Commit Graph

194 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eitan Seri-Levi
992b476eac Add SSZ support to validator block production endpoints (#4534)
## Issue Addressed

#4531 

## Proposed Changes

add SSZ support to the following block production endpoints:

GET /eth/v2/validator/blocks/{slot}
GET /eth/v1/validator/blinded_blocks/{slot}

## Additional Info

i updated a few existing tests to use ssz instead of writing completely new tests
2023-09-21 06:38:31 +00:00
Michael Sproul
5a35278aea Add more checks and logging before genesis (#4730)
## Proposed Changes

This PR adds more logging prior to genesis, particularly on networks that start with execution enabled.

There are new checks using `eth_getBlockByHash/Number` to verify that the genesis state's `latest_execution_payload_header` matches the execution node's genesis block.

The first commit also runs the merge-readiness/Capella-readiness checks prior to genesis. This has two effects:

- Give more information on the execution node's status and its readiness for genesis.
- Prevent the `el_offline` status from being set on `/eth/v1/node/syncing`, which previously caused the VC to complain loudly.

I would like to include this for the Holesky reboot. It would have caught the misconfig that doomed the first Holesky.

## Additional Info

- Geth doesn't serve payload bodies prior to genesis, which is why we use the legacy methods. I haven't checked with other ELs yet.
- Currently this is logging errors with _Capella_ genesis states generated by `ethereum-genesis-generator` because the `withdrawals_root` is not set correctly (it is 0x0). This is not a blocker for Holesky, as it starts from Bellatrix (Pari is investigating).
2023-09-21 00:26:53 +00:00
Michael Sproul
4b6cb3db2c Prevent port re-use in HTTP API tests (#4745)
## Issue Addressed

CI is plagued by `AddrAlreadyInUse` failures, which are caused by race conditions in allocating free ports.

This PR removes all usages of the `unused_port` crate for Lighthouse's HTTP API, in favour of passing `:0` as the listen address. As a result, the listen address isn't known ahead of time and must be read from the listening socket after it binds. This requires tying some self-referential knots, which is a little disruptive, but hopefully doesn't clash too much with Deneb 🤞

There are still a few usages of `unused_tcp4_port` left in cases where we start external processes, like the `watch` Postgres DB, Anvil, Geth, Nethermind, etc. Removing these usages is non-trivial because it's hard to read the port back from an external process after starting it with `--port 0`. We might be able to do something on Linux where we read from `/proc/`, but I'll leave that for future work.
2023-09-20 01:19:03 +00:00
Age Manning
e4ed317b76 Add Experimental QUIC support (#4577)
## Issue Addressed

#4402 

## Proposed Changes

This PR adds QUIC support to Lighthouse. As this is not officially spec'd this will only work between lighthouse <-> lighthouse connections. We attempt a QUIC connection (if the node advertises it) and if it fails we fallback to TCP. 

This should be a backwards compatible modification. We want to test this functionality on live networks to observe any improvements in bandwidth/latency.

NOTE: This also removes the websockets transport as I believe no one is really using it. It should be mentioned in our release however.


Co-authored-by: João Oliveira <hello@jxs.pt>
2023-09-15 03:07:24 +00:00
Michael Sproul
74eb267643 Remove double-locking deadlock from HTTP API (#4687)
## Issue Addressed

Fix a deadlock introduced in #4236 which was caught during the v4.4.0 release testing cycle (with thanks to @paulhauner and `gdb`).

## Proposed Changes

Avoid re-locking the fork choice read lock when querying a state by root in the HTTP API. This avoids a deadlock due to the lock already being held.

## Additional Info

The [RwLock docs](https://docs.rs/lock_api/latest/lock_api/struct.RwLock.html#method.read) explicitly advise against re-locking:

> Note that attempts to recursively acquire a read lock on a RwLock when the current thread already holds one may result in a deadlock.
2023-08-31 11:18:00 +00:00
Michael Sproul
8e95b69a1a Send success code for duplicate blocks on HTTP (#4655)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #4473 (take 3)

## Proposed Changes

- Send a 202 status code by default for duplicate blocks, instead of 400. This conveys to the caller that the block was published, but makes no guarantees about its validity. Block relays can count this as a success or a failure as they wish.
- For users wanting finer-grained control over which status is returned for duplicates, a flag `--http-duplicate-block-status` can be used to adjust the behaviour. A 400 status can be supplied to restore the old (spec-compliant) behaviour, or a 200 status can be used to silence VCs that warn loudly for non-200 codes (e.g. Lighthouse prior to v4.4.0).
- Update the Lighthouse VC to gracefully handle success codes other than 200. The info message isn't the nicest thing to read, but it covers all bases and isn't a nasty `ERRO`/`CRIT` that will wake anyone up.

## Additional Info

I'm planning to raise a PR to `beacon-APIs` to specify that clients may return 202 for duplicate blocks. Really it would be nice to use some 2xx code that _isn't_ the same as the code for "published but invalid". I think unfortunately there aren't any suitable codes, and maybe the best fit is `409 CONFLICT`. Given that we need to fix this promptly for our release, I think using the 202 code temporarily with configuration strikes a nice compromise.
2023-08-28 00:55:31 +00:00
Eitan Seri-Levi
661779f08e Implement expected withdrawals endpoint (#4390)
## Issue Addressed

[#4029](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/4029)

## Proposed Changes

implement expected_withdrawals HTTP API per the spec 

https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/304

## Additional Info
2023-08-24 05:54:36 +00:00
Michael Sproul
524d9af288 Fix beacon-processor-max-workers (#4636)
## Issue Addressed

Fixes a bug in the handling of `--beacon-process-max-workers` which caused it to have no effect.

