mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
[SMTChecker] Adding division by zero checks in the CHC engine
This commit is contained in:
parent
a83ad58109
commit
f0d81601db
@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
### 0.7.5 (unreleased)
|
||||
|
||||
Compiler Features:
|
||||
* SMTChecker: Add division by zero checks in the CHC engine.
|
||||
|
||||
Bugfixes:
|
||||
* SMTChecker: Fix lack of reporting potential violations when using only the CHC engine.
|
||||
|
@ -716,6 +716,13 @@ void BMC::checkOverflow(BMCVerificationTarget& _target, smtutil::Expression cons
|
||||
void BMC::checkDivByZero(BMCVerificationTarget& _target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
solAssert(_target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, "");
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
m_solvedTargets.count(_target.expression) &&
|
||||
m_solvedTargets.at(_target.expression).count(VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero)
|
||||
)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
checkCondition(
|
||||
_target.constraints && (_target.value == 0),
|
||||
_target.callStack,
|
||||
|
@ -533,18 +533,9 @@ void CHC::visitAssert(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
|
||||
void CHC::visitAddMulMod(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue();
|
||||
errorFlag().increaseIndex();
|
||||
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(
|
||||
&_funCall,
|
||||
VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero,
|
||||
errorFlag().currentValue()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
solAssert(_funCall.arguments().at(2), "");
|
||||
smtutil::Expression target = expr(*_funCall.arguments().at(2)) == 0 && errorFlag().currentValue() == newErrorId(_funCall);
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion((errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError) || target);
|
||||
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_funCall, VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, expr(*_funCall.arguments().at(2)) == 0);
|
||||
|
||||
SMTEncoder::visitAddMulMod(_funCall);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -643,13 +634,7 @@ void CHC::makeArrayPopVerificationTarget(FunctionCall const& _arrayPop)
|
||||
auto symbArray = dynamic_pointer_cast<SymbolicArrayVariable>(m_context.expression(memberAccess->expression()));
|
||||
solAssert(symbArray, "");
|
||||
|
||||
auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue();
|
||||
errorFlag().increaseIndex();
|
||||
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(&_arrayPop, VerificationTarget::Type::PopEmptyArray, errorFlag().currentValue());
|
||||
|
||||
smtutil::Expression target = (symbArray->length() <= 0) && (errorFlag().currentValue() == newErrorId(_arrayPop));
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion((errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError) || target);
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_arrayPop, VerificationTarget::Type::PopEmptyArray, symbArray->length() <= 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> CHC::arithmeticOperation(
|
||||
@ -660,6 +645,9 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> CHC::arithmeticOperation(
|
||||
frontend::Expression const& _expression
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (_op == Token::Mod || _op == Token::Div)
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, _right == 0);
|
||||
|
||||
auto values = SMTEncoder::arithmeticOperation(_op, _left, _right, _commonType, _expression);
|
||||
|
||||
IntegerType const* intType = nullptr;
|
||||
@ -673,46 +661,19 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> CHC::arithmeticOperation(
|
||||
if (_op == Token::Mod || (_op == Token::Div && !intType->isSigned()))
|
||||
return values;
|
||||
|
||||
auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue();
|
||||
errorFlag().increaseIndex();
|
||||
|
||||
VerificationTarget::Type targetType;
|
||||
unsigned errorId = newErrorId(_expression);
|
||||
|
||||
optional<smtutil::Expression> target;
|
||||
if (_op == Token::Div)
|
||||
{
|
||||
targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow;
|
||||
target = values.second > intType->maxValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow, values.second > intType->maxValue());
|
||||
else if (intType->isSigned())
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned secondErrorId = newErrorId(_expression);
|
||||
targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::UnderOverflow;
|
||||
target = (values.second < intType->minValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId) ||
|
||||
(values.second > intType->maxValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == secondErrorId);
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow, values.second < intType->minValue());
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow, values.second > intType->maxValue());
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (_op == Token::Sub)
|
||||
{
|
||||
targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow;
|
||||
target = values.second < intType->minValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow, values.second < intType->minValue());
|
||||
else if (_op == Token::Add || _op == Token::Mul)
|
||||
{
|
||||
targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow;
|
||||
target = values.second > intType->maxValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow, values.second > intType->maxValue());
|
||||
else
|
||||
solAssert(false, "");
|
||||
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(
|
||||
&_expression,
|
||||
targetType,
|
||||
errorFlag().currentValue()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion((errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError) || *target);
|
||||
|
||||
return values;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1158,7 +1119,7 @@ void CHC::addVerificationTarget(
|
||||
if (!source->annotation().experimentalFeatures.count(ExperimentalFeature::SMTChecker))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
m_verificationTargets.emplace(_scope, CHCVerificationTarget{{_type, _from, _constraints}, _errorId});
|
||||
m_verificationTargets[_scope].push_back(CHCVerificationTarget{{_type, _from, _constraints}, _errorId});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CHC::addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression _errorId)
|
||||
@ -1175,6 +1136,18 @@ void CHC::addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CHC::addVerificationTarget(frontend::Expression const& _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression const& _target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue();
|
||||
errorFlag().increaseIndex();
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(&_scope, _type, errorFlag().currentValue());
|
||||
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(
|
||||
errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError ||
|
||||
(_target && errorFlag().currentValue() == newErrorId(_scope))
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CHC::addAssertVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, smtutil::Expression _from, smtutil::Expression _constraints, smtutil::Expression _errorId)
|
||||
{
|
||||
addVerificationTarget(_scope, VerificationTarget::Type::Assert, _from, _constraints, _errorId);
|
||||
@ -1182,8 +1155,12 @@ void CHC::addAssertVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, smtutil::Expression
|
||||
|
||||
void CHC::checkVerificationTargets()
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (auto const& [scope, target]: m_verificationTargets)
|
||||
for (auto const& [scope, targets]: m_verificationTargets)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < targets.size(); ++i)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto const& target = targets[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Assert)
|
||||
checkAssertTarget(scope, target);
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -1205,8 +1182,7 @@ void CHC::checkVerificationTargets()
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (
|
||||
target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow ||
|
||||
target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow ||
|
||||
target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::UnderOverflow
|
||||
target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto const* expr = dynamic_cast<Expression const*>(scope);
|
||||
@ -1241,20 +1217,10 @@ void CHC::checkVerificationTargets()
|
||||
|
||||
auto it = m_errorIds.find(scope->id());
|
||||
solAssert(it != m_errorIds.end(), "");
|
||||
unsigned errorId = it->second;
|
||||
solAssert(i < it->second.size(), "");
|
||||
unsigned errorId = it->second[i];
|
||||
|
||||
if (target.type != VerificationTarget::Type::UnderOverflow)
|
||||
checkAndReportTarget(scope, target, errorId, errorReporterId, satMsg, unknownMsg);
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto specificTarget = target;
|
||||
specificTarget.type = VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow;
|
||||
checkAndReportTarget(scope, specificTarget, errorId, underflowErrorId, satMsgUnderflow + " happens here.", satMsgUnderflow + " might happen here.");
|
||||
|
||||
++it;
|
||||
solAssert(it != m_errorIds.end(), "");
|
||||
specificTarget.type = VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow;
|
||||
checkAndReportTarget(scope, specificTarget, it->second, overflowErrorId, satMsgOverflow + " happens here.", satMsgOverflow + " might happen here.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1268,7 +1234,8 @@ void CHC::checkAssertTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, CHCVerificationTarget const&
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto it = m_errorIds.find(assertion->id());
|
||||
solAssert(it != m_errorIds.end(), "");
|
||||
unsigned errorId = it->second;
|
||||
solAssert(!it->second.empty(), "");
|
||||
unsigned errorId = it->second[0];
|
||||
|
||||
checkAndReportTarget(assertion, _target, errorId, 6328_error, "Assertion violation happens here.", "Assertion violation might happen here.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1464,7 +1431,7 @@ unsigned CHC::newErrorId(frontend::Expression const& _expr)
|
||||
// because error id zero actually means no error in the CHC encoding.
|
||||
if (errorId == 0)
|
||||
errorId = m_context.newUniqueId();
|
||||
m_errorIds.emplace(_expr.id(), errorId);
|
||||
m_errorIds[_expr.id()].push_back(errorId);
|
||||
return errorId;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ private:
|
||||
|
||||
void addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression _from, smtutil::Expression _constraints, smtutil::Expression _errorId);
|
||||
void addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression _errorId);
|
||||
void addVerificationTarget(frontend::Expression const& _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression const& _target);
|
||||
void addAssertVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, smtutil::Expression _from, smtutil::Expression _constraints, smtutil::Expression _errorId);
|
||||
|
||||
void checkVerificationTargets();
|
||||
@ -277,7 +278,9 @@ private:
|
||||
smtutil::Expression errorId;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
std::map<ASTNode const*, CHCVerificationTarget, IdCompare> m_verificationTargets;
|
||||
/// Verification targets corresponding to ASTNodes. There can be multiple targets for a single ASTNode,
|
||||
/// e.g., divByZero and Overflow for signed division.
|
||||
std::map<ASTNode const*, std::vector<CHCVerificationTarget>, IdCompare> m_verificationTargets;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Targets proven safe.
|
||||
std::map<ASTNode const*, std::set<VerificationTarget::Type>> m_safeTargets;
|
||||
@ -294,9 +297,8 @@ private:
|
||||
std::map<ASTNode const*, std::set<Expression const*>, IdCompare> m_functionAssertions;
|
||||
|
||||
/// Maps ASTNode ids to error ids.
|
||||
/// A multimap is used instead of map anticipating the UnderOverflow
|
||||
/// target which has 2 error ids.
|
||||
std::multimap<unsigned, unsigned> m_errorIds;
|
||||
/// There can be multiple errorIds associated with a single ASTNode.
|
||||
std::map<unsigned, std::vector<unsigned>> m_errorIds;
|
||||
|
||||
/// The current block.
|
||||
smtutil::Expression m_currentBlock = smtutil::Expression(true);
|
||||
|
@ -787,7 +787,6 @@ void SMTEncoder::visitAddMulMod(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
auto x = expr(*args.at(0));
|
||||
auto y = expr(*args.at(1));
|
||||
auto k = expr(*args.at(2));
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(k != 0);
|
||||
auto const& intType = dynamic_cast<IntegerType const&>(*_funCall.annotation().type);
|
||||
|
||||
if (kind == FunctionType::Kind::AddMod)
|
||||
@ -1532,8 +1531,6 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> SMTEncoder::arithmeticOperation(
|
||||
|
||||
if (_op == Token::Div || _op == Token::Mod)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(_right != 0);
|
||||
|
||||
// mod and unsigned division never underflow/overflow
|
||||
if (_op == Token::Mod || !intType->isSigned())
|
||||
return {valueUnbounded, valueUnbounded};
|
||||
@ -1744,13 +1741,15 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> SMTEncoder::divModWithSlacks(
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(((d.currentValue() * _right) + r.currentValue()) == _left);
|
||||
if (_type.isSigned())
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(
|
||||
(_left >= 0 && 0 <= r.currentValue() && r.currentValue() < smtutil::abs(_right)) ||
|
||||
(_left < 0 && (0 - smtutil::abs(_right)) < r.currentValue() && r.currentValue() <= 0)
|
||||
(_left >= 0 && 0 <= r.currentValue() && (_right == 0 || r.currentValue() < smtutil::abs(_right))) ||
|
||||
(_left < 0 && ((_right == 0 || 0 - smtutil::abs(_right) < r.currentValue()) && r.currentValue() <= 0))
|
||||
);
|
||||
else // unsigned version
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(0 <= r.currentValue() && r.currentValue() < _right);
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(0 <= r.currentValue() && (_right == 0 || r.currentValue() < _right));
|
||||
|
||||
return {d.currentValue(), r.currentValue()};
|
||||
auto divResult = smtutil::Expression::ite(_right == 0, 0, d.currentValue());
|
||||
auto modResult = smtutil::Expression::ite(_right == 0, 0, r.currentValue());
|
||||
return {divResult, modResult};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void SMTEncoder::assignment(
|
||||
|
@ -222,10 +222,10 @@ def examine_id_coverage(top_dir, source_id_to_file_names, new_ids_only=False):
|
||||
old_source_only_ids = {
|
||||
"1123", "1133", "1218", "1220", "1584", "1823", "1950",
|
||||
"1988", "2418", "2461", "2512", "2592", "2657", "2800", "2842", "2856",
|
||||
"3263", "3356", "3441", "3682", "3876",
|
||||
"3046", "3263", "3356", "3441", "3682", "3876",
|
||||
"3893", "4010", "4281", "4802", "4805", "4828",
|
||||
"4904", "4990", "5052", "5073", "5170", "5188", "5272", "5347", "5473",
|
||||
"5622", "6041", "6052", "6272", "6708", "6792", "6931", "7110", "7128", "7186",
|
||||
"5622", "6041", "6052", "6084", "6272", "6708", "6792", "6931", "7110", "7128", "7186",
|
||||
"7589", "7593", "7653", "7812", "7885", "8065", "8084", "8140",
|
||||
"8261", "8312", "8592", "8758", "9011",
|
||||
"9085", "9390", "9440", "9547", "9551", "9615", "9980"
|
||||
|
@ -12,5 +12,6 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (141-166): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (263-278): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (141-166): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 6328: (170-184): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (263-278): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -22,5 +22,7 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 6321: (253-260): Unnamed return variable can remain unassigned. Add an explicit return with value to all non-reverting code paths or name the variable.
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (94-109): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (180-195): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (94-109): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 6328: (113-126): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (180-195): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 6328: (199-212): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -12,5 +12,6 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (141-166): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (263-278): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (141-166): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 6328: (170-184): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (263-278): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
uint x = 2 / z;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 6084: (69-74): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (69-74): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (111-116): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (111-116): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (110-115): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4984: (110-115): CHC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 0x80 * 2**248 - 1) happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (110-115): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (110-115): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (110-115): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (113-118): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (113-118): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (113-118): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (113-118): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 3046: (117-120): BMC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 4281: (117-120): CHC: Division by zero happens here.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user