Document function overloads and resolution

This commit is contained in:
elenadimitrova 2017-11-21 13:01:59 +02:00
parent 40e8716926
commit c6a4aba9f0

View File

@ -426,12 +426,20 @@ value types and strings.
bytes32 constant myHash = keccak256("abc");
}
.. index:: ! functions
.. _functions:
*********
Functions
*********
.. index:: ! view function, function;view
.. _view-functions:
**************
View Functions
**************
==============
Functions can be declared ``view`` in which case they promise not to modify the state.
@ -465,11 +473,12 @@ The following statements are considered modifying the state:
.. warning::
The compiler does not enforce yet that a ``view`` method is not modifying state.
.. index:: ! pure function, function;pure
.. _pure-functions:
**************
Pure Functions
**************
==============
Functions can be declared ``pure`` in which case they promise not to read from or modify the state.
@ -498,9 +507,8 @@ In addition to the list of state modifying statements explained above, the follo
.. _fallback-function:
*****************
Fallback Function
*****************
=================
A contract can have exactly one unnamed function. This function cannot have
arguments and cannot return anything.
@ -577,6 +585,85 @@ Please ensure you test your fallback function thoroughly to ensure the execution
}
}
.. index:: ! overload
.. _overload-function:
Function Overloading
====================
A Contract can have multiple functions of the same name but with different arguments.
This also applies to inherited functions. The following example shows overloading of the
``f`` function in the scope of contract ``A``.
::
pragma solidity ^0.4.16;
contract A {
function f(uint _in) public pure returns (uint out) {
out = 1;
}
function f(uint _in, bytes32 _key) public pure returns (uint out) {
out = 2;
}
}
Overloaded functions are also present in the external interface. It is an error if two
externally visible functions differ by their Solidity types but not by their external types.
::
// This will not compile
pragma solidity ^0.4.16;
contract A {
function f(B _in) public pure returns (B out) {
out = _in;
}
function f(address _in) public pure returns (address out) {
out = _in;
}
}
contract B {
}
Both ``f`` function overloads above end up accepting the address type for the ABI although
they are considered different inside Solidity.
Overload resolution and Argument matching
-----------------------------------------
Overloaded functions are selected by matching the function declarations in the current scope
to the arguments supplied in the function call. Functions are selected as overload candidates
if all arguments can be implicitly converted to the expected types. If there is not exactly one
candidate, resolution fails.
.. note::
Return parameters are not taken into account for overload resolution.
::
pragma solidity ^0.4.16;
contract A {
function f(uint8 _in) public pure returns (uint8 out) {
out = _in;
}
function f(uint256 _in) public pure returns (uint256 out) {
out = _in;
}
}
Calling ``f(50)`` would create a type error since ``250`` can be implicitly converted both to ``uint8``
and ``uint256`` types. On another hand ``f(256)`` would resolve to ``f(uint256)`` overload as ``256`` cannot be implicitly
converted to ``uint8``.
.. index:: ! event
.. _events:
@ -854,7 +941,7 @@ derived override, but this function will bypass
}
If ``Base1`` calls a function of ``super``, it does not simply
call this function on one of its base contracts. Rather, it
call this function on one of its base contracts. Rather, it
calls this function on the next base contract in the final
inheritance graph, so it will call ``Base2.kill()`` (note that
the final inheritance sequence is -- starting with the most