## Proposed Changes

For this PR I channeled @ethDreamer and saw deep into the faulty CLI config -- this bug is almost identical to the one Mark found and fixed in #4622.
2023-08-21 05:02:34 +00:00
zhiqiangxu
609819bb4d attester_duties: remove unnecessary case (#4614)
Since `tolerant_current_epoch` is expected to be either `current_epoch` or `current_epoch+1`, we can eliminate a case here. 

And added a comment about `compute_historic_attester_duties` , since `RelativeEpoch::from_epoch` will only allow `request_epoch == current_epoch-1` when `request_epoch < current_epoch`.
2023-08-17 02:37:30 +00:00
Michael Sproul
7251a93c5e Don't kill SSE stream if channel fills up (#4500)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #4245

## Proposed Changes

- If an SSE channel fills up, send a comment instead of terminating the stream.
- Add a CLI flag for scaling up the SSE buffer: `--http-sse-capacity-multiplier N`.

## Additional Info

~~Blocked on #4462. I haven't rebased on that PR yet for initial testing, because it still needs some more work to handle long-running HTTP threads.~~

- [x] Add CLI flag tests.
2023-08-17 02:37:29 +00:00
Michael Sproul
249f85f1d9 Improve HTTP API error messages + tweaks (#4595)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #3404 (mostly)

## Proposed Changes

- Remove all uses of Warp's `and_then` (which backtracks) in favour of `then` (which doesn't).
- Bump the priority of the `POST` method for `v2/blocks` to `P0`. Publishing a block needs to happen quickly.
- Run the new SSZ POST endpoints on the beacon processor. I think this was missed in between merging #4462 and #4504/#4479.
- Fix a minor issue in the validator registrations endpoint whereby an error from spawning the task on the beacon processor would be dropped.

## Additional Info

I've tested this manually and can confirm that we no longer get the dreaded `Unsupported endpoint version` errors for queries like:

```
$ curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" --data @block.json "http://localhost:5052/eth/v2/beacon/blocks" | jq
{
  "code": 400,
  "message": "BAD_REQUEST: WeakSubjectivityConflict",
  "stacktraces": []
}
```

```
$ curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/octet-stream" --data @block.json "http://localhost:5052/eth/v2/beacon/blocks" | jq
{
  "code": 400,
  "message": "BAD_REQUEST: invalid SSZ: OffsetOutOfBounds(572530811)",
  "stacktraces": []
}
```

```
$ curl "http://localhost:5052/eth/v2/validator/blocks/7067595"
{"code":400,"message":"BAD_REQUEST: invalid query: Invalid query string","stacktraces":[]}
```

However, I can still trigger it by leaving off the `Content-Type`. We can re-test this aspect with #4575.
2023-08-14 04:06:37 +00:00
zhiqiangxu
f1ac12f23a Fix some typos (#4565) 2023-08-14 00:29:43 +00:00
Paul Hauner
b60304b19f Use BeaconProcessor for API requests (#4462)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Rather than spawning new tasks on the tokio executor to process each HTTP API request, send the tasks to the `BeaconProcessor`. This achieves:

1. Places a bound on how many concurrent requests are being served (i.e., how many we are actually trying to compute at one time).
1. Places a bound on how many requests can be awaiting a response at one time (i.e., starts dropping requests when we have too many queued).
1. Allows the BN prioritise HTTP requests with respect to messages coming from the P2P network (i.e., proiritise importing gossip blocks rather than serving API requests).

Presently there are two levels of priorities:

- `Priority::P0`
    - The beacon processor will prioritise these above everything other than importing new blocks.
    - Roughly all validator-sensitive endpoints.
- `Priority::P1`
    - The beacon processor will prioritise practically all other P2P messages over these, except for historical backfill things.
    - Everything that's not `Priority::P0`
    
The `--http-enable-beacon-processor false` flag can be supplied to revert back to the old behaviour of spawning new `tokio` tasks for each request:

```
        --http-enable-beacon-processor <BOOLEAN>
            The beacon processor is a scheduler which provides quality-of-service and DoS protection. When set to
            "true", HTTP API requests will queued and scheduled alongside other tasks. When set to "false", HTTP API
            responses will be executed immediately. [default: true]
```
    
## New CLI Flags

I added some other new CLI flags:

```
        --beacon-processor-aggregate-batch-size <INTEGER>
            Specifies the number of gossip aggregate attestations in a signature verification batch. Higher values may
            reduce CPU usage in a healthy network while lower values may increase CPU usage in an unhealthy or hostile
            network. [default: 64]
        --beacon-processor-attestation-batch-size <INTEGER>
            Specifies the number of gossip attestations in a signature verification batch. Higher values may reduce CPU
            usage in a healthy network whilst lower values may increase CPU usage in an unhealthy or hostile network.
            [default: 64]
        --beacon-processor-max-workers <INTEGER>
            Specifies the maximum concurrent tasks for the task scheduler. Increasing this value may increase resource
            consumption. Reducing the value may result in decreased resource usage and diminished performance. The
            default value is the number of logical CPU cores on the host.
        --beacon-processor-reprocess-queue-len <INTEGER>
            Specifies the length of the queue for messages requiring delayed processing. Higher values may prevent
            messages from being dropped while lower values may help protect the node from becoming overwhelmed.
            [default: 12288]
```


I needed to add the max-workers flag since the "simulator" flavor tests started failing with HTTP timeouts on the test assertions. I believe they were failing because the Github runners only have 2 cores and there just weren't enough workers available to process our requests in time. I added the other flags since they seem fun to fiddle with.

## Additional Info

I bumped the timeouts on the "simulator" flavor test from 4s to 8s. The prioritisation of consensus messages seems to be causing slower responses, I guess this is what we signed up for 🤷 

The `validator/register` validator has some special handling because the relays have a bad habit of timing out on these calls. It seems like a waste of a `BeaconProcessor` worker to just wait for the builder API HTTP response, so we spawn a new `tokio` task to wait for a builder response.

