roysc/plugeth
1
0
Fork 0
forked from cerc-io/plugeth
Code Pull Requests Activity
ac5aa672d3
plugeth/internal/ethapi/testdata/eth_getHeaderByHash-hash-0.json

20 lines
1.4 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 00:53:29 +00:00
{
"baseFeePerGas": "0x3b9aca00",
"difficulty": "0x20000",
"extraData": "0x",
"gasLimit": "0x47e7c4",
"gasUsed": "0x0",
internal/ethapi: handle blobs in API methods (#28786) EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash. However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary: - `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes - `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary: - `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes - `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired. - `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages - `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
2024-01-17 14:06:14 +00:00
"hash": "0x98e056de84de969782b238b4509b32814627ba443ea622054a79c2bc7e4d92c7",
internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 00:53:29 +00:00
"logsBloom": "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"miner": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"mixHash": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"nonce": "0x0000000000000000",
"number": "0x0",
"parentHash": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"receiptsRoot": "0x56e81f171bcc55a6ff8345e692c0f86e5b48e01b996cadc001622fb5e363b421",
"sha3Uncles": "0x1dcc4de8dec75d7aab85b567b6ccd41ad312451b948a7413f0a142fd40d49347",
internal/ethapi: handle blobs in API methods (#28786) EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash. However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary: - `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes - `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary: - `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes - `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired. - `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages - `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
2024-01-17 14:06:14 +00:00
"stateRoot": "0xd883f48b83cc9c1e8389453beb4ad4e572462eec049ca4fffbe16ecefb3fe937",
internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 00:53:29 +00:00
"timestamp": "0x0",
"totalDifficulty": "0x1",
"transactionsRoot": "0x56e81f171bcc55a6ff8345e692c0f86e5b48e01b996cadc001622fb5e363b421"
}
Copy Permalink