Fix some typos (#4565)
This commit is contained in:
parent
1fcada8a32
commit
f1ac12f23a
@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ pub enum WhenSlotSkipped {
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is how the HTTP API behaves.
|
||||
None,
|
||||
/// If the slot it a skip slot, return the previous non-skipped block.
|
||||
/// If the slot is a skip slot, return the previous non-skipped block.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is generally how the specification behaves.
|
||||
Prev,
|
||||
|
@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ impl BeaconProposerCache {
|
||||
|
||||
/// Compute the proposer duties using the head state without cache.
|
||||
pub fn compute_proposer_duties_from_head<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
|
||||
current_epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
request_epoch: Epoch,
|
||||
chain: &BeaconChain<T>,
|
||||
) -> Result<(Vec<usize>, Hash256, ExecutionStatus, Fork), BeaconChainError> {
|
||||
// Atomically collect information about the head whilst holding the canonical head `Arc` as
|
||||
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ pub fn compute_proposer_duties_from_head<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
|
||||
.ok_or(BeaconChainError::HeadMissingFromForkChoice(head_block_root))?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Advance the state into the requested epoch.
|
||||
ensure_state_is_in_epoch(&mut state, head_state_root, current_epoch, &chain.spec)?;
|
||||
ensure_state_is_in_epoch(&mut state, head_state_root, request_epoch, &chain.spec)?;
|
||||
|
||||
let indices = state
|
||||
.get_beacon_proposer_indices(&chain.spec)
|
||||
|
@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ const DEFAULT_SUGGESTED_FEE_RECIPIENT: [u8; 20] =
|
||||
|
||||
/// A payload alongside some information about where it came from.
|
||||
pub enum ProvenancedPayload<P> {
|
||||
/// A good ol' fashioned farm-to-table payload from your local EE.
|
||||
/// A good old fashioned farm-to-table payload from your local EE.
|
||||
Local(P),
|
||||
/// A payload from a builder (e.g. mev-boost).
|
||||
Builder(P),
|
||||
|
@ -1426,10 +1426,10 @@ pub fn serve<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* beacon/blocks
|
||||
* beacon/blinded_blocks
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// POST beacon/blocks
|
||||
// POST beacon/blinded_blocks
|
||||
let post_beacon_blinded_blocks = eth_v1
|
||||
.and(warp::path("beacon"))
|
||||
.and(warp::path("blinded_blocks"))
|
||||
@ -3208,7 +3208,7 @@ pub fn serve<T: BeaconChainTypes>(
|
||||
},
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// POST validator/duties/sync
|
||||
// POST validator/duties/sync/{epoch}
|
||||
let post_validator_duties_sync = eth_v1
|
||||
.and(warp::path("validator"))
|
||||
.and(warp::path("duties"))
|
||||
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ struct Initialization {
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Default)]
|
||||
pub struct RewardCache {
|
||||
initialization: Option<Initialization>,
|
||||
/// `BitVec` of validator indices which don't have default participation flags for the prev. epoch.
|
||||
/// `BitVec` of validator indices which don't have default participation flags for the prev epoch.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// We choose to only track whether validators have *any* participation flag set because
|
||||
/// it's impossible to include a new attestation which is better than the existing participation
|
||||
|
@ -466,13 +466,10 @@ where
|
||||
// for lower slots to account for skip slots.
|
||||
.find(|(_, slot)| *slot <= ancestor_slot)
|
||||
.map(|(root, _)| root)),
|
||||
Ordering::Less => Ok(Some(block_root)),
|
||||
Ordering::Equal =>
|
||||
// Root is older than queried slot, thus a skip slot. Return most recent root prior
|
||||
// to slot.
|
||||
{
|
||||
Ok(Some(block_root))
|
||||
}
|
||||
Ordering::Less => Ok(Some(block_root)),
|
||||
Ordering::Equal => Ok(Some(block_root)),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -910,7 +910,7 @@ impl ProtoArray {
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Indicates if the node itself is viable for the head, or if it's best descendant is viable
|
||||
/// Indicates if the node itself is viable for the head, or if its best descendant is viable
|
||||
/// for the head.
|
||||
fn node_leads_to_viable_head<E: EthSpec>(
|
||||
&self,
|
||||
|
@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ async fn fill_in_selection_proofs<T: SlotClock + 'static, E: EthSpec>(
|
||||
/// 2. We won't miss a block if the duties for the current slot happen to change with this poll.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This sounds great, but is it safe? Firstly, the additional notification will only contain block
|
||||
/// producers that were not included in the first notification. This should be safety enough.
|
||||
/// producers that were not included in the first notification. This should be safe enough.
|
||||
/// However, we also have the slashing protection as a second line of defence. These two factors
|
||||
/// provide an acceptable level of safety.
|
||||
///
|
||||
|
@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ impl<T: EthSpec> ProductionValidatorClient<T> {
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn start_service(&mut self) -> Result<(), String> {
|
||||
// We use `SLOTS_PER_EPOCH` as the capacity of the block notification channel, because
|
||||
// we don't except notifications to be delayed by more than a single slot, let alone a
|
||||
// we don't expect notifications to be delayed by more than a single slot, let alone a
|
||||
// whole epoch!
|
||||
let channel_capacity = T::slots_per_epoch() as usize;
|
||||
let (block_service_tx, block_service_rx) = mpsc::channel(channel_capacity);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user