This PR enhances eth_createAccessList RPC call to support scenarios where the node is launched with an unlimited gas cap (--rpc.gascap 0). The eth_createAccessList RPC call returns failure if user doesn't explicitly set a gas limit.
This change adds support for blob-transaction in certain API-endpoints, e.g. eth_fillTransaction. A follow-up PR will add support for signing such transactions.
EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash.
However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary:
- `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes
- `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes
The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary:
- `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes
- `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired.
- `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages
- `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
Given the discussions around deprecating pending (see #28623 or ethereum/execution-apis#495), we can move away from using the pending block internally, and use latest instead
Here, the core.Message interface turns into a plain struct and
types.Message gets removed.
This is a breaking change to packages core and core/types. While we do
not promise API stability for package core, we do for core/types. An
exception can be made for types.Message, since it doesn't have any
purpose apart from invoking the state transition in package core.
types.Message was also marked deprecated by the same commit it
got added in, 4dca5d4db7 (November 2016).
The core.Message interface was added in December 2014, in commit
db494170dc, for the purpose of 'testing' state transitions. It's the
same change that made transaction struct fields private. Before that,
the state transition used *types.Transaction directly.
Over time, multiple implementations of the interface accrued across
different packages, since constructing a Message is required whenever
one wants to invoke the state transition. These implementations all
looked very similar, a struct with private fields exposing the fields
as accessor methods.
By changing Message into a struct with public fields we can remove all
these useless interface implementations. It will also hopefully
simplify future changes to the type with less updates to apply across
all of go-ethereum when a field is added to Message.
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
* internal/ethapi: error if tx args includes chain id that doesn't match local
* internal/ethapi: simplify code a bit
Co-authored-by: Péter Szilágyi <peterke@gmail.com>
Currently, setDefaults overwrites the transaction input value if only input is provided. This causes personal_sendTransaction to estimate the gas based on a transaction with empty data. eth_estimateGas never calls setDefaults so it was unaffected by this.
Ticket #23273 found a flaw where we were unable to sign legacy-transactions
using the external signer, even if we're still on non-london network. That's
fixed in this PR.
Additionally, I found that even when supplying all parameters, it was impossible
to sign a london-transaction on an unsynched node. It's a pretty common usecase
that someone wants to sign a transaction using an unsynced 'vanilla' node,
providing all necessary data. Our setDefaults, however, insisted on checking the
current block against the config. This PR therefore adds a case, so that if both
MaxPriorityFeePerGas and MaxFeePerGas are provided, we accept them as given.
OBS This PR fixes a regression -- on current master, we are unable to sign a
london-transaction unless the node is synched, which may break scenarios where
geth (or clef) is used as a cold wallet.
Fixes#23273
* internal/ethapi: add baseFee to RPCMarshalHeader
* internal/ethapi: add FeeCap, Tip and correct GasPrice to EIP-1559 RPCTransaction results
* core,eth,les,internal: add support for tip estimation in gas price oracle
* internal/ethapi,eth/gasprice: don't suggest tip larger than fee cap
* core/types,internal: use correct eip1559 terminology for json marshalling
* eth, internal/ethapi: fix rebase problems
* internal/ethapi: fix rpc name of basefee
* internal/ethapi: address review concerns
* core, eth, internal, les: simplify gasprice oracle (#25)
* core, eth, internal, les: simplify gasprice oracle
* eth/gasprice: fix typo
* internal/ethapi: minor tweak in tx args
* internal/ethapi: calculate basefee for pending block
* internal/ethapi: fix panic
* internal/ethapi, eth/tracers: simplify txargs ToMessage
* internal/ethapi: remove unused param
* core, eth, internal: fix regressions wrt effective gas price in the evm
* eth/gasprice: drop weird debug println
* internal/jsre/deps: hack in 1559 gas conversions into embedded web3
* internal/jsre/deps: hack basFee to decimal conversion
* internal/ethapi: init feecap and tipcap for legacy txs too
* eth, graphql, internal, les: fix gas price suggestion on all combos
* internal/jsre/deps: handle decimal tipcap and feecap
* eth, internal: minor review fixes
* graphql, internal: export max fee cap RPC endpoint
* internal/ethapi: fix crash in transaction_args
* internal/ethapi: minor refactor to make the code safer
Co-authored-by: Ryan Schneider <ryanleeschneider@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lightclient@protonmail.com <lightclient@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: gary rong <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Péter Szilágyi <peterke@gmail.com>
There are two transaction parameter structures defined in
the codebase, although for different purposes. But most of
the parameters are shared. So it's nice to reduce the code
duplication by merging them together.
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
