Add optional bounds to unroll loops in BMC model checker

Changelog.md

@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Compiler Features:
  * NatSpec: Include NatSpec from events that are emitted by a contract but defined outside of it in userdoc and devdoc output.
  * Optimizer: Re-implement simplified version of ``UnusedAssignEliminator`` and ``UnusedStoreEliminator``. It can correctly remove some unused assignments in deeply nested loops that were ignored by the old version.
  * Parser: Unary plus is no longer recognized as a unary operator in the AST and triggers an error at the parsing stage (rather than later during the analysis).
+ * SMTChecker: Add CLI option ``--model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations`` and a JSON option ``settings.modelChecker.bmcLoopIterations`` that specify how many loop iterations the BMC engine should unroll. Note that false negatives are possible when unrolling loops. This is due to the possibility that bmc loop iteration setting is less than actual number of iterations needed to complete a loop.
  * SMTChecker: Group all messages about unsupported language features in a single warning. The CLI option ``--model-checker-show-unsupported`` and the JSON option ``settings.modelChecker.showUnsupported`` can be enabled to show the full list.
  * SMTChecker: Properties that are proved safe are now reported explicitly at the end of analysis. By default, only the number of safe properties is shown. The CLI option ``--model-checker-show-proved-safe`` and the JSON option ``settings.modelChecker.showProvedSafe`` can be enabled to show the full list of safe properties.
  * Standard JSON Interface: Add experimental support for importing ASTs via Standard JSON.

libsolidity/formal/BMC.cpp

@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
 
 #include <libsolidity/formal/BMC.h>
 
-#include <libsolidity/formal/ModelChecker.h>
 #include <libsolidity/formal/SymbolicTypes.h>
 
 #include <libsmtutil/SMTPortfolio.h>
@@ -26,6 +25,8 @@
 #include <liblangutil/CharStream.h>
 #include <liblangutil/CharStreamProvider.h>
 
+#include <utility>
+
 #ifdef HAVE_Z3_DLOPEN
 #include <z3_version.h>
 #endif
@@ -245,7 +246,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(IfStatement const& _node)
 
 	// We ignore called functions here because they have
 	// specific input values.
-	if (isRootFunction())
+	if (isRootFunction() && !isInsideLoop())
 		addVerificationTarget(
 			VerificationTargetType::ConstantCondition,
 			expr(_node.condition()),
@@ -280,7 +281,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(Conditional const& _op)
 	m_context.pushSolver();
 	_op.condition().accept(*this);
 
-	if (isRootFunction())
+	if (isRootFunction() && !isInsideLoop())
 		addVerificationTarget(
 			VerificationTargetType::ConstantCondition,
 			expr(_op.condition()),
@@ -294,109 +295,172 @@ bool BMC::visit(Conditional const& _op)
 	return false;
 }
 
-// Here we consider the execution of two branches:
+// Unrolls while or do-while loop
-// Branch 1 assumes the loop condition to be true and executes the loop once,
-// after resetting touched variables.
-// Branch 2 assumes the loop condition to be false and skips the loop after
-// visiting the condition (it might contain side-effects, they need to be considered)
-// and does not erase knowledge.
-// If the loop is a do-while, condition side-effects are lost since the body,
-// executed once before the condition, might reassign variables.
-// Variables touched by the loop are merged with Branch 2.
 bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
 {
-	auto indicesBeforeLoop = copyVariableIndices();
+	unsigned int bmcLoopIterations = m_settings.bmcLoopIterations.value_or(1);
-	m_context.resetVariables(touchedVariables(_node));
+	smtutil::Expression broke(false);
-	decltype(indicesBeforeLoop) indicesAfterLoop;
+	smtutil::Expression loopCondition(true);
 	if (_node.isDoWhile())
 	{
-		indicesAfterLoop = visitBranch(&_node.body()).first;
+		for (unsigned int i = 0; i < bmcLoopIterations; ++i)
-		// TODO the assertions generated in the body should still be active in the condition
+		{
-		_node.condition().accept(*this);
+			m_loopCheckpoints.emplace();
-		if (isRootFunction())
+
-			addVerificationTarget(
+			auto indicesBefore = copyVariableIndices();
-				VerificationTargetType::ConstantCondition,
+			_node.body().accept(*this);
-				expr(_node.condition()),
+
-				&_node.condition()
+			auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] =	mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
-			);
+
-	}
+			auto indicesBreak = copyVariableIndices();
-	else
+			_node.condition().accept(*this);
-	{
+			mergeVariables(
-		_node.condition().accept(*this);
+				!brokeInCurrentIteration,
-		if (isRootFunction())
+				copyVariableIndices(),
-			addVerificationTarget(
+				indicesBreak
-				VerificationTargetType::ConstantCondition,
-				expr(_node.condition()),
-				&_node.condition()
 			);
 
