) | | F | x / y, for signed numbers in two's complement, 0 if y == 0 |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| mod(x, y) | | F | x % y, 0 if y == 0 |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| smod(x, y) | | F | x % y, for signed numbers in two's complement, 0 if y == 0 |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| exp(x, y) | | F | x to the power of y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| not(x) | | F | bitwise "not" of x (every bit of x is negated) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| lt(x, y) | | F | 1 if x < y, 0 otherwise |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| gt(x, y) | | F | 1 if x > y, 0 otherwise |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| slt(x, y) | | F | 1 if x < y, 0 otherwise, for signed numbers in two's complement |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| sgt(x, y) | | F | 1 if x > y, 0 otherwise, for signed numbers in two's complement |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| eq(x, y) | | F | 1 if x == y, 0 otherwise |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| iszero(x) | | F | 1 if x == 0, 0 otherwise |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| and(x, y) | | F | bitwise "and" of x and y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| or(x, y) | | F | bitwise "or" of x and y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| xor(x, y) | | F | bitwise "xor" of x and y |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| byte(n, x) | | F | nth byte of x, where the most significant byte is the 0th byte |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| shl(x, y) | | C | logical shift left y by x bits |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| shr(x, y) | | C | logical shift right y by x bits |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| sar(x, y) | | C | signed arithmetic shift right y by x bits |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| addmod(x, y, m) | | F | (x + y) % m with arbitrary precision arithmetic, 0 if m == 0 |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| mulmod(x, y, m) | | F | (x * y) % m with arbitrary precision arithmetic, 0 if m == 0 |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| signextend(i, x) | | F | sign extend from (i*8+7)th bit counting from least significant |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| keccak256(p, n) | | F | keccak(mem[p...(p+n))) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| pc() | | F | current position in code |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| pop(x) | `-` | F | discard value x |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| mload(p) | | F | mem[p...(p+32)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| mstore(p, v) | `-` | F | mem[p...(p+32)) := v |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| mstore8(p, v) | `-` | F | mem[p] := v & 0xff (only modifies a single byte) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| sload(p) | | F | storage[p] |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| sstore(p, v) | `-` | F | storage[p] := v |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| msize() | | F | size of memory, i.e. largest accessed memory index |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| gas() | | F | gas still available to execution |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| address() | | F | address of the current contract / execution context |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| balance(a) | | F | wei balance at address a |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| selfbalance() | | I | equivalent to balance(address()), but cheaper |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| caller() | | F | call sender (excluding ``delegatecall``) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| callvalue() | | F | wei sent together with the current call |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| calldataload(p) | | F | call data starting from position p (32 bytes) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| calldatasize() | | F | size of call data in bytes |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| calldatacopy(t, f, s) | `-` | F | copy s bytes from calldata at position f to mem at position t |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| codesize() | | F | size of the code of the current contract / execution context |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| codecopy(t, f, s) | `-` | F | copy s bytes from code at position f to mem at position t |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| extcodesize(a) | | F | size of the code at address a |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| extcodecopy(a, t, f, s) | `-` | F | like codecopy(t, f, s) but take code at address a |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| returndatasize() | | B | size of the last returndata |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| returndatacopy(t, f, s) | `-` | B | copy s bytes from returndata at position f to mem at position t |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| extcodehash(a) | | C | code hash of address a |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| create(v, p, n) | | F | create new contract with code mem[p...(p+n)) and send v wei |
| | | | and return the new address; returns 0 on error |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| create2(v, p, n, s) | | C | create new contract with code mem[p...(p+n)) at address |
| | | | keccak256(0xff . this . s . keccak256(mem[p...(p+n))) |
| | | | and send v wei and return the new address, where ``0xff`` is a |
| | | | 1 byte value, ``this`` is the current contract's address |
| | | | as a 20 byte value and ``s`` is a big-endian 256-bit value; |
| | | | returns 0 on error |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| call(g, a, v, in, | | F | call contract at address a with input mem[in...(in+insize)) |
| insize, out, outsize) | | | providing g gas and v wei and output area |
| | | | mem[out...(out+outsize)) returning 0 on error (eg. out of gas) |
| | | | and 1 on success |
