Commit Graph

948 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jimmy Chen
8d9c748025 Fix attestation withdrawals root mismatch (#4249)
## Issue Addressed

Addresses #4234 

## Proposed Changes

- Skip withdrawals processing in an inconsistent state replay. 
- Repurpose `StateRootStrategy`: rename to `StateProcessingStrategy` and always skip withdrawals if using `StateProcessingStrategy::Inconsistent`
- Add a test to reproduce the scenario


Co-authored-by: Jimmy Chen <jimmy@sigmaprime.io>
2023-05-09 10:48:15 +00:00
Age Manning
35ca086269 Backfill blocks only to the WSP by default (#4082)
## Limit Backfill Sync

This PR transitions Lighthouse from syncing all the way back to genesis to only syncing back to the weak subjectivity point (~ 5 months) when syncing via a checkpoint sync.

There are a number of important points to note with this PR:

- Firstly and most importantly, this PR fundamentally shifts the default security guarantees of checkpoint syncing in Lighthouse. Prior to this PR, Lighthouse could verify the checkpoint of any given chain by ensuring the chain eventually terminates at the corresponding genesis. This guarantee can still be employed via the new CLI flag --genesis-backfill which will prompt lighthouse to the old behaviour of downloading all blocks back to genesis. The new behaviour only checks the proposer signatures for the last 5 months of blocks but cannot guarantee the chain matches the genesis chain.
- I have not modified any of the peer scoring or RPC responses. Clients syncing from gensis, will downscore new Lighthouse peers that do not possess blocks prior to the WSP. This is by design, as Lighthouse nodes of this form, need a mechanism to sort through peers in order to find useful peers in order to complete their genesis sync. We therefore do not discriminate between empty/error responses for blocks prior or post the local WSP. If we request a block that a peer does not posses, then fundamentally that peer is less useful to us than other peers.
- This will make a radical shift in that the majority of nodes will no longer store the full history of the chain. In the future we could add a pruning mechanism to remove old blocks from the db also.


Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-05-05 03:49:23 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
2aef2db66f Un-deprecate test utils functions such as extend_chain (#4255)
## Issue Addressed

This PR un-deprecates some commonly used test util functions, e.g. `extend_chain`. Most of these were deprecated in 2020 but some of us still found them quite convenient and they're still being used a lot. If there's no issue with using them, I think we should remove the "Deprecated" comment to avoid confusion.
2023-05-03 04:12:12 +00:00
Michael Sproul
c11638c36c Split common crates out into their own repos (#3890)
## Proposed Changes

Split out several crates which now exist in separate repos under `sigp`.

- [`ssz` and `ssz_derive`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_ssz)
- [`tree_hash` and `tree_hash_derive`](https://github.com/sigp/tree_hash)
- [`ethereum_hashing`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_hashing)
- [`ethereum_serde_utils`](https://github.com/sigp/ethereum_serde_utils)
- [`ssz_types`](https://github.com/sigp/ssz_types)

For the published crates see: https://crates.io/teams/github:sigp:crates-io?sort=recent-updates.

## Additional Info

- [x] Need to work out how to handle versioning. I was hoping to do 1.0 versions of several crates, but if they depend on `ethereum-types 0.x` that is not going to work. EDIT: decided to go with 0.5.x versions.
- [x] Need to port several changes from `tree-states`, `capella`, `eip4844` branches to the external repos.
2023-04-28 01:15:40 +00:00
int88
90d562b3d4 add attestation inclusion distance in http api (#4148)
## Issue Addressed

#4097

## Proposed Changes

Add attestation inclusion distance in http api, extend `/lighthouse/ui/validator_metrics` to include it.

## Usage
```
curl -X POST "http://localhost:8001/lighthouse/ui/validator_metrics" -d '{"indices": [1]}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" | jq
```

```
{
  "data": {
    "validators": {
      "1": {
        "attestation_hits": 3,
        "attestation_misses": 1,
        "attestation_hit_percentage": 75,
        "attestation_head_hits": 3,
        "attestation_head_misses": 0,
        "attestation_head_hit_percentage": 100,
        "attestation_target_hits": 3,
        "attestation_target_misses": 0,
        "attestation_target_hit_percentage": 100,
        "attestation_inclusion_distance": 1
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Additional Info

NA
2023-04-26 01:12:35 +00:00
Pawan Dhananjay
a78285db5e Fix Rust 1.69 lints (#4222)
## Issue Addressed

N/A

## Proposed Changes

Fixes lints mostly `extra-unused-type-parameters` https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#extra_unused_type_paramete
2023-04-21 18:29:28 +00:00
Michael Sproul
1d92e3f77c Use efficient payload reconstruction for HTTP API (#4102)
## Proposed Changes

Builds on #4028 to use the new payload bodies methods in the HTTP API as well.

## Caveats

The payloads by range method only works for the finalized chain, so it can't be used in the execution engine integration tests because we try to reconstruct unfinalized payloads there.
2023-04-18 02:47:35 +00:00
Paul Hauner
dd124b2d68 Address observed proposers behaviour (#4192)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Apply two changes to code introduced in #4179:

1. Remove the `ERRO` log for when we error on `proposer_has_been_observed()`. We were seeing a lot of this in our logs for finalized blocks and it's a bit noisy.
1. Use `false` rather than `true` for `proposal_already_known` when there is an error. If a block raises an error in `proposer_has_been_observed()` then the block must be invalid, so we should process (and reject) it now rather than queuing it.

For reference, here is one of the offending `ERRO` logs:

