Fixes a minor error in the testdata
3.3 KiB
EIP-1559 testing
This test contains testcases for EIP-1559, which uses an new transaction type and has a new block parameter.
Prestate
The alloc portion contains one contract (0x000000000000000000000000000000000000aaaa
), containing the
following code: 0x58585454
: PC; PC; SLOAD; SLOAD
.
Essentialy, this contract does SLOAD(0)
and SLOAD(1)
.
The alloc also contains some funds on 0xa94f5374fce5edbc8e2a8697c15331677e6ebf0b
.
Transactions
There are two transactions, each invokes the contract above.
- EIP-1559 ACL-transaction, which contains the
0x0
slot for0xaaaa
- Legacy transaction
Execution
Running it yields:
$ dir=./testdata/9 && ./evm t8n --state.fork=London --input.alloc=$dir/alloc.json --input.txs=$dir/txs.json --input.env=$dir/env.json --trace && cat trace-* | grep SLOAD
{"pc":2,"op":84,"gas":"0x48c28","gasCost":"0x834","memory":"0x","memSize":0,"stack":["0x0","0x1"],"returnStack":null,"returnD
ata":"0x","depth":1,"refund":0,"opName":"SLOAD","error":""}
{"pc":3,"op":84,"gas":"0x483f4","gasCost":"0x64","memory":"0x","memSize":0,"stack":["0x0","0x0"],"returnStack":null,"returnDa
ta":"0x","depth":1,"refund":0,"opName":"SLOAD","error":""}
{"pc":2,"op":84,"gas":"0x49cf4","gasCost":"0x834","memory":"0x","memSize":0,"stack":["0x0","0x1"],"returnStack":null,"returnD
ata":"0x","depth":1,"refund":0,"opName":"SLOAD","error":""}
{"pc":3,"op":84,"gas":"0x494c0","gasCost":"0x834","memory":"0x","memSize":0,"stack":["0x0","0x0"],"returnStack":null,"returnD
ata":"0x","depth":1,"refund":0,"opName":"SLOAD","error":""}
We can also get the post-alloc:
$ dir=./testdata/9 && ./evm t8n --state.fork=London --input.alloc=$dir/alloc.json --input.txs=$dir/txs.json --input.env=$dir/env.json --output.alloc=stdout
{
"alloc": {
"0x000000000000000000000000000000000000aaaa": {
"code": "0x58585454",
"balance": "0x3",
"nonce": "0x1"
},
"0x2adc25665018aa1fe0e6bc666dac8fc2697ff9ba": {
"balance": "0x5bb10ddef6e0"
},
"0xa94f5374fce5edbc8e2a8697c15331677e6ebf0b": {
"balance": "0xff745ee8832120",
"nonce": "0x2"
}
}
}
If we try to execute it on older rules:
dir=./testdata/9 && ./evm t8n --state.fork=Berlin --input.alloc=$dir/alloc.json --input.txs=$dir/txs.json --input.env=$dir/env.json --output.alloc=stdout
ERROR(10): Failed signing transactions: ERROR(10): Tx 0: failed to sign tx: transaction type not supported
It fails, due to the evm t8n
cannot sign them in with the given signer. We can bypass that, however,
by feeding it presigned transactions, located in txs_signed.json
.
dir=./testdata/9 && ./evm t8n --state.fork=Berlin --input.alloc=$dir/alloc.json --input.txs=$dir/txs_signed.json --input.env=$dir/env.json
INFO [05-07|12:28:42.072] rejected tx index=0 hash=b4821e..536819 error="transaction type not supported"
INFO [05-07|12:28:42.072] rejected tx index=1 hash=a9c6c6..fa4036 from=0xa94f5374Fce5edBC8E2a8697C15331677e6EbF0B error="nonce too high: address 0xa94f5374Fce5edBC8E2a8697C15331677e6EbF0B, tx: 1 state: 0"
INFO [05-07|12:28:42.073] Wrote file file=alloc.json
INFO [05-07|12:28:42.073] Wrote file file=result.json
Number 0
is not applicable, and therefore number 1
has wrong nonce, and both are rejected.