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
| | | | :ref:`See more <yul-call-return-area>` |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| callcode(g, a, v, in, | | F | identical to ``call`` but only use the code from a and stay |
| insize, out, outsize) | | | in the context of the current contract otherwise |
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
| | | | :ref:`See more <yul-call-return-area>` |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| delegatecall(g, a, in, | | H | identical to ``callcode`` but also keep ``caller`` |
| insize, out, outsize) | | | and ``callvalue`` |
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
| | | | :ref:`See more <yul-call-return-area>` |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| staticcall(g, a, in, | | B | identical to ``call(g, a, 0, in, insize, out, outsize)`` but do |
| insize, out, outsize) | | | not allow state modifications |
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
| | | | :ref:`See more <yul-call-return-area>` |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| return(p, s) | `-` | F | end execution, return data mem[p...(p+s)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| revert(p, s) | `-` | B | end execution, revert state changes, return data mem[p...(p+s)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| selfdestruct(a) | `-` | F | end execution, destroy current contract and send funds to a |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| invalid() | `-` | F | end execution with invalid instruction |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| log0(p, s) | `-` | F | log without topics and data mem[p...(p+s)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| log1(p, s, t1) | `-` | F | log with topic t1 and data mem[p...(p+s)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| log2(p, s, t1, t2) | `-` | F | log with topics t1, t2 and data mem[p...(p+s)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| log3(p, s, t1, t2, t3) | `-` | F | log with topics t1, t2, t3 and data mem[p...(p+s)) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| log4(p, s, t1, t2, t3, | `-` | F | log with topics t1, t2, t3, t4 and data mem[p...(p+s)) |
| t4) | | | |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| chainid() | | I | ID of the executing chain (EIP-1344) |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| basefee() | | L | current block's base fee (EIP-3198 and EIP-1559) |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| origin() | | F | transaction sender |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| gasprice() | | F | gas price of the transaction |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| blockhash(b) | | F | hash of block nr b - only for last 256 blocks excluding current |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| coinbase() | | F | current mining beneficiary |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| timestamp() | | F | timestamp of the current block in seconds since the epoch |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| number() | | F | current block number |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
2022-11-11 11:15:35 +00:00
| difficulty() | | F | difficulty of the current block (see note below) |
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| gaslimit() | | F | block gas limit of the current block |
+-------------------------+-----+---+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
.. _yul-call-return-area:
.. note::
The ``call*`` instructions use the ``out`` and ``outsize`` parameters to define an area in memory where
2020-12-03 17:02:51 +00:00
the return or failure data is placed. This area is written to depending on how many bytes the called contract returns.
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
If it returns more data, only the first ``outsize`` bytes are written. You can access the rest of the data
using the ``returndatacopy`` opcode. If it returns less data, then the remaining bytes are not touched at all.
You need to use the ``returndatasize`` opcode to check which part of this memory area contains the return data.
2020-12-03 17:02:51 +00:00
The remaining bytes will retain their values as of before the call.
2020-01-21 13:18:05 +00:00
2022-11-11 11:15:35 +00:00
.. note::
With the Paris network upgrade the semantics of ``difficulty`` have been changed.
It returns the value of ``prevrandao``, which is a 256-bit value, whereas the highest recorded
difficulty value within Ethash was ~54 bits.
This change is described in `EIP-4399 <https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4399>`_.
Please note that irrelevant to which EVM version is selected in the compiler, the semantics of
instructions depend on the final chain of deployment.
2020-05-04 13:05:14 +00:00
In some internal dialects, there are additional functions:
datasize, dataoffset, datacopy
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The functions ``datasize(x)``, ``dataoffset(x)`` and ``datacopy(t, f, l)``
2020-05-04 13:05:14 +00:00
are used to access other parts of a Yul object.
``datasize`` and ``dataoffset`` can only take string literals (the names of other objects)
as arguments and return the size and offset in the data area, respectively.
For the EVM, the ``datacopy`` function is equivalent to ``codecopy``.
setimmutable, loadimmutable
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2020-10-15 14:40:45 +00:00
The functions ``setimmutable(offset, "name", value)`` and ``loadimmutable("name")`` are
used for the immutable mechanism in Solidity and do not nicely map to pure Yul.
2020-10-15 14:40:45 +00:00
The call to ``setimmutable(offset, "name", value)`` assumes that the runtime code of the contract
containing the given named immutable was copied to memory at offset ``offset`` and will write ``value`` to all
positions in memory (relative to ``offset``) that contain the placeholder that was generated for calls
to ``loadimmutable("name")`` in the runtime code.
2020-05-04 13:05:14 +00:00
linkersymbol
^^^^^^^^^^^^
The function ``linkersymbol("library_id")`` is a placeholder for an address literal to be substituted
by the linker.
