Add more metrics for tracking sync messages (#4308)
## Issue Addressed NA ## Proposed Changes Adds metrics to track validators that are submitting equivocating (but not slashable) sync messages. This follows on from some research we've been doing in a separate fork of LH. ## Additional Info @jimmygchen and @michaelsproul have already run their eyes over this so it should be easy to get into v4.2.0, IMO.
This commit is contained in:
parent
75aea7054c
commit
01ae37ac37
@ -874,6 +874,14 @@ lazy_static! {
|
||||
"beacon_sync_committee_message_gossip_verification_seconds",
|
||||
"Full runtime of sync contribution gossip verification"
|
||||
);
|
||||
pub static ref SYNC_MESSAGE_EQUIVOCATIONS: Result<IntCounter> = try_create_int_counter(
|
||||
"sync_message_equivocations_total",
|
||||
"Number of sync messages with the same validator index for different blocks"
|
||||
);
|
||||
pub static ref SYNC_MESSAGE_EQUIVOCATIONS_TO_HEAD: Result<IntCounter> = try_create_int_counter(
|
||||
"sync_message_equivocations_to_head_total",
|
||||
"Number of sync message which conflict with a previous message but elect the head"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Sync Committee Contribution Verification
|
||||
|
@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet};
|
||||
use std::hash::Hash;
|
||||
use std::marker::PhantomData;
|
||||
use types::slot_data::SlotData;
|
||||
use types::{Epoch, EthSpec, Slot, Unsigned};
|
||||
use types::{Epoch, EthSpec, Hash256, Slot, Unsigned};
|
||||
|
||||
/// The maximum capacity of the `AutoPruningEpochContainer`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@ -39,10 +39,10 @@ pub const MAX_CACHED_EPOCHS: u64 = 3;
|
||||
|
||||
pub type ObservedAttesters<E> = AutoPruningEpochContainer<EpochBitfield, E>;
|
||||
pub type ObservedSyncContributors<E> =
|
||||
AutoPruningSlotContainer<SlotSubcommitteeIndex, SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E>, E>;
|
||||
AutoPruningSlotContainer<SlotSubcommitteeIndex, Hash256, SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E>, E>;
|
||||
pub type ObservedAggregators<E> = AutoPruningEpochContainer<EpochHashSet, E>;
|
||||
pub type ObservedSyncAggregators<E> =
|
||||
AutoPruningSlotContainer<SlotSubcommitteeIndex, SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet, E>;
|
||||
AutoPruningSlotContainer<SlotSubcommitteeIndex, (), SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet, E>;
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)]
|
||||
pub enum Error {
|
||||
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ pub enum Error {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Implemented on an item in an `AutoPruningContainer`.
|
||||
pub trait Item {
|
||||
pub trait Item<T> {
|
||||
/// Instantiate `Self` with the given `capacity`.
|
||||
fn with_capacity(capacity: usize) -> Self;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ pub trait Item {
|
||||
/// Returns the number of validators that have been observed by `self`.
|
||||
fn validator_count(&self) -> usize;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Store `validator_index` in `self`.
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize) -> bool;
|
||||
/// Store `validator_index` and `value` in `self`.
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize, value: T) -> bool;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if `validator_index` has been stored in `self`.
|
||||
fn contains(&self, validator_index: usize) -> bool;
|
||||
/// Returns `Some(T)` if there is an entry for `validator_index`.
