Fix SMTChecker bug when a public library function is called internally by an internal library function, which in turn is called internally by a contract.

This commit is contained in:
Leo Alt
2022-11-28 13:07:18 +01:00
parent 40f0329baa
commit 9a8dd4242f
6 changed files with 66 additions and 5 deletions
+4
View File
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ using namespace solidity::frontend::test;
SMTCheckerTest::SMTCheckerTest(string const& _filename): SyntaxTest(_filename, EVMVersion{})
{
auto contract = m_reader.stringSetting("SMTContract", "");
if (!contract.empty())
m_modelCheckerSettings.contracts.contracts[""] = {contract};
auto const& showUnproved = m_reader.stringSetting("SMTShowUnproved", "yes");
if (showUnproved == "no")
m_modelCheckerSettings.showUnproved = false;
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
library L {
function f1(uint x) public pure {
assert(x > 0); // should fail
}
function f(uint x) internal pure { f1(x); }
}
contract C {
function g(uint x) external pure {
// This should trigger the assertion failure
// since it calls `f` internally, which calls
// `f1` internally.
return L.f(x);
}
function h(uint x) external pure {
// This should not trigger the assertion failure
// since it delegatecalls and that's not supported.
return L.f1(x);
}
}
// ====
// SMTContract: C
// ----
// Warning 4588: (533-540): Assertion checker does not yet implement this type of function call.
// Warning 6328: (58-71): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.\nCounterexample:\n\nx = 0\n\nTransaction trace:\nC.constructor()\nC.g(0)\n L.f(0) -- internal call\n L.f1(0) -- internal call
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
library L {
function f1(uint x) public pure {
assert(x > 0); // should fail
}
function f() internal pure {
f1(0); // should cause the assertion in `f1` to fail
}
function g() internal pure {
f1(1); // should not cause the assertion in `f1` to fail
}
}
contract C {
function f() external pure {
return L.f(); // should cause the assertion to fail
}
function g() external pure {
return L.g(); // should not cause the assertion to fail
}
}
// ====
// SMTContract: C
// ----
// Warning 6328: (58-71): CHC: Assertion violation happens here.\nCounterexample:\n\n\nTransaction trace:\nC.constructor()\nC.f()\n L.f() -- internal call\n L.f1(0) -- internal call