Add unique IDs to error reporting calls

liblangutil/ParserBase.cpp

@@ -145,12 +145,12 @@ void ParserBase::decreaseRecursionDepth()
 
 void ParserBase::parserWarning(string const& _description)
 {
-	m_errorReporter.warning(currentLocation(), _description);
+	m_errorReporter.warning(6635_error, currentLocation(), _description);
 }
 
 void ParserBase::parserError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
-	m_errorReporter.parserError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.parserError(2314_error, _location, _description);
 }
 
 void ParserBase::parserError(string const& _description)
@@ -165,5 +165,5 @@ void ParserBase::fatalParserError(string const& _description)
 
 void ParserBase::fatalParserError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
-	m_errorReporter.fatalParserError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.fatalParserError(1957_error, _location, _description);
 }

libsolidity/analysis/ConstantEvaluator.cpp

@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ void ConstantEvaluator::endVisit(BinaryOperation const& _operation)
 		TypePointer commonType = left->binaryOperatorResult(_operation.getOperator(), right);
 		if (!commonType)
 			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(
+				6020_error,
 				_operation.location(),
 				"Operator " +
 				string(TokenTraits::toString(_operation.getOperator())) +
@@ -83,7 +84,7 @@ void ConstantEvaluator::endVisit(Identifier const& _identifier)
 	else if (!m_types->count(value.get()))
 	{
 		if (m_depth > 32)
-			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(_identifier.location(), "Cyclic constant definition (or maximum recursion depth exhausted).");
+			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(5210_error, _identifier.location(), "Cyclic constant definition (or maximum recursion depth exhausted).");
 		ConstantEvaluator(m_errorReporter, m_depth + 1, m_types).evaluate(*value);
 	}
 

libsolidity/analysis/ContractLevelChecker.cpp

@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkDuplicateFunctions(ContractDefinition const& _co
 		{
 			if (constructor)
 				m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+					7997_error,
 					function->location(),
 					SecondarySourceLocation().append("Another declaration is here:", constructor->location()),
 					"More than one constructor defined."
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkDuplicateFunctions(ContractDefinition const& _co
 		{
 			if (fallback)
 				m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+					7301_error,
 					function->location(),
 					SecondarySourceLocation().append("Another declaration is here:", fallback->location()),
 					"Only one fallback function is allowed."
@@ -98,6 +100,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkDuplicateFunctions(ContractDefinition const& _co
 		{
 			if (receive)
 				m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+					4046_error,
 					function->location(),
 					SecondarySourceLocation().append("Another declaration is here:", receive->location()),
 					"Only one receive function is allowed."
@@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::findDuplicateDefinitions(map<string, vector<T>> const
 				ssl.limitSize(_message);
 
 				m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+					1686_error,
 					overloads[i]->location(),
 					ssl,
 					_message
@@ -197,9 +201,9 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkAbstractDefinitions(ContractDefinition const& _c
 	if (_contract.abstract())
 	{
 		if (_contract.contractKind() == ContractKind::Interface)
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(_contract.location(), "Interfaces do not need the \"abstract\" keyword, they are abstract implicitly.");
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(9348_error, _contract.location(), "Interfaces do not need the \"abstract\" keyword, they are abstract implicitly.");
 		else if (_contract.contractKind() == ContractKind::Library)
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(_contract.location(), "Libraries cannot be abstract.");
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(9571_error, _contract.location(), "Libraries cannot be abstract.");
 		else
 			solAssert(_contract.contractKind() == ContractKind::Contract, "");
 	}
@@ -215,7 +219,8 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkAbstractDefinitions(ContractDefinition const& _c
 		SecondarySourceLocation ssl;
 		for (auto declaration: _contract.annotation().unimplementedDeclarations)
 			ssl.append("Missing implementation: ", declaration->location());
-		m_errorReporter.typeError(_contract.location(), ssl,
+		m_errorReporter.typeError(
+			3656_error,_contract.location(), ssl,
 			"Contract \"" + _contract.annotation().canonicalName
 			+ "\" should be marked as abstract.");
 
@@ -243,6 +248,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkBaseConstructorArguments(ContractDefinition cons
 					}
 					else
 						m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+							1563_error,
 							modifier->location(),
 							"Modifier-style base constructor call without arguments."
 						);
@@ -304,6 +310,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::annotateBaseConstructorArguments(
 		}
 
 		m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+			3364_error,
 			*mainLocation,
 			ssl,
 			"Base constructor arguments given twice."
@@ -343,6 +350,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkExternalTypeClashes(ContractDefinition const& _c
 			for (size_t j = i + 1; j < it.second.size(); ++j)
 				if (!it.second[i].second->hasEqualParameterTypes(*it.second[j].second))
 					m_errorReporter.typeError(
+						9914_error,
 						it.second[j].first->location(),
 						"Function overload clash during conversion to external types for arguments."
 					);
@@ -356,6 +364,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkHashCollisions(ContractDefinition const& _contra
 		util::FixedHash<4> const& hash = it.first;
 		if (hashes.count(hash))
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				1860_error,
 				_contract.location(),
 				string("Function signature hash collision for ") + it.second->externalSignature()
 			);
@@ -369,11 +378,11 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkLibraryRequirements(ContractDefinition const& _c
 		return;
 
 	if (!_contract.baseContracts().empty())
-		m_errorReporter.typeError(_contract.location(), "Library is not allowed to inherit.");
+		m_errorReporter.typeError(9469_error, _contract.location(), "Library is not allowed to inherit.");
 
 	for (auto const& var: _contract.stateVariables())
 		if (!var->isConstant())
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(var->location(), "Library cannot have non-constant state variables");
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(9957_error, var->location(), "Library cannot have non-constant state variables");
 }
 