|
||||
fn get(&self, validator_index: usize) -> Option<T>;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Stores a `BitVec` that represents which validator indices have attested or sent sync committee
|
||||
@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ pub struct EpochBitfield {
|
||||
bitfield: BitVec,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Item for EpochBitfield {
|
||||
impl Item<()> for EpochBitfield {
|
||||
fn with_capacity(capacity: usize) -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
bitfield: BitVec::with_capacity(capacity),
|
||||
@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ impl Item for EpochBitfield {
|
||||
self.bitfield.iter().filter(|bit| **bit).count()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize, _value: ()) -> bool {
|
||||
self.bitfield
|
||||
.get_mut(validator_index)
|
||||
.map(|mut bit| {
|
||||
@ -129,8 +129,11 @@ impl Item for EpochBitfield {
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn contains(&self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
self.bitfield.get(validator_index).map_or(false, |bit| *bit)
|
||||
fn get(&self, validator_index: usize) -> Option<()> {
|
||||
self.bitfield
|
||||
.get(validator_index)
|
||||
.map_or(false, |bit| *bit)
|
||||
.then_some(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -140,7 +143,7 @@ pub struct EpochHashSet {
|
||||
set: HashSet<usize>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Item for EpochHashSet {
|
||||
impl Item<()> for EpochHashSet {
|
||||
fn with_capacity(capacity: usize) -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
set: HashSet::with_capacity(capacity),
|
||||
@ -163,27 +166,27 @@ impl Item for EpochHashSet {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Inserts the `validator_index` in the set. Returns `true` if the `validator_index` was
|
||||
/// already in the set.
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize, _value: ()) -> bool {
|
||||
!self.set.insert(validator_index)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if the `validator_index` is in the set.
|
||||
fn contains(&self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
self.set.contains(&validator_index)
|
||||
fn get(&self, validator_index: usize) -> Option<()> {
|
||||
self.set.contains(&validator_index).then_some(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Stores a `HashSet` of which validator indices have created a sync aggregate during a
|
||||
/// slot.
|
||||
pub struct SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E> {
|
||||
set: HashSet<usize>,
|
||||
map: HashMap<usize, Hash256>,
|
||||
phantom: PhantomData<E>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<E: EthSpec> Item for SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E> {
|
||||
impl<E: EthSpec> Item<Hash256> for SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E> {
|
||||
fn with_capacity(capacity: usize) -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
set: HashSet::with_capacity(capacity),
|
||||
map: HashMap::with_capacity(capacity),
|
||||
phantom: PhantomData,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -194,22 +197,24 @@ impl<E: EthSpec> Item for SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn len(&self) -> usize {
|
||||
self.set.len()
|
||||
self.map.len()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn validator_count(&self) -> usize {
|
||||
self.set.len()
|
||||
self.map.len()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Inserts the `validator_index` in the set. Returns `true` if the `validator_index` was
|
||||
/// already in the set.
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
!self.set.insert(validator_index)
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize, beacon_block_root: Hash256) -> bool {
|
||||
self.map
|
||||
.insert(validator_index, beacon_block_root)
|
||||
.is_some()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if the `validator_index` is in the set.
|
||||
fn contains(&self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
self.set.contains(&validator_index)
|
||||
fn get(&self, validator_index: usize) -> Option<Hash256> {
|
||||
self.map.get(&validator_index).copied()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -219,7 +224,7 @@ pub struct SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet {
|
||||
set: HashSet<usize>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl Item for SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet {
|
||||
impl Item<()> for SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet {
|
||||
fn with_capacity(capacity: usize) -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
set: HashSet::with_capacity(capacity),
|
||||
@ -241,13 +246,13 @@ impl Item for SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Inserts the `validator_index` in the set. Returns `true` if the `validator_index` was
|
||||
/// already in the set.
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
fn insert(&mut self, validator_index: usize, _value: ()) -> bool {
|
||||
!self.set.insert(validator_index)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `true` if the `validator_index` is in the set.
|
||||
fn contains(&self, validator_index: usize) -> bool {
|
||||
self.set.contains(&validator_index)
|
||||
fn get(&self, validator_index: usize) -> Option<()> {
|
||||
self.set.contains(&validator_index).then_some(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -275,7 +280,7 @@ impl<T, E: EthSpec> Default for AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<T: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
impl<T: Item<()>, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
/// Observe that `validator_index` has produced attestation `a`. Returns `Ok(true)` if `a` has
|
||||
/// previously been observed for `validator_index`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@ -293,7 +298,7 @@ impl<T: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
self.prune(epoch);
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(item) = self.items.get_mut(&epoch) {
|
||||
Ok(item.insert(validator_index))
|
||||
Ok(item.insert(validator_index, ()))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// To avoid re-allocations, try and determine a rough initial capacity for the new item
|
||||
// by obtaining the mean size of all items in earlier epoch.
