* core/state/snapshot: print warning if failed to resolve journal
* core/state/snapshot: fix snapshot recovery
When we meet the snapshot journal consisted with:
- disk layer generator with new-format
- diff layer journal with old-format
The base layer should be returned without error.
The broken diff layer can be reconstructed later
but we definitely don't want to reconstruct the
huge diff layer.
* core: add tests
* core/state/snapshot: introduce snapshot journal version
* core: update the disk layer in an atomic way
* core: persist the disk layer generator periodically
* core/state/snapshot: improve logging
* core/state/snapshot: forcibly ensure the legacy snapshot is matched
* core/state/snapshot: add debug logs
* core, tests: fix tests and special recovery case
* core: polish
* core: add more blockchain tests for snapshot recovery
* core/state: fix comment
* core: add recovery flag for snapshot
* core: add restart after start-after-crash tests
* core/rawdb: fix imports
* core: fix tests
* core: remove log
* core/state/snapshot: fix snapshot
* core: avoid callbacks in SetHead
* core: fix setHead cornercase where the threshold root has state
* core: small docs for the test cases
Co-authored-by: Péter Szilágyi <peterke@gmail.com>
* core/state/snapshot: add diskRoot function
* core/state/snapshot: disable iteration if the snapshot is generating
* core/state/snapshot: simplify the function
* core/state: panic for undefined layer
* core/state/snapshot: exit Geth if generator hits missing trie nodes
* core/state/snapshot: error instead of hard die on generator fault
* core/state/snapshot: don't enable logging on the tests
* core/state/snapshot: implement storage iterator
* core/state/snapshot, tests: implement helper function
* core/state/snapshot: fix storage issue
If an account is deleted in the tx_1 but recreated in the tx_2,
the it can happen that in this diff layer, both destructedSet
and storageData records this account. In this case, the storage
iterator should be able to iterate the slots belong to new account
but disable further iteration in deeper layers(belong to old account)
* core/state/snapshot: address peter and martin's comment
* core/state: address comments
* core/state/snapshot: fix test
* all: seperate consensus error and evm internal error
There are actually two types of error will be returned when
a tranaction/message call is executed: (a) consensus error
(b) evm internal error. The former should be converted to
a consensus issue, e.g. The sender doesn't enough asset to
purchase the gas it specifies. The latter is allowed since
evm itself is a blackbox and internal error is allowed to happen.
This PR emphasizes the difference by introducing a executionResult
structure. The evm error is embedded inside. So if any error
returned, it indicates consensus issue happens.
And also this PR improve the `EstimateGas` API to return the concrete
revert reason if the transaction always fails
* all: polish
* accounts/abi/bind/backends: add tests
* accounts/abi/bind/backends, internal: cleanup error message
* all: address comments
* core: fix lint
* accounts, core, eth, internal: address comments
* accounts, internal: resolve revert reason if possible
* accounts, internal: address comments