 void ContractLevelChecker::checkBaseABICompatibility(ContractDefinition const& _contract)
@@ -412,6 +421,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkBaseABICompatibility(ContractDefinition const& _
 
 	if (!errors.infos.empty())
 		m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(
+			6594_error,
 			_contract.location(),
 			errors,
 			std::string("Contract \"") +
@@ -428,6 +438,7 @@ void ContractLevelChecker::checkPayableFallbackWithoutReceive(ContractDefinition
 	if (auto const* fallback = _contract.fallbackFunction())
 		if (fallback->isPayable() && !_contract.interfaceFunctionList().empty() && !_contract.receiveFunction())
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				3628_error,
 				_contract.location(),
 				"This contract has a payable fallback function, but no receive ether function. Consider adding a receive ether function.",
 				SecondarySourceLocation{}.append("The payable fallback function is defined here.", fallback->location())

libsolidity/analysis/ControlFlowAnalyzer.cpp

@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ void ControlFlowAnalyzer::checkUninitializedAccess(CFGNode const* _entry, CFGNod
 				ssl.append("The variable was declared here.", variableOccurrence->declaration().location());
 
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				3464_error,
 				variableOccurrence->occurrence() ?
 					*variableOccurrence->occurrence() :
 					variableOccurrence->declaration().location(),
@@ -176,6 +177,6 @@ void ControlFlowAnalyzer::checkUnreachable(CFGNode const* _entry, CFGNode const*
 		// Extend the location, as long as the next location overlaps (unreachable is sorted).
 		for (; it != unreachable.end() && it->start <= location.end; ++it)
 			location.end = std::max(location.end, it->end);
-		m_errorReporter.warning(location, "Unreachable code.");
+		m_errorReporter.warning(5740_error, location, "Unreachable code.");
 	}
 }

libsolidity/analysis/DeclarationTypeChecker.cpp

@@ -188,12 +188,14 @@ void DeclarationTypeChecker::endVisit(Mapping const& _mapping)
 		{
 			if (contractType->contractDefinition().isLibrary())
 				m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(
+					1665_error,
 					typeName->location(),
 					"Library types cannot be used as mapping keys."
 				);
 		}
 		else if (typeName->annotation().type->category() != Type::Category::Enum)
 			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(
+				7804_error,
 				typeName->location(),
 				"Only elementary types, contract types or enums are allowed as mapping keys."
 			);
@@ -253,9 +255,9 @@ void DeclarationTypeChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _variable)
 		return;
 
 	if (_variable.isConstant() && !_variable.isStateVariable())
-		m_errorReporter.declarationError(_variable.location(), "The \"constant\" keyword can only be used for state variables.");
+		m_errorReporter.declarationError(1788_error, _variable.location(), "The \"constant\" keyword can only be used for state variables.");
 	if (_variable.immutable() && !_variable.isStateVariable())
-		m_errorReporter.declarationError(_variable.location(), "The \"immutable\" keyword can only be used for state variables.");
+		m_errorReporter.declarationError(8297_error, _variable.location(), "The \"immutable\" keyword can only be used for state variables.");
 
 	if (!_variable.typeName())
 	{
@@ -360,19 +362,19 @@ void DeclarationTypeChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _variable)
 void DeclarationTypeChecker::typeError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter.typeError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.typeError(2311_error, _location, _description);
 }
 
 void DeclarationTypeChecker::fatalTypeError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(5651_error, _location, _description);
 }
 
 void DeclarationTypeChecker::fatalDeclarationError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(2046_error, _location, _description);
 }
 
 bool DeclarationTypeChecker::check(ASTNode const& _node)

libsolidity/analysis/DocStringAnalyser.cpp

@@ -173,5 +173,5 @@ void DocStringAnalyser::parseDocStrings(
 void DocStringAnalyser::appendError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccured = true;
-	m_errorReporter.docstringParsingError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.docstringParsingError(7816_error, _location, _description);
 }

libsolidity/analysis/ImmutableValidator.cpp

@@ -166,33 +166,39 @@ void ImmutableValidator::analyseVariableReference(VariableDeclaration const& _va
 	{
 		if (!m_currentConstructor)
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				1581_error,
 				_expression.location(),
 				"Immutable variables can only be initialized inline or assigned directly in the constructor."
 			);
 		else if (m_currentConstructor->annotation().contract->id() != _variableReference.annotation().contract->id())
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				7484_error,
 				_expression.location(),
 				"Immutable variables must be initialized in the constructor of the contract they are defined in."
 			);
 		else if (m_inLoop)
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				6672_error,
 				_expression.location(),
 				"Immutable variables can only be initialized once, not in a while statement."
 			);
 		else if (m_inBranch)
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				4599_error,
 				_expression.location(),
 				"Immutable variables must be initialized unconditionally, not in an if statement."
 			);
 
 		if (!m_initializedStateVariables.emplace(&_variableReference).second)
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				1574_error,
 				_expression.location(),
 				"Immutable state variable already initialized."
 			);
 	}
 	else if (m_inConstructionContext)
 		m_errorReporter.typeError(
+			7733_error,
 			_expression.location(),
 			"Immutable variables cannot be read during contract creation time, which means "
 			"they cannot be read in the constructor or any function or modifier called from it."
@@ -206,6 +212,7 @@ void ImmutableValidator::checkAllVariablesInitialized(solidity::langutil::Source
 			if (varDecl->immutable())
 				if (!util::contains(m_initializedStateVariables, varDecl))
 					m_errorReporter.typeError(
+						2658_error,
 						_location,
 						solidity::langutil::SecondarySourceLocation().append("Not initialized: ", varDecl->location()),
 						"Construction control flow ends without initializing all immutable state variables."