|
||||
@ -309,7 +314,7 @@ impl<T: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
let initial_capacity = sum.checked_div(count).unwrap_or_else(T::default_capacity);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut item = T::with_capacity(initial_capacity);
|
||||
item.insert(validator_index);
|
||||
item.insert(validator_index, ());
|
||||
self.items.insert(epoch, item);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(false)
|
||||
@ -333,7 +338,7 @@ impl<T: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
let exists = self
|
||||
.items
|
||||
.get(&epoch)
|
||||
.map_or(false, |item| item.contains(validator_index));
|
||||
.map_or(false, |item| item.get(validator_index).is_some());
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(exists)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -392,7 +397,7 @@ impl<T: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
pub fn index_seen_at_epoch(&self, index: usize, epoch: Epoch) -> bool {
|
||||
self.items
|
||||
.get(&epoch)
|
||||
.map(|item| item.contains(index))
|
||||
.map(|item| item.get(index).is_some())
|
||||
.unwrap_or(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -405,23 +410,63 @@ impl<T: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningEpochContainer<T, E> {
|
||||
/// sync contributions with an epoch prior to `data.slot - 3` will be cleared from the cache.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// `V` should be set to a `SyncAggregatorSlotHashSet` or a `SyncContributorSlotHashSet`.
|
||||
pub struct AutoPruningSlotContainer<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, V, E: EthSpec> {
|
||||
pub struct AutoPruningSlotContainer<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, S, V, E: EthSpec> {
|
||||
lowest_permissible_slot: Slot,
|
||||
items: HashMap<K, V>,
|
||||
_phantom: PhantomData<E>,
|
||||
_phantom_e: PhantomData<E>,
|
||||
_phantom_s: PhantomData<S>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, V, E: EthSpec> Default for AutoPruningSlotContainer<K, V, E> {
|
||||
impl<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, S, V, E: EthSpec> Default for AutoPruningSlotContainer<K, S, V, E> {
|
||||
fn default() -> Self {
|
||||
Self {
|
||||
lowest_permissible_slot: Slot::new(0),
|
||||
items: HashMap::new(),
|
||||
_phantom: PhantomData,
|
||||
_phantom_e: PhantomData,
|
||||
_phantom_s: PhantomData,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, V: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningSlotContainer<K, V, E> {
|
||||
impl<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash + Copy, S, V: Item<S>, E: EthSpec>
|
||||
AutoPruningSlotContainer<K, S, V, E>
|
||||
{
|
||||
/// Observes the given `value` for the given `validator_index`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// The `override_observation` function is supplied `previous_observation`
|
||||
/// and `value`. If it returns `true`, then any existing observation will be
|
||||
/// overridden.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This function returns `Some` if:
|
||||
/// - An observation already existed for the validator, AND,
|
||||
/// - The `override_observation` function returned `false`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Alternatively, it returns `None` if:
|
||||
/// - An observation did not already exist for the given validator, OR,
|
||||
/// - The `override_observation` function returned `true`.
|
||||
pub fn observe_validator_with_override<F>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
key: K,
|
||||
validator_index: usize,
|
||||
value: S,
|
||||
override_observation: F,
|
||||
) -> Result<Option<S>, Error>
|
||||
where
|
||||
F: Fn(&S, &S) -> bool,
|
||||
{
|
||||
if let Some(prev_observation) = self.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)? {
|
||||
if override_observation(&prev_observation, &value) {
|
||||
self.observe_validator(key, validator_index, value)?;
|
||||
Ok(None)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Ok(Some(prev_observation))
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
self.observe_validator(key, validator_index, value)?;
|
||||
Ok(None)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Observe that `validator_index` has produced a sync committee message. Returns `Ok(true)` if
|
||||
/// the sync committee message has previously been observed for `validator_index`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@ -429,14 +474,19 @@ impl<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, V: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningSlotContainer<K, V
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// - `validator_index` is higher than `VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_LIMIT`.
|
||||
/// - `key.slot` is earlier than `self.lowest_permissible_slot`.