-		indicesAfterLoop = visitBranch(&_node.body(), expr(_node.condition())).first;
+			mergeVariables(
+				broke || !loopCondition,
+				indicesBefore,
+				copyVariableIndices()
+			);
+			loopCondition = expr(_node.condition());
+			broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
+			m_loopCheckpoints.pop();
+		}
 	}
+	else {
+		smtutil::Expression loopConditionOnPreviousIteration(true);
+		for (unsigned int i = 0; i < bmcLoopIterations; ++i)
+		{
+			m_loopCheckpoints.emplace();
+			auto indicesBefore = copyVariableIndices();
+			_node.condition().accept(*this);
+			loopCondition = expr(_node.condition());
 
-	// We reset the execution to before the loop
+			auto indicesAfterCondition = copyVariableIndices();
-	// and visit the condition in case it's not a do-while.
-	// A do-while's body might have non-precise information
-	// in its first run about variables that are touched.
-	resetVariableIndices(indicesBeforeLoop);
-	if (!_node.isDoWhile())
-		_node.condition().accept(*this);
 
-	mergeVariables(expr(_node.condition()), indicesAfterLoop, copyVariableIndices());
+			pushPathCondition(loopCondition);
+			_node.body().accept(*this);
+			popPathCondition();
 
+			auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] =	mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
+
+			// merges indices modified when accepting loop condition that no longer holds
+			mergeVariables(
+				!loopCondition,
+				indicesAfterCondition,
+				copyVariableIndices()
+			);
+
+			// handles breaks in previous iterations
+			// breaks in current iterations are handled when traversing loop checkpoints
+			// handles case when the loop condition no longer holds but bmc loop iterations still unrolls the loop
+			mergeVariables(
+				broke || !loopConditionOnPreviousIteration,
+				indicesBefore,
+				copyVariableIndices()
+			);
+			m_loopCheckpoints.pop();
+			broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
+			loopConditionOnPreviousIteration = loopCondition;
+		}
+	}
+	if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
+		m_context.addAssertion(not(loopCondition) || broke);
 	m_loopExecutionHappened = true;
 	return false;
 }
 
-// Here we consider the execution of two branches similar to WhileStatement.
+// Unrolls for loop
 bool BMC::visit(ForStatement const& _node)
 {
 	if (_node.initializationExpression())
 		_node.initializationExpression()->accept(*this);
 
-	auto indicesBeforeLoop = copyVariableIndices();
+	smtutil::Expression broke(false);
-
+	smtutil::Expression forCondition(true);
-	// Do not reset the init expression part.
+	smtutil::Expression forConditionOnPreviousIteration(true);
-	auto touchedVars = touchedVariables(_node.body());
+	unsigned int bmcLoopIterations = m_settings.bmcLoopIterations.value_or(1);
-	if (_node.condition())
+	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < bmcLoopIterations; ++i)
-		touchedVars += touchedVariables(*_node.condition());
-	if (_node.loopExpression())
-		touchedVars += touchedVariables(*_node.loopExpression());
-
-	m_context.resetVariables(touchedVars);
-
-	if (_node.condition())
 	{
-		_node.condition()->accept(*this);
+		auto indicesBefore = copyVariableIndices();
-		if (isRootFunction())
+		if (_node.condition())
-			addVerificationTarget(
+		{
-				VerificationTargetType::ConstantCondition,
+			_node.condition()->accept(*this);
-				expr(*_node.condition()),
+			// values in loop condition might change during loop iteration
-				_node.condition()
+			forCondition = expr(*_node.condition());
+		}
+		m_loopCheckpoints.emplace();
+		auto indicesAfterCondition = copyVariableIndices();
+
+		pushPathCondition(forCondition);
+		_node.body().accept(*this);
+
+		auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] =	mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
+
+		// accept loop expression if there was no break
+		if (_node.loopExpression())
+		{
+			auto indicesBreak = copyVariableIndices();
+			_node.loopExpression()->accept(*this);
+			mergeVariables(
+				!brokeInCurrentIteration,
+				copyVariableIndices(),
+				indicesBreak
 			);
+		}
+		popPathCondition();
+
+		// merges indices modified when accepting loop condition that does no longer hold
+		mergeVariables(
+			!forCondition,
+			indicesAfterCondition,
+			copyVariableIndices()
+		);
+
+		// handles breaks in previous iterations
+		// breaks in current iterations are handled when traversing loop checkpoints
+		// handles case when the loop condition no longer holds but bmc loop iterations still unrolls the loop
+		mergeVariables(
+			broke || !forConditionOnPreviousIteration,
+			indicesBefore,
+			copyVariableIndices()
+		);
+		m_loopCheckpoints.pop();
+		broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
+		forConditionOnPreviousIteration = forCondition;
 	}
-
+	if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
-	m_context.pushSolver();
+		m_context.addAssertion(not(forCondition) || broke);
-	if (_node.condition())
-		m_context.addAssertion(expr(*_node.condition()));
-	_node.body().accept(*this);
-	if (_node.loopExpression())
-		_node.loopExpression()->accept(*this);
-	m_context.popSolver();
-
-	auto indicesAfterLoop = copyVariableIndices();
-	// We reset the execution to before the loop
-	// and visit the condition.
-	resetVariableIndices(indicesBeforeLoop);
-	if (_node.condition())
-		_node.condition()->accept(*this);
-
-	auto forCondition = _node.condition() ? expr(*_node.condition()) : smtutil::Expression(true);
-	mergeVariables(forCondition, indicesAfterLoop, copyVariableIndices());
-
 	m_loopExecutionHappened = true;
 	return false;
 }
 