```
ERRO Failed to check observed proposers block_root: 0x5845…878e, source: rpc, error: FinalizedBlock { slot: Slot(5410983), finalized_slot: Slot(5411232) }
```

## Additional Info

NA
2023-04-14 06:37:16 +00:00
Paul Hauner
2b3084f578 Use head state for exit verification (#4183)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

Similar to #4181 but without the version bump and a more nuanced fix.

Patches the high CPU usage seen after the Capella fork which was caused by processing exits when there are skip slots.

## Additional Info

~~This is an imperfect solution that will cause us to drop some exits at the fork boundary. This is tracked at #4184.~~
2023-04-14 01:11:46 +00:00
Michael Sproul
a3669abac5 Avoid processing redundant RPC blocks (#4179)
## Proposed Changes

We already make some attempts to avoid processing RPC blocks when a block from the same proposer is already being processed through gossip. This PR strengthens that guarantee by using the existing cache for `observed_block_producers` to inform whether an RPC block's processing should be delayed.
2023-04-13 07:05:02 +00:00
Michael Sproul
b90c0c3fb1 Make re-org strat more cautious and add more config (#4151)
## Proposed Changes

This change attempts to prevent failed re-orgs by:

1. Lowering the re-org cutoff from 2s to 1s. This is informed by a failed re-org attempted by @yorickdowne's node. The failed block was requested in the 1.5-2s window due to a Vouch failure, and failed to propagate to the majority of the network before the attestation deadline at 4s.
2. Allow users to adjust their re-org cutoff depending on observed network conditions and their risk profile. The static 2 second cutoff was too rigid.
3. Add a `--proposer-reorg-disallowed-offsets` flag which can be used to prohibit reorgs at certain slots. This is intended to help workaround an issue whereby reorging blocks at slot 1 are currently taking ~1.6s to propagate on gossip rather than ~500ms. This is suspected to be due to a cache miss in current versions of Prysm, which should be fixed in their next release.

## Additional Info

I'm of two minds about removing the `shuffling_stable` check which checks for blocks at slot 0 in the epoch. If we removed it users would be able to configure Lighthouse to try reorging at slot 0, which likely wouldn't work very well due to interactions with the proposer index cache. I think we could leave it for now and revisit it later.
2023-04-13 07:05:01 +00:00
Jimmy Chen
2de3451011 Rate limiting backfill sync (#3936)
## Issue Addressed

#3212 

## Proposed Changes

- Introduce a new `rate_limiting_backfill_queue` - any new inbound backfill work events gets immediately sent to this FIFO queue **without any processing**
- Spawn a `backfill_scheduler` routine that pops a backfill event from the FIFO queue at specified intervals (currently halfway through a slot, or at 6s after slot start for 12s slots) and sends the event to `BeaconProcessor` via a `scheduled_backfill_work_tx` channel
- This channel gets polled last in the `InboundEvents`, and work event received is  wrapped in a `InboundEvent::ScheduledBackfillWork` enum variant, which gets processed immediately or queued by the `BeaconProcessor` (existing logic applies from here)

Diagram comparing backfill processing with / without rate-limiting: 
https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3212#issuecomment-1386249922

See this comment for @paulhauner's  explanation and solution: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3212#issuecomment-1384674956

## Additional Info

I've compared this branch (with backfill processing rate limited to to 1 and 3 batches per slot) against the latest stable version. The CPU usage during backfill sync is reduced by ~5% - 20%, more details on this page:

https://hackmd.io/@jimmygchen/SJuVpJL3j

The above testing is done on Goerli (as I don't currently have hardware for Mainnet), I'm guessing the differences are likely to be bigger on mainnet due to block size.

### TODOs

- [x] Experiment with processing multiple batches per slot. (need to think about how to do this for different slot durations)
- [x] Add option to disable rate-limiting, enabed by default.
- [x] (No longer required now we're reusing the reprocessing queue) Complete the `backfill_scheduler` task when backfill sync is completed or not required
2023-04-03 03:02:55 +00:00
Daniel Ramirez Chiquillo
036b797b2c Add finalized to HTTP API responses (#3753)
## Issue Addressed

#3708 

## Proposed Changes
- Add `is_finalized_block` method to `BeaconChain` in `beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/beacon_chain.rs`.
- Add `is_finalized_state` method to `BeaconChain` in `beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/beacon_chain.rs`.
- Add `fork_and_execution_optimistic_and_finalized` in `beacon_node/http_api/src/state_id.rs`.
- Add `ExecutionOptimisticFinalizedForkVersionedResponse` type in `consensus/types/src/fork_versioned_response.rs`.
- Add `execution_optimistic_finalized_fork_versioned_response`function in  `beacon_node/http_api/src/version.rs`.
- Add `ExecutionOptimisticFinalizedResponse` type in `common/eth2/src/types.rs`.
- Add `add_execution_optimistic_finalized` method in  `common/eth2/src/types.rs`.
- Update API response methods to include finalized.
- Remove `execution_optimistic_fork_versioned_response`

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-30 06:08:37 +00:00
Paul Hauner
1f8c17b530 Fork choice modifications and cleanup (#3962)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

- Implements https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/pull/3290/
- Bumps `ef-tests` to [v1.3.0-rc.4](https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-spec-tests/releases/tag/v1.3.0-rc.4).

The `CountRealizedFull` concept has been removed and the `--count-unrealized-full` and `--count-unrealized` BN flags now do nothing but log a `WARN` when used.

## Database Migration Debt

This PR removes the `best_justified_checkpoint` from fork choice. This field is persisted on-disk and the correct way to go about this would be to make a DB migration to remove the field. However, in this PR I've simply stubbed out the value with a junk value. I've taken this approach because if we're going to do a DB migration I'd love to remove the `Option`s around the justified and finalized checkpoints on `ProtoNode` whilst we're at it. Those options were added in #2822 which was included in Lighthouse v2.1.0. The options were only put there to handle the migration and they've been set to `Some` ever since v2.1.0. There's no reason to keep them as options anymore.

I started adding the DB migration to this branch but I started to feel like I was bloating this rather critical PR with nice-to-haves. I've kept the partially-complete migration [over in my repo](https://github.com/paulhauner/lighthouse/tree/fc-pr-18-migration) so we can pick it up after this PR is merged.
2023-03-21 07:34:41 +00:00
Age Manning
785a9171e6 Customisable shuffling cache size (#4081)
This PR enables the user to adjust the shuffling cache size.

This is useful for some HTTP API requests which require re-computing old shufflings. This PR currently optimizes the
beacon/states/{state_id}/committees HTTP API by first checking the cache before re-building shuffling.

If the shuffling is set to a non-default value, then the HTTP API request will also fill the cache when as it constructs new shufflings.

If the CLI flag is not present or the value is set to the default of 16 the default behaviour is observed.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-21 05:14:59 +00:00