I've added an optimisation for the `GET beacon/states/{state_id}/validators/{validator_id}` endpoint in [efbabe3](efbabe3252). That's the endpoint the VC uses to resolve pubkeys to validator indices, and it's the endpoint that was causing us grief. Perhaps I should move that into a new PR, not sure.
2023-08-08 23:30:15 +00:00
Eitan Seri-Levi
521432129d Support SSZ request body for POST /beacon/blinded_blocks endpoints (v1 & v2) (#4504)
## Issue Addressed

#4262 

## Proposed Changes

add SSZ support in request body for POST /beacon/blinded_blocks endpoints (v1 & v2)

## Additional Info
2023-08-07 22:53:04 +00:00
Armağan Yıldırak
3397612160 Shift networking configuration (#4426)
## Issue Addressed
Addresses [#4401](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/4401)

## Proposed Changes
Shift some constants into ```ChainSpec``` and remove the constant values from code space.

## Additional Info

I mostly used ```MainnetEthSpec::default_spec()``` for getting ```ChainSpec```. I wonder Did I make a mistake about that.


Co-authored-by: armaganyildirak <armaganyildirak@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
Co-authored-by: Diva M <divma@protonmail.com>
2023-08-03 01:51:47 +00:00
Divma
ff9b09d964 upgrade to libp2p 0.52 (#4431)
## Issue Addressed

Upgrade libp2p to v0.52

## Proposed Changes
- **Workflows**: remove installation of `protoc`
- **Book**: remove installation of `protoc`
- **`Dockerfile`s and `cross`**: remove custom base `Dockerfile` for cross since it's no longer needed. Remove `protoc` from remaining `Dockerfiles`s
- **Upgrade `discv5` to `v0.3.1`:** we have some cool stuff in there: no longer needs `protoc` and faster ip updates on cold start
- **Upgrade `prometheus` to `0.21.0`**, now it no longer needs encoding checks
- **things that look like refactors:** bunch of api types were renamed and need to be accessed in a different (clearer) way
- **Lighthouse network**
	- connection limits is now a behaviour
	- banned peers no longer exist on the swarm level, but at the behaviour level
	- `connection_event_buffer_size` now is handled per connection with a buffer size of 4
	- `mplex` is deprecated and was removed
	- rpc handler now logs the peer to which it belongs

## Additional Info

Tried to keep as much behaviour unchanged as possible. However, there is a great deal of improvements we can do _after_ this upgrade:
- Smart connection limits: Connection limits have been checked only based on numbers, we can now use information about the incoming peer to decide if we want it
- More powerful peer management: Dial attempts from other behaviours can be rejected early
- Incoming connections can be rejected early
- Banning can be returned exclusively to the peer management: We should not get connections to banned peers anymore making use of this
- TCP Nat updates: We might be able to take advantage of confirmed external addresses to check out tcp ports/ips


Co-authored-by: Age Manning <Age@AgeManning.com>
Co-authored-by: Akihito Nakano <sora.akatsuki@gmail.com>
2023-08-02 00:59:34 +00:00
Eitan Seri-Levi
e8c411c288 add ssz support in request body for /beacon/blocks endpoints (v1 & v2) (#4479)
## Issue Addressed

[#4457](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/4457)

## Proposed Changes

add ssz support in request body for  /beacon/blocks endpoints (v1 & v2)


## Additional Info
2023-07-31 23:51:37 +00:00
Gua00va
117802cef1 Add Eth Version Header (#4528)
## Issue Addressed
Closes #4525 

## Proposed Changes
`GET /eth/v1/validator/blinded_blocks` endpoint and `GET /eth/v1/validator/blocks`  now send `Eth-Version` header.

Co-authored-by: Gua00va <105484243+Gua00va@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-07-31 01:53:07 +00:00
Aoi Kurokawa
85a3340d0e Implement liveness BeaconAPI (#4343)
## Issue Addressed

#4243

## Proposed Changes

- create a new endpoint for liveness/{endpoint}

## Additional Info
This is my first PR.
2023-07-31 01:53:03 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
fc7f1ba6b9 Phase 0 attestation rewards via Beacon API (#4474)
## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4026.

Beacon-API spec [here](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Beacon/getAttestationsRewards).

Endpoint: `POST /eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

This endpoint already supports post-Altair epochs. This PR adds support for phase 0 rewards calculation.

## Proposed Changes

- [x] Attestation rewards API to support phase 0 rewards calculation, re-using logic from `state_processing`. Refactored `get_attestation_deltas` slightly to support computing deltas for a subset of validators.
- [x] Add `inclusion_delay` to `ideal_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add `inactivity` penalties to both `ideal_rewards` and `total_rewards` (`beacon-API` spec update to follow)
- [x] Add tests to compute attestation rewards and compare results with beacon states 

## Additional Notes

- The extra penalty for missing attestations or being slashed during an inactivity leak is currently not included in the API response (for both phase 0 and Altair) in the spec. 
- I went with adding `inactivity` as a separate component rather than combining them with the 4 rewards, because this is how it was grouped in [the phase 0 spec](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/blob/dev/specs/phase0/beacon-chain.md#get_attestation_deltas). During inactivity leak, all rewards include the optimal reward, and inactivity penalties are calculated separately (see below code snippet from the spec), so it would be quite confusing if we merge them. This would also work better with Altair, because there's no "cancelling" of rewards and inactivity penalties are more separate.
- Altair calculation logic (to include inactivity penalties) to be updated in a follow-up PR.

```python
def get_attestation_deltas(state: BeaconState) -> Tuple[Sequence[Gwei], Sequence[Gwei]]:
    """
    Return attestation reward/penalty deltas for each validator.
    """
    source_rewards, source_penalties = get_source_deltas(state)
    target_rewards, target_penalties = get_target_deltas(state)
    head_rewards, head_penalties = get_head_deltas(state)
    inclusion_delay_rewards, _ = get_inclusion_delay_deltas(state)
    _, inactivity_penalties = get_inactivity_penalty_deltas(state)

    rewards = [
        source_rewards[i] + target_rewards[i] + head_rewards[i] + inclusion_delay_rewards[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    penalties = [
        source_penalties[i] + target_penalties[i] + head_penalties[i] + inactivity_penalties[i]
        for i in range(len(state.validators))
    ]

    return rewards, penalties
```