|
||||
pub fn observe_validator(&mut self, key: K, validator_index: usize) -> Result<bool, Error> {
|
||||
pub fn observe_validator(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
key: K,
|
||||
validator_index: usize,
|
||||
value: S,
|
||||
) -> Result<bool, Error> {
|
||||
let slot = key.get_slot();
|
||||
self.sanitize_request(slot, validator_index)?;
|
||||
|
||||
self.prune(slot);
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(item) = self.items.get_mut(&key) {
|
||||
Ok(item.insert(validator_index))
|
||||
Ok(item.insert(validator_index, value))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// To avoid re-allocations, try and determine a rough initial capacity for the new item
|
||||
// by obtaining the mean size of all items in earlier slot.
|
||||
@ -452,32 +502,45 @@ impl<K: SlotData + Eq + Hash, V: Item, E: EthSpec> AutoPruningSlotContainer<K, V
|
||||
let initial_capacity = sum.checked_div(count).unwrap_or_else(V::default_capacity);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut item = V::with_capacity(initial_capacity);
|
||||
item.insert(validator_index);
|
||||
item.insert(validator_index, value);
|
||||
self.items.insert(key, item);
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `Ok(true)` if the `validator_index` has already produced a conflicting sync committee message.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ## Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// - `validator_index` is higher than `VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_LIMIT`.
|
||||
/// - `key.slot` is earlier than `self.lowest_permissible_slot`.
|
||||
// Identical to `Self::observation_for_validator` but discards the
|
||||
// observation, simply returning `true` if the validator has been observed
|
||||
// at all.
|
||||
pub fn validator_has_been_observed(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
key: K,
|
||||
validator_index: usize,
|
||||
) -> Result<bool, Error> {
|
||||
self.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.map(|observation| observation.is_some())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns `Ok(Some)` if the `validator_index` has already produced a
|
||||
/// conflicting sync committee message.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ## Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// - `validator_index` is higher than `VALIDATOR_REGISTRY_LIMIT`.
|
||||
/// - `key.slot` is earlier than `self.lowest_permissible_slot`.
|
||||
pub fn observation_for_validator(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
key: K,
|
||||
validator_index: usize,
|
||||
) -> Result<Option<S>, Error> {
|
||||
self.sanitize_request(key.get_slot(), validator_index)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let exists = self
|
||||
let observation = self
|
||||
.items
|
||||
.get(&key)
|
||||
.map_or(false, |item| item.contains(validator_index));
|
||||
.and_then(|item| item.get(validator_index));
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(exists)
|
||||
Ok(observation)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns the number of validators that have been observed at the given `slot`. Returns
|
||||
@ -561,6 +624,116 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
|
||||
type E = types::MainnetEthSpec;
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn value_storage() {
|
||||
type Container = AutoPruningSlotContainer<Slot, Hash256, SyncContributorSlotHashSet<E>, E>;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut store: Container = <_>::default();
|
||||
let key = Slot::new(0);
|
||||
let validator_index = 0;
|
||||
let value = Hash256::zero();
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert there is no entry.
|
||||
assert!(store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.is_none());
|
||||
assert!(!store
|
||||
.validator_has_been_observed(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
// Add an entry.
|
||||
assert!(!store
|
||||
.observe_validator(key, validator_index, value)
|
||||
.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert there is a correct entry.
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
Some(value)
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(store
|
||||
.validator_has_been_observed(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap());
|
||||
|
||||
let alternate_value = Hash256::from_low_u64_be(1);
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that override false does not override.
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observe_validator_with_override(key, validator_index, alternate_value, |_, _| {
|
||||
false
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
Some(value)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that override true overrides and acts as if there was never an
|
||||
// entry there.
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observe_validator_with_override(key, validator_index, alternate_value, |_, _| {
|
||||
true
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
None
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
Some(alternate_value)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Reset the store.
|
||||
let mut store: Container = <_>::default();
|
||||
|
||||
// Asset that a new entry with override = false is inserted
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
None
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observe_validator_with_override(key, validator_index, value, |_, _| { false })
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
Some(value)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Reset the store.