ethDreamer
65a5eb8292 Reconstruct Payloads using Payload Bodies Methods (#4028)
## Issue Addressed

* #3895 

Co-authored-by: ethDreamer <37123614+ethDreamer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-19 23:15:59 +00:00
Paul Hauner
c3e5053612 Reduce false positive logging for late builder blocks (#4073)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

When producing a block from a builder, there are two points where we could consider the block "broadcast":

1. When the blinded block is published to the builder.
2. When the un-blinded block is published to the P2P network (this is always *after* the previous step).

Our logging for late block broadcasts was using (2) for builder-blocks, which was creating a lot of false-positive logs. This is because the builder publishes the block on the P2P network themselves before returning it to us and we perform (2). For clarity, the logs were false-positives because we claim that the block was published late by us when it was actually published earlier by the builder.

This PR changes our logging behavior so we do our logging at (1) instead. It also updates our metrics for block broadcast to distinguish between local and builder blocks. I believe the metrics change will be natively compatible with existing Grafana dashboards.

## Additional Info

One could argue that the builder *should* return the block to us faster, however that's not the case. I think it's more important that we don't desensitize users with false-positives.
2023-03-17 00:44:03 +00:00
Michael Sproul
4c2d4af6cd Make more noise when the EL is broken (#3986)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #3814, replaces #3818.

## Proposed Changes

* Add a WARN log for the case where we are attempting to sync chain segments but can't process them because they're building on an invalid parent. The most common case where we see this is when the execution node database is corrupt, causing sync to stall mysteriously (because we're currently logging the failure only at debug level).
* Additionally I've bumped up the logging for invalid execution payloads to `WARN`. This may result in some duplicate logs as we log errors from the `beacon_chain` and then again from the beacon processor. Invalid payloads and corrupt DBs _should_ be rare enough that this doesn't produce overwhelming log volume.
2023-03-17 00:44:02 +00:00
Michael Sproul
36e163c042 Add parent_block_number to payload SSE (#4053)
## Issue Addressed

In #4027 I forgot to add the `parent_block_number` to the payload attributes SSE.

## Proposed Changes

Compute the parent block number while computing the pre-payload attributes. Pass it on to the SSE stream.

## Additional Info

Not essential for v3.5.1 as I suspect most builders don't need the `parent_block_root`. I would like to use it for my dummy no-op builder however.
2023-03-14 06:26:37 +00:00
Divma
e190ebb8a0 Support for Ipv6 (#4046)
## Issue Addressed
Add support for ipv6 and dual stack in lighthouse. 

## Proposed Changes
From an user perspective, now setting an ipv6 address, optionally configuring the ports should feel exactly the same as using an ipv4 address. If listening over both ipv4 and ipv6 then the user needs to:
- use the `--listen-address` two times (ipv4 and ipv6 addresses)
- `--port6` becomes then required
- `--discovery-port6` can now be used to additionally configure the ipv6 udp port

### Rough list of code changes
- Discovery:
  - Table filter and ip mode set to match the listening config. 
  - Ipv6 address, tcp port and udp port set in the ENR builder
  - Reported addresses now check which tcp port to give to libp2p
- LH Network Service:
  - Can listen over Ipv6, Ipv4, or both. This uses two sockets. Using mapped addresses is disabled from libp2p and it's the most compatible option.
- NetworkGlobals:
  - No longer stores udp port since was not used at all. Instead, stores the Ipv4 and Ipv6 TCP ports.
- NetworkConfig:
  - Update names to make it clear that previous udp and tcp ports in ENR were Ipv4
  - Add fields to configure Ipv6 udp and tcp ports in the ENR
  - Include advertised enr Ipv6 address.
  - Add type to model Listening address that's either Ipv4, Ipv6 or both. A listening address includes the ip, udp port and tcp port.
- UPnP:
  - Kept only for ipv4
- Cli flags:
  - `--listen-addresses` now can take up to two values
  - `--port` will apply to ipv4 or ipv6 if only one listening address is given. If two listening addresses are given it will apply only to Ipv4.
  - `--port6` New flag required when listening over ipv4 and ipv6 that applies exclusively to Ipv6.
  - `--discovery-port` will now apply to ipv4 and ipv6 if only one listening address is given.
  - `--discovery-port6` New flag to configure the individual udp port of ipv6 if listening over both ipv4 and ipv6.
  - `--enr-udp-port` Updated docs to specify that it only applies to ipv4. This is an old behaviour.
  - `--enr-udp6-port` Added to configure the enr udp6 field.
  - `--enr-tcp-port` Updated docs to specify that it only applies to ipv4. This is an old behaviour.
  - `--enr-tcp6-port` Added to configure the enr tcp6 field.
  - `--enr-addresses` now can take two values.
  - `--enr-match` updated behaviour.
- Common:
  - rename `unused_port` functions to specify that they are over ipv4.
  - add functions to get unused ports over ipv6.
- Testing binaries
  - Updated code to reflect network config changes and unused_port changes.

## Additional Info

TODOs:
- use two sockets in discovery. I'll get back to this and it's on https://github.com/sigp/discv5/pull/160
- lcli allow listening over two sockets in generate_bootnodes_enr
- add at least one smoke flag for ipv6 (I have tested this and works for me)
- update the book
2023-03-14 01:13:34 +00:00
Michael Sproul
90cef1db86 Appease Clippy 1.68 and refactor http_api (#4068)
## Proposed Changes

Two tiny updates to satisfy Clippy 1.68

Plus refactoring of the `http_api` into less complex types so the compiler can chew and digest them more easily.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <michael@sigmaprime.io>
2023-03-13 01:40:03 +00:00
Alex Wied
4a1c0c96be Fix order of arguments to log_count (#4060)
See: https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/4027

## Proposed Changes

The order of the arguments to `log_count` is swapped in `beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/events.rs`.
2023-03-13 01:40:01 +00:00
Michael Sproul
01556f6f01 Optimise payload attributes calculation and add SSE (#4027)
## Issue Addressed

Closes #3896
Closes #3998
Closes #3700

## Proposed Changes

- Optimise the calculation of withdrawals for payload attributes by avoiding state clones, avoiding unnecessary state advances and reading from the snapshot cache if possible.
- Use the execution layer's payload attributes cache to avoid re-calculating payload attributes. I actually implemented a new LRU cache just for withdrawals but it had the exact same key and most of the same data as the existing payload attributes cache, so I deleted it.
- Add a new SSE event that fires when payloadAttributes are calculated. This is useful for block builders, a la https://github.com/ethereum/beacon-APIs/issues/244.
- Add a new CLI flag `--always-prepare-payload` which forces payload attributes to be sent with every fcU regardless of connected proposers. This is intended for use by builders/relays.

For maximum effect, the flags I've been using to run Lighthouse in "payload builder mode" are:

```
--always-prepare-payload \
--prepare-payload-lookahead 12000 \
--suggested-fee-recipient 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
```

The fee recipient is required so Lighthouse has something to pack in the payload attributes (it can be ignored by the builder). The lookahead causes fcU to be sent at the start of every slot rather than at 8s. As usual, fcU will also be sent after each change of head block. I think this combination is sufficient for builders to build on all viable heads. Often there will be two fcU (and two payload attributes) sent for the same slot: one sent at the start of the slot with the head from `n - 1` as the parent, and one sent after the block arrives with `n` as the parent.

Example usage of the new event stream:

```bash
curl -N "http://localhost:5052/eth/v1/events?topics=payload_attributes"
```

## Additional Info

- [x] Tests added by updating the proposer re-org tests. This has the benefit of testing the proposer re-org code paths with withdrawals too, confirming that the new changes don't interact poorly.
- [ ] Benchmarking with `blockdreamer` on devnet-7 showed promising results but I'm yet to do a comparison to `unstable`.


Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-03-05 23:43:30 +00:00
Paul Hauner
cac3a66be4 Permit a null LVH from an INVALID response to newPayload (#4037)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Proposed Changes

As discovered in #4034, Lighthouse is not accepting `latest_valid_hash == None` in an `INVALID` response to `newPayload`. The `null`/`None` response *was* illegal at one point, however it was added in https://github.com/ethereum/execution-apis/pull/254.

This PR brings Lighthouse in line with the standard and should fix the root cause of what #4034 patched around.

## Additional Info

NA
2023-03-03 04:12:50 +00:00
Divma
047c7544e3 Clean capella (#4019)
## Issue Addressed

Cleans up all the remnants of 4844 in capella. This makes sure when 4844 is reviewed there is nothing we are missing because it got included here 

## Proposed Changes

drop a bomb on every 4844 thing 

## Additional Info

Merge process I did (locally) is as follows:
- squash merge to produce one commit
- in new branch off unstable with the squashed commit create a `git revert HEAD` commit
- merge that new branch onto 4844 with `--strategy ours`
- compare local 4844 to remote 4844 and make sure the diff is empty
- enjoy

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-03-01 03:19:02 +00:00
Michael Sproul
47b22d5256 Allow compilation with no slasher backend (#3888)
## Proposed Changes

Allowing compiling without MDBX by running:

