mirror of
				https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
				synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	Merge pull request #10078 from blishko/chc_division_by_zero
[SMTChecker] Enable division by zero checks in CHC engine
This commit is contained in:
		
						commit
						dae41b4cfd
					
				| @ -1,5 +1,7 @@ | ||||
| ### 0.7.5 (unreleased) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Compiler Features: | ||||
|  * SMTChecker: Add division by zero checks in the CHC engine. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Bugfixes: | ||||
|  * SMTChecker: Fix lack of reporting potential violations when using only the CHC engine. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -716,6 +716,13 @@ void BMC::checkOverflow(BMCVerificationTarget& _target, smtutil::Expression cons | ||||
| void BMC::checkDivByZero(BMCVerificationTarget& _target) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	solAssert(_target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, ""); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if ( | ||||
| 		m_solvedTargets.count(_target.expression) && | ||||
| 		m_solvedTargets.at(_target.expression).count(VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero) | ||||
| 	) | ||||
| 		return; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	checkCondition( | ||||
| 		_target.constraints && (_target.value == 0), | ||||
| 		_target.callStack, | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -533,18 +533,9 @@ void CHC::visitAssert(FunctionCall const& _funCall) | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void CHC::visitAddMulMod(FunctionCall const& _funCall) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue(); | ||||
| 	errorFlag().increaseIndex(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget( | ||||
| 		&_funCall, | ||||
| 		VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, | ||||
| 		errorFlag().currentValue() | ||||
| 	); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	solAssert(_funCall.arguments().at(2), ""); | ||||
| 	smtutil::Expression target = expr(*_funCall.arguments().at(2)) == 0 && errorFlag().currentValue() == newErrorId(_funCall); | ||||
| 	m_context.addAssertion((errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError) || target); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget(_funCall, VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, expr(*_funCall.arguments().at(2)) == 0); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	SMTEncoder::visitAddMulMod(_funCall); | ||||
| } | ||||
| @ -643,13 +634,7 @@ void CHC::makeArrayPopVerificationTarget(FunctionCall const& _arrayPop) | ||||
| 	auto symbArray = dynamic_pointer_cast<SymbolicArrayVariable>(m_context.expression(memberAccess->expression())); | ||||
| 	solAssert(symbArray, ""); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue(); | ||||
| 	errorFlag().increaseIndex(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget(&_arrayPop, VerificationTarget::Type::PopEmptyArray, errorFlag().currentValue()); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	smtutil::Expression target = (symbArray->length() <= 0) && (errorFlag().currentValue() == newErrorId(_arrayPop)); | ||||
| 	m_context.addAssertion((errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError) || target); | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget(_arrayPop, VerificationTarget::Type::PopEmptyArray, symbArray->length() <= 0); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> CHC::arithmeticOperation( | ||||
| @ -660,6 +645,9 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> CHC::arithmeticOperation( | ||||
| 	frontend::Expression const& _expression | ||||
| ) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	if (_op == Token::Mod || _op == Token::Div) | ||||
| 		addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero, _right == 0); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	auto values = SMTEncoder::arithmeticOperation(_op, _left, _right, _commonType, _expression); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	IntegerType const* intType = nullptr; | ||||
| @ -673,46 +661,19 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> CHC::arithmeticOperation( | ||||
| 	if (_op == Token::Mod || (_op == Token::Div && !intType->isSigned())) | ||||
| 		return values; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue(); | ||||
| 	errorFlag().increaseIndex(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	VerificationTarget::Type targetType; | ||||
| 	unsigned errorId = newErrorId(_expression); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	optional<smtutil::Expression> target; | ||||
| 	if (_op == Token::Div) | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow; | ||||
| 		target = values.second > intType->maxValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 		addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow, values.second > intType->maxValue()); | ||||
| 	else if (intType->isSigned()) | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		unsigned secondErrorId = newErrorId(_expression); | ||||
| 		targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::UnderOverflow; | ||||
| 		target = (values.second < intType->minValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId) || | ||||
| 			(values.second > intType->maxValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == secondErrorId); | ||||
