K8s Add proper namespace support #982

Open
opened 2026-01-27 01:49:59 +00:00 by zramsay · 1 comment
Member

tagging @srw for more details

tagging @srw for more details
Owner

Essentially right now everything deploys into the default namespace. This is bad for several reasons.

At the very least SO should use a default dedicated namespace such as laconic with the ability to override it per deployment.

Further the web deployer also places everything in the default namespace, prob the initial fix here is to have the web deployer use a different default namespace laconic-apps and again with some ability to override per deployment/user namespaces.

The per user namespace is prob a heavier lift so we should implement the dedicated default namespaces first.

this is related to #992

Essentially right now everything deploys into the default namespace. This is bad for several reasons. At the very least SO should use a default dedicated namespace such as _laconic_ with the ability to override it per deployment. Further the web deployer also places everything in the default namespace, prob the initial fix here is to have the web deployer use a different default namespace _laconic-apps_ and again with some ability to override per deployment/user namespaces. The per user namespace is prob a heavier lift so we should implement the dedicated default namespaces first. this is related to https://git.vdb.to/cerc-io/stack-orchestrator/issues/992
srw added the
Priority
Critical
label 2026-02-18 18:54:00 +00:00
srw changed title from add proper namespacing to registry-driven k8s deployments to K8s Add proper namespace support 2026-02-18 18:56:24 +00:00
srw added the
K8s
label 2026-02-18 19:03:56 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: cerc-io/stack-orchestrator#982
No description provided.