|
||||
let mut store: Container = <_>::default();
|
||||
|
||||
// Asset that a new entry with override = true is inserted
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
None
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observe_validator_with_override(key, validator_index, value, |_, _| { true })
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
None,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(key, validator_index)
|
||||
.unwrap(),
|
||||
Some(value)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
macro_rules! test_suite_epoch {
|
||||
($mod_name: ident, $type: ident) => {
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
@ -722,7 +895,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
test_suite_epoch!(observed_aggregators, ObservedAggregators);
|
||||
|
||||
macro_rules! test_suite_slot {
|
||||
($mod_name: ident, $type: ident) => {
|
||||
($mod_name: ident, $type: ident, $value: expr) => {
|
||||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||||
mod $mod_name {
|
||||
use super::*;
|
||||
@ -737,7 +910,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
"should indicate an unknown item is unknown"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store.observe_validator(key, i),
|
||||
store.observe_validator(key, i, $value),
|
||||
Ok(false),
|
||||
"should observe new item"
|
||||
);
|
||||
@ -750,7 +923,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
"should indicate a known item is known"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
store.observe_validator(key, i),
|
||||
store.observe_validator(key, i, $value),
|
||||
Ok(true),
|
||||
"should acknowledge an existing item"
|
||||
);
|
||||
@ -997,6 +1170,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
test_suite_slot!(observed_sync_contributors, ObservedSyncContributors);
|
||||
test_suite_slot!(observed_sync_aggregators, ObservedSyncAggregators);
|
||||
test_suite_slot!(
|
||||
observed_sync_contributors,
|
||||
ObservedSyncContributors,
|
||||
Hash256::zero()
|
||||
);
|
||||
test_suite_slot!(observed_sync_aggregators, ObservedSyncAggregators, ());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -153,7 +153,21 @@ pub enum Error {
|
||||
/// It's unclear if this sync message is valid, however we have already observed a
|
||||
/// signature from this validator for this slot and should not observe
|
||||
/// another.
|
||||
PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown { validator_index: u64, slot: Slot },
|
||||
PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index: u64,
|
||||
slot: Slot,
|
||||
prev_root: Hash256,
|
||||
new_root: Hash256,
|
||||
},
|
||||
/// We have already observed a contribution for the aggregator and refuse to
|
||||
/// process another.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ## Peer scoring
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// It's unclear if this sync message is valid, however we have already observed a
|
||||
/// signature from this validator for this slot and should not observe
|
||||
/// another.
|
||||
PriorSyncContributionMessageKnown { validator_index: u64, slot: Slot },
|
||||
/// The sync committee message was received on an invalid sync committee message subnet.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// ## Peer scoring
|
||||
@ -378,10 +392,10 @@ impl<T: BeaconChainTypes> VerifiedSyncContribution<T> {
|
||||
if chain
|
||||
.observed_sync_aggregators
|
||||
.write()
|
||||
.observe_validator(observed_key, aggregator_index as usize)
|
||||
.observe_validator(observed_key, aggregator_index as usize, ())
|
||||
.map_err(BeaconChainError::from)?
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(Error::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
return Err(Error::PriorSyncContributionMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index: aggregator_index,
|
||||
slot: contribution.slot,
|
||||
});
|
||||
@ -450,19 +464,40 @@ impl VerifiedSyncCommitteeMessage {
|
||||
// The sync committee message is the first valid message received for the participating validator
|
||||
// for the slot, sync_message.slot.
|
||||
let validator_index = sync_message.validator_index;
|
||||
if chain
|
||||
let head_root = chain.canonical_head.cached_head().head_block_root();
|
||||
let new_root = sync_message.beacon_block_root;
|
||||
let should_override_prev = |prev_root: &Hash256, new_root: &Hash256| {
|
||||
let roots_differ = new_root != prev_root;
|
||||
let new_elects_head = new_root == &head_root;
|
||||
|
||||
if roots_differ {
|
||||
// Track sync committee messages that differ from each other.
|
||||
metrics::inc_counter(&metrics::SYNC_MESSAGE_EQUIVOCATIONS);
|
||||
if new_elects_head {
|
||||
// Track sync committee messages that swap from an old block to a new block.
|
||||
metrics::inc_counter(&metrics::SYNC_MESSAGE_EQUIVOCATIONS_TO_HEAD);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
roots_differ && new_elects_head
|
||||
};
|
||||
if let Some(prev_root) = chain
|
||||
.observed_sync_contributors
|
||||
.read()
|
||||
.validator_has_been_observed(
|
||||
.observation_for_validator(
|
||||
SlotSubcommitteeIndex::new(sync_message.slot, subnet_id.into()),
|
||||
validator_index as usize,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.map_err(BeaconChainError::from)?