```bash
CARGO_INSTALL_EXTRA_FLAGS="--no-default-features" make
```

The reasons to do this are several:

- Save compilation time if the slasher won't be used
- Work around compilation errors in slasher backend dependencies (our pinned version of MDBX is currently not compiling on FreeBSD with certain compiler versions).

## Additional Info

When I opened this PR we were using resolver v1 which [doesn't disable default features in dependencies](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/features.html#resolver-version-2-command-line-flags), and `mdbx` is default for the `slasher` crate. Even after the resolver got changed to v2 in #3697 compiling with `--no-default-features` _still_ wasn't turning off the slasher crate's default features, so I added `default-features = false` in all the places we depend on it.

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-02-28 02:20:49 +00:00
Michael Sproul
fa8b920dd8
Merge branch 'capella' into unstable 2023-02-22 10:25:45 +11:00
Mac L
3642efe76a Cache validator balances and allow them to be served over the HTTP API (#3863)
## Issue Addressed

#3804

## Proposed Changes

- Add `total_balance` to the validator monitor and adjust the number of historical epochs which are cached. 
- Allow certain values in the cache to be served out via the HTTP API without requiring a state read.

## Usage
```
curl -X POST "http://localhost:5052/lighthouse/ui/validator_info" -d '{"indices": [0]}' -H "Content-Type: application/json" | jq
```