Its first and only argument must be a string literal and uniquely represents the address to be inserted.
Identifiers can be arbitrary but when the compiler produces Yul code from Solidity sources,
it uses a library name qualified with the name of the source unit that defines that library.
To link the code with a particular library address, the same identifier must be provided to the
``--libraries`` option on the command line.
For example this code
.. code-block:: yul
let a := linkersymbol("file.sol:Math")
is equivalent to
.. code-block:: yul
let a := 0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890
when the linker is invoked with ``--libraries "file.sol:Math=0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890``
option.
See :ref:`Using the Commandline Compiler <commandline-compiler>` for details about the Solidity linker.
2020-07-02 10:48:20 +00:00
memoryguard
^^^^^^^^^^^
This function is available in the EVM dialect with objects. The caller of
2020-09-16 08:47:13 +00:00
``let ptr := memoryguard(size)`` (where ``size`` has to be a literal number)
promises that they only use memory in either the range ``[0, size)`` or the
2020-09-17 15:25:37 +00:00
unbounded range starting at ``ptr``.
2020-09-16 08:47:13 +00:00
Since the presence of a ``memoryguard`` call indicates that all memory access
adheres to this restriction, it allows the optimizer to perform additional
optimization steps, for example the stack limit evader, which attempts to move
stack variables that would otherwise be unreachable to memory.
The Yul optimizer promises to only use the memory range ``[size, ptr)`` for its purposes.
If the optimizer does not need to reserve any memory, it holds that ``ptr == size``.
2020-07-02 10:48:20 +00:00
``memoryguard`` can be called multiple times, but needs to have the same literal as argument
within one Yul subobject. If at least one ``memoryguard`` call is found in a subobject,
2020-09-16 08:47:13 +00:00
the additional optimiser steps will be run on it.
2020-05-04 13:05:14 +00:00
.. _yul-verbatim:
2021-03-17 18:37:39 +00:00
verbatim
^^^^^^^^
The set of ``verbatim...`` builtin functions lets you create bytecode for opcodes
that are not known to the Yul compiler. It also allows you to create
bytecode sequences that will not be modified by the optimizer.
The functions are ``verbatim_<n>i_<m>o("<data>", ...)``, where
2021-07-14 15:55:05 +00:00
- ``n`` is a decimal between 0 and 99 that specifies the number of input stack slots / variables
- ``m`` is a decimal between 0 and 99 that specifies the number of output stack slots / variables
- ``data`` is a string literal that contains the sequence of bytes
2021-03-17 18:37:39 +00:00
If you for example want to define a function that multiplies the input
by two, without the optimizer touching the constant two, you can use
.. code-block:: yul
let x := calldataload(0)
let double := verbatim_1i_1o(hex"600202", x)
This code will result in a ``dup1`` opcode to retrieve ``x``
(the optimizer might directly re-use result of the
``calldataload`` opcode, though)
directly followed by ``600202``. The code is assumed to
consume the copied value of ``x`` and produce the result
on the top of the stack. The compiler then generates code
to allocate a stack slot for ``double`` and store the result there.
As with all opcodes, the arguments are arranged on the stack
with the leftmost argument on the top, while the return values
are assumed to be laid out such that the rightmost variable is
at the top of the stack.
Since ``verbatim`` can be used to generate arbitrary opcodes
or even opcodes unknown to the Solidity compiler, care has to be taken
when using ``verbatim`` together with the optimizer. Even when the
optimizer is switched off, the code generator has to determine
the stack layout, which means that e.g. using ``verbatim`` to modify
the stack height can lead to undefined behaviour.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of restrictions on
verbatim bytecode that are not checked by
the compiler. Violations of these restrictions can result in
undefined behaviour.
2021-07-14 15:55:05 +00:00
- Control-flow should not jump into or out of verbatim blocks,
but it can jump within the same verbatim block.
- Stack contents apart from the input and output parameters
should not be accessed.
- The stack height difference should be exactly ``m - n``
(output slots minus input slots).
- Verbatim bytecode cannot make any assumptions about the
surrounding bytecode. All required parameters have to be
passed in as stack variables.
2021-03-17 18:37:39 +00:00
The optimizer does not analyze verbatim bytecode and always
assumes that it modifies all aspects of state and thus can only
do very few optimizations across ``verbatim`` function calls.
