mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
Merge pull request #5797 from ethereum/faq-array-pass
[DOCS] Remove copy between contracts FAQ item
This commit is contained in:
commit
da73e25398
@ -264,6 +264,31 @@ Complications for Arrays and Structs
|
||||
The semantics of assignments are a bit more complicated for non-value types like arrays and structs.
|
||||
Assigning *to* a state variable always creates an independent copy. On the other hand, assigning to a local variable creates an independent copy only for elementary types, i.e. static types that fit into 32 bytes. If structs or arrays (including ``bytes`` and ``string``) are assigned from a state variable to a local variable, the local variable holds a reference to the original state variable. A second assignment to the local variable does not modify the state but only changes the reference. Assignments to members (or elements) of the local variable *do* change the state.
|
||||
|
||||
In the example below the call to ``g(x)`` has no effect on ``x`` because it needs
|
||||
to create an independent copy of the storage value in memory. However ``h(x)`` modifies ``x`` because a reference and
|
||||
not a copy is passed.
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
pragma solidity >=0.4.16 <0.6.0;
|
||||
|
||||
contract C {
|
||||
uint[20] x;
|
||||
|
||||
function f() public {
|
||||
g(x);
|
||||
h(x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function g(uint[20] memory y) internal pure {
|
||||
y[2] = 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function h(uint[20] storage y) internal {
|
||||
y[3] = 4;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
.. index:: ! scoping, declarations, default value
|
||||
|
||||
.. _default-value:
|
||||
|
@ -96,36 +96,6 @@ In this example::
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Can a contract pass an array (static size) or string or ``bytes`` (dynamic size) to another contract?
|
||||
=====================================================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Sure. Take care that if you cross the memory / storage boundary,
|
||||
independent copies will be created::
|
||||
|
||||
pragma solidity >=0.4.16 <0.6.0;
|
||||
|
||||
contract C {
|
||||
uint[20] x;
|
||||
|
||||
function f() public {
|
||||
g(x);
|
||||
h(x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function g(uint[20] memory y) internal pure {
|
||||
y[2] = 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function h(uint[20] storage y) internal {
|
||||
y[3] = 4;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
The call to ``g(x)`` will not have an effect on ``x`` because it needs
|
||||
to create an independent copy of the storage value in memory.
|
||||
On the other hand, ``h(x)`` successfully modifies ``x`` because only
|
||||
a reference and not a copy is passed.
|
||||
|
||||
What does the following strange check do in the Custom Token contract?
|
||||
======================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user