```
{
  "data": {
    "validators": {
      "0": {
        "info": [
          {
            "epoch": 172981,
            "total_balance": 36566388519
          },
         ...
          {
            "epoch": 172990,
            "total_balance": 36566496513
          }
        ]
      },
      "1": {
        "info": [
          {
            "epoch": 172981,
            "total_balance": 36355797968
          },
          ...
          {
            "epoch": 172990,
            "total_balance": 36355905962
          }
        ]
      }
    }
  }
}
```

## Additional Info

This requires no historical states to operate which mean it will still function on the freshly checkpoint synced node, however because of this, the values will populate each epoch (up to a maximum of 10 entries).

Another benefit of this method, is that we can easily cache any other values which would normally require a state read and serve them via the same endpoint. However, we would need be cautious about not overly increasing block processing time by caching values from complex computations.

This also caches some of the validator metrics directly, rather than pulling them from the Prometheus metrics when the API is called. This means when the validator count exceeds the individual monitor threshold, the cached values will still be available.

Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-02-21 20:54:55 +00:00
Paul Hauner
d53d43844c
Suggestions for Capella beacon_chain (#3999)
* Remove CapellaReadiness::NotSynced

Some EEs have a habit of flipping between synced/not-synced, which causes some
spurious "Not read for the merge" messages back before the merge. For the
merge, if the EE wasn't synced the CE simple wouldn't go through the transition
(due to optimistic sync stuff). However, we don't have that hard requirement
for Capella; the CE will go through the fork and just wait for the EE to catch
up. I think that removing `NotSynced` here will avoid false-positives on the
"Not ready logs..". We'll be creating other WARN/ERRO logs if the EE isn't
synced, anyway.

* Change some Capella readiness logging

There's two changes here:

1. Shorten the log messages, for readability.
2. Change the hints.

Connecting a Capella-ready LH to a non-Capella-ready EE gives this log:

```
WARN Not ready for Capella                   info: The execution endpoint does not appear to support the required engine api methods for Capella: Required Methods Unsupported: engine_getPayloadV2 engine_forkchoiceUpdatedV2 engine_newPayloadV2, service: slot_notifier
```

This variant of error doesn't get a "try updating" style hint, when it's the
one that needs it. This is because we detect the method-not-found reponse from
the EE and return default capabilities, rather than indicating that the request
fails. I think it's fair to say that an EE upgrade is required whenever it
doesn't provide the required methods.

I changed the `ExchangeCapabilitiesFailed` message since that can only happen
when the EE fails to respond with anything other than success or not-found.
2023-02-21 11:05:36 +11:00
Michael Sproul
0b6850221e
Fix Capella schema downgrades (#4004) 2023-02-20 17:50:42 +11:00
Michael Sproul
918b688f72
Simplify payload traits and reduce cloning (#3976)
* Simplify payload traits and reduce cloning

* Fix self limiter
2023-02-15 14:17:56 +11:00
Michael Sproul
f7bd4bf06e
Update block rewards API for Capella 2023-02-14 12:09:40 +11:00
Michael Sproul
18c8cab4da
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella-merge 2023-02-14 12:07:27 +11:00
Michael Sproul
2f456ff9eb Fix regression in DB write atomicity (#3931)
## Issue Addressed

Fix a bug introduced by #3696. The bug is not expected to occur frequently, so releasing this PR is non-urgent.

## Proposed Changes

* Add a variant to `StoreOp` that allows a raw KV operation to be passed around.
* Return to using `self.store.do_atomically` rather than `self.store.hot_db.do_atomically`. This streamlines the write back into a single call and makes our auto-revert work again.
* Prevent `import_block_update_shuffling_cache` from failing block import. This is an outstanding bug from before v3.4.0 which may have contributed to some random unexplained database corruption.

## Additional Info

In #3696 I split the database write into two calls, one to convert the `StoreOp`s to `KeyValueStoreOp`s and one to write them. This had the unfortunate side-effect of damaging our atomicity guarantees in case of a write error. If the first call failed, we would be left with the block in fork choice but not on-disk (or the snapshot cache), which would prevent us from processing any descendant blocks. On `unstable` the first call is very unlikely to fail unless the disk is full, but on `tree-states` the conversion is more involved and a user reported database corruption after it failed in a way that should have been recoverable.

Additionally, as @emhane observed, #3696 also inadvertently removed the import of the new block into the block cache. Although this seems like it could have negatively impacted performance, there are several mitigating factors:

- For regular block processing we should almost always load the parent block (and state) from the snapshot cache.
- We often load blinded blocks, which bypass the block cache anyway.
- Metrics show no noticeable increase in the block cache miss rate with v3.4.0.

However, I expect the block cache _will_ be useful again in `tree-states`, so it is restored to use by this PR.
2023-02-13 03:32:01 +00:00
Michael Sproul
c9354a9d25 Tweaks to reward APIs (#3957)
## Proposed Changes

* Return the effective balance in gwei to align with the spec ([ideal attestation rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards/getAttestationsRewards)).
* Use quoted `i64`s for attestation and sync committee rewards.
2023-02-10 06:19:42 +00:00
Paul Hauner
5276dd0cb0 Fix edge-case when finding the finalized descendant (#3924)
## Issue Addressed

NA

## Description

We were missing an edge case when checking to see if a block is a descendant of the finalized checkpoint. This edge case is described for one of the tests in this PR:

a119edc739/consensus/proto_array/src/proto_array_fork_choice.rs (L1018-L1047)

This bug presented itself in the following mainnet log:

```
Jan 26 15:12:42.841 ERRO Unable to validate attestation error: MissingBeaconState(0x7c30cb80ec3d4ec624133abfa70e4c6cfecfca456bfbbbff3393e14e5b20bf25), peer_id: 16Uiu2HAm8RPRciXJYtYc5c3qtCRdrZwkHn2BXN3XP1nSi1gxHYit, type: "unaggregated", slot: Slot(5660161), beacon_block_root: 0x4a45e59da7cb9487f4836c83bdd1b741b4f31c67010c7ae343fa6771b3330489
```

Here the BN is rejecting an attestation because of a "missing beacon state". Whilst it was correct to reject the attestation, it should have rejected it because it attests to a block that conflicts with finality rather than claiming that the database is inconsistent.

The block that this attestation points to (`0x4a45`) is block `C` in the above diagram. It is a non-canonical block in the first slot of an epoch that conflicts with the finalized checkpoint. Due to our lazy pruning of proto array, `0x4a45` was still present in proto-array. Our missed edge-case in [`ForkChoice::is_descendant_of_finalized`](38514c07f2/consensus/fork_choice/src/fork_choice.rs (L1375-L1379)) would have indicated to us that the block is a descendant of the finalized block. Therefore, we would have accepted the attestation thinking that it attests to a descendant of the finalized *checkpoint*.

Since we didn't have the shuffling for this erroneously processed block, we attempted to read its state from the database. This failed because we prune states from the database by keeping track of the tips of the chain and iterating back until we find a finalized block. This would have deleted `C` from the database, hence the `MissingBeaconState` error.
2023-02-09 23:51:18 +00:00
naviechan
9547ac069c Implement block_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3907)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/blocks/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": {
    "proposer_index": "123",
    "total": "123",
    "attestations": "123",
    "sync_aggregate": "123",
    "proposer_slashings": "123",
    "attester_slashings": "123"
  }
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `block_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
2023-02-07 08:33:23 +00:00
Paul Hauner
e062a7cf76
Broadcast address changes at Capella (#3919)
* Add first efforts at broadcast

* Tidy

* Move broadcast code to client

* Progress with broadcast impl

* Rename to address change

* Fix compile errors

* Use `while` loop

* Tidy

* Flip broadcast condition

* Switch to forgetting individual indices

* Always broadcast when the node starts

* Refactor into two functions

* Add testing

* Add another test

* Tidy, add more testing

* Tidy

* Add test, rename enum

* Rename enum again

* Tidy

* Break loop early

* Add V15 schema migration

* Bump schema version

* Progress with migration

* Update beacon_node/client/src/address_change_broadcast.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Fix typo in function name

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-02-07 17:13:49 +11:00
kevinbogner
4d07e40501 Implement attestation_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3822)
## Issue Addressed

#3661 

## Proposed Changes
`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/attestations/{epoch}`

```json
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "ideal_rewards": [
        {
          "effective_balance": "1000000000",
          "head": "2500",
          "target": "5000",
          "source": "5000"
        }
      ],
      "total_rewards": [
        {
          "validator_index": "0",
          "head": "2000",
          "target": "2000",
          "source": "4000",
          "inclusion_delay": "2000"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
- [`sync_committee_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3790)
- `attestation_rewards`
- `block_rewards`.

This PR *only* implements the `attestation_rewards`.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards

## Additional Info
The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

---
- [x] `get_state`
- [x] Calculate *ideal rewards* with some logic from  `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Calculate *actual rewards*  with some logic from `get_flag_index_deltas`
- [x] Code cleanup
- [x] Testing
2023-02-07 00:00:19 +00:00
ethDreamer
90b6ae62e6
Use Local Payload if More Profitable than Builder (#3934)
* Use Local Payload if More Profitable than Builder

* Rename clone -> clone_from_ref

* Minimize Clones of GetPayloadResponse

* Cleanup & Fix Tests

* Added Tests for Payload Choice by Profit

* Fix Outdated Comments
2023-02-01 19:37:46 -06:00
Mark Mackey
d842215a44
Merge branch 'upstream/unstable' into capella 2023-01-31 12:16:26 -06:00
ethDreamer
7b7595347d
exchangeCapabilities & Capella Readiness Logging (#3918)
* Undo Passing Spec to Engine API

* Utilize engine_exchangeCapabilities

* Add Logging to Indicate Capella Readiness

* Add exchangeCapabilities to mock_execution_layer

* Send Nested Array for engine_exchangeCapabilities

* Use Mutex Instead of RwLock for EngineCapabilities

* Improve Locking to Avoid Deadlock

* Prettier logic for get_engine_capabilities

* Improve Comments

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/beacon_chain/src/capella_readiness.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/client/src/notifier.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/execution_layer/src/engine_api/http.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Addressed Michael's Comments

---------

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 18:26:23 +01:00
Michael Sproul
0866b739d0 Clippy 1.67 (#3916)
## Proposed Changes

Clippy 1.67.0 put us on blast for the size of some of our errors, most of them written by me ( 👀 ). This PR shrinks the size of `BeaconChainError` by dropping some extraneous info and boxing an inner error which should only occur infrequently anyway.

For the `AttestationSlashInfo` and `BlockSlashInfo` I opted to ignore the lint as they are always used in a `Result<A, Info>` where `A` is a similar size. This means they don't bloat the size of the `Result`, so it's a bit annoying for Clippy to report this as an issue.

I also chose to ignore `clippy::uninlined-format-args` because I think the benefit-to-churn ratio is too low. E.g. sometimes we have long identifiers in `format!` args and IMO the non-inlined form is easier to read:

```rust
// I prefer this...
format!(
    "{} did {} to {}",
    REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME,
    ANOTHER_REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME,
    regular_long_identifier_name
);
  
// To this
format!("{REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME} did {ANOTHER_REALLY_LONG_CONSTANT_NAME} to {regular_long_identifier_name}");
```

I tried generating an automatic diff with `cargo clippy --fix` but it came out at:

```
250 files changed, 1209 insertions(+), 1469 deletions(-)
```

Which seems like a bad idea when we'd have to back-merge it to `capella` and `eip4844` 😱
2023-01-27 09:48:42 +00:00
Michael Sproul
e48487db01
Fix the new BLS to execution change test 2023-01-25 15:47:07 +11:00
Michael Sproul
79a20e8a5f
Update sync rewards API for abstract exec payload 2023-01-25 15:46:47 +11:00
Michael Sproul
c76a1971cc
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/unstable' into capella 2023-01-25 14:20:16 +11:00
GeemoCandama
a7351c00c0 light client optimistic update reprocessing (#3799)
## Issue Addressed
Currently there is a race between receiving blocks and receiving light client optimistic updates (in unstable), which results in processing errors. This is a continuation of PR #3693 and seeks to progress on issue #3651

## Proposed Changes

Add the parent_root to ReprocessQueueMessage::BlockImported so we can remove blocks from queue when a block arrives that has the same parent root. We use the parent root as opposed to the block_root because the LightClientOptimisticUpdate does not contain the block_root.

If light_client_optimistic_update.attested_header.canonical_root() != head_block.message().parent_root() then we queue the update. Otherwise we process immediately.
## Additional Info
michaelsproul came up with this idea.
The code was heavily based off of the attestation reprocessing.
I have not properly tested this to see if it works as intended.
2023-01-24 22:17:50 +00:00
ethDreamer
3d4dd6af75
Use eth1_withdrawal_credentials in Test States (#3898)
* Use eth1_withdrawal_credential in Some Test States

* Update beacon_node/genesis/src/interop.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Update beacon_node/genesis/src/interop.rs

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>

* Increase validator sizes

* Pick next sync committee message

Co-authored-by: Michael Sproul <micsproul@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Hauner <paul@paulhauner.com>
2023-01-24 16:22:51 +01:00
naviechan
2802bc9a9c Implement sync_committee_rewards API (per-validator reward) (#3903)
## Issue Addressed

[#3661](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/issues/3661)

## Proposed Changes

`/eth/v1/beacon/rewards/sync_committee/{block_id}`

```
{
  "execution_optimistic": false,
  "finalized": false,
  "data": [
    {
      "validator_index": "0",
      "reward": "2000"
    }
  ]
}
```

The issue contains the implementation of three per-validator reward APIs:
* `sync_committee_rewards`
* [`attestation_rewards`](https://github.com/sigp/lighthouse/pull/3822)
* `block_rewards`

This PR only implements the `sync_committe_rewards `.

The endpoints can be viewed in the Ethereum Beacon nodes API browser: [https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards](https://ethereum.github.io/beacon-APIs/?urls.primaryName=dev#/Rewards)

## Additional Info

The implementation of [consensus client reward APIs](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three/blob/master/projects/project-ideas.md#consensus-client-reward-apis) is part of the [EPF](https://github.com/eth-protocol-fellows/cohort-three).

Co-authored-by: navie <naviechan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: kevinbogner <kevbogner@gmail.com>
2023-01-24 02:06:42 +00:00
Michael Sproul
d8abf2fc41
Import BLS to execution changes before Capella (#3892)
* Import BLS to execution changes before Capella

* Test for BLS to execution change HTTP API

* Pack BLS to execution changes in LIFO order

* Remove unused var

* Clippy
2023-01-21 10:39:59 +11:00