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(Error::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot: sync_message.slot,
|
||||
});
|
||||
if !should_override_prev(&prev_root, &new_root) {
|
||||
return Err(Error::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot: sync_message.slot,
|
||||
prev_root,
|
||||
new_root,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The aggregate signature of the sync committee message is valid.
|
||||
@ -474,18 +509,22 @@ impl VerifiedSyncCommitteeMessage {
|
||||
// It's important to double check that the sync committee message still hasn't been observed, since
|
||||
// there can be a race-condition if we receive two sync committee messages at the same time and
|
||||
// process them in different threads.
|
||||
if chain
|
||||
if let Some(prev_root) = chain
|
||||
.observed_sync_contributors
|
||||
.write()
|
||||
.observe_validator(
|
||||
.observe_validator_with_override(
|
||||
SlotSubcommitteeIndex::new(sync_message.slot, subnet_id.into()),
|
||||
validator_index as usize,
|
||||
sync_message.beacon_block_root,
|
||||
should_override_prev,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.map_err(BeaconChainError::from)?
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Err(Error::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot: sync_message.slot,
|
||||
prev_root,
|
||||
new_root,
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -5,12 +5,16 @@ use beacon_chain::test_utils::{BeaconChainHarness, EphemeralHarnessType, Relativ
|
||||
use int_to_bytes::int_to_bytes32;
|
||||
use lazy_static::lazy_static;
|
||||
use safe_arith::SafeArith;
|
||||
use state_processing::{
|
||||
per_block_processing::{altair::sync_committee::process_sync_aggregate, VerifySignatures},
|
||||
state_advance::complete_state_advance,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use store::{SignedContributionAndProof, SyncCommitteeMessage};
|
||||
use tree_hash::TreeHash;
|
||||
use types::consts::altair::SYNC_COMMITTEE_SUBNET_COUNT;
|
||||
use types::{
|
||||
AggregateSignature, Epoch, EthSpec, Hash256, Keypair, MainnetEthSpec, SecretKey, Slot,
|
||||
SyncSelectionProof, SyncSubnetId, Unsigned,
|
||||
SyncContributionData, SyncSelectionProof, SyncSubnetId, Unsigned,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
pub type E = MainnetEthSpec;
|
||||
@ -47,10 +51,29 @@ fn get_valid_sync_committee_message(
|
||||
relative_sync_committee: RelativeSyncCommittee,
|
||||
message_index: usize,
|
||||
) -> (SyncCommitteeMessage, usize, SecretKey, SyncSubnetId) {
|
||||
let head_state = harness.chain.head_beacon_state_cloned();
|
||||
let head_block_root = harness.chain.head_snapshot().beacon_block_root;
|
||||
get_valid_sync_committee_message_for_block(
|
||||
harness,
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
relative_sync_committee,
|
||||
message_index,
|
||||
head_block_root,
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a sync message that is valid for some slot in the given `chain`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Also returns some info about who created it.
