solidity/test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/external_calls/external_call_indirect_2.sol
2023-03-09 14:59:32 +01:00

54 lines
1.6 KiB
Solidity

contract A {
uint x;
address immutable owner;
constructor() {
owner = msg.sender;
}
function setX(uint _x) public {
require(msg.sender == owner);
x = _x;
}
function getX() public view returns (uint) {
return x;
}
}
contract B {
A a;
constructor() {
a = new A();
assert(a.getX() == 0); // should hold
}
function g() public view {
assert(a.getX() == 0); // should hold, but fails because
// the nondet_interface constraint added for `A a` in between
// txs of `B` does not have the constraint that `msg.sender != address(this)`
// so `A.setX` is allowed with `msg.sender = address(this)` inside
// the current rules defining nondet_interface.
// If we want to support that, we likely need a new type of nondet_interface
// `nondet_interface_with_tx` that contains tx data as well as restricts
// every further `nondet_interface_with_tx` to not have that `msg.sender`.
}
function getX() public view returns (uint) {
return a.getX();
}
}
contract C {
B b;
constructor() {
b = new B();
assert(b.getX() == 0); // should hold
}
function f() public view {
assert(b.getX() == 0); // should hold
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: chc
// SMTExtCalls: trusted
// ----
// Warning 6328: (434-455): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Warning 6328: (1270-1291): CHC: Assertion violation might happen here.
// Info 1391: CHC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.