## Example API Response

<details>
  <summary>Click me</summary>
  
```json
{
  "ideal_rewards": [
    {
      "effective_balance": "1000000000",
      "head": "6638",
      "target": "6638",
      "source": "6638",
      "inclusion_delay": "9783",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "2000000000",
      "head": "13276",
      "target": "13276",
      "source": "13276",
      "inclusion_delay": "19565",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "3000000000",
      "head": "19914",
      "target": "19914",
      "source": "19914",
      "inclusion_delay": "29349",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "4000000000",
      "head": "26553",
      "target": "26553",
      "source": "26553",
      "inclusion_delay": "39131",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "5000000000",
      "head": "33191",
      "target": "33191",
      "source": "33191",
      "inclusion_delay": "48914",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "6000000000",
      "head": "39829",
      "target": "39829",
      "source": "39829",
      "inclusion_delay": "58697",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "7000000000",
      "head": "46468",
      "target": "46468",
      "source": "46468",
      "inclusion_delay": "68480",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "8000000000",
      "head": "53106",
      "target": "53106",
      "source": "53106",
      "inclusion_delay": "78262",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "9000000000",
      "head": "59744",
      "target": "59744",
      "source": "59744",
      "inclusion_delay": "88046",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "10000000000",
      "head": "66383",
      "target": "66383",
      "source": "66383",
      "inclusion_delay": "97828",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "11000000000",
      "head": "73021",
      "target": "73021",
      "source": "73021",
      "inclusion_delay": "107611",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "12000000000",
      "head": "79659",
      "target": "79659",
      "source": "79659",
      "inclusion_delay": "117394",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "13000000000",
      "head": "86298",
      "target": "86298",
      "source": "86298",
      "inclusion_delay": "127176",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "14000000000",
      "head": "92936",
      "target": "92936",
      "source": "92936",
      "inclusion_delay": "136959",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "15000000000",
      "head": "99574",
      "target": "99574",
      "source": "99574",
      "inclusion_delay": "146742",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "16000000000",
      "head": "106212",
      "target": "106212",
      "source": "106212",
      "inclusion_delay": "156525",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "17000000000",
      "head": "112851",
      "target": "112851",
      "source": "112851",
      "inclusion_delay": "166307",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "18000000000",
      "head": "119489",
      "target": "119489",
      "source": "119489",
      "inclusion_delay": "176091",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "19000000000",
      "head": "126127",
      "target": "126127",
      "source": "126127",
      "inclusion_delay": "185873",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "20000000000",
      "head": "132766",
      "target": "132766",
      "source": "132766",
      "inclusion_delay": "195656",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "21000000000",
      "head": "139404",
      "target": "139404",
      "source": "139404",
      "inclusion_delay": "205439",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "22000000000",
      "head": "146042",
      "target": "146042",
      "source": "146042",
      "inclusion_delay": "215222",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "23000000000",
      "head": "152681",
      "target": "152681",
      "source": "152681",
      "inclusion_delay": "225004",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "24000000000",
      "head": "159319",
      "target": "159319",
      "source": "159319",
      "inclusion_delay": "234787",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "25000000000",
      "head": "165957",
      "target": "165957",
      "source": "165957",
      "inclusion_delay": "244570",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "26000000000",
      "head": "172596",
      "target": "172596",
      "source": "172596",
      "inclusion_delay": "254352",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "27000000000",
      "head": "179234",
      "target": "179234",
      "source": "179234",
      "inclusion_delay": "264136",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "28000000000",
      "head": "185872",
      "target": "185872",
      "source": "185872",
      "inclusion_delay": "273918",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "29000000000",
      "head": "192510",
      "target": "192510",
      "source": "192510",
      "inclusion_delay": "283701",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "30000000000",
      "head": "199149",
      "target": "199149",
      "source": "199149",
      "inclusion_delay": "293484",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "31000000000",
      "head": "205787",
      "target": "205787",
      "source": "205787",
      "inclusion_delay": "303267",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "effective_balance": "32000000000",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ],
  "total_rewards": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "32",
      "head": "212426",
      "target": "212426",
      "source": "212426",
      "inclusion_delay": "313050",
      "inactivity": "0"
    },
    {
      "validator_index": "63",
      "head": "-357771",
      "target": "-357771",
      "source": "-357771",
      "inclusion_delay": "0",
      "inactivity": "0"
    }
  ]
}
```
</details>
2023-07-18 01:48:40 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
f2223feb21 Rust 1.71 lints (#4503)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Add lints for rust 1.71

[3789134](3789134ae2) is probably the one that needs most attention as it changes beacon state code. I changed the `is_in_inactivity_leak ` function to return a `ArithError` as not all consumers of that function work well with a `BeaconState::Error`.
2023-07-17 00:14:19 +00:00
Michael Sproul
6c375205fb Fix HTTP state API bug and add --epochs-per-migration (#4236)
## Issue Addressed

Fix an issue observed by `@zlan` on Discord where Lighthouse would sometimes return this error when looking up states via the API:

> {"code":500,"message":"UNHANDLED_ERROR: ForkChoiceError(MissingProtoArrayBlock(0xc9cf1495421b6ef3215d82253b388d77321176a1dcef0db0e71a0cd0ffc8cdb7))","stacktraces":[]}

## Proposed Changes

The error stems from a faulty assumption in the HTTP API logic: that any state in the hot database must have its block in fork choice. This isn't true because the state's hot database may update much less frequently than the fork choice store, e.g. if reconstructing states (where freezer migration pauses), or if the freezer migration runs slowly. There could also be a race between loading the hot state and checking fork choice, e.g. even if the finalization migration of DB+fork choice were atomic, the update could happen between the 1st and 2nd calls.