|
||||
fn get_valid_sync_committee_message_for_block(
|
||||
harness: &BeaconChainHarness<EphemeralHarnessType<E>>,
|
||||
slot: Slot,
|
||||
relative_sync_committee: RelativeSyncCommittee,
|
||||
message_index: usize,
|
||||
block_root: Hash256,
|
||||
) -> (SyncCommitteeMessage, usize, SecretKey, SyncSubnetId) {
|
||||
let head_state = harness.chain.head_beacon_state_cloned();
|
||||
let (signature, _) = harness
|
||||
.make_sync_committee_messages(&head_state, head_block_root, slot, relative_sync_committee)
|
||||
.make_sync_committee_messages(&head_state, block_root, slot, relative_sync_committee)
|
||||
.get(0)
|
||||
.expect("sync messages should exist")
|
||||
.get(message_index)
|
||||
@ -119,7 +142,7 @@ fn get_non_aggregator(
|
||||
subcommittee.iter().find_map(|pubkey| {
|
||||
let validator_index = harness
|
||||
.chain
|
||||
.validator_index(&pubkey)
|
||||
.validator_index(pubkey)
|
||||
.expect("should get validator index")
|
||||
.expect("pubkey should exist in beacon chain");
|
||||
|
||||
@ -376,7 +399,7 @@ async fn aggregated_gossip_verification() {
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::AggregatorNotInCommittee {
|
||||
aggregator_index
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aggregator_index == valid_aggregate.message.aggregator_index as u64
|
||||
if aggregator_index == valid_aggregate.message.aggregator_index
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -472,7 +495,7 @@ async fn aggregated_gossip_verification() {
|
||||
|
||||
assert_invalid!(
|
||||
"sync contribution created with incorrect sync committee",
|
||||
next_valid_contribution.clone(),
|
||||
next_valid_contribution,
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::InvalidSignature | SyncCommitteeError::AggregatorNotInCommittee { .. }
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -496,6 +519,30 @@ async fn unaggregated_gossip_verification() {
|
||||
|
||||
let (valid_sync_committee_message, expected_validator_index, validator_sk, subnet_id) =
|
||||
get_valid_sync_committee_message(&harness, current_slot, RelativeSyncCommittee::Current, 0);
|
||||
let parent_root = harness.chain.head_snapshot().beacon_block.parent_root();
|
||||
let (valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent, _, _, _) =
|
||||
get_valid_sync_committee_message_for_block(
|
||||
&harness,
|
||||
current_slot,
|
||||
RelativeSyncCommittee::Current,
|
||||
0,
|
||||
parent_root,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message.slot, valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.slot,
|
||||
"test pre-condition: same slot"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert_eq!(
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message.validator_index,
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.validator_index,
|
||||
"test pre-condition: same validator index"
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message.beacon_block_root
|
||||
!= valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.beacon_block_root,
|
||||
"test pre-condition: differing roots"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
macro_rules! assert_invalid {
|
||||
($desc: tt, $attn_getter: expr, $subnet_getter: expr, $($error: pat_param) |+ $( if $guard: expr )?) => {
|
||||
@ -602,28 +649,130 @@ async fn unaggregated_gossip_verification() {
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::InvalidSignature
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let head_root = valid_sync_committee_message.beacon_block_root;
|
||||
let parent_root = valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.beacon_block_root;
|
||||
|
||||
let verifed_message_to_parent = harness
|
||||
.chain
|
||||
.verify_sync_committee_message_for_gossip(
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.clone(),
|
||||
subnet_id,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("valid sync message to parent should be verified");
|
||||
// Add the aggregate to the pool.
|
||||
harness
|
||||
.chain
|
||||
.verify_sync_committee_message_for_gossip(valid_sync_committee_message.clone(), subnet_id)
|
||||
.expect("valid sync message should be verified");
|
||||
.add_to_naive_sync_aggregation_pool(verifed_message_to_parent)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following test ensures that:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* There has been no other valid sync committee message for the declared slot for the
|
||||
* validator referenced by sync_committee_message.validator_index.
|
||||
* A sync committee message from the same validator to the same block will
|
||||
* be rejected.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assert_invalid!(
|
||||
"sync message that has already been seen",
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message,
|
||||
"sync message to parent block that has already been seen",
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.clone(),
|
||||
subnet_id,
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
prev_root,
|
||||
new_root
|
||||
}
|
||||
if validator_index == expected_validator_index as u64 && slot == current_slot
|
||||
if validator_index == expected_validator_index as u64 && slot == current_slot && prev_root == parent_root && new_root == parent_root
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let verified_message_to_head = harness
|
||||
.chain
|
||||
.verify_sync_committee_message_for_gossip(valid_sync_committee_message.clone(), subnet_id)
|
||||
.expect("valid sync message to the head should be verified");
|
||||
// Add the aggregate to the pool.
