## Issue Addressed Update Information in Lighthouse Book ## Proposed Changes - move Validator Graffiti from Advanced Usage to Validator Management - update API response and command - some items that aren't too sure I put it in comment, which can be seen in raw/review format but not live ## Additional Info Please provide any additional information. For example, future considerations or information useful for reviewers. Co-authored-by: chonghe <44791194+chong-he@users.noreply.github.com>
11 KiB
Merge Migration
The Merge has occurred on mainnet on 15th September 2022. This document provides detail of what users need to do in the past (before The Merge) to run a Lighthouse node on a post-merge Ethereum network. This document now serves as a record of the milestone upgrade.
Necessary Configuration
There are two configuration changes required for a Lighthouse node to operate correctly throughout the merge:
- You must run your own execution engine such as Besu, Erigon, Geth or Nethermind alongside Lighthouse.
You must update your
lighthouse bn
configuration to connect to the execution engine using new flags which are documented on this page in the Connecting to an execution engine section. - If your Lighthouse node has validators attached you must nominate an Ethereum address to
receive transactions tips from blocks proposed by your validators. These changes should
be made to your
lighthouse vc
configuration, and are covered on the Suggested fee recipient page.
Additionally, you must update Lighthouse to v3.0.0 (or later), and must update your execution engine to a merge-ready version.
When?
All networks (Mainnet, Goerli (Prater), Ropsten, Sepolia, Kiln, Gnosis) have successfully undergone the Bellatrix fork and transitioned to a post-merge Network. Your node must have a merge-ready configuration to continue operating. Table below lists the date at which Bellatrix and The Merge occurred:
Network | Bellatrix | The Merge | Remark |
---|---|---|---|
Ropsten | 2nd June 2022 | 8th June 2022 | Deprecated |
Sepolia | 20th June 2022 | 6th July 2022 | |
Goerli | 4th August 2022 | 10th August 2022 | Previously named Prater |
Mainnet | 6th September 2022 | 15th September 2022 | |
Gnosis | 30th November 2022 | 8th December 2022 |
Connecting to an execution engine
The Lighthouse beacon node must connect to an execution engine in order to validate the transactions present in post-merge blocks. Two new flags are used to configure this connection:
--execution-endpoint <URL>
: the URL of the execution engine API. Often this will behttp://localhost:8551
.--execution-jwt <FILE>
: the path to the file containing the JWT secret shared by Lighthouse and the execution engine.
If you set up an execution engine with --execution-endpoint
then you must provide a JWT secret
using --execution-jwt
. This is a mandatory form of authentication that ensures that Lighthouse
has the authority to control the execution engine.
Tip: the --execution-jwt-secret-key flag can be used instead of --execution-jwt . This is useful, for example, for users who wish to inject the value into a Docker container without needing to pass a jwt secret file.
The execution engine connection must be exclusive, i.e. you must have one execution node per beacon node. The reason for this is that the beacon node controls the execution node. Please see the FAQ for further information about why many:1 and 1:many configurations are not supported.
Execution engine configuration
Each execution engine has its own flags for configuring the engine API and JWT. Please consult the relevant page for your execution engine for the required flags:
- Geth: Connecting to Consensus Clients
- Nethermind: Running Nethermind Post Merge
- Besu: Prepare For The Merge
- Erigon: Beacon Chain (Consensus Layer)
Once you have configured your execution engine to open up the engine API (usually on port 8551) you
should add the URL to your lighthouse bn
flags with --execution-endpoint <URL>
, as well as
the path to the JWT secret with --execution-jwt <FILE>
.
There are merge-ready releases of all compatible execution engines available now.
Example
Let us look at an example of the command line arguments for a pre-merge production staking BN:
lighthouse \
--network mainnet \
beacon_node \
--http \
--eth1-endpoints http://localhost:8545,https://mainnet.infura.io/v3/TOKEN
Converting the above to a post-merge configuration would render:
lighthouse \
--network mainnet \
beacon_node \
--http \
--execution-endpoint http://localhost:8551
--execution-jwt /path/to/jwtsecret
The changes here are:
- Remove
--eth1-endpoints
- The endpoint at
localhost
can be retained, it is our local execution engine. Once it is upgraded to a merge-compatible release it will be used in the post-merge environment. - The
infura.io
endpoint will be abandoned, Infura and most other third-party node providers are not compatible with post-merge BNs.
- The endpoint at
- Add the
--execution-endpoint
flag.- We have reused the node at
localhost
, however we've switched to the authenticated engine API port8551
. All execution engines will have a specific port for this API, however it might not be8551
, see their documentation for details.