The optimizer treats verbatim bytecode as an opaque block of code.
It will not split it but might move, duplicate
or combine it with identical verbatim bytecode blocks.
If a verbatim bytecode block is unreachable by the control-flow,
it can be removed.
.. warning::
During discussions about whether or not EVM improvements
might break existing smart contracts, features inside ``verbatim``
cannot receive the same consideration as those used by the Solidity
compiler itself.
.. note::
To avoid confusion, all identifiers starting with the string ``verbatim`` are reserved
and cannot be used for user-defined identifiers.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
.. _yul-object:
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
Specification of Yul Object
===========================
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
Yul objects are used to group named code and data sections.
The functions ``datasize``, ``dataoffset`` and ``datacopy``
can be used to access these sections from within code.
Hex strings can be used to specify data in hex encoding,
regular strings in native encoding. For code,
``datacopy`` will access its assembled binary representation.
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: none
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
Object = 'object' StringLiteral '{' Code ( Object | Data )* '}'
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
Code = 'code' Block
Data = 'data' StringLiteral ( HexLiteral | StringLiteral )
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
HexLiteral = 'hex' ('"' ([0-9a-fA-F]{2})* '"' | '\'' ([0-9a-fA-F]{2})* '\'')
StringLiteral = '"' ([^"\r\n\\] | '\\' .)* '"'
Above, ``Block`` refers to ``Block`` in the Yul code grammar explained in the previous chapter.
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
2022-03-07 15:24:20 +00:00
.. note::
An object with a name that ends in ``_deployed`` is treated as deployed code by the Yul optimizer.
The only consequence of this is a different gas cost heuristic in the optimizer.
2021-06-08 14:35:37 +00:00
.. note::
Data objects or sub-objects whose names contain a ``.`` can be defined
but it is not possible to access them through ``datasize``,
``dataoffset`` or ``datacopy`` because ``.`` is used as a separator
to access objects inside another object.
.. note::
The data object called ``".metadata"`` has a special meaning:
It cannot be accessed from code and is always appended to the very end of the
bytecode, regardless of its position in the object.
Other data objects with special significance might be added in the
future, but their names will always start with a ``.``.
An example Yul Object is shown below:
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: yul
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
// A contract consists of a single object with sub-objects representing
// the code to be deployed or other contracts it can create.
// The single "code" node is the executable code of the object.
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
// Every (other) named object or data section is serialized and
// made accessible to the special built-in functions datacopy / dataoffset / datasize
2020-01-24 00:11:12 +00:00
// The current object, sub-objects and data items inside the current object
// are in scope.
object "Contract1" {
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
// This is the constructor code of the contract.
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
code {
2019-05-10 04:11:23 +00:00
function allocate(size) -> ptr {
ptr := mload(0x40)
// Note that Solidity generated IR code reserves memory offset ``0x60`` as well, but a pure Yul object is free to use memory as it chooses.
if iszero(ptr) { ptr := 0x60 }
2019-05-10 04:11:23 +00:00
mstore(0x40, add(ptr, size))
}
2020-01-24 00:11:12 +00:00
// first create "Contract2"
let size := datasize("Contract2")
2019-05-10 04:11:23 +00:00
let offset := allocate(size)
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
// This will turn into codecopy for EVM
2020-01-24 00:11:12 +00:00
datacopy(offset, dataoffset("Contract2"), size)
// constructor parameter is a single number 0x1234
mstore(add(offset, size), 0x1234)
pop(create(0, offset, add(size, 32)))
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
// now return the runtime object (the currently
// executing code is the constructor code)
2022-03-07 15:24:20 +00:00
size := datasize("Contract1_deployed")
offset := allocate(size)
// This will turn into a memory->memory copy for Ewasm and
// a codecopy for EVM
2022-03-07 15:24:20 +00:00
datacopy(offset, dataoffset("Contract1_deployed"), size)
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
return(offset, size)
}
data "Table2" hex"4123"
2022-03-07 15:24:20 +00:00
object "Contract1_deployed" {
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
code {
2019-05-10 04:11:23 +00:00
function allocate(size) -> ptr {
ptr := mload(0x40)
// Note that Solidity generated IR code reserves memory offset ``0x60`` as well, but a pure Yul object is free to use memory as it chooses.