libsolidity/analysis/NameAndTypeResolver.cpp

@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ bool NameAndTypeResolver::performImports(SourceUnit& _sourceUnit, map<string, So
 			if (!_sourceUnits.count(path))
 			{
 				m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+					5073_error,
 					imp->location(),
 					"Import \"" + path + "\" (referenced as \"" + imp->path() + "\") not found."
 				);
@@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ bool NameAndTypeResolver::performImports(SourceUnit& _sourceUnit, map<string, So
 					if (declarations.empty())
 					{
 						m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+							2904_error,
 							imp->location(),
 							"Declaration \"" +
 							alias.symbol->name() +
@@ -208,6 +210,7 @@ void NameAndTypeResolver::warnVariablesNamedLikeInstructions()
 				// Don't warn the user for what the user did not.
 				continue;
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				8261_error,
 				declaration->location(),
 				"Variable is shadowed in inline assembly by an instruction of the same name"
 			);
@@ -326,6 +329,7 @@ void NameAndTypeResolver::importInheritedScope(ContractDefinition const& _base)
 					}
 
 					m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+						9097_error,
 						secondDeclarationLocation,
 						SecondarySourceLocation().append("The previous declaration is here:", firstDeclarationLocation),
 						"Identifier already declared."
@@ -343,19 +347,19 @@ void NameAndTypeResolver::linearizeBaseContracts(ContractDefinition& _contract)
 		UserDefinedTypeName const& baseName = baseSpecifier->name();
 		auto base = dynamic_cast<ContractDefinition const*>(baseName.annotation().referencedDeclaration);
 		if (!base)
-			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(baseName.location(), "Contract expected.");
+			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(8758_error, baseName.location(), "Contract expected.");
 		// "push_front" has the effect that bases mentioned later can overwrite members of bases
 		// mentioned earlier
 		input.back().push_front(base);
 		vector<ContractDefinition const*> const& basesBases = base->annotation().linearizedBaseContracts;
 		if (basesBases.empty())
-			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(baseName.location(), "Definition of base has to precede definition of derived contract");
+			m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(2449_error, baseName.location(), "Definition of base has to precede definition of derived contract");
 		input.push_front(list<ContractDefinition const*>(basesBases.begin(), basesBases.end()));
 	}
 	input.back().push_front(&_contract);
 	vector<ContractDefinition const*> result = cThreeMerge(input);
 	if (result.empty())
-		m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(_contract.location(), "Linearization of inheritance graph impossible");
+		m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(5005_error, _contract.location(), "Linearization of inheritance graph impossible");
 	_contract.annotation().linearizedBaseContracts = result;
 	_contract.annotation().contractDependencies.insert(result.begin() + 1, result.end());
 }
@@ -476,6 +480,7 @@ bool DeclarationRegistrationHelper::registerDeclaration(
 		}
 
 		_errorReporter.declarationError(
+			2333_error,
 			secondDeclarationLocation,
 			SecondarySourceLocation().append("The previous declaration is here:", firstDeclarationLocation),
 			"Identifier already declared."
@@ -486,6 +491,7 @@ bool DeclarationRegistrationHelper::registerDeclaration(
 	{
 		if (dynamic_cast<MagicVariableDeclaration const*>(shadowedDeclaration))
 			_errorReporter.warning(
+				2319_error,
 				*_errorLocation,
 				"This declaration shadows a builtin symbol."
 			);
@@ -493,6 +499,7 @@ bool DeclarationRegistrationHelper::registerDeclaration(
 		{
 			auto shadowedLocation = shadowedDeclaration->location();
 			_errorReporter.warning(
+				2519_error,
 				_declaration.location(),
 				"This declaration shadows an existing declaration.",
 				SecondarySourceLocation().append("The shadowed declaration is here:", shadowedLocation)

libsolidity/analysis/OverrideChecker.cpp

@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkIllegalOverrides(ContractDefinition const& _contract)
 	{
 		if (contains_if(inheritedFuncs, MatchByName{modifier->name()}))
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				5631_error,
 				modifier->location(),
 				"Override changes function or public state variable to modifier."
 			);
@@ -474,7 +475,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkIllegalOverrides(ContractDefinition const& _contract)
 			continue;
 
 		if (contains_if(inheritedMods, MatchByName{function->name()}))
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(function->location(), "Override changes modifier to function.");
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(1469_error, function->location(), "Override changes modifier to function.");
 
 		checkOverrideList(OverrideProxy{function}, inheritedFuncs);
 	}
@@ -484,7 +485,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkIllegalOverrides(ContractDefinition const& _contract)
 			continue;
 
 		if (contains_if(inheritedMods, MatchByName{stateVar->name()}))
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(stateVar->location(), "Override changes modifier to public state variable.");
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(1456_error, stateVar->location(), "Override changes modifier to public state variable.");
 
 		checkOverrideList(OverrideProxy{stateVar}, inheritedFuncs);
 	}
@@ -500,6 +501,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkOverride(OverrideProxy const& _overriding, OverridePr
 
 	if (_overriding.isModifier() && *_overriding.modifierType() != *_super.modifierType())
 		m_errorReporter.typeError(
+			1078_error,
 			_overriding.location(),
 			"Override changes modifier signature."
 		);
@@ -593,6 +595,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::overrideListError(
 		contractSingularPlural = "contracts ";
 
 	m_errorReporter.typeError(
+		5883_error,
 		_item.overrides() ? _item.overrides()->location() : _item.location(),
 		ssl,
 		_message1 +
@@ -606,6 +609,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::overrideListError(
 void OverrideChecker::overrideError(Declaration const& _overriding, Declaration const& _super, string const& _message, string const& _secondaryMsg)
 {
 	m_errorReporter.typeError(
+		9456_error,
 		_overriding.location(),
 		SecondarySourceLocation().append(_secondaryMsg, _super.location()),
 		_message
@@ -616,6 +620,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::overrideError(Declaration const& _overriding, Declaration
 void OverrideChecker::overrideError(OverrideProxy const& _overriding, OverrideProxy const& _super, string const& _message, string const& _secondaryMsg)
 {
 	m_errorReporter.typeError(
+		1452_error,
 		_overriding.location(),
 		SecondarySourceLocation().append(_secondaryMsg, _super.location()),
 		_message
@@ -718,7 +723,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkAmbiguousOverridesInternal(set<OverrideProxy> _baseCa
 			" Since one of the bases defines a public state variable which cannot be overridden, "
 			"you have to change the inheritance layout or the names of the functions.";
 