To address this I've changed the HTTP API logic to use the finalized block's execution status as a fallback where it is safe to do so. In the case where a block is non-canonical and prior to finalization (permanently orphaned) we default `execution_optimistic` to `true`.

## Additional Info

I've also added a new CLI flag to reduce the frequency of the finalization migration as this is useful for several purposes:

- Spacing out database writes (less frequent, larger batches)
- Keeping a limited chain history with high availability, e.g. the last month in the hot database.

This new flag made it _substantially_ easier to test this change. It was extracted from `tree-states` (where it's called `--db-migration-period`), which is why this PR also carries the `tree-states` label.
2023-07-17 00:14:12 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
46be05f728 Cache target attester balances for unrealized FFG progression calculation (#4362)
## Issue Addressed

#4118 

## Proposed Changes

This PR introduces a "progressive balances" cache on the `BeaconState`, which keeps track of the accumulated target attestation balance for the current & previous epochs. The cached values are utilised by fork choice to calculate unrealized justification and finalization (instead of converting epoch participation arrays to balances for each block we receive).

This optimization will be rolled out gradually to allow for more testing. A new `--progressive-balances disabled|checked|strict|fast` flag is introduced to support this:
- `checked`: enabled with checks against participation cache, and falls back to the existing epoch processing calculation if there is a total target attester balance mismatch. There is no performance gain from this as the participation cache still needs to be computed. **This is the default mode for now.**
- `strict`: enabled with checks against participation cache, returns error if there is a mismatch. **Used for testing only**.
- `fast`: enabled with no comparative checks and without computing the participation cache. This mode gives us the performance gains from the optimization. This is still experimental and not currently recommended for production usage, but will become the default mode in a future release.
- `disabled`: disable the usage of progressive cache, and use the existing method for FFG progression calculation. This mode may be useful if we find a bug and want to stop the frequent error logs.

### Tasks

- [x] Initial cache implementation in `BeaconState`
- [x] Perform checks in fork choice to compare the progressive balances cache against results from `ParticipationCache`
- [x] Add CLI flag, and disable the optimization by default
- [x] Testing on Goerli & Benchmarking
- [x]  Move caching logic from state processing to the `ProgressiveBalancesCache` (see [this comment](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/4362#discussion_r1230877001))
- [x] Add attesting balance metrics



Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
2023-06-30 01:13:06 +00:00
Eitan Seri-Levi
826e090f50 Update node health endpoint (#4310)
## Issue Addressed

[#4292](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/4292)

## Proposed Changes

Updated the node health endpoint

will return a 200 status code if  `!syncing && !el_offline && !optimistic`

wil return a 206 if `(syncing || optimistic) &&  !el_offline`

will return a 503 if `el_offline`



## Additional Info
2023-06-30 01:13:04 +00:00
Jack McPherson
1aff082eea Add broadcast validation routes to Beacon Node HTTP API (#4316)
## Issue Addressed

 - #4293 
 - #4264 

## Proposed Changes

*Changes largely follow those suggested in the main issue*.

 - Add new routes to HTTP API
   - `post_beacon_blocks_v2`
   - `post_blinded_beacon_blocks_v2`
 - Add new routes to `BeaconNodeHttpClient`
   - `post_beacon_blocks_v2`
   - `post_blinded_beacon_blocks_v2`
 - Define new Eth2 common types
   - `BroadcastValidation`, enum representing the level of validation to apply to blocks prior to broadcast
   - `BroadcastValidationQuery`, the corresponding HTTP query string type for the above type
 - ~~Define `_checked` variants of both `publish_block` and `publish_blinded_block` that enforce a validation level at a type level~~
 - Add interactive tests to the `bn_http_api_tests` test target covering each validation level (to their own test module, `broadcast_validation_tests`)
   - `beacon/blocks`
       - `broadcast_validation=gossip`
         - Invalid (400)
         - Full Pass (200)
         - Partial Pass (202)
        - `broadcast_validation=consensus`
          - Invalid (400)
          - Only gossip (400)
          - Only consensus pass (i.e., equivocates) (200)
          - Full pass (200)
        - `broadcast_validation=consensus_and_equivocation`
          - Invalid (400)
          - Invalid due to early equivocation (400)
          - Only gossip (400)
          - Only consensus (400)
          - Pass (200)
   - `beacon/blinded_blocks`
       - `broadcast_validation=gossip`
         - Invalid (400)
         - Full Pass (200)
         - Partial Pass (202)
        - `broadcast_validation=consensus`
          - Invalid (400)
          - Only gossip (400)
          - ~~Only consensus pass (i.e., equivocates) (200)~~
          - Full pass (200)
        - `broadcast_validation=consensus_and_equivocation`
          - Invalid (400)
          - Invalid due to early equivocation (400)
          - Only gossip (400)
          - Only consensus (400)
          - Pass (200)
 - Add a new trait, `IntoGossipVerifiedBlock`, which allows type-level guarantees to be made as to gossip validity
 - Modify the structure of the `ObservedBlockProducers` cache from a `(slot, validator_index)` mapping to a `((slot, validator_index), block_root)` mapping
 - Modify `ObservedBlockProducers::proposer_has_been_observed` to return a `SeenBlock` rather than a boolean on success
 - Punish gossip peer (low) for submitting equivocating blocks
 - Rename `BlockError::SlashablePublish` to `BlockError::SlashableProposal`

## Additional Info

This PR contains changes that directly modify how blocks are verified within the client. For more context, consult [comments in-thread](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/4316#discussion_r1234724202).


