renaming from ethermint to laconic #69
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
bug
C:CLI
C:Crypto
C:Encoding
C:Proto
C:Types
dependencies
docker
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
go
good first issue
help wanted
high priority
in progress
invalid
javascript
low priority
medium priority
question
Status: Stale
Type: ADR
Type: Build
Type: CI
Type: Docs
Type: Tests
urgent
wontfix
Copied from Github
Kind/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: cerc-io/laconicd-deprecated#69
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "murali/minor-changes"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Changing variable names, chain id, import names etc from ethermint to laconic/laconicd.
For contributor use:
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
)godoc
comments.Unreleased
section inCHANGELOG.md
Files changed
in the Github PR explorerFor admin use:
WIP
,R4R
,docs
, etc)Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files
12.92% <0.00%> (ø)
23.07% <0.00%> (ø)
0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
10.05% <0.00%> (ø)
0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
71.85% <0.00%> (ø)
87.02% <39.13%> (ø)
53.57% <50.00%> (ø)
Hey still seeing a fair number of instances of "ethermint" spread throughout, e.g. https://github.com/cerc-io/laconicd/blob/murali/minor-changes/app/ante/eip712.go#L29, https://github.com/cerc-io/laconicd/blob/main/.github/workflows/lint.yml#L2. I think the only place it makes sense to continue with their naming convention is for the CHANGELOG, the proto/etheremint types and all references to them, or anywhere where we do import a pkg from upstream ethermint (nowhere, currently).
Laconicd has five modules, 3 of those are our own and two are forked from ethermint. Besides the modules, the majority of the files in this repo (and in ethermint's) are the standard boilerplate forked and modified from cosmos-sdk. There is no reason to avoid rebranding those files. Now that we are using a stock version of the SDK (not using our SMT fork any longer), we could potentially use the upstream ethermint
x/evm
andx/feemarket
modules but this requires some further discussion as it is entirely possible we will need to diverge again (and it has both negative and positive ramifications on maintenance).For ease of syncing up with the fork (evmos/ethermint), decided on only changing the chainID. https://github.com/cerc-io/laconicd/pull/73
Pull request closed