2019-05-10 04:11:23 +00:00
if iszero(ptr) { ptr := 0x60 }
mstore(0x40, add(ptr, size))
}
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
// runtime code
2020-01-24 00:11:12 +00:00
mstore(0, "Hello, World!")
return(0, 0x20)
}
}
// Embedded object. Use case is that the outside is a factory contract,
// and Contract2 is the code to be created by the factory
object "Contract2" {
code {
// code here ...
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
}
2022-03-07 15:24:20 +00:00
object "Contract2_deployed" {
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
code {
// code here ...
}
}
2020-01-24 00:11:12 +00:00
data "Table1" hex"4123"
2017-04-21 16:35:56 +00:00
}
}
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
Yul Optimizer
=============
The Yul optimizer operates on Yul code and uses the same language for input, output and
intermediate states. This allows for easy debugging and verification of the optimizer.
Please refer to the general :ref:`optimizer documentation <optimizer>`
for more details about the different optimization stages and how to use the optimizer.
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
If you want to use Solidity in stand-alone Yul mode, you activate the optimizer using ``--optimize``
and optionally specify the :ref:`expected number of contract executions <optimizer-parameter-runs>` with
``--optimize-runs``:
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
docs: use Yul lexer to highlight Yul code segments. Many commits squashed; turns out that with the combination of: * Python v2.7, * Sphinx v1.8.5, and * Pygments v2.3.1 versions (old!) used in the CI, the only viable approach is: * to use `code-block` directives with explicit language specification, * to provide no file-local default using `highlight`, and * to set language as `none` for grammar specifications. Underlying are the following issues (again, for the old versions listed above): * Generic RST `code` doesn't work when language is `none`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:430:Cannot analyze code. No Pygments lexer found for "none". Additionally, it might be trying to fall back to the default (Solidity) if left unspecified. * If a file-local default is specified using `highlight`, then `code-block` _must_ also provide a language: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:185:Error in "code-block" directive: 1 argument(s) required, 0 supplied. * Sphinx seems to try the file-local default "yul" (specified with `highlight`) on `code` marked having language `json`: Warning, treated as error: /root/project/docs/yul.rst:130:Could not lex literal_block as "yul". Highlighting skipped. * The only well-lexed highlighter for two of the three grammar specifications is `peg`, but it was added in Pygments v2.6. One of the grammars - in the "Formal Specification" section, the one after "We will use a destructuring notation for the AST nodes." - _must_ be left unhighlighted, with language set to `none`: all lexers do really poorly. ... And one should never, ever start treating warnings as mere warnings, without having exhausted all other options. Otherwise, it's a slippery slope, - and look where that brought Gandhi: to being a strawman in every lousy argument to be had!..
2020-04-26 08:36:05 +00:00
.. code-block:: sh
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
solc --strict-assembly --optimize --optimize-runs 200
2020-01-09 17:35:22 +00:00
In Solidity mode, the Yul optimizer is activated together with the regular optimizer.
.. _optimization-step-sequence:
Optimization Step Sequence
--------------------------
2022-09-12 08:57:02 +00:00
Detailed information regrading the optimization sequence as well a list of abbreviations is
available in the :ref:`optimizer docs <optimizer-steps>`.
2020-04-16 09:57:07 +00:00
.. _erc20yul:
Complete ERC20 Example
======================
.. code-block:: yul
object "Token" {
code {
// Store the creator in slot zero.