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-06-29 12:02:38 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
448d3ec9b3 Aggregate subsets (#3493)
## Issue Addressed

Resolves #3238 

## Proposed Changes

Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.

## Additional Info

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.
2023-06-27 01:06:49 +00:00
Michael Sproul
affea585f4 Remove CountUnrealized (#4357)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #4332

## Proposed Changes

Remove the `CountUnrealized` type, defaulting unrealized justification to _on_. This fixes the #4332 issue by ensuring that importing the same block to fork choice always results in the same outcome.

Finalized sync speed may be slightly impacted by this change, but that is deemed an acceptable trade-off until the optimisation from #4118 is implemented.

TODO:

- [x] Also check that the block isn't a duplicate before importing
2023-06-16 06:44:31 +00:00
Age Manning
aa1ed787e9 Logging via the HTTP API (#4074)
This PR adds the ability to read the Lighthouse logs from the HTTP API for both the BN and the VC. 

This is done in such a way to as minimize any kind of performance hit by adding this feature.

The current design creates a tokio broadcast channel and mixes is into a form of slog drain that combines with our main global logger drain, only if the http api is enabled. 

The drain gets the logs, checks the log level and drops them if they are below INFO. If they are INFO or higher, it sends them via a broadcast channel only if there are users subscribed to the HTTP API channel. If not, it drops the logs. 

If there are more than one subscriber, the channel clones the log records and converts them to json in their independent HTTP API tasks. 

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-05-22 05:57:08 +00:00
Paul Hauner
01ae37ac37 Add more metrics for tracking sync messages (#4308)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Adds metrics to track validators that are submitting equivocating (but not slashable) sync messages. This follows on from some research we've been doing in a separate fork of LH.

## Additional Info

@jimmygchen and @michaelsproul have already run their eyes over this so it should be easy to get into v4.2.0, IMO.
2023-05-19 05:13:07 +00:00
Michael Sproul
3052db29fe Implement el_offline and use it in the VC (#4295)
## Issue Addressed

Closes https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/4291, part of #3613.

## Proposed Changes

- Implement the `el_offline` field on `/eth/v1/node/syncing`. We set `el_offline=true` if:
  - The EL's internal status is `Offline` or `AuthFailed`, _or_
  - The most recent call to `newPayload` resulted in an error (more on this in a moment).

- Use the `el_offline` field in the VC to mark nodes with offline ELs as _unsynced_. These nodes will still be used, but only after synced nodes.
- Overhaul the usage of `RequireSynced` so that `::No` is used almost everywhere. The `--allow-unsynced` flag was broken and had the opposite effect to intended, so it has been deprecated.
- Add tests for the EL being offline on the upcheck call, and being offline due to the newPayload check.


## Why track `newPayload` errors?

Tracking the EL's online/offline status is too coarse-grained to be useful in practice, because:

- If the EL is timing out to some calls, it's unlikely to timeout on the `upcheck` call, which is _just_ `eth_syncing`. Every failed call is followed by an upcheck [here](693886b941/beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engines.rs (L372-L380)), which would have the effect of masking the failure and keeping the status _online_.
- The `newPayload` call is the most likely to time out. It's the call in which ELs tend to do most of their work (often 1-2 seconds), with `forkchoiceUpdated` usually returning much faster (<50ms).
- If `newPayload` is failing consistently (e.g. timing out) then this is a good indication that either the node's EL is in trouble, or the network as a whole is. In the first case validator clients _should_ prefer other BNs if they have one available. In the second case, all of their BNs will likely report `el_offline` and they'll just have to proceed with trying to use them.

## Additional Changes

- Add utility method `ForkName::latest` which is quite convenient for test writing, but probably other things too.
- Delete some stale comments from when we used to support multiple execution nodes.
2023-05-17 05:51:56 +00:00
Mac L
3c029d48bf DB migration for fork choice cleanup (#4265)
## Issue Addressed

#4233

## Proposed Changes

Remove the `best_justified_checkpoint` from the `PersistedForkChoiceStore` type as it is now unused.
Additionally, remove the `Option`'s wrapping the `justified_checkpoint` and `finalized_checkpoint` fields on `ProtoNode` which were only present to facilitate a previous migration.

Include the necessary code to facilitate the migration to a new DB schema.
2023-05-15 02:10:42 +00:00
Michael Sproul
c11638c36c Split common crates out into their own repos (#3890)
## Proposed Changes

Split out several crates which now exist in separate repos under `sigp`.

- [`ssz` and `ssz_derive`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_ssz)
- [`tree_hash` and `tree_hash_derive`](https://github.com/sigp/tree_hash)
- [`ethereum_hashing`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_hashing)
- [`ethereum_serde_utils`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_serde_utils)
- [`ssz_types`](https://github.com/sigp/ssz_types)

For the published crates see: https://crates.io/teams/github:sigp:crates-io?sort=recent-updates.

## Additional Info

- [x] Need to work out how to handle versioning. I was hoping to do 1.0 versions of several crates, but if they depend on `ethereum-types 0.x` that is not going to work. EDIT: decided to go with 0.5.x versions.
- [x] Need to port several changes from `tree-states`, `capella`, `eip4844` branches to the external repos.
2023-04-28 01:15:40 +00:00
int88
90d562b3d4 add attestation inclusion distance in http api (#4148)
## Issue Addressed

#4097

## Proposed Changes

Add attestation inclusion distance in http api, extend `/lighthouse/ui/validator_metrics` to include it.