- We have reused the node at
- Add the
--execution-jwt
flag.- This is the path to a file containing a 32-byte secret for authenticating the BN with the execution engine. It is critical that both the BN and execution engine reference a file with the same value, otherwise they'll fail to communicate.
Note that the --network
and --http
flags haven't changed. The only changes required for the
merge are ensuring that --execution-endpoint
and --execution-jwt
flags are provided! In fact,
you can even leave the --eth1-endpoints
flag there, it will be ignored. This is not recommended as
a deprecation warning will be logged and Lighthouse may remove these flags in the future.
The relationship between --eth1-endpoints
and --execution-endpoint
Pre-merge users will be familiar with the --eth1-endpoints
flag. This provides a list of Ethereum
"eth1" nodes (Besu, Erigon, Geth or Nethermind). Each beacon node (BN) can have multiple eth1 endpoints
and each eth1 endpoint can have many BNs connection (many-to-many relationship). The eth1 node
provides a source of truth for the deposit
contract and beacon chain proposers include this
information in beacon blocks in order to on-board new validators. BNs exclusively use the eth
namespace on the eth1 JSON-RPC API to
achieve this.
To progress through the Bellatrix upgrade nodes will need a new connection to an "eth1" node;
--execution-endpoint
. This connection has a few different properties. Firstly, the term "eth1
node" has been deprecated and replaced with "execution engine". Whilst "eth1 node" and "execution
engine" still refer to the same projects (Besu, Erigon, Geth or Nethermind), the former refers to the pre-merge
versions and the latter refers to post-merge versions. Secondly, there is a strict one-to-one
relationship between Lighthouse and the execution engine; only one Lighthouse node can connect to
one execution engine. Thirdly, it is impossible to fully verify the post-merge chain without an
execution engine. It was possible to verify the pre-merge chain without an eth1 node, it was just
impossible to reliably propose blocks without it.
Since an execution engine is a hard requirement in the post-merge chain and the execution engine
contains the transaction history of the Ethereum chain, there is no longer a need for the
--eth1-endpoints
flag for information about the deposit contract. The --execution-endpoint
can
be used for all such queries. Therefore we can say that where --execution-endpoint
is included,
--eth1-endpoints
should be omitted.
FAQ
How do I know if my node is set up correctly?
Lighthouse will log a message indicating that it is ready for the merge:
INFO Ready for the merge, current_difficulty: 10789363, terminal_total_difficulty: 10790000
Once the merge has occurred you should see that Lighthouse remains in sync and marks blocks
as verified
indicating that they have been processed successfully by the execution engine:
INFO Synced, slot: 3690668, block: 0x1244…cb92, epoch: 115333, finalized_epoch: 115331, finalized_root: 0x0764…2a3d, exec_hash: 0x929c…1ff6 (verified), peers: 78
Can I still use the --staking
flag?
Yes. The --staking
flag is just an alias for --http --eth1
. The --eth1
flag is now superfluous
so --staking
is equivalent to --http
. You need either --staking
or --http
for the validator
client to be able to connect to the beacon node.
Can I use http://localhost:8545
for the execution endpoint?
Most execution nodes use port 8545
for the Ethereum JSON-RPC API. Unless custom configuration is
used, an execution node will not provide the necessary engine API on port 8545
. You should
not attempt to use http://localhost:8545
as your engine URL and should instead use
http://localhost:8551
.
Can I share an execution node between multiple beacon nodes (many:1)?
It is not possible to connect more than one beacon node to the same execution engine. There must be a 1:1 relationship between beacon nodes and execution nodes.
The beacon node controls the execution node via the engine API, telling it which block is the current head of the chain. If multiple beacon nodes were to connect to a single execution node they could set conflicting head blocks, leading to frequent re-orgs on the execution node.
We imagine that in future there will be HTTP proxies available which allow users to nominate a single controlling beacon node, while allowing consistent updates from other beacon nodes.
What about multiple execution endpoints (1:many)?
It is not possible to connect one beacon node to more than one execution engine. There must be a 1:1 relationship between beacon nodes and execution nodes.
Since an execution engine can only have one controlling BN, the value of having multiple execution engines connected to the same BN is very low. An execution engine cannot be shared between BNs to reduce costs.
Whilst having multiple execution engines connected to a single BN might be useful for advanced testing scenarios, Lighthouse (and other consensus clients) have decided to support only one execution endpoint. Such scenarios could be resolved with a custom-made HTTP proxy.
Additional Resources
There are several community-maintained guides which provide more background information, as well as guidance for specific setups.