| 		addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow, values.second < intType->minValue()); | ||||
| 		addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow, values.second > intType->maxValue()); | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 	else if (_op == Token::Sub) | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow; | ||||
| 		target = values.second < intType->minValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 		addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow, values.second < intType->minValue()); | ||||
| 	else if (_op == Token::Add || _op == Token::Mul) | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		targetType = VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow; | ||||
| 		target = values.second > intType->maxValue() && errorFlag().currentValue() == errorId; | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| 		addVerificationTarget(_expression, VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow, values.second > intType->maxValue()); | ||||
| 	else | ||||
| 		solAssert(false, ""); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget( | ||||
| 		&_expression, | ||||
| 		targetType, | ||||
| 		errorFlag().currentValue() | ||||
| 	); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	m_context.addAssertion((errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError) || *target); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	return values; | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| @ -1158,7 +1119,7 @@ void CHC::addVerificationTarget( | ||||
| 	if (!source->annotation().experimentalFeatures.count(ExperimentalFeature::SMTChecker)) | ||||
| 		return; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	m_verificationTargets.emplace(_scope, CHCVerificationTarget{{_type, _from, _constraints}, _errorId}); | ||||
| 	m_verificationTargets[_scope].push_back(CHCVerificationTarget{{_type, _from, _constraints}, _errorId}); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void CHC::addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression _errorId) | ||||
| @ -1175,6 +1136,18 @@ void CHC::addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void CHC::addVerificationTarget(frontend::Expression const& _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression const& _target) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	auto previousError = errorFlag().currentValue(); | ||||
| 	errorFlag().increaseIndex(); | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget(&_scope, _type, errorFlag().currentValue()); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	m_context.addAssertion( | ||||
| 		errorFlag().currentValue() == previousError || | ||||
| 		(_target && errorFlag().currentValue() == newErrorId(_scope)) | ||||
| 	); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void CHC::addAssertVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, smtutil::Expression _from, smtutil::Expression _constraints, smtutil::Expression _errorId) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	addVerificationTarget(_scope, VerificationTarget::Type::Assert, _from, _constraints, _errorId); | ||||
| @ -1182,79 +1155,72 @@ void CHC::addAssertVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, smtutil::Expression | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void CHC::checkVerificationTargets() | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	for (auto const& [scope, target]: m_verificationTargets) | ||||
| 	for (auto const& [scope, targets]: m_verificationTargets) | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Assert) | ||||
| 			checkAssertTarget(scope, target); | ||||
| 		else | ||||
| 		for (size_t i = 0; i < targets.size(); ++i) | ||||
| 		{ | ||||
| 			string satMsg; | ||||
| 			string satMsgUnderflow; | ||||
| 			string satMsgOverflow; | ||||
| 			string unknownMsg; | ||||
| 			ErrorId errorReporterId; | ||||
| 			ErrorId underflowErrorId = 3944_error; | ||||
| 			ErrorId overflowErrorId = 4984_error; | ||||
| 			auto const& target = targets[i]; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 			if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::PopEmptyArray) | ||||
| 			{ | ||||
| 				solAssert(dynamic_cast<FunctionCall const*>(scope), ""); | ||||
| 				satMsg = "Empty array \"pop\" detected here."; | ||||
| 				unknownMsg = "Empty array \"pop\" might happen here."; | ||||
| 				errorReporterId = 2529_error; | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 			else if ( | ||||
| 				target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow || | ||||
| 				target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow || | ||||
| 				target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::UnderOverflow | ||||
| 			) | ||||
| 			{ | ||||
| 				auto const* expr = dynamic_cast<Expression const*>(scope); | ||||
| 				solAssert(expr, ""); | ||||
| 				auto const* intType = dynamic_cast<IntegerType const*>(expr->annotation().type); | ||||
| 				if (!intType) | ||||
| 					intType = TypeProvider::uint256(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 				satMsgUnderflow = "Underflow (resulting value less than " + formatNumberReadable(intType->minValue()) + ")"; | ||||
| 				satMsgOverflow = "Overflow (resulting value larger than " + formatNumberReadable(intType->maxValue()) + ")"; | ||||
| 				if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow) | ||||
| 				{ | ||||
| 					satMsg = satMsgUnderflow + " happens here."; | ||||
| 					unknownMsg = satMsgUnderflow + " might happen here."; | ||||