sstore(0, caller())
// Deploy the contract
datacopy(0, dataoffset("runtime"), datasize("runtime"))
return(0, datasize("runtime"))
}
object "runtime" {
code {
// Protection against sending Ether
require(iszero(callvalue()))
// Dispatcher
switch selector()
case 0x70a08231 /* "balanceOf(address)" */ {
returnUint(balanceOf(decodeAsAddress(0)))
}
case 0x18160ddd /* "totalSupply()" */ {
returnUint(totalSupply())
}
case 0xa9059cbb /* "transfer(address,uint256)" */ {
transfer(decodeAsAddress(0), decodeAsUint(1))
returnTrue()
}
case 0x23b872dd /* "transferFrom(address,address,uint256)" */ {
transferFrom(decodeAsAddress(0), decodeAsAddress(1), decodeAsUint(2))
returnTrue()
}
case 0x095ea7b3 /* "approve(address,uint256)" */ {
approve(decodeAsAddress(0), decodeAsUint(1))
returnTrue()
}
case 0xdd62ed3e /* "allowance(address,address)" */ {
returnUint(allowance(decodeAsAddress(0), decodeAsAddress(1)))
}
case 0x40c10f19 /* "mint(address,uint256)" */ {
mint(decodeAsAddress(0), decodeAsUint(1))
returnTrue()
}
default {
revert(0, 0)
}
function mint(account, amount) {
require(calledByOwner())
mintTokens(amount)
addToBalance(account, amount)
emitTransfer(0, account, amount)
}
function transfer(to, amount) {
executeTransfer(caller(), to, amount)
}
function approve(spender, amount) {
revertIfZeroAddress(spender)
setAllowance(caller(), spender, amount)
emitApproval(caller(), spender, amount)
}
function transferFrom(from, to, amount) {
decreaseAllowanceBy(from, caller(), amount)
executeTransfer(from, to, amount)
}
function executeTransfer(from, to, amount) {
revertIfZeroAddress(to)
deductFromBalance(from, amount)
addToBalance(to, amount)
emitTransfer(from, to, amount)
}
/* ---------- calldata decoding functions ----------- */
function selector() -> s {
s := div(calldataload(0), 0x100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000)
}
function decodeAsAddress(offset) -> v {
v := decodeAsUint(offset)
if iszero(iszero(and(v, not(0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff)))) {
revert(0, 0)
}
}
function decodeAsUint(offset) -> v {
let pos := add(4, mul(offset, 0x20))
if lt(calldatasize(), add(pos, 0x20)) {
revert(0, 0)
}
v := calldataload(pos)
}
/* ---------- calldata encoding functions ---------- */
function returnUint(v) {
mstore(0, v)
return(0, 0x20)
}
function returnTrue() {
returnUint(1)
}
/* -------- events ---------- */
function emitTransfer(from, to, amount) {
let signatureHash := 0xddf252ad1be2c89b69c2b068fc378daa952ba7f163c4a11628f55a4df523b3ef
emitEvent(signatureHash, from, to, amount)
}
function emitApproval(from, spender, amount) {
let signatureHash := 0x8c5be1e5ebec7d5bd14f71427d1e84f3dd0314c0f7b2291e5b200ac8c7c3b925
emitEvent(signatureHash, from, spender, amount)
}
function emitEvent(signatureHash, indexed1, indexed2, nonIndexed) {
mstore(0, nonIndexed)
log3(0, 0x20, signatureHash, indexed1, indexed2)
}
/* -------- storage layout ---------- */
function ownerPos() -> p { p := 0 }
function totalSupplyPos() -> p { p := 1 }
function accountToStorageOffset(account) -> offset {
offset := add(0x1000, account)
}
function allowanceStorageOffset(account, spender) -> offset {
offset := accountToStorageOffset(account)
mstore(0, offset)
mstore(0x20, spender)
offset := keccak256(0, 0x40)
}
/* -------- storage access ---------- */
function owner() -> o {
o := sload(ownerPos())
}
function totalSupply() -> supply {
supply := sload(totalSupplyPos())
}
function mintTokens(amount) {
sstore(totalSupplyPos(), safeAdd(totalSupply(), amount))
}
function balanceOf(account) -> bal {
bal := sload(accountToStorageOffset(account))
}
function addToBalance(account, amount) {
let offset := accountToStorageOffset(account)
sstore(offset, safeAdd(sload(offset), amount))
}
function deductFromBalance(account, amount) {
let offset := accountToStorageOffset(account)
let bal := sload(offset)
require(lte(amount, bal))
sstore(offset, sub(bal, amount))
}
function allowance(account, spender) -> amount {
amount := sload(allowanceStorageOffset(account, spender))
}
function setAllowance(account, spender, amount) {
sstore(allowanceStorageOffset(account, spender), amount)
}
function decreaseAllowanceBy(account, spender, amount) {
let offset := allowanceStorageOffset(account, spender)
let currentAllowance := sload(offset)
require(lte(amount, currentAllowance))
sstore(offset, sub(currentAllowance, amount))
}
/* ---------- utility functions ---------- */
function lte(a, b) -> r {
r := iszero(gt(a, b))
}
function gte(a, b) -> r {
r := iszero(lt(a, b))
}
function safeAdd(a, b) -> r {
r := add(a, b)
if or(lt(r, a), lt(r, b)) { revert(0, 0) }
}
function calledByOwner() -> cbo {
cbo := eq(owner(), caller())
}
function revertIfZeroAddress(addr) {
require(addr)
}
function require(condition) {
if iszero(condition) { revert(0, 0) }
}
}
}
}