|
||||
harness
|
||||
.chain
|
||||
.add_to_naive_sync_aggregation_pool(verified_message_to_head)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following test ensures that:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A sync committee message from the same validator to the same block will
|
||||
* be rejected.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assert_invalid!(
|
||||
"sync message to the head that has already been seen",
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message.clone(),
|
||||
subnet_id,
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
prev_root,
|
||||
new_root
|
||||
}
|
||||
if validator_index == expected_validator_index as u64 && slot == current_slot && prev_root == head_root && new_root == head_root
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following test ensures that:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A sync committee message from the same validator to a non-head block will
|
||||
* be rejected.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assert_invalid!(
|
||||
"sync message to parent after message to head has already been seen",
|
||||
valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.clone(),
|
||||
subnet_id,
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
prev_root,
|
||||
new_root
|
||||
}
|
||||
if validator_index == expected_validator_index as u64 && slot == current_slot && prev_root == head_root && new_root == parent_root
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure that the sync aggregates in the op pool for both the parent block and head block are valid.
|
||||
let chain = &harness.chain;
|
||||
let check_sync_aggregate = |root: Hash256| async move {
|
||||
// Generate an aggregate sync message from the naive aggregation pool.
|
||||
let aggregate = chain
|
||||
.get_aggregated_sync_committee_contribution(&SyncContributionData {
|
||||
// It's a test pre-condition that both sync messages have the same slot.
|
||||
slot: valid_sync_committee_message.slot,
|
||||
beacon_block_root: root,
|
||||
subcommittee_index: subnet_id.into(),
|
||||
})
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Insert the aggregate into the op pool.
|
||||
chain.op_pool.insert_sync_contribution(aggregate).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Load the block and state for the given root.
|
||||
let block = chain.get_block(&root).await.unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
let mut state = chain.get_state(&block.state_root(), None).unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Advance the state to simulate a pre-state for block production.
|
||||
let slot = valid_sync_committee_message.slot + 1;
|
||||
complete_state_advance(&mut state, Some(block.state_root()), slot, &chain.spec).unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Get an aggregate that would be included in a block.
|
||||
let aggregate_for_inclusion = chain.op_pool.get_sync_aggregate(&state).unwrap().unwrap();
|
||||
|
||||
// Validate the retrieved aggregate against the state.
|
||||
process_sync_aggregate(
|
||||
&mut state,
|
||||
&aggregate_for_inclusion,
|
||||
0,
|
||||
VerifySignatures::True,
|
||||
&chain.spec,
|
||||
)
|
||||
.unwrap();
|
||||
};
|
||||
check_sync_aggregate(valid_sync_committee_message.beacon_block_root).await;
|
||||
check_sync_aggregate(valid_sync_committee_message_to_parent.beacon_block_root).await;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following test ensures that:
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -649,7 +798,7 @@ async fn unaggregated_gossip_verification() {
|
||||
|
||||
assert_invalid!(
|
||||
"sync message on incorrect subnet",
|
||||
next_valid_sync_committee_message.clone(),
|
||||
next_valid_sync_committee_message,
|
||||
next_subnet_id,
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::InvalidSubnetId {
|
||||
received,
|
||||
|
@ -199,10 +199,14 @@ pub fn process_sync_committee_signatures<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
|
||||
Err(SyncVerificationError::PriorSyncCommitteeMessageKnown {
|
||||
validator_index,
|
||||
slot,
|
||||
prev_root,
|
||||
new_root,
|
||||
}) => {
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
log,
|
||||
"Ignoring already-known sync message";
|
||||
"new_root" => ?new_root,
|
||||
"prev_root" => ?prev_root,
|
||||
"slot" => slot,
|
||||
"validator_index" => validator_index,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
@ -2343,6 +2343,25 @@ impl<T: BeaconChainTypes> Worker<T> {
|
||||
"peer_id" => %peer_id,
|
||||
"type" => ?message_type,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// Do not penalize the peer.
|
||||
|
||||
self.propagate_validation_result(message_id, peer_id, MessageAcceptance::Ignore);
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
SyncCommitteeError::PriorSyncContributionMessageKnown { .. } => {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have already seen a sync contribution message from this validator for this epoch.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The peer is not necessarily faulty.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
debug!(
|
||||
self.log,
|
||||
"Prior sync contribution message known";
|
||||
"peer_id" => %peer_id,
|
||||
"type" => ?message_type,
|
||||
);
|
||||
// We still penalize the peer slightly. We don't want this to be a recurring
|
||||
// behaviour.
|
||||
self.gossip_penalize_peer(
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user