| 					errorReporterId = underflowErrorId; | ||||
| 				} | ||||
| 				else if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow) | ||||
| 				{ | ||||
| 					satMsg = satMsgOverflow + " happens here."; | ||||
| 					unknownMsg = satMsgOverflow + " might happen here."; | ||||
| 					errorReporterId = overflowErrorId; | ||||
| 				} | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 			else if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero) | ||||
| 			{ | ||||
| 				satMsg = "Division by zero happens here."; | ||||
| 				unknownMsg = "Division by zero might happen here."; | ||||
| 				errorReporterId = 4281_error; | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 			else | ||||
| 				solAssert(false, ""); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 			auto it = m_errorIds.find(scope->id()); | ||||
| 			solAssert(it != m_errorIds.end(), ""); | ||||
| 			unsigned errorId = it->second; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 			if (target.type != VerificationTarget::Type::UnderOverflow) | ||||
| 				checkAndReportTarget(scope, target, errorId, errorReporterId, satMsg, unknownMsg); | ||||
| 			if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Assert) | ||||
| 				checkAssertTarget(scope, target); | ||||
| 			else | ||||
| 			{ | ||||
| 				auto specificTarget = target; | ||||
| 				specificTarget.type = VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow; | ||||
| 				checkAndReportTarget(scope, specificTarget, errorId, underflowErrorId, satMsgUnderflow + " happens here.", satMsgUnderflow + " might happen here."); | ||||
| 				string satMsg; | ||||
| 				string satMsgUnderflow; | ||||
| 				string satMsgOverflow; | ||||
| 				string unknownMsg; | ||||
| 				ErrorId errorReporterId; | ||||
| 				ErrorId underflowErrorId = 3944_error; | ||||
| 				ErrorId overflowErrorId = 4984_error; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 				++it; | ||||
| 				if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::PopEmptyArray) | ||||
| 				{ | ||||
| 					solAssert(dynamic_cast<FunctionCall const*>(scope), ""); | ||||
| 					satMsg = "Empty array \"pop\" detected here."; | ||||
| 					unknownMsg = "Empty array \"pop\" might happen here."; | ||||
| 					errorReporterId = 2529_error; | ||||
| 				} | ||||
| 				else if ( | ||||
| 					target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow || | ||||
| 					target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow | ||||
| 				) | ||||
| 				{ | ||||
| 					auto const* expr = dynamic_cast<Expression const*>(scope); | ||||
| 					solAssert(expr, ""); | ||||
| 					auto const* intType = dynamic_cast<IntegerType const*>(expr->annotation().type); | ||||
| 					if (!intType) | ||||
| 						intType = TypeProvider::uint256(); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 					satMsgUnderflow = "Underflow (resulting value less than " + formatNumberReadable(intType->minValue()) + ")"; | ||||
| 					satMsgOverflow = "Overflow (resulting value larger than " + formatNumberReadable(intType->maxValue()) + ")"; | ||||
| 					if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Underflow) | ||||
| 					{ | ||||
| 						satMsg = satMsgUnderflow + " happens here."; | ||||
| 						unknownMsg = satMsgUnderflow + " might happen here."; | ||||
| 						errorReporterId = underflowErrorId; | ||||
| 					} | ||||
| 					else if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow) | ||||
| 					{ | ||||
| 						satMsg = satMsgOverflow + " happens here."; | ||||
| 						unknownMsg = satMsgOverflow + " might happen here."; | ||||
| 						errorReporterId = overflowErrorId; | ||||
| 					} | ||||
| 				} | ||||
| 				else if (target.type == VerificationTarget::Type::DivByZero) | ||||
| 				{ | ||||
| 					satMsg = "Division by zero happens here."; | ||||
| 					unknownMsg = "Division by zero might happen here."; | ||||
| 					errorReporterId = 4281_error; | ||||
| 				} | ||||
| 				else | ||||
| 					solAssert(false, ""); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 				auto it = m_errorIds.find(scope->id()); | ||||
| 				solAssert(it != m_errorIds.end(), ""); | ||||
| 				specificTarget.type = VerificationTarget::Type::Overflow; | ||||
| 				checkAndReportTarget(scope, specificTarget, it->second, overflowErrorId, satMsgOverflow + " happens here.", satMsgOverflow + " might happen here."); | ||||
| 				solAssert(i < it->second.size(), ""); | ||||
| 				unsigned errorId = it->second[i]; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 				checkAndReportTarget(scope, target, errorId, errorReporterId, satMsg, unknownMsg); | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| @ -1268,7 +1234,8 @@ void CHC::checkAssertTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, CHCVerificationTarget const& | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		auto it = m_errorIds.find(assertion->id()); | ||||
| 		solAssert(it != m_errorIds.end(), ""); | ||||
| 		unsigned errorId = it->second; | ||||
| 		solAssert(!it->second.empty(), ""); | ||||
| 		unsigned errorId = it->second[0]; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		checkAndReportTarget(assertion, _target, errorId, 6328_error, "Assertion violation happens here.", "Assertion violation might happen here."); | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| @ -1464,7 +1431,7 @@ unsigned CHC::newErrorId(frontend::Expression const& _expr) | ||||
| 	// because error id zero actually means no error in the CHC encoding.
 | ||||
| 	if (errorId == 0) | ||||
| 		errorId = m_context.newUniqueId(); | ||||
| 	m_errorIds.emplace(_expr.id(), errorId); | ||||
| 	m_errorIds[_expr.id()].push_back(errorId); | ||||
| 	return errorId; | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -183,6 +183,7 @@ private: | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	void addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression _from, smtutil::Expression _constraints, smtutil::Expression _errorId); | ||||
| 	void addVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression _errorId); | ||||
| 	void addVerificationTarget(frontend::Expression const& _scope, VerificationTarget::Type _type, smtutil::Expression const& _target); | ||||
| 	void addAssertVerificationTarget(ASTNode const* _scope, smtutil::Expression _from, smtutil::Expression _constraints, smtutil::Expression _errorId); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	void checkVerificationTargets(); | ||||
| @ -277,7 +278,9 @@ private: | ||||
| 		smtutil::Expression errorId; | ||||
| 	}; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	std::map<ASTNode const*, CHCVerificationTarget, IdCompare> m_verificationTargets; | ||||
| 	/// Verification targets corresponding to ASTNodes. There can be multiple targets for a single ASTNode,
 | ||||
| 	/// e.g., divByZero and Overflow for signed division.
 | ||||
| 	std::map<ASTNode const*, std::vector<CHCVerificationTarget>, IdCompare> m_verificationTargets; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/// Targets proven safe.
 | ||||
| 	std::map<ASTNode const*, std::set<VerificationTarget::Type>> m_safeTargets; | ||||
| @ -294,9 +297,8 @@ private: | ||||
| 	std::map<ASTNode const*, std::set<Expression const*>, IdCompare> m_functionAssertions; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/// Maps ASTNode ids to error ids.
 | ||||
| 	/// A multimap is used instead of map anticipating the UnderOverflow
 | ||||
| 	/// target which has 2 error ids.
 | ||||
| 	std::multimap<unsigned, unsigned> m_errorIds; | ||||
| 	/// There can be multiple errorIds associated with a single ASTNode.
 | ||||
| 	std::map<unsigned, std::vector<unsigned>> m_errorIds; | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	/// The current block.
 | ||||
| 	smtutil::Expression m_currentBlock = smtutil::Expression(true); | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -787,7 +787,6 @@ void SMTEncoder::visitAddMulMod(FunctionCall const& _funCall) | ||||
| 	auto x = expr(*args.at(0)); | ||||
| 	auto y = expr(*args.at(1)); | ||||
| 	auto k = expr(*args.at(2)); | ||||
| 	m_context.addAssertion(k != 0); | ||||
| 	auto const& intType = dynamic_cast<IntegerType const&>(*_funCall.annotation().type); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (kind == FunctionType::Kind::AddMod) | ||||
| @ -1532,8 +1531,6 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> SMTEncoder::arithmeticOperation( | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	if (_op == Token::Div || _op == Token::Mod) | ||||
| 	{ | ||||
| 		m_context.addAssertion(_right != 0); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 		// mod and unsigned division never underflow/overflow
 | ||||
| 		if (_op == Token::Mod || !intType->isSigned()) | ||||
| 			return {valueUnbounded, valueUnbounded}; | ||||
| @ -1744,13 +1741,15 @@ pair<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> SMTEncoder::divModWithSlacks( | ||||
| 	m_context.addAssertion(((d.currentValue() * _right) + r.currentValue()) == _left); | ||||
| 	if (_type.isSigned()) | ||||
| 		m_context.addAssertion( | ||||
| 			(_left >= 0 && 0 <= r.currentValue() && r.currentValue() < smtutil::abs(_right)) || | ||||
| 			(_left < 0 && (0 - smtutil::abs(_right)) < r.currentValue() && r.currentValue() <= 0) | ||||
| 			(_left >= 0 && 0 <= r.currentValue() && (_right == 0 || r.currentValue() < smtutil::abs(_right))) || | ||||
| 			(_left < 0 && ((_right == 0 || 0 - smtutil::abs(_right) < r.currentValue()) && r.currentValue() <= 0)) | ||||
| 		); | ||||
| 	else // unsigned version
 | ||||
| 		m_context.addAssertion(0 <= r.currentValue() && r.currentValue() < _right); | ||||
| 		m_context.addAssertion(0 <= r.currentValue() && (_right == 0 || r.currentValue() < _right)); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	return {d.currentValue(), r.currentValue()}; | ||||
| 	auto divResult = smtutil::Expression::ite(_right == 0, 0, d.currentValue()); | ||||
| 	auto modResult = smtutil::Expression::ite(_right == 0, 0, r.currentValue()); | ||||
| 	return {divResult, modResult}; | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void SMTEncoder::assignment( | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -222,10 +222,10 @@ def examine_id_coverage(top_dir, source_id_to_file_names, new_ids_only=False): | ||||
|     old_source_only_ids = { | ||||
|         "1123", "1133", "1218", "1220", "1584", "1823", "1950", | ||||
|         "1988", "2418", "2461", "2512", "2592", "2657", "2800", "2842", "2856", | ||||
|         "3263", "3356", "3441", "3682", "3876", | ||||
|         "3046", "3263", "3356", "3441", "3682", "3876", | ||||
|         "3893", "4010", "4281", "4802", "4805", "4828", | ||||
|         "4904", "4990", "5052", "5073", "5170", "5188", "5272", "5347", "5473", | ||||
|         "5622", "6041", "6052", "6272", "6708", "6792", "6931", "7110", "7128", "7186", | ||||
|         "5622", "6041", "6052", "6084", "6272", "6708", "6792", "6931", "7110", "7128", "7186", | ||||
|         "7589", "7593", "7653", "7812", "7885", "8065", "8084", "8140", | ||||
|         "8261", "8312", "8592", "8758", "9011", | ||||
|         "9085", "9390", "9440", "9547", "9551", "9615", "9980" | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -12,5 +12,6 @@ contract C { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (141-166): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (263-278): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (141-166): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 6328: (170-184): CHC: Assertion violation happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (263-278): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -22,5 +22,7 @@ contract C { | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 6321: (253-260): Unnamed return variable can remain unassigned. Add an explicit return with value to all non-reverting code paths or name the variable. | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (94-109): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (180-195): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (94-109): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 6328: (113-126): CHC: Assertion violation happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (180-195): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 6328: (199-212): CHC: Assertion violation happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -12,5 +12,6 @@ contract C { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (141-166): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (263-278): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (141-166): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 6328: (170-184): CHC: Assertion violation happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (263-278): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -5,4 +5,4 @@ contract C { | ||||
| 	uint x = 2 / z; | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 6084: (69-74): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (69-74): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -5,4 +5,4 @@ contract C { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (111-116): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (111-116): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -6,5 +6,5 @@ contract C  { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (110-115): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4984: (110-115): CHC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 0x80 * 2**248 - 1) happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (110-115): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C  { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (110-115): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (110-115): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C  { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (113-118): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (113-118): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C  { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (113-118): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (113-118): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -6,4 +6,4 @@ contract C { | ||||
| 	} | ||||
| } | ||||
| // ---- | ||||
| // Warning 3046: (117-120): BMC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
| // Warning 4281: (117-120): CHC: Division by zero happens here. | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user