[cond-expr] don't allow conditional as left value for the first stage

This commit is contained in:
Lu Guanqun 2016-01-11 15:08:28 +08:00
parent b003290638
commit bf7daf0814
3 changed files with 33 additions and 65 deletions

View File

@ -748,55 +748,37 @@ bool TypeChecker::visit(Conditional const& _conditional)
{
expectType(_conditional.condition(), BoolType());
_conditional.trueExpression().accept(*this);
_conditional.falseExpression().accept(*this);
TypePointer const& trueType = type(_conditional.trueExpression());
TypePointer const& falseType = type(_conditional.falseExpression());
// we fake it as an equal operator, but any other comparison operator can work.
TypePointer commonType = trueType->binaryOperatorResult(Token::Equal, falseType);
if (!commonType)
{
typeError(
_conditional.location(),
"True expression's type " +
trueType->toString() +
" doesn't match false expression's type " +
falseType->toString() +
"."
);
// even we can't find a common type, we have to set a type here,
// otherwise the upper statement will not be able to check the type.
commonType = trueType;
}
_conditional.annotation().type = commonType;
if (_conditional.annotation().lValueRequested)
{
requireLValue(_conditional.trueExpression());
requireLValue(_conditional.falseExpression());
typeError(
_conditional.location(),
"Conditional expression as left value is not supported yet."
);
TypePointer const& trueType = type(_conditional.trueExpression());
TypePointer const& falseType = type(_conditional.falseExpression());
// as a left value, we require exact match to prevent subtle conversion issues.
if (*trueType != *falseType)
typeError(
_conditional.location(),
"True expression's type " +
trueType->toString() +
" doesn't match false expression's type " +
falseType->toString() +
"."
);
_conditional.annotation().type = trueType;
_conditional.annotation().isLValue = true;
}
else
{
_conditional.trueExpression().accept(*this);
_conditional.falseExpression().accept(*this);
TypePointer const& trueType = type(_conditional.trueExpression());
TypePointer const& falseType = type(_conditional.falseExpression());
// we fake it as an equal operator, but any other comparison operator can work.
TypePointer commonType = trueType->binaryOperatorResult(Token::Equal, falseType);
if (!commonType)
{
typeError(
_conditional.location(),
"True expression's type " +
trueType->toString() +
" doesn't match false expression's type " +
falseType->toString() +
"."
);
// even we can't find a common type, we have to set a type here,
// otherwise the upper statement will not be able to check the type.
commonType = trueType;
}
_conditional.annotation().type = commonType;
}
return false;
}

View File

@ -128,22 +128,6 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(conditional_expression_multiple)
BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("f(uint256)", u256(40)) == toBigEndian(u256(10)));
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(conditional_expression_as_left_value)
{
char const* sourceCode = R"(
contract test {
function f(uint x) returns(uint d) {
uint y = 1;
uint z = 1;
(x > 10 ? y : z) = 3;
return y ** z;
}
})";
compileAndRun(sourceCode);
BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("f(uint256)", u256(20)) == toBigEndian(u256(3)));
BOOST_CHECK(callContractFunction("f(uint256)", u256(5)) == toBigEndian(u256(1)));
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(conditional_expression_with_return_values)
{
char const* sourceCode = R"(

View File

@ -2972,12 +2972,14 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(invalid_different_types_for_conditional_expression)
BOOST_CHECK(expectError(text) == Error::Type::TypeError);
}
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(invalid_left_value_in_conditional_expression)
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(left_value_in_conditional_expression_not_supported_yet)
{
char const* text = R"(
contract C {
function f() {
(true ? 3 : 5) = 1;
uint x;
uint y;
(true ? x : y) = 1;
}
}
)";