In all other UDPv4 methods, the deadline is checked first. It seems weird to me that ping is an exception. Deadline comparison is also less resource intensive.
Co-authored-by: Exca-DK <Exca-DK@users.noreply.github.com>
This changes the eth_getProof method implementation to re-encode the requested
storage keys, canonicalizing them in the response. For backwards-compatibility reasons,
go-ethereum accepts non-canonical hex keys. Accepting them is fine, but we should
not mirror invalid inputs into the output.
Closes#27306
---------
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
This is likely the culprit behind several data corruption issues, e.g. where data has been
written to the freezer, but the deletion from pebble does not go through due to process
crash.
The state availability is checked during the creation of a state reader.
- In hash-based database, if the specified root node does not exist on disk disk, then
the state reader won't be created and an error will be returned.
- In path-based database, if the specified state layer is not available, then the
state reader won't be created and an error will be returned.
This change also contains a stricter semantics regarding the `Commit` operation: once it has been performed, the trie is no longer usable, and certain operations will return an error.
This removes the feature where top nodes of the proof can be elided.
It was intended to be used by the LES server, to save bandwidth
when the client had already fetched parts of the state and only needed
some extra nodes to complete the proof. Alas, it never got implemented
in the client.
* go.mod: update kzg libraries to use big-endian
* go.sum: ran go mod tidy
* core/testdata/precompiles: fix blob verification test
* core/testdata/precompiles: fix blob verification test
Package rpc uses cgo to find the maximum UNIX domain socket path
length. If exceeded, a warning is printed. This is the only use of cgo in this
package. It seems excessive to depend on cgo just for this warning, so
we now hard-code the usual limit for Linux instead.
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
This change ensures Reheap will be called even before the London fork activates.
Since Reheap would otherwise only be called through `SetBaseFee` after London,
the list would just keep growing if the fork was not enabled or not reached yet.
* all: move main transaction pool into a subpool
* go.mod: remove superfluous updates
* core/txpool: review fixes, handle txs rejected by all subpools
* core/txpool: typos
The logs in this function are pulled straight from disk in rawdb.ReadRawReceipts and
also modified in receipts.DeriveFields, so removing the copy should be fine.
We had to do this workaround because it wasn't possible to export typed arrays from
JS to []byte. This was added in dop251/goja@2352993, so we can use the better way now.
This adds two ways to check for subscription support. First, one can now check
whether the transport method (HTTP/WS/etc.) is capable of subscriptions using
the new Client.SupportsSubscriptions method.
Second, the error returned by Subscribe can now reliably be tested using this
pattern:
sub, err := client.Subscribe(...)
if errors.Is(err, rpc.ErrNotificationsUnsupported) {
// no subscription support
}
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
This PR adds server-side limits for JSON-RPC batch requests. Before this change, batches
were limited only by processing time. The server would pick calls from the batch and
answer them until the response timeout occurred, then stop processing the remaining batch
items.
Here, we are adding two additional limits which can be configured:
- the 'item limit': batches can have at most N items
- the 'response size limit': batches can contain at most X response bytes
These limits are optional in package rpc. In Geth, we set a default limit of 1000 items
and 25MB response size.
When a batch goes over the limit, an error response is returned to the client. However,
doing this correctly isn't always possible. In JSON-RPC, only method calls with a valid
`id` can be responded to. Since batches may also contain non-call messages or
notifications, the best effort thing we can do to report an error with the batch itself is
reporting the limit violation as an error for the first method call in the batch. If a batch is
too large, but contains only notifications and responses, the error will be reported with
a null `id`.
The RPC client was also changed so it can deal with errors resulting from too large
batches. An older client connected to the server code in this PR could get stuck
until the request timeout occurred when the batch is too large. **Upgrading to a version
of the RPC client containing this change is strongly recommended to avoid timeout issues.**
For some weird reason, when writing the original client implementation, @fjl worked off of
the assumption that responses could be distributed across batches arbitrarily. So for a
batch request containing requests `[A B C]`, the server could respond with `[A B C]` but
also with `[A B] [C]` or even `[A] [B] [C]` and it wouldn't make a difference to the
client.
So in the implementation of BatchCallContext, the client waited for all requests in the
batch individually. If the server didn't respond to some of the requests in the batch, the
client would eventually just time out (if a context was used).
With the addition of batch limits into the server, we anticipate that people will hit this
kind of error way more often. To handle this properly, the client now waits for a single
response batch and expects it to contain all responses to the requests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
* core/txpool: abstraction prep work for secondary pools (blob pool)
* core/txpool: leave subpool concepts to a followup pr
* les: fix tests using hard coded errors
* core/txpool: use bitmaps instead of maps for tx type filtering
* cmd/evm: make evm blocktest output logs if so instructed
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
---------
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