-	m_errorReporter.typeError(_location, ssl, message);
+	m_errorReporter.typeError(6480_error, _location, ssl, message);
 }
 
 set<ContractDefinition const*, OverrideChecker::CompareByID> OverrideChecker::resolveOverrideList(OverrideSpecifier const& _overrides) const
@@ -766,6 +771,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkOverrideList(OverrideProxy _item, OverrideProxyBySign
 				SecondarySourceLocation ssl;
 				ssl.append("First occurrence here: ", list[i-1]->location());
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					4520_error,
 					list[i]->location(),
 					ssl,
 						"Duplicate contract \"" +
@@ -791,6 +797,7 @@ void OverrideChecker::checkOverrideList(OverrideProxy _item, OverrideProxyBySign
 
 	if (_item.overrides() && expectedContracts.empty())
 		m_errorReporter.typeError(
+			7792_error,
 			_item.overrides()->location(),
 			_item.astNodeNameCapitalized() + " has override specified but does not override anything."
 		);

libsolidity/analysis/PostTypeChecker.cpp

@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct ConstStateVarCircularReferenceChecker: public PostTypeChecker::Checker
 		for (auto declaration: m_constVariables)
 			if (auto identifier = findCycle(*declaration))
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					6161_error,
 					declaration->location(),
 					"The value of the constant " + declaration->name() +
 					" has a cyclic dependency via " + identifier->name() + "."
@@ -165,7 +166,7 @@ struct ConstStateVarCircularReferenceChecker: public PostTypeChecker::Checker
 		auto visitor = [&](VariableDeclaration const& _variable, util::CycleDetector<VariableDeclaration>& _cycleDetector, size_t _depth)
 		{
 			if (_depth >= 256)
-				m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(_variable.location(), "Variable definition exhausting cyclic dependency validator.");
+				m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(7380_error, _variable.location(), "Variable definition exhausting cyclic dependency validator.");
 
 			// Iterating through the dependencies needs to be deterministic and thus cannot
 			// depend on the memory layout.
@@ -209,6 +210,7 @@ struct OverrideSpecifierChecker: public PostTypeChecker::Checker
 			TypeType const* actualTypeType = dynamic_cast<TypeType const*>(decl->type());
 
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				9301_error,
 				override->location(),
 				"Expected contract but got " +
 				actualTypeType->actualType()->toString(true) +
@@ -243,6 +245,7 @@ struct ModifierContextChecker: public PostTypeChecker::Checker
 		if (ModifierType const* type = dynamic_cast<decltype(type)>(_identifier.annotation().type))
 		{
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				3112_error,
 				_identifier.location(),
 				"Modifier can only be referenced in function headers."
 			);
@@ -280,6 +283,7 @@ struct EventOutsideEmitChecker: public PostTypeChecker::Checker
 			// Check for event outside of emit statement
 			if (!m_insideEmitStatement && functionType->kind() == FunctionType::Kind::Event)
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					3132_error,
 					_functionCall.location(),
 					"Event invocations have to be prefixed by \"emit\"."
 				);
@@ -308,7 +312,7 @@ struct NoVariablesInInterfaceChecker: public PostTypeChecker::Checker
 			&& !_variable.isCallableOrCatchParameter()
 			&& !m_insideStruct
 		)
-			m_errorReporter.typeError(_variable.location(), "Variables cannot be declared in interfaces.");
+			m_errorReporter.typeError(8274_error, _variable.location(), "Variables cannot be declared in interfaces.");
 
 		return true;
 	}

libsolidity/analysis/ReferencesResolver.cpp

@@ -268,19 +268,19 @@ void ReferencesResolver::operator()(yul::VariableDeclaration const& _varDecl)
 void ReferencesResolver::declarationError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter.declarationError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.declarationError(8532_error, _location, _description);
 }
 
 void ReferencesResolver::declarationError(SourceLocation const& _location, SecondarySourceLocation const& _ssl, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter.declarationError(_location, _ssl, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.declarationError(3881_error, _location, _ssl, _description);
 }
 
 void ReferencesResolver::fatalDeclarationError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(6546_error, _location, _description);
 }
 