## Usage
```
curl -X POST "http://localhost:8001/lighthouse/ui/validator_metrics" -d '{"indices": [1]}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" | jq
```

```
{
  "data": {
    "validators": {
      "1": {
        "attestation_hits": 3,
        "attestation_misses": 1,
        "attestation_hit_percentage": 75,
        "attestation_head_hits": 3,
        "attestation_head_misses": 0,
        "attestation_head_hit_percentage": 100,
        "attestation_target_hits": 3,
        "attestation_target_misses": 0,
        "attestation_target_hit_percentage": 100,
        "attestation_inclusion_distance": 1
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Additional Info

NA
2023-04-26 01:12:35 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
3b117f4bf6 Add a flag to disable peer scoring (#4135)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Adds a flag for disabling peer scoring. This is useful for local testing and testing small networks for new features.
2023-04-12 01:48:19 +00:00
Mac L
8630ddfec4 Add beacon.watch (#3362)
> This is currently a WIP and all features are subject to alteration or removal at any time.

## Overview

The successor to #2873.

Contains the backbone of `beacon.watch` including syncing code, the initial API, and several core database tables.

See `watch/README.md` for more information, requirements and usage.
2023-04-03 05:35:11 +00:00
Daniel Ramirez Chiquillo
036b797b2c Add finalized to HTTP API responses (#3753)
## Issue Addressed

#3708 

## Proposed Changes
- Add `is_finalized_block` method to `BeaconChain` in `beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/beacon_chain.rs`.
- Add `is_finalized_state` method to `BeaconChain` in `beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/beacon_chain.rs`.
- Add `fork_and_execution_optimistic_and_finalized` in `beacon_node/http_api/src/state_id.rs`.
- Add `ExecutionOptimisticFinalizedForkVersionedResponse` type in `consensus/types/src/fork_versioned_response.rs`.
- Add `execution_optimistic_finalized_fork_versioned_response`function in  `beacon_node/http_api/src/version.rs`.
- Add `ExecutionOptimisticFinalizedResponse` type in `common/eth2/src/types.rs`.
- Add `add_execution_optimistic_finalized` method in  `common/eth2/src/types.rs`.
- Update API response methods to include finalized.
- Remove `execution_optimistic_fork_versioned_response`

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-30 06:08:37 +00:00
Christopher Chong
6bb28bc806 Add debug fork choice api (#4003)
## Issue Addressed

Which issue # does this PR address?
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3669

## Proposed Changes

Please list or describe the changes introduced by this PR.
- A new API to fetch fork choice data, as specified [here](https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/pull/232)
- A new integration test to test the new API

## Additional Info

Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations
or information useful for reviewers.

- `extra_data` field specified in the beacon-API spec is not implemented, please let me know if I should instead.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-03-29 02:56:37 +00:00
int88
d3c20ffa9d improve error message (#4141)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Not use magic number directly in the error message.

## Additional Info

NA
2023-03-28 22:07:05 +00:00
Age Manning
785a9171e6 Customisable shuffling cache size (#4081)
This PR enables the user to adjust the shuffling cache size.

This is useful for some HTTP API requests which require re-computing old shufflings. This PR currently optimizes the
beacon/states/{state_id}/committees HTTP API by first checking the cache before re-building shuffling.

If the shuffling is set to a non-default value, then the HTTP API request will also fill the cache when as it constructs new shufflings.

If the CLI flag is not present or the value is set to the default of 16 the default behaviour is observed.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-21 05:14:59 +00:00
Paul Hauner
c3e5053612 Reduce false positive logging for late builder blocks (#4073)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

When producing a block from a builder, there are two points where we could consider the block "broadcast":

1. When the blinded block is published to the builder.
2. When the un-blinded block is published to the P2P network (this is always *after* the previous step).

Our logging for late block broadcasts was using (2) for builder-blocks, which was creating a lot of false-positive logs. This is because the builder publishes the block on the P2P network themselves before returning it to us and we perform (2). For clarity, the logs were false-positives because we claim that the block was published late by us when it was actually published earlier by the builder.

This PR changes our logging behavior so we do our logging at (1) instead. It also updates our metrics for block broadcast to distinguish between local and builder blocks. I believe the metrics change will be natively compatible with existing Grafana dashboards.

## Additional Info

One could argue that the builder *should* return the block to us faster, however that's not the case. I think it's more important that we don't desensitize users with false-positives.
2023-03-17 00:44:03 +00:00
Michael Sproul
90cef1db86 Appease Clippy 1.68 and refactor http_api (#4068)
## Proposed Changes

Two tiny updates to satisfy Clippy 1.68

Plus refactoring of the `http_api` into less complex types so the compiler can chew and digest them more easily.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-13 01:40:03 +00:00
Michael Sproul
01556f6f01 Optimise payload attributes calculation and add SSE (#4027)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #3896
Closes #3998
Closes #3700

## Proposed Changes

- Optimise the calculation of withdrawals for payload attributes by avoiding state clones, avoiding unnecessary state advances and reading from the snapshot cache if possible.
- Use the execution layer's payload attributes cache to avoid re-calculating payload attributes. I actually implemented a new LRU cache just for withdrawals but it had the exact same key and most of the same data as the existing payload attributes cache, so I deleted it.
- Add a new SSE event that fires when payloadAttributes are calculated. This is useful for block builders, a la https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/issues/244.
- Add a new CLI flag `--always-prepare-payload` which forces payload attributes to be sent with every fcU regardless of connected proposers. This is intended for use by builders/relays.

For maximum effect, the flags I've been using to run Lighthouse in "payload builder mode" are:

```
--always-prepare-payload \
--prepare-payload-lookahead 12000 \
--suggested-fee-recipient 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
```

The fee recipient is required so Lighthouse has something to pack in the payload attributes (it can be ignored by the builder). The lookahead causes fcU to be sent at the start of every slot rather than at 8s. As usual, fcU will also be sent after each change of head block. I think this combination is sufficient for builders to build on all viable heads. Often there will be two fcU (and two payload attributes) sent for the same slot: one sent at the start of the slot with the head from `n - 1` as the parent, and one sent after the block arrives with `n` as the parent.

Example usage of the new event stream:

```bash
curl -N "http://localhost:5052/eth/v1/events?topics=payload_attributes"
```

## Additional Info

- [x] Tests added by updating the proposer re-org tests. This has the benefit of testing the proposer re-org code paths with withdrawals too, confirming that the new changes don't interact poorly.
- [ ] Benchmarking with `blockdreamer` on devnet-7 showed promising results but I'm yet to do a comparison to `unstable`.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-03-05 23:43:30 +00:00
Divma
047c7544e3 Clean capella (#4019)
## Issue Addressed

Cleans up all the remnants of 4844 in capella. This makes sure when 4844 is reviewed there is nothing we are missing because it got included here 

## Proposed Changes

drop a bomb on every 4844 thing 

## Additional Info

Merge process I did (locally) is as follows:
- squash merge to produce one commit
- in new branch off unstable with the squashed commit create a `git revert HEAD` commit
- merge that new branch onto 4844 with `--strategy ours`
- compare local 4844 to remote 4844 and make sure the diff is empty
- enjoy

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-03-01 03:19:02 +00:00
Paul Hauner
17d9a620cf Add more logs in the BN HTTP API during block production (#4025)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Adds two new `DEBG` logs to the HTTP API:

1. As soon as we are requested to produce a block.
2. As soon as a signed block is received.

In #3858 we added some very helpful logs to the VC so we could see when things are happening with block proposals in the VC. After doing some more debugging, I found that I can tell when the VC is sending a block but I *can't* tell the time that the BN receives it (I can only get the time after the BN has started doing some work with the block). Knowing when the VC published and as soon as the BN receives is useful for determining the delays introduced by network latency (and some other things like JSON decoding, etc).

## Additional Info

NA
2023-02-28 02:20:53 +00:00
Michael Sproul
fa8b920dd8
Merge branch 'capella' into unstable 2023-02-22 10:25:45 +11:00
Mac L
3642efe76a Cache validator balances and allow them to be served over the HTTP API (#3863)
## Issue Addressed

#3804

## Proposed Changes

- Add `total_balance` to the validator monitor and adjust the number of historical epochs which are cached. 
- Allow certain values in the cache to be served out via the HTTP API without requiring a state read.

## Usage
```
curl -X POST "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/ui/validator_info" -d '{"indices": [0]}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" | jq
```

```
{
  "data": {
    "validators": {
      "0": {
        "info": [
          {
            "epoch": 172981,
            "total_balance": 36566388519
          },
         ...
          {
            "epoch": 172990,
            "total_balance": 36566496513
          }
        ]
      },
      "1": {
        "info": [
          {
            "epoch": 172981,
            "total_balance": 36355797968
          },
          ...
          {
            "epoch": 172990,
            "total_balance": 36355905962
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Additional Info

This requires no historical states to operate which mean it will still function on the freshly checkpoint synced node, however because of this, the values will populate each epoch (up to a maximum of 10 entries).

Another benefit of this method, is that we can easily cache any other values which would normally require a state read and serve them via the same endpoint. However, we would need be cautious about not overly increasing block processing time by caching values from complex computations.

This also caches some of the validator metrics directly, rather than pulling them from the Prometheus metrics when the API is called. This means when the validator count exceeds the individual monitor threshold, the cached values will still be available.

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-02-21 20:54:55 +00:00
Michael Sproul
18c8cab4da
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella-merge 2023-02-14 12:07:27 +11:00
Paul Hauner
84843d67d7 Reduce some EE and builder related ERRO logs to WARN (#3966)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Our `ERRO` stream has been rather noisy since the merge due to some unexpected behaviours of builders and EEs. Now that we've been running post-merge for a while, I think we can drop some of these `ERRO` to `WARN` so we're not "crying wolf".

The modified logs are:

#### `ERRO Execution engine call failed`

I'm seeing this quite frequently on Geth nodes. They seem to timeout when they're busy and it rarely indicates a serious issue. We also have logging across block import, fork choice updating and payload production that raise `ERRO` or `CRIT` when the EE times out, so I think we're not at risk of silencing actual issues.

#### `ERRO "Builder failed to reveal payload"`

In #3775 we reduced this log from `CRIT` to `ERRO` since it's common for builders to fail to reveal the block to the producer directly whilst still broadcasting it to the networ. I think it's worth dropping this to `WARN` since it's rarely interesting.

I elected to stay with `WARN` since I really do wish builders would fulfill their API promises by returning the block to us. Perhaps I'm just being pedantic here, I could be convinced otherwise.

#### `ERRO "Relay error when registering validator(s)"`

It seems like builders and/or mev-boost struggle to handle heavy loads of validator registrations. I haven't observed issues with validators not actually being registered, but I see timeouts on these endpoints many times a day. It doesn't seem like this `ERRO` is worth it.

#### `ERRO Error fetching block for peer     ExecutionLayerErrorPayloadReconstruction`

This means we failed to respond to a peer on the P2P network with a block they requested because of an error in the `execution_layer`. It's very common to see timeouts or incomplete responses on this endpoint whilst the EE is busy and I don't think it's important enough for an `ERRO`. As long as the peer count stays high, I don't think the user needs to be actively concerned about how we're responding to peers.

## Additional Info

NA
2023-02-12 23:14:08 +00:00
ethDreamer
39f8327f73
Properly Deserialize ForkVersionedResponses (#3944)
* Move ForkVersionedResponse to consensus/types

* Properly Deserialize ForkVersionedResponses

* Elide Types in from_value Calls

* Added Tests for ForkVersionedResponse Deserialize

* Address Sean's Comments & Make Less Restrictive

* Utilize `map_fork_name!`
2023-02-10 08:49:25 -06:00
naviechan
9547ac069c Implement block_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3907)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/blocks/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": {
    "proposer_index": "123",
    "total": "123",
    "attestations": "123",
    "sync_aggregate": "123",
    "proposer_slashings": "123",
    "attester_slashings": "123"
  }
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `block_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
2023-02-07 08:33:23 +00:00