eth/downloader: minor comments cleanup (#15495)

it's -> its

pet peeve, and I like to imagine I'm not alone.
This commit is contained in:
jtakalai 2017-11-16 13:14:51 +02:00 committed by Péter Szilágyi
parent bb57f1f1e5
commit 5aa3eac22d

View File

@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ func (d *Downloader) Synchronise(id string, head common.Hash, td *big.Int, mode
}
// synchronise will select the peer and use it for synchronising. If an empty string is given
// it will use the best peer possible and synchronize if it's TD is higher than our own. If any of the
// it will use the best peer possible and synchronize if its TD is higher than our own. If any of the
// checks fail an error will be returned. This method is synchronous
func (d *Downloader) synchronise(id string, hash common.Hash, td *big.Int, mode SyncMode) error {
// Mock out the synchronisation if testing
@ -1003,8 +1003,8 @@ func (d *Downloader) fetchParts(errCancel error, deliveryCh chan dataPack, deliv
return errCancel
case packet := <-deliveryCh:
// If the peer was previously banned and failed to deliver it's pack
// in a reasonable time frame, ignore it's message.
// If the peer was previously banned and failed to deliver its pack
// in a reasonable time frame, ignore its message.
if peer := d.peers.Peer(packet.PeerId()); peer != nil {
// Deliver the received chunk of data and check chain validity
accepted, err := deliver(packet)
@ -1205,8 +1205,8 @@ func (d *Downloader) processHeaders(origin uint64, td *big.Int) error {
case <-d.cancelCh:
}
}
// If no headers were retrieved at all, the peer violated it's TD promise that it had a
// better chain compared to ours. The only exception is if it's promised blocks were
// If no headers were retrieved at all, the peer violated its TD promise that it had a
// better chain compared to ours. The only exception is if its promised blocks were
// already imported by other means (e.g. fecher):
//
// R <remote peer>, L <local node>: Both at block 10