 }

libsolidity/analysis/StaticAnalyzer.cpp

@@ -120,13 +120,14 @@ void StaticAnalyzer::endVisit(FunctionDefinition const&)
 			{
 				if (var.first.second->isCallableOrCatchParameter())
 					m_errorReporter.warning(
+						5667_error,
 						var.first.second->location(),
 						"Unused " +
 						string(var.first.second->isTryCatchParameter() ? "try/catch" : "function") +
 						" parameter. Remove or comment out the variable name to silence this warning."
 					);
 				else
-					m_errorReporter.warning(var.first.second->location(), "Unused local variable.");
+					m_errorReporter.warning(2072_error, var.first.second->location(), "Unused local variable.");
 			}
 	m_localVarUseCount.clear();
 	m_constructor = false;
@@ -159,6 +160,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(VariableDeclaration const& _variable)
 		set<StructDefinition const*> structsSeen;
 		if (structureSizeEstimate(*_variable.type(), structsSeen) >= bigint(1) << 64)
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				3408_error,
 				_variable.location(),
 				"Variable covers a large part of storage and thus makes collisions likely. "
 				"Either use mappings or dynamic arrays and allow their size to be increased only "
@@ -183,6 +185,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(ExpressionStatement const& _statement)
 {
 	if (_statement.expression().annotation().isPure)
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			6133_error,
 			_statement.location(),
 			"Statement has no effect."
 		);
@@ -196,11 +199,13 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
 	{
 		if (type->kind() == MagicType::Kind::Message && _memberAccess.memberName() == "gas")
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				1400_error,
 				_memberAccess.location(),
 				"\"msg.gas\" has been deprecated in favor of \"gasleft()\""
 			);
 		else if (type->kind() == MagicType::Kind::Block && _memberAccess.memberName() == "blockhash")
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				8113_error,
 				_memberAccess.location(),
 				"\"block.blockhash()\" has been deprecated in favor of \"blockhash()\""
 			);
@@ -211,6 +216,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
 			ContractType const& contract = dynamic_cast<ContractType const&>(*type->typeArgument());
 			if (m_constructorUsesAssembly->check(contract.contractDefinition()))
 				m_errorReporter.warning(
+					6417_error,
 					_memberAccess.location(),
 					"The constructor of the contract (or its base) uses inline assembly. "
 					"Because of that, it might be that the deployed bytecode is different from type(...).runtimeCode."
@@ -222,6 +228,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
 		if (auto const* type = dynamic_cast<FunctionType const*>(_memberAccess.annotation().type))
 			if (type->kind() == FunctionType::Kind::BareCallCode)
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					2256_error,
 					_memberAccess.location(),
 					"\"callcode\" has been deprecated in favour of \"delegatecall\"."
 				);
@@ -235,6 +242,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
 			{
 				if (id->name() == "this")
 					m_errorReporter.warning(
+						5805_error,
 						id->location(),
 						"\"this\" used in constructor. "
 						"Note that external functions of a contract "
@@ -285,6 +293,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(BinaryOperation const& _operation)
 		))
 			if (rhs->isZero())
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					1211_error,
 					_operation.location(),
 					(_operation.getOperator() == Token::Div) ? "Division by zero." : "Modulo zero."
 				);
@@ -307,6 +316,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(FunctionCall const& _functionCall)
 				))
 					if (lastArg->isZero())
 						m_errorReporter.typeError(
+							4195_error,
 							_functionCall.location(),
 							"Arithmetic modulo zero."
 						);
@@ -317,6 +327,7 @@ bool StaticAnalyzer::visit(FunctionCall const& _functionCall)
 			functionType->declaration().scope() == m_currentContract
 		)
 			m_errorReporter.typeError(
+				6700_error,
 				_functionCall.location(),
 				SecondarySourceLocation().append(
 					"The function declaration is here:",

libsolidity/analysis/SyntaxChecker.cpp

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void SyntaxChecker::endVisit(SourceUnit const& _sourceUnit)
 				string(";\"");
 
 		// when reporting the warning, print the source name only
-		m_errorReporter.warning({-1, -1, _sourceUnit.location().source}, errorString);
+		m_errorReporter.warning(3420_error, {-1, -1, _sourceUnit.location().source}, errorString);
 	}
 	m_sourceUnit = nullptr;
 }
@@ -79,18 +79,20 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(PragmaDirective const& _pragma)
 	solAssert(!_pragma.tokens().empty(), "");
 	solAssert(_pragma.tokens().size() == _pragma.literals().size(), "");
 	if (_pragma.tokens()[0] != Token::Identifier)
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_pragma.location(), "Invalid pragma \"" + _pragma.literals()[0] + "\"");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(5226_error, _pragma.location(), "Invalid pragma \"" + _pragma.literals()[0] + "\"");
 	else if (_pragma.literals()[0] == "experimental")
 	{
 		solAssert(m_sourceUnit, "");
 		vector<string> literals(_pragma.literals().begin() + 1, _pragma.literals().end());
 		if (literals.empty())
 			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+				9679_error,
 				_pragma.location(),
 				"Experimental feature name is missing."
 			);
 		else if (literals.size() > 1)
 			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+				6022_error,
 				_pragma.location(),
 				"Stray arguments."
 			);
@@ -98,17 +100,17 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(PragmaDirective const& _pragma)
 		{
 			string const literal = literals[0];
 			if (literal.empty())
-				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_pragma.location(), "Empty experimental feature name is invalid.");
+				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(3250_error, _pragma.location(), "Empty experimental feature name is invalid.");
 			else if (!ExperimentalFeatureNames.count(literal))
-				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_pragma.location(), "Unsupported experimental feature name.");
+				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(8491_error, _pragma.location(), "Unsupported experimental feature name.");
 			else if (m_sourceUnit->annotation().experimentalFeatures.count(ExperimentalFeatureNames.at(literal)))
-				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_pragma.location(), "Duplicate experimental feature name.");
+				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(1231_error, _pragma.location(), "Duplicate experimental feature name.");
 			else
 			{
 				auto feature = ExperimentalFeatureNames.at(literal);
 				m_sourceUnit->annotation().experimentalFeatures.insert(feature);
 				if (!ExperimentalFeatureWithoutWarning.count(feature))
-					m_errorReporter.warning(_pragma.location(), "Experimental features are turned on. Do not use experimental features on live deployments.");
+					m_errorReporter.warning(2264_error, _pragma.location(), "Experimental features are turned on. Do not use experimental features on live deployments.");
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -121,6 +123,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(PragmaDirective const& _pragma)
 		static SemVerVersion const currentVersion{string(VersionString)};
 		if (!matchExpression.matches(currentVersion))
 			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+				3997_error,
 				_pragma.location(),
 				"Source file requires different compiler version (current compiler is " +
 				string(VersionString) + ") - note that nightly builds are considered to be "
@@ -129,7 +132,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(PragmaDirective const& _pragma)
 		m_versionPragmaFound = true;
 	}
 	else
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_pragma.location(), "Unknown pragma \"" + _pragma.literals()[0] + "\"");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(4936_error, _pragma.location(), "Unknown pragma \"" + _pragma.literals()[0] + "\"");
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(ModifierDefinition const&)
 void SyntaxChecker::endVisit(ModifierDefinition const& _modifier)
 {
 	if (_modifier.isImplemented() && !m_placeholderFound)
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_modifier.body().location(), "Modifier body does not contain '_'.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(2883_error, _modifier.body().location(), "Modifier body does not contain '_'.");
 	m_placeholderFound = false;
 }
 
