mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
192 lines
6.9 KiB
ReStructuredText
192 lines
6.9 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. index:: voting, ballot
|
|
|
|
.. _voting:
|
|
|
|
******
|
|
Voting
|
|
******
|
|
|
|
The following contract is quite complex, but showcases
|
|
a lot of Solidity's features. It implements a voting
|
|
contract. Of course, the main problems of electronic
|
|
voting is how to assign voting rights to the correct
|
|
persons and how to prevent manipulation. We will not
|
|
solve all problems here, but at least we will show
|
|
how delegated voting can be done so that vote counting
|
|
is **automatic and completely transparent** at the
|
|
same time.
|
|
|
|
The idea is to create one contract per ballot,
|
|
providing a short name for each option.
|
|
Then the creator of the contract who serves as
|
|
chairperson will give the right to vote to each
|
|
address individually.
|
|
|
|
The persons behind the addresses can then choose
|
|
to either vote themselves or to delegate their
|
|
vote to a person they trust.
|
|
|
|
At the end of the voting time, ``winningProposal()``
|
|
will return the proposal with the largest number
|
|
of votes.
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
|
|
pragma solidity >=0.7.0 <0.9.0;
|
|
/// @title Voting with delegation.
|
|
contract Ballot {
|
|
// This declares a new complex type which will
|
|
// be used for variables later.
|
|
// It will represent a single voter.
|
|
struct Voter {
|
|
uint weight; // weight is accumulated by delegation
|
|
bool voted; // if true, that person already voted
|
|
address delegate; // person delegated to
|
|
uint vote; // index of the voted proposal
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This is a type for a single proposal.
|
|
struct Proposal {
|
|
bytes32 name; // short name (up to 32 bytes)
|
|
uint voteCount; // number of accumulated votes
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
address public chairperson;
|
|
|
|
// This declares a state variable that
|
|
// stores a `Voter` struct for each possible address.
|
|
mapping(address => Voter) public voters;
|
|
|
|
// A dynamically-sized array of `Proposal` structs.
|
|
Proposal[] public proposals;
|
|
|
|
/// Create a new ballot to choose one of `proposalNames`.
|
|
constructor(bytes32[] memory proposalNames) {
|
|
chairperson = msg.sender;
|
|
voters[chairperson].weight = 1;
|
|
|
|
// For each of the provided proposal names,
|
|
// create a new proposal object and add it
|
|
// to the end of the array.
|
|
for (uint i = 0; i < proposalNames.length; i++) {
|
|
// `Proposal({...})` creates a temporary
|
|
// Proposal object and `proposals.push(...)`
|
|
// appends it to the end of `proposals`.
|
|
proposals.push(Proposal({
|
|
name: proposalNames[i],
|
|
voteCount: 0
|
|
}));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Give `voter` the right to vote on this ballot.
|
|
// May only be called by `chairperson`.
|
|
function giveRightToVote(address voter) public {
|
|
// If the first argument of `require` evaluates
|
|
// to `false`, execution terminates and all
|
|
// changes to the state and to Ether balances
|
|
// are reverted.
|
|
// This used to consume all gas in old EVM versions, but
|
|
// not anymore.
|
|
// It is often a good idea to use `require` to check if
|
|
// functions are called correctly.
|
|
// As a second argument, you can also provide an
|
|
// explanation about what went wrong.
|
|
require(
|
|
msg.sender == chairperson,
|
|
"Only chairperson can give right to vote."
|
|
);
|
|
require(
|
|
!voters[voter].voted,
|
|
"The voter already voted."
|
|
);
|
|
require(voters[voter].weight == 0);
|
|
voters[voter].weight = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Delegate your vote to the voter `to`.
|
|
function delegate(address to) public {
|
|
// assigns reference
|
|
Voter storage sender = voters[msg.sender];
|
|
require(!sender.voted, "You already voted.");
|
|
|
|
require(to != msg.sender, "Self-delegation is disallowed.");
|
|
|
|
// Forward the delegation as long as
|
|
// `to` also delegated.
|
|
// In general, such loops are very dangerous,
|
|
// because if they run too long, they might
|
|
// need more gas than is available in a block.
|
|
// In this case, the delegation will not be executed,
|
|
// but in other situations, such loops might
|
|
// cause a contract to get "stuck" completely.
|
|
while (voters[to].delegate != address(0)) {
|
|
to = voters[to].delegate;
|
|
|
|
// We found a loop in the delegation, not allowed.
|
|
require(to != msg.sender, "Found loop in delegation.");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Since `sender` is a reference, this
|
|
// modifies `voters[msg.sender].voted`
|
|
sender.voted = true;
|
|
sender.delegate = to;
|
|
Voter storage delegate_ = voters[to];
|
|
if (delegate_.voted) {
|
|
// If the delegate already voted,
|
|
// directly add to the number of votes
|
|
proposals[delegate_.vote].voteCount += sender.weight;
|
|
} else {
|
|
// If the delegate did not vote yet,
|
|
// add to her weight.
|
|
delegate_.weight += sender.weight;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// Give your vote (including votes delegated to you)
|
|
/// to proposal `proposals[proposal].name`.
|
|
function vote(uint proposal) public {
|
|
Voter storage sender = voters[msg.sender];
|
|
require(sender.weight != 0, "Has no right to vote");
|
|
require(!sender.voted, "Already voted.");
|
|
sender.voted = true;
|
|
sender.vote = proposal;
|
|
|
|
// If `proposal` is out of the range of the array,
|
|
// this will throw automatically and revert all
|
|
// changes.
|
|
proposals[proposal].voteCount += sender.weight;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/// @dev Computes the winning proposal taking all
|
|
/// previous votes into account.
|
|
function winningProposal() public view
|
|
returns (uint winningProposal_)
|
|
{
|
|
uint winningVoteCount = 0;
|
|
for (uint p = 0; p < proposals.length; p++) {
|
|
if (proposals[p].voteCount > winningVoteCount) {
|
|
winningVoteCount = proposals[p].voteCount;
|
|
winningProposal_ = p;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Calls winningProposal() function to get the index
|
|
// of the winner contained in the proposals array and then
|
|
// returns the name of the winner
|
|
function winnerName() public view
|
|
returns (bytes32 winnerName_)
|
|
{
|
|
winnerName_ = proposals[winningProposal()].name;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Possible Improvements
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
Currently, many transactions are needed to assign the rights
|
|
to vote to all participants. Can you think of a better way?
|