Files
stack-orchestrator/docs/arista-scraped/static-inter-vrf-route.md
T
A. F. DudleyandClaude Opus 4.6 0b52fc99d7 fix: ashburn relay playbooks and document DZ tunnel ACL root cause
Playbook fixes from testing:
- ashburn-relay-biscayne: insert DNAT rules at position 1 before
  Docker's ADDRTYPE LOCAL rule (was being swallowed at position 3+)
- ashburn-relay-mia-sw01: add inbound route for 137.239.194.65 via
  egress-vrf vrf1 (nexthop only, no interface — EOS silently drops
  cross-VRF routes that specify a tunnel interface)
- ashburn-relay-was-sw01: replace PBR with static route, remove
  Loopback101

Bug doc (bug-ashburn-tunnel-port-filtering.md): root cause is the
DoubleZero agent on mia-sw01 overwrites SEC-USER-500-IN ACL, dropping
outbound gossip with src 137.239.194.65. The DZ agent controls
Tunnel500's lifecycle. Fix requires a separate GRE tunnel using
mia-sw01's free LAN IP (209.42.167.137) to bypass DZ infrastructure.

Also adds all repo docs, scripts, inventory, and remaining playbooks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-03-07 01:44:25 +00:00

83 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown

<!-- Source: https://www.arista.com/en/um-eos/eos-static-inter-vrf-route -->
<!-- Scraped: 2026-03-06T20:43:17.977Z -->
# Static Inter-VRF Route
The Static Inter-VRF Route feature adds support for static inter-VRF routes. This enables the configuration of routes to destinations in one ingress VRF with an ability to specify a next-hop in a different egress VRF through a static configuration.
You can configure static inter-VRF routes in default and non-default VRFs. A different
egress VRF is achieved by “tagging” the **next-hop** or **forwarding
via** with a reference to an egress VRF (different from the source
VRF) in which that next-hop should be evaluated. Static inter-VRF routes
with ECMP next-hop sets in the same egress VRF or heterogenous egress VRFs
can be specified.
The Static Inter-VRF Route feature is independent and complementary to other mechanisms that can be used to setup local inter-VRF routes. The other supported mechanisms in EOS and the broader use-cases they support are documented here:
- [Inter-VRF Local Route Leaking using BGP VPN](/um-eos/eos-inter-vrf-local-route-leaking#xx1348142)
- [Inter-VRF Local Route Leaking using VRF-leak Agent](/um-eos/eos-inter-vrf-local-route-leaking#xx1346287)
## Configuration
The configuration to setup static-Inter VRF routes in an ingress (source) VRF to forward IP traffic to a different egress (target) VRF can be done in the following modes:
- This command creates a static route in one ingress VRF that points to a next-hop
in a different egress VRF.
ip | ipv6
route [vrf
vrf-name
destination-prefix [egress-vrf
egress-next-hop-vrf-name]
next-hop]
## Show Commands
Use the **show ip route vrf** to display the egress VRF name if it
differs from the source VRF.
**Example**
```
`switch# **show ip route vrf vrf1**
VRF: vrf1
Codes: C - connected, S - static, K - kernel,
O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area, E1 - OSPF external type 1,
E2 - OSPF external type 2, N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1,
N2 - OSPF NSSA external type2, B - BGP, B I - iBGP, B E - eBGP,
R - RIP, I L1 - IS-IS level 1, I L2 - IS-IS level 2,
O3 - OSPFv3, A B - BGP Aggregate, A O - OSPF Summary,
NG - Nexthop Group Static Route, V - VXLAN Control Service,
DH - DHCP client installed default route, M - Martian,
DP - Dynamic Policy Route, L - VRF Leaked
Gateway of last resort is not set
S 1.0.1.0/24 [1/0] via 1.0.0.2, Vlan2180 (egress VRF default)
S 1.0.7.0/24 [1/0] via 1.0.6.2, Vlan2507 (egress VRF vrf3)`
```
## Limitations
- For bidirectional traffic to work correctly between a pair of VRFs, static inter-VRF
routes in both VRFs must be configured.
- Static Inter-VRF routing is supported only in multi-agent routing protocol mode.