solidity/libyul/optimiser/RedundantAssignEliminator.h
2021-08-13 14:25:14 +02:00

144 lines
5.4 KiB
C++

/*
This file is part of solidity.
solidity is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
solidity is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with solidity. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
/**
* Optimiser component that removes assignments to variables that are not used
* until they go out of scope or are re-assigned.
*/
#pragma once
#include <libyul/ASTForward.h>
#include <libyul/optimiser/ASTWalker.h>
#include <libyul/optimiser/OptimiserStep.h>
#include <libyul/optimiser/RedundantStoreBase.h>
#include <map>
#include <vector>
namespace solidity::yul
{
struct Dialect;
/**
* Optimiser component that removes assignments to variables that are not used
* until they go out of scope or are re-assigned. This component
* respects the control-flow and takes it into account for removal.
*
* Example:
*
* {
* let a
* a := 1
* a := 2
* b := 2
* if calldataload(0)
* {
* b := mload(a)
* }
* a := b
* }
*
* In the example, "a := 1" can be removed because the value from this assignment
* is not used in any control-flow branch (it is replaced right away).
* The assignment "a := 2" is also overwritten by "a := b" at the end,
* but there is a control-flow path (through the condition body) which uses
* the value from "a := 2" and thus, this assignment cannot be removed.
*
* Detailed rules:
*
* The AST is traversed twice: in an information gathering step and in the
* actual removal step. During information gathering, we maintain a
* mapping from assignment statements to the three states
* "unused", "undecided" and "used".
* When an assignment is visited, it is added to the mapping in the "undecided" state
* (see remark about for loops below) and every other assignment to the same variable
* that is still in the "undecided" state is changed to "unused".
* When a variable is referenced, the state of any assignment to that variable still
* in the "undecided" state is changed to "used".
* At points where control flow splits, a copy
* of the mapping is handed over to each branch. At points where control flow
* joins, the two mappings coming from the two branches are combined in the following way:
* Statements that are only in one mapping or have the same state are used unchanged.
* Conflicting values are resolved in the following way:
* "unused", "undecided" -> "undecided"
* "unused", "used" -> "used"
* "undecided, "used" -> "used".
*
* For for-loops, the condition, body and post-part are visited twice, taking
* the joining control-flow at the condition into account.
* In other words, we create three control flow paths: Zero runs of the loop,
* one run and two runs and then combine them at the end.
* Running at most twice is enough because there are only three different states.
*
* Since this algorithm has exponential runtime in the nesting depth of for loops,
* a shortcut is taken at a certain nesting level: We only use the zero- and
* once-run of the for loop and change any assignment that was newly introduced
* in the for loop from to "used".
*
* For switch statements that have a "default"-case, there is no control-flow
* part that skips the switch.
*
* At ``leave`` statements, all return variables are set to "used".
*
* When a variable goes out of scope, all statements still in the "undecided"
* state are changed to "unused", unless the variable is the return
* parameter of a function - there, the state changes to "used".
*
* In the second traversal, all assignments that are in the "unused" state are removed.
*
*
* This step is usually run right after the SSA transform to complete
* the generation of the pseudo-SSA.
*
* Prerequisite: Disambiguator, ForLoopInitRewriter.
*/
class RedundantAssignEliminator: public RedundantStoreBase
{
public:
static constexpr char const* name{"RedundantAssignEliminator"};
static void run(OptimiserStepContext&, Block& _ast);
explicit RedundantAssignEliminator(Dialect const& _dialect): RedundantStoreBase(_dialect) {}
void operator()(Identifier const& _identifier) override;
void operator()(VariableDeclaration const& _variableDeclaration) override;
void operator()(Assignment const& _assignment) override;
void operator()(FunctionDefinition const&) override;
void operator()(Leave const&) override;
void operator()(Block const& _block) override;
using RedundantStoreBase::visit;
void visit(Statement const& _statement) override;
private:
void shortcutNestedLoop(TrackedStores const& _beforeLoop) override;
void finalizeFunctionDefinition(FunctionDefinition const& _functionDefinition) override;
void changeUndecidedTo(YulString _variable, State _newState);
/// Called when a variable goes out of scope. Sets the state of all still undecided
/// assignments to the final state. In this case, this also applies to pending
/// break and continue TrackedStores.
void finalize(YulString _variable, State _finalState);
std::set<YulString> m_declaredVariables;
std::set<YulString> m_returnVariables;
};
}