+std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints()
+{
+	smtutil::Expression continues(false);
+	smtutil::Expression brokeInCurrentIteration(false);
+	for (auto const& loopControl: m_loopCheckpoints.top())
+	{
+		// use SSAs associated with this break statement only if
+		// loop didn't break or continue earlier in the iteration
+		// loop condition is included in break path conditions
+		mergeVariables(
+			!brokeInCurrentIteration && !continues && loopControl.pathConditions,
+			loopControl.variableIndices,
+			copyVariableIndices()
+		);
+		if (loopControl.kind == LoopControlKind::Break)
+			brokeInCurrentIteration =
+				brokeInCurrentIteration || loopControl.pathConditions;
+		else if (loopControl.kind == LoopControlKind::Continue)
+			continues = continues || loopControl.pathConditions;
+	}
+	return std::pair(continues, brokeInCurrentIteration);
+}
+
 bool BMC::visit(TryStatement const& _tryStatement)
 {
 	FunctionCall const* externalCall = dynamic_cast<FunctionCall const*>(&_tryStatement.externalCall());
@@ -428,6 +492,28 @@ bool BMC::visit(TryStatement const& _tryStatement)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool BMC::visit(Break const&)
+{
+	LoopControl control = {
+		LoopControlKind::Break,
+		currentPathConditions(),
+		copyVariableIndices()
+	};
+	m_loopCheckpoints.top().emplace_back(control);
+	return false;
+}
+
+bool BMC::visit(Continue const&)
+{
+	LoopControl control = {
+		LoopControlKind::Continue,
+		currentPathConditions(),
+		copyVariableIndices()
+	};
+	m_loopCheckpoints.top().emplace_back(control);
+	return false;
+}
+
 void BMC::endVisit(UnaryOperation const& _op)
 {
 	SMTEncoder::endVisit(_op);
@@ -535,7 +621,7 @@ void BMC::visitRequire(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
 	auto const& args = _funCall.arguments();
 	solAssert(args.size() >= 1, "");
 	solAssert(args.front()->annotation().type->category() == Type::Category::Bool, "");
-	if (isRootFunction())
+	if (isRootFunction() && !isInsideLoop())
 		addVerificationTarget(
 			VerificationTargetType::ConstantCondition,
 			expr(*args.front()),
@@ -960,7 +1046,7 @@ void BMC::checkCondition(
 	vector<smtutil::Expression> expressionsToEvaluate;
 	vector<string> expressionNames;
 	tie(expressionsToEvaluate, expressionNames) = _modelExpressions;
-	if (_callStack.size())
+	if (!_callStack.empty())
 		if (_additionalValue)
 		{
 			expressionsToEvaluate.emplace_back(*_additionalValue);
@@ -973,8 +1059,9 @@ void BMC::checkCondition(
 	string extraComment = SMTEncoder::extraComment();
 	if (m_loopExecutionHappened)
 		extraComment +=
-			"\nNote that some information is erased after the execution of loops.\n"
+			"False negatives are possible when unrolling loops.\n"
-			"You can re-introduce information using require().";
+			"This is due to the possibility that the BMC loop iteration setting is"
+			" smaller than the actual number of iterations needed to complete a loop.";
 	if (m_externalFunctionCallHappened)
 		extraComment +=
 			"\nNote that external function calls are not inlined,"
@@ -1145,3 +1232,7 @@ void BMC::assignment(smt::SymbolicVariable& _symVar, smtutil::Expression const&
 	));
 }
 
+bool BMC::isInsideLoop() const
+{
+	return !m_loopCheckpoints.empty();
+}

libsolidity/formal/BMC.h

@@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ private:
 	void endVisit(FunctionCall const& _node) override;
 	void endVisit(Return const& _node) override;
 	bool visit(TryStatement const& _node) override;
+	bool visit(Break const& _node) override;
+	bool visit(Continue const& _node) override;
 	//@}
 
 	/// Visitor helpers.
@@ -188,6 +190,9 @@ private:
 	smtutil::CheckResult checkSatisfiable();
 	//@}
 
+	std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
+	bool isInsideLoop() const;
+
 	std::unique_ptr<smtutil::SolverInterface> m_interface;
 
 	/// Flags used for better warning messages.
@@ -204,6 +209,21 @@ private:
 
 	/// Number of verification conditions that could not be proved.
 	size_t m_unprovedAmt = 0;
-};
 
+	enum class LoopControlKind
+	{
+		Continue,
+		Break
+	};
+
+	// Current path conditions and SSA indices for break or continue statement
+	struct LoopControl {
+		LoopControlKind kind;
+		smtutil::Expression pathConditions;
+		VariableIndices variableIndices;
+	};
+
+	// Loop control statements for every loop
+	std::stack<std::vector<LoopControl>> m_loopCheckpoints;
+};
 }

libsolidity/formal/ModelCheckerSettings.h

@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct ModelCheckerExtCalls
 
 struct ModelCheckerSettings
 {
+	std::optional<unsigned> bmcLoopIterations;
 	ModelCheckerContracts contracts = ModelCheckerContracts::Default();
 	/// Currently division and modulo are replaced by multiplication with slack vars, such that
 	/// a / b <=> a = b * k + m
@@ -179,6 +180,7 @@ struct ModelCheckerSettings
 	bool operator==(ModelCheckerSettings const& _other) const noexcept
 	{
 		return
+			bmcLoopIterations == _other.bmcLoopIterations &&
 			contracts == _other.contracts &&
 			divModNoSlacks == _other.divModNoSlacks &&
 			engine == _other.engine &&

libsolidity/formal/SMTEncoder.h

@@ -168,7 +168,9 @@ protected:
 	void endVisit(IndexAccess const& _node) override;
 	void endVisit(IndexRangeAccess const& _node) override;
 	bool visit(InlineAssembly const& _node) override;
+	bool visit(Break const&) override { return false; }
 	void endVisit(Break const&) override {}
+	bool visit(Continue const&) override { return false; }
 	void endVisit(Continue const&) override {}
 	bool visit(TryCatchClause const&) override { return true; }
 	void endVisit(TryCatchClause const&) override {}

libsolidity/interface/StandardCompiler.cpp

@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ std::optional<Json::Value> checkSettingsKeys(Json::Value const& _input)
 
 std::optional<Json::Value> checkModelCheckerSettingsKeys(Json::Value const& _input)
 {
-	static set<string> keys{"contracts", "divModNoSlacks", "engine", "extCalls", "invariants", "showProvedSafe", "showUnproved", "showUnsupported", "solvers", "targets", "timeout"};
+	static set<string> keys{"bmcLoopIterations", "contracts", "divModNoSlacks", "engine", "extCalls", "invariants", "showProvedSafe", "showUnproved", "showUnsupported", "solvers", "targets", "timeout"};
 	return checkKeys(_input, keys, "modelChecker");
 }
 
@@ -1013,6 +1013,16 @@ std::variant<StandardCompiler::InputsAndSettings, Json::Value> StandardCompiler:
 		ret.modelCheckerSettings.engine = *engine;
 	}
 
+	if (modelCheckerSettings.isMember("bmcLoopIterations"))
+	{
+		if (!ret.modelCheckerSettings.engine.bmc)
+			return formatFatalError(Error::Type::JSONError, "settings.modelChecker.bmcLoopIterations requires the BMC engine to be enabled.");
+		if (modelCheckerSettings["bmcLoopIterations"].isUInt())
+			ret.modelCheckerSettings.bmcLoopIterations = modelCheckerSettings["bmcLoopIterations"].asUInt();
+		else
+			return formatFatalError(Error::Type::JSONError, "settings.modelChecker.bmcLoopIterations must be an unsigned integer.");
+	}
+
 	if (modelCheckerSettings.isMember("extCalls"))
 	{
 		if (!modelCheckerSettings["extCalls"].isString())

solc/CommandLineParser.cpp

@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static string const g_strModelCheckerShowUnsupported = "model-checker-show-unsup
 static string const g_strModelCheckerSolvers = "model-checker-solvers";
 static string const g_strModelCheckerTargets = "model-checker-targets";
 static string const g_strModelCheckerTimeout = "model-checker-timeout";
+static string const g_strModelCheckerBMCLoopIterations = "model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations";
 static string const g_strNone = "none";
 static string const g_strNoOptimizeYul = "no-optimize-yul";
 static string const g_strOptimize = "optimize";
@@ -861,17 +862,23 @@ General Information)").c_str(),
 		(
 			g_strModelCheckerTargets.c_str(),
 			po::value<string>()->value_name("default,all,constantCondition,underflow,overflow,divByZero,balance,assert,popEmptyArray,outOfBounds")->default_value("default"),
-			"Select model checker verification targets. "
+			"Select model checker verification targets."
 			"Multiple targets can be selected at the same time, separated by a comma and no spaces."
 			" By default all targets except underflow and overflow are selected."
 		)
 		(
 			g_strModelCheckerTimeout.c_str(),
 			po::value<unsigned>()->value_name("ms"),
-			"Set model checker timeout per query in milliseconds. "
+			"Set model checker timeout per query in milliseconds."
-			"The default is a deterministic resource limit. "
+			"The default is a deterministic resource limit."
 			"A timeout of 0 means no resource/time restrictions for any query."
 		)
+		(
+			g_strModelCheckerBMCLoopIterations.c_str(),
+			po::value<unsigned>(),
+			"Set loop unrolling depth for BMC engine."
+			"Default is 1."
+		)
 	;
 	desc.add(smtCheckerOptions);
 
@@ -965,6 +972,7 @@ void CommandLineParser::processArgs()
 		{g_strModelCheckerInvariants, {InputMode::Compiler, InputMode::CompilerWithASTImport}},
 		{g_strModelCheckerSolvers, {InputMode::Compiler, InputMode::CompilerWithASTImport}},
 		{g_strModelCheckerTimeout, {InputMode::Compiler, InputMode::CompilerWithASTImport}},
+		{g_strModelCheckerBMCLoopIterations, {InputMode::Compiler, InputMode::CompilerWithASTImport}},
 		{g_strModelCheckerContracts, {InputMode::Compiler, InputMode::CompilerWithASTImport}},
 		{g_strModelCheckerTargets, {InputMode::Compiler, InputMode::CompilerWithASTImport}}
 	};
@@ -1337,6 +1345,13 @@ void CommandLineParser::processArgs()
 	if (m_args.count(g_strModelCheckerTimeout))
 		m_options.modelChecker.settings.timeout = m_args[g_strModelCheckerTimeout].as<unsigned>();
 
+	if (m_args.count(g_strModelCheckerBMCLoopIterations))
+	{
+		if (!m_options.modelChecker.settings.engine.bmc)
+			solThrow(CommandLineValidationError, "BMC loop unrolling requires the BMC engine to be enabled");
+		m_options.modelChecker.settings.bmcLoopIterations = m_args[g_strModelCheckerBMCLoopIterations].as<unsigned>();
+	}
+
 	m_options.metadata.literalSources = (m_args.count(g_strMetadataLiteral) > 0);
 	m_options.modelChecker.initialize =
 		m_args.count(g_strModelCheckerContracts) ||

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations/args

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+--model-checker-engine bmc --model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations 3

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations/err

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Warning: BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+  --> model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations/input.sol:10:3:
+   |
+10 | 		assert(x == 3);
+   | 		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+Note: Counterexample:
+  x = 2
+
+Note: Callstack:
+Note: False negatives are possible when unrolling loops.
+This is due to the possibility that the BMC loop iteration setting is smaller than the actual number of iterations needed to complete a loop.

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations/input.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
+pragma solidity >=0.0;
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		do {
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_invalid_arg/args

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+--model-checker-engine bmc --model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations bmc

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_invalid_arg/err

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+the argument ('bmc') for option '--model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations' is invalid

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_invalid_arg/exit

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_no_argument/args

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+--model-checker-engine bmc --model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_no_argument/err

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+the argument ('model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_no_argument/input.sol') for option '--model-checker-bmc-loop-iterations' is invalid

test/cmdlineTests/model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_no_argument/exit

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1

test/cmdlineTests/standard_model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations/input.json

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+{
+	"language": "Solidity",
+	"sources":
+	{
+		"Source":
+		{
+			"content": "// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
+			pragma solidity >=0.0;
+			contract C
+			{
+				function f(uint x) public pure {
+					require(x == 0);
+					do {
+						++x;
+					} while (x < 2);
+					assert(x == 2);
+				}
+			}"
+		}
+	},
+	"settings":
+	{
+		"modelChecker":
+		{
+			"engine": "bmc",
+            "bmcLoopIterations": 3
+		}
+	}
+}

test/cmdlineTests/standard_model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations/output.json

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+{
+    "errors":
+    [
+        {
+            "component": "general",
+            "errorCode": "6002",
+            "formattedMessage": "Info: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option \"show proved safe\" to see all of them.
+
+",
+            "message": "BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option \"show proved safe\" to see all of them.",
+            "severity": "info",
+            "type": "Info"
+        }
+    ],
+    "sources":
+    {
+        "Source":
+        {
+            "id": 0
+        }
+    }
+}

test/cmdlineTests/standard_model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_invalid_arg/input.json

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+{
+	"language": "Solidity",
+	"sources":
+	{
+		"Source":
+		{
+			"content": "// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
+			pragma solidity >=0.0;
+			contract C
+			{
+				function f(uint x) public pure {
+					require(x == 0);
+					do {
+						++x;
+					} while (x < 2);
+					assert(x == 2);
+				}
+			}"
+		}
+	},
+	"settings":
+	{
+		"modelChecker":
+		{
+			"engine": "bmc",
+            "bmcLoopIterations": "bmc"
+		}
+	}
+}

test/cmdlineTests/standard_model_checker_bmc_loop_iterations_invalid_arg/output.json

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+    "errors":
+    [
+        {
+            "component": "general",
+            "formattedMessage": "settings.modelChecker.bmcLoopIterations must be an unsigned integer.",
+            "message": "settings.modelChecker.bmcLoopIterations must be an unsigned integer.",
+            "severity": "error",
+            "type": "JSONError"
+        }
+    ]
+}

test/libsolidity/SMTCheckerTest.cpp

@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ SMTCheckerTest::SMTCheckerTest(string const& _filename): SyntaxTest(_filename, E
 			m_shouldRun = false;
 #endif
 	}
+
+	auto const& bmcLoopIterations = m_reader.sizetSetting("BMCLoopIterations", 1);
+	m_modelCheckerSettings.bmcLoopIterations = std::optional<unsigned>{bmcLoopIterations};
 }
 
 TestCase::TestResult SMTCheckerTest::run(ostream& _stream, string const& _linePrefix, bool _formatted)

test/libsolidity/SMTCheckerTest.h

@@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ protected:
 		Set in m_modelCheckerSettings.
 	SMTSolvers: `all`, `cvc4`, `z3`, `none`, where the default is `all`.
 		Set in m_modelCheckerSettings.
+	BMCLoopIterations: number of loop iterations for BMC engine, the default is 1.
+		Set in m_modelCheckerSettings.
 	*/
 
 	ModelCheckerSettings m_modelCheckerSettings;

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/functions/functions_trivial_condition_for.sol

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-contract C
-{
-	function f(bool x) public pure { require(x); for (;x;) {} }
-}
-// ====
-// SMTEngine: all
-// ----
-// Warning 6838: (65-66): BMC: Condition is always true.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/functions/functions_trivial_condition_while.sol

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-contract C
-{
-	function f(bool x) public pure { require(x); while (x) {} }
-}
-// ====
-// SMTEngine: all
-// ----
-// Warning 6838: (66-67): BMC: Condition is always true.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		do {
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			{
+				++x;
+				++x;
+			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			if (x >= 2)
+				++x;
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 4);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_4.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+		} while (true);
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 1
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_5.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+contract C {
+    uint x;
+
+    function condition() private returns(bool) {
+		++x;
+		return x < 3;
+	}
+
+	function f() public {
+		require(x == 0);
+		do {
+		} while (condition());
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Warning 2661: (77-80): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_assertion_fails_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		do {
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Warning 4661: (102-116): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_assertion_fails_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			break;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 0);
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 2
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (87-92): Unreachable code.
+// Warning 4661: (97-111): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_assertion_fails_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			continue;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 2
+// ----
+// Warning 4661: (100-114): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			break;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (87-92): Unreachable code.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		do {
+			if (x > 0)
+				break;
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		do {
+			if (x >= 0) {
+				++x;
+				break;
+			}
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_4.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		do {
+			if (x > 0) {
+				++x;
+				break;
+			}
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_5.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			if (x > 1) {
+				++x;
+				break;
+			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_6.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			if (x > 0) {
+ 				x = 2;
+				break;
+			}
+			if (x > 1) {
+				x = 3;
+				break;
+			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_7.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			if (x > 1) {
+				x = 3;
+				break;
+ 			}
+			if (x > 0) {
+				x = 2;
+				break;
+ 			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_8.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			break;
+		} while (++x < 2);
+        // loop condition is not executed after break
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (79-86): Unreachable code.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_continue_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			if (x > 1) {
+				break;
+ 			}
+			if (x >= 0) {
+				x = 10;
+				continue;
+ 			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 10);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_break_continue_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		do {
+			if (x > 1) {
+				x = 3;
+				break;
+ 			}
+			if (x >= 0) {
+				x = 2;
+				continue;
+ 			}
+		} while (x < 4);
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_continue_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			if (x == 3) {
+				continue;
+			}
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_continue_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		uint y = 0;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			if (x == 2) {
+				++x;
+				y = 1;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (x == 3) {
+				y = 2;
+				continue;
+			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(y == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_continue_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		uint y = 0;
+		do {
+			++x;
+			if (x > 0) {
+				y = 1;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (x > 0) {
+				y = 2;
+				continue;
+			}
+		} while (x < 3);
+		assert(y == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_continue_4.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		uint i;
+		do {
+			++i;
+			if (i == 2) {
+				x = 2;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (i == 1) {
+				x = 1;
+				continue;
+			}
+		} while (i < 3);
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_nested.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint z) public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		require(z == 0);
+		do {
+			uint y = 0;
+			do {
+				++z;
+				++y;
+			} while (y < 2);
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(z == 4);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_nested_break.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint z) public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		require(z == 0);
+		do {
+			uint y = 0;
+			do {
+				if (y > 0)
+					break;
+				++z;
+				++y;
+			} while (y < 2);
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(z == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_nested_continue.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint z) public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		require(z == 0);
+		do {
+			uint y = 0;
+			do {
+				++y;
+				if (y > 0)
+					continue;
+				++z;
+			} while (y < 2);
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 2);
+		assert(z == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_semantics_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		int y = 0;
+		do {
+			if (x >= 3)
+				y = 1;
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
+        // BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
+		assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+		assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 1
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_semantics_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		int y = 0;
+		do {
+			if (x >= 3)
+				y = 1;
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
+        // BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
+		assert(x == 3); // should hold
+		assert(y == 1); // should hold
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_semantics_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		int y = 0;
+		do {
+			if (x >= 3)
+				y = 1;
+			++x;
+		} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
+        // BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
+		assert(x == 3); // should hold
+		assert(y == 1); // should hold
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/do_while_bmc_iterations_shallow_unroll.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		uint y;
+		do {
+			++y;
+			if (y == 2)
+			    x = 3;
+		} while (y < 3);
+		// nothing is reported because loop condition is true after unrolling the loop one time
+		assert(x == 4);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 1
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_1_fail.sol

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-contract C
-{
-	function f(uint x) public pure {
-		require(x < 100);
-		for(uint i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
-			// Overflows due to resetting x.
-			x = x + 1;
-		}
-		assert(x < 14);
-	}
-}
-// ====
-// SMTEngine: all
-// SMTSolvers: z3
-// ----
-// Warning 4984: (143-148): CHC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) might happen here.
-// Warning 6328: (156-170): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.
-// Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
-// Warning 2661: (143-148): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_1_false_positive.sol

@@ -14,4 +14,4 @@ contract C
 // ----
 // Warning 4984: (106-111): CHC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) might happen here.
 // Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
-// Warning 2661: (106-111): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
+			++x;
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
+			x = i;
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
+			if (i > 1)
+				x = 10;
+		assert(x == 10);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+//  Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_4.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 0; ++i)
+			++x;
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_5.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (; x < 0; ++x) {}
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 1
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_6.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		for (uint i = 1; i < 3;) {
+			x = i;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_7.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C
+{
+	uint x;
+
+	function condition() private returns(bool) {
+		++x;
+		return x < 3;
+	}
+
+	function f() public {
+		require(x == 0);
+		for (; condition();) {
+		}
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Warning 2661: (71-74): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_8.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+contract C
+{
+	uint x;
+	uint y;
+
+	function condition() private returns(bool) {
+		++x;
+		return x < 3;
+	}
+
+	function expression() private {
+		++y;
+	}
+
+	function f() public {
+		require(x == 0);
+		require(y == 0);
+		for (; condition(); expression()) {
+		}
+		assert(x == 3);
+		assert(y == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Warning 2661: (80-83): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
+// Warning 2661: (140-143): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_assertion_fails_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i)
+			++x;
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Warning 4661: (92-106): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_assertion_fails_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			++x;
+			break;
+		}
+		assert(x == 0);
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (77-80): Unreachable code.
+// Warning 4661: (108-122): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_assertion_fails_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			++x;
+			continue;
+		}
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Warning 4661: (111-125): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			break;
+			++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (77-80): Unreachable code.
+// Warning 5740: (97-100): Unreachable code.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			++x;
+ 			break;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (77-80): Unreachable code.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (i > 0)
+				break;
+			++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_4.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			++x;
+			if (i > 0)
+				break;
+		}
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_5.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (i > 1) {
+				x = 1;
+				break;
+			}
+			if (i > 1) {
+				x = 2;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_6.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (i > 1) {
+				x = 1;
+				break;
+			}
+			if (i >= 1) {
+				x = 2;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_7.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (;;) {
+			++x;
+			break;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_8.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (;;) {
+ 			break;
+			++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 0);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (78-81): Unreachable code.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_9.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (;x < 2;) {
+			++x;
+ 			break;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_continue_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (i > 1) {
+				break;
+ 			}
+			if (i >= 0) {
+				x = 10;
+				continue;
+ 			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 10);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_continue_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			if (i > 0) {
+				x = 1;
+				break;
+ 			}
+			if (i >= 0) {
+				x = 2;
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 2
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_break_continue_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (i > 0) {
+				x = 1;
+				break;
+ 			} else {
+				x = 2;
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_continue_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (i > 1)
+				continue;
+			++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_continue_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			if (i == 1) {
+				x = 1;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (i == 0) {
+				x = 2;
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_continue_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
+			if (x > 1) {
+				x = 10;
+				continue;
+			}
+ 			if (x > 0) {
+				x = 11;
+				continue;
+			}
+			++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 10);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_continue_4.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (; x < 2; ++x) {
+			if (x > 1) {
+				x = 10;
+				continue;
+			}
+			if (x > 0) {
+				x = 11;
+				continue;
+			}
+		}
+		// x > 0 branch triggers x = 11 and continue triggers ++x loop expression
+		assert(x == 12);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_continue_5.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (; x < 2; ++x) {
+			continue;
+		}
+		// loop expression is executed after continue
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_false_positive.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		for (;;) {
+			x = 1;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1000);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_nested.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			for (uint j = 0; j < 2; ++j)
+				++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 4);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_nested_break.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			for (uint j = 0; j < 2; ++j) {
+				x = x + 1;
+				break;
+			}
+			break;
+		}
+		assert(x == 1);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Warning 5740: (92-95): Unreachable code.
+// Warning 5740: (126-129): Unreachable code.
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_nested_continue.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			for (uint j = 0; j < 2; ++j) {
+			    if (i > 0)
+					continue;
+				++x;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 2);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_semantics_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		int y = 0;
+		for (; x < 3 || y == 1; ++x) {
+			if (x >= 3)
+				y = 1;
+		}
+        // BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
+		assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+		assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_semantics_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		int y = 0;
+		for (; x < 3 || y == 1; ++x) {
+			if (x >= 3)
+				y = 1;
+		}
+        // BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
+		assert(x == 3); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+		assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 4
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_semantics_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		int y = 0;
+		for (; x < 3 || y == 1; ++x) {
+			if (x >= 3)
+				y = 1;
+		}
+        // BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
+		assert(x == 3); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+		assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_bmc_iterations_shallow_unroll.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C
+{
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x = 0;
+		for (uint i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
+			++x;
+		}
+		// nothing is reported because loop condition is still true after BMCLoopIterations
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 1
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_trivial_condition_1.sol

@@ -10,4 +10,3 @@ contract C {
 // SMTSolvers: z3
 // ----
 // Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
-// Warning 6838: (90-96): BMC: Condition is always true.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_trivial_condition_2.sol

@@ -13,4 +13,3 @@ contract C {
 // SMTSolvers: z3
 // ----
 // Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
-// Warning 6838: (106-112): BMC: Condition is always true.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/for_loop_unreachable_1.sol

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-contract C {
-    function f(uint x) public pure {
-        require(x == 2);
-        for (; x > 2;) {}
-        assert(x == 2);
-    }
-}
-// ====
-// SMTEngine: all
-// SMTSolvers: z3
-// ----
-// Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
-// Warning 6838: (90-95): BMC: Condition is always false.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/while_bmc_iterations_1.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+contract C {
+	function f(uint x) public pure {
+		require(x == 0);
+		uint y;
+		while (y < 3) {
+			++y;
+			if (y == 2)
+			    x = 3;
+		}
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 2
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/while_bmc_iterations_2.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		while (x < 3) {
+			++x;
+			{
+				++x;
+				++x;
+			}
+		}
+		assert(x == 3);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 3
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

test/libsolidity/smtCheckerTests/loops/while_bmc_iterations_3.sol

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+contract C {
+	function f() public pure {
+		uint x;
+		while (x < 3) {
+			if (x >= 2)
+				++x;
+			++x;
+		}
+		assert(x == 4);
+	}
+}
+// ====
+// SMTEngine: bmc
+// SMTSolvers: z3
+// BMCLoopIterations: 5
+// ----
+// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.