@@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ void SyntaxChecker::checkSingleStatementVariableDeclaration(ASTNode const& _stat
 {
 	auto varDecl = dynamic_cast<VariableDeclarationStatement const*>(&_statement);
 	if (varDecl)
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_statement.location(), "Variable declarations can only be used inside blocks.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(9079_error, _statement.location(), "Variable declarations can only be used inside blocks.");
 }
 
 bool SyntaxChecker::visit(IfStatement const& _ifStatement)
@@ -189,7 +192,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(Continue const& _continueStatement)
 {
 	if (m_inLoopDepth <= 0)
 		// we're not in a for/while loop, report syntax error
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_continueStatement.location(), "\"continue\" has to be in a \"for\" or \"while\" loop.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(4123_error, _continueStatement.location(), "\"continue\" has to be in a \"for\" or \"while\" loop.");
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -197,13 +200,14 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(Break const& _breakStatement)
 {
 	if (m_inLoopDepth <= 0)
 		// we're not in a for/while loop, report syntax error
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_breakStatement.location(), "\"break\" has to be in a \"for\" or \"while\" loop.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(6102_error, _breakStatement.location(), "\"break\" has to be in a \"for\" or \"while\" loop.");
 	return true;
 }
 
 bool SyntaxChecker::visit(Throw const& _throwStatement)
 {
 	m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+		4538_error,
 		_throwStatement.location(),
 		"\"throw\" is deprecated in favour of \"revert()\", \"require()\" and \"assert()\"."
 	);
@@ -222,29 +226,29 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(Literal const& _literal)
 	// Generic checks no matter what base this number literal is of:
 	if (value.back() == '_')
 	{
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No trailing underscores allowed.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(2090_error, _literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No trailing underscores allowed.");
 		return true;
 	}
 
 	if (value.find("__") != ASTString::npos)
 	{
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. Only one consecutive underscores between digits allowed.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(2990_error, _literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. Only one consecutive underscores between digits allowed.");
 		return true;
 	}
 
 	if (!_literal.isHexNumber()) // decimal literal
 	{
 		if (value.find("._") != ASTString::npos)
-			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscores in front of the fraction part allowed.");
+			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(3891_error, _literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscores in front of the fraction part allowed.");
 
 		if (value.find("_.") != ASTString::npos)
-			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscores in front of the fraction part allowed.");
+			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(1023_error, _literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscores in front of the fraction part allowed.");
 
 		if (value.find("_e") != ASTString::npos)
-			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscore at the end of the mantissa allowed.");
+			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(6415_error, _literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscore at the end of the mantissa allowed.");
 
 		if (value.find("e_") != ASTString::npos)
-			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscore in front of exponent allowed.");
+			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(6165_error, _literal.location(), "Invalid use of underscores in number literal. No underscore in front of exponent allowed.");
 	}
 
 	return true;
@@ -253,7 +257,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(Literal const& _literal)
 bool SyntaxChecker::visit(UnaryOperation const& _operation)
 {
 	if (_operation.getOperator() == Token::Add)
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_operation.location(), "Use of unary + is disallowed.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(9636_error, _operation.location(), "Use of unary + is disallowed.");
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -265,6 +269,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(InlineAssembly const& _inlineAssembly)
 
 	if (yul::MSizeFinder::containsMSize(_inlineAssembly.dialect(), _inlineAssembly.operations()))
 		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+			6553_error,
 			_inlineAssembly.location(),
 			"The msize instruction cannot be used when the Yul optimizer is activated because "
 			"it can change its semantics. Either disable the Yul optimizer or do not use the instruction."
@@ -285,7 +290,8 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(ContractDefinition const& _contract)
 	ASTString const& contractName = _contract.name();
 	for (FunctionDefinition const* function: _contract.definedFunctions())
 		if (function->name() == contractName)
-			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(function->location(),
+			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+				5796_error,function->location(),
 				"Functions are not allowed to have the same name as the contract. "
 				"If you intend this to be a constructor, use \"constructor(...) { ... }\" to define it."
 			);
@@ -298,15 +304,16 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(FunctionDefinition const& _function)
 	{
 		string suggestedVisibility = _function.isFallback() || _function.isReceive() || m_isInterface ? "external" : "public";
 		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+			4937_error,
 			_function.location(),
 			"No visibility specified. Did you intend to add \"" + suggestedVisibility + "\"?"
 		);
 	}
 
 	if (m_isInterface && !_function.modifiers().empty())
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_function.location(), "Functions in interfaces cannot have modifiers.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(5842_error, _function.location(), "Functions in interfaces cannot have modifiers.");
 	else if (!_function.isImplemented() && !_function.modifiers().empty())
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_function.location(), "Functions without implementation cannot have modifiers.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(2668_error, _function.location(), "Functions without implementation cannot have modifiers.");
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -315,11 +322,11 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(FunctionTypeName const& _node)
 {
 	for (auto const& decl: _node.parameterTypeList()->parameters())
 		if (!decl->name().empty())
-			m_errorReporter.warning(decl->location(), "Naming function type parameters is deprecated.");
+			m_errorReporter.warning(6162_error, decl->location(), "Naming function type parameters is deprecated.");
 
 	for (auto const& decl: _node.returnParameterTypeList()->parameters())
 		if (!decl->name().empty())
-			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(decl->location(), "Return parameters in function types may not be named.");
+			m_errorReporter.syntaxError(7304_error, decl->location(), "Return parameters in function types may not be named.");
 
 	return true;
 }
@@ -329,6 +336,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(VariableDeclarationStatement const& _statement)
 	// Report if none of the variable components in the tuple have a name (only possible via deprecated "var")
 	if (boost::algorithm::all_of_equal(_statement.declarations(), nullptr))
 		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+			3299_error,
 			_statement.location(),
 			"The use of the \"var\" keyword is disallowed. The declaration part of the statement can be removed, since it is empty."
 		);
@@ -339,7 +347,7 @@ bool SyntaxChecker::visit(VariableDeclarationStatement const& _statement)
 bool SyntaxChecker::visit(StructDefinition const& _struct)
 {
 	if (_struct.members().empty())
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(_struct.location(), "Defining empty structs is disallowed.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(5306_error, _struct.location(), "Defining empty structs is disallowed.");
 
 	return true;
 }

libsolidity/analysis/ViewPureChecker.cpp

@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ void ViewPureChecker::endVisit(FunctionDefinition const& _funDef)
 		!_funDef.overrides()
 	)
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			2018_error,
 			_funDef.location(),
 			"Function state mutability can be restricted to " + stateMutabilityToString(m_bestMutabilityAndLocation.mutability)
 		);
@@ -252,6 +253,7 @@ void ViewPureChecker::reportMutability(
 	))
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.typeError(
+			2527_error,
 			_location,
 			"Function declared as pure, but this expression (potentially) reads from the "
 			"environment or state and thus requires \"view\"."
@@ -261,6 +263,7 @@ void ViewPureChecker::reportMutability(
 	else if (_mutability == StateMutability::NonPayable)
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.typeError(
+			8961_error,
 			_location,
 			"Function declared as " +
 			stateMutabilityToString(m_currentFunction->stateMutability()) +
@@ -277,12 +280,14 @@ void ViewPureChecker::reportMutability(
 		{
 			if (_nestedLocation)
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					4006_error,
 					_location,
 					SecondarySourceLocation().append("\"msg.value\" or \"callvalue()\" appear here inside the modifier.", *_nestedLocation),
 					"This modifier uses \"msg.value\" or \"callvalue()\" and thus the function has to be payable or internal."
 				);
 			else
 				m_errorReporter.typeError(
+					5887_error,
 					_location,
 					"\"msg.value\" and \"callvalue()\" can only be used in payable public functions. Make the function "
 					"\"payable\" or use an internal function to avoid this error."

libsolidity/formal/BMC.cpp

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ BMC::BMC(
 	if (_enabledSolvers.some())
 		if (!_smtlib2Responses.empty())
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				5622_error,
 				"SMT-LIB2 query responses were given in the auxiliary input, "
 				"but this Solidity binary uses an SMT solver (Z3/CVC4) directly."
 				"These responses will be ignored."
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ void BMC::analyze(SourceUnit const& _source, set<Expression const*> _safeAsserti
 		{
 			m_noSolverWarning = true;
 			m_outerErrorReporter.warning(
+				8084_error,
 				SourceLocation(),
 				"BMC analysis was not possible since no integrated SMT solver (Z3 or CVC4) was found."
 			);
@@ -467,6 +469,7 @@ void BMC::internalOrExternalFunctionCall(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
 		inlineFunctionCall(_funCall);
 	else if (funType.kind() == FunctionType::Kind::Internal)
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			5729_error,
 			_funCall.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this type of function call."
 		);
@@ -760,6 +763,7 @@ void BMC::checkCondition(
 			for (auto const& eval: sortedModel)
 				modelMessage << "  " << eval.first << " = " << eval.second << "\n";
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				4334_error,
 				_location,
 				message.str(),
 				SecondarySourceLocation().append(modelMessage.str(), SourceLocation{})
@@ -770,20 +774,20 @@ void BMC::checkCondition(
 		else
 		{
 			message << ".";
-			m_errorReporter.warning(_location, message.str(), secondaryLocation);
+			m_errorReporter.warning(6084_error, _location, message.str(), secondaryLocation);
 		}
 		break;
 	}
 	case smt::CheckResult::UNSATISFIABLE:
 		break;
 	case smt::CheckResult::UNKNOWN:
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_location, _description + " might happen here.", secondaryLocation);
+		m_errorReporter.warning(5225_error, _location, _description + " might happen here.", secondaryLocation);
 		break;
 	case smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING:
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_location, "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
+		m_errorReporter.warning(1584_error, _location, "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
 		break;
 	case smt::CheckResult::ERROR:
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_location, "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
+		m_errorReporter.warning(1823_error, _location, "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
 		break;
 	}
 
@@ -813,9 +817,9 @@ void BMC::checkBooleanNotConstant(
 	m_interface->pop();
 
 	if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::ERROR || negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::ERROR)
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_condition.location(), "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
+		m_errorReporter.warning(8592_error, _condition.location(), "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
 	else if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING || negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING)
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_condition.location(), "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
+		m_errorReporter.warning(3356_error, _condition.location(), "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
 	else if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::SATISFIABLE && negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::SATISFIABLE)
 	{
 		// everything fine.
@@ -825,7 +829,7 @@ void BMC::checkBooleanNotConstant(
 		// can't do anything.
 	}
 	else if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::UNSATISFIABLE && negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::UNSATISFIABLE)
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_condition.location(), "Condition unreachable.", SMTEncoder::callStackMessage(_callStack));
+		m_errorReporter.warning(2512_error, _condition.location(), "Condition unreachable.", SMTEncoder::callStackMessage(_callStack));
 	else
 	{
 		string value;
@@ -841,6 +845,7 @@ void BMC::checkBooleanNotConstant(
 			value = "false";
 		}
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			6838_error,
 			_condition.location(),
 			boost::algorithm::replace_all_copy(_description, "$VALUE", value),
 			SMTEncoder::callStackMessage(_callStack)
@@ -862,7 +867,7 @@ BMC::checkSatisfiableAndGenerateModel(vector<smt::Expression> const& _expression
 		string description("Error querying SMT solver");
 		if (_e.comment())
 			description += ": " + *_e.comment();
-		m_errorReporter.warning(description);
+		m_errorReporter.warning(8140_error, description);
 		result = smt::CheckResult::ERROR;
 	}
 

libsolidity/formal/CHC.cpp

@@ -965,10 +965,10 @@ pair<smt::CheckResult, vector<string>> CHC::query(smt::Expression const& _query,
 	case smt::CheckResult::UNKNOWN:
 		break;
 	case smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING:
-		m_outerErrorReporter.warning(_location, "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
+		m_outerErrorReporter.warning(1988_error, _location, "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
 		break;
 	case smt::CheckResult::ERROR:
-		m_outerErrorReporter.warning(_location, "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
+		m_outerErrorReporter.warning(1218_error, _location, "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
 		break;
 	}
 	return {result, values};

libsolidity/formal/SMTEncoder.cpp

@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(FunctionDefinition const&)
 bool SMTEncoder::visit(InlineAssembly const& _inlineAsm)
 {
 	m_errorReporter.warning(
+		7737_error,
 		_inlineAsm.location(),
 		"Assertion checker does not support inline assembly."
 	);
@@ -325,6 +326,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(VariableDeclarationStatement const& _varDecl)
 	}
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			7186_error,
 			_varDecl.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement such variable declarations."
 		);
@@ -350,6 +352,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(Assignment const& _assignment)
 			m_context.newValue(*varDecl);
 
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			9149_error,
 			_assignment.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this assignment operator."
 		);
@@ -409,6 +412,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(TupleExpression const& _tuple)
 
 	if (_tuple.isInlineArray())
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			2177_error,
 			_tuple.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement inline arrays."
 		);
@@ -493,6 +497,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(UnaryOperation const& _op)
 		}
 		else
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				1950_error,
 				_op.location(),
 				"Assertion checker does not yet implement such increments / decrements."
 			);
@@ -522,6 +527,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(UnaryOperation const& _op)
 				arrayIndexAssignment(_op.subExpression(), symbVar->currentValue());
 			else
 				m_errorReporter.warning(
+					2683_error,
 					_op.location(),
 					"Assertion checker does not yet implement \"delete\" for this expression."
 				);
@@ -530,6 +536,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(UnaryOperation const& _op)
 	}
 	default:
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			3682_error,
 			_op.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this operator."
 		);
@@ -568,6 +575,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(BinaryOperation const& _op)
 		compareOperation(_op);
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			3876_error,
 			_op.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this operator."
 		);
@@ -580,6 +588,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
 	if (_funCall.annotation().kind == FunctionCallKind::StructConstructorCall)
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			4639_error,
 			_funCall.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this expression."
 		);
@@ -639,6 +648,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
 	}
 	default:
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			4588_error,
 			_funCall.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this type of function call."
 		);
@@ -771,6 +781,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::visitTypeConversion(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
 		}
 
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			5084_error,
 			_funCall.location(),
 			"Type conversion is not yet fully supported and might yield false positives."
 		);
@@ -800,6 +811,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(Literal const& _literal)
 	else
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			7885_error,
 			_literal.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet support the type of this literal (" +
 			_literal.annotation().type->toString() +
@@ -850,6 +862,7 @@ bool SMTEncoder::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
 			accessedName = identifier->name();
 		else
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				9551_error,
 				_memberAccess.location(),
 				"Assertion checker does not yet support this expression."
 			);
@@ -879,6 +892,7 @@ bool SMTEncoder::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
 	}
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			7650_error,
 			_memberAccess.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet support this expression."
 		);
@@ -903,6 +917,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(IndexAccess const& _indexAccess)
 		if (varDecl->type()->category() == Type::Category::FixedBytes)
 		{
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				7989_error,
 				_indexAccess.location(),
 				"Assertion checker does not yet support index accessing fixed bytes."
 			);
@@ -917,6 +932,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(IndexAccess const& _indexAccess)
 	else
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			9118_error,
 			_indexAccess.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this expression."
 		);
@@ -940,6 +956,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::endVisit(IndexRangeAccess const& _indexRangeAccess)
 {
 	createExpr(_indexRangeAccess);
 	m_errorReporter.warning(
+		2923_error,
 		_indexRangeAccess.location(),
 		"Assertion checker does not yet implement this expression."
 	);
@@ -1019,6 +1036,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::arrayIndexAssignment(Expression const& _expr, smt::Expression c
 		else
 		{
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				9056_error,
 				_expr.location(),
 				"Assertion checker does not yet implement this expression."
 			);
@@ -1034,6 +1052,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::defineGlobalVariable(string const& _name, Expression const& _ex
 		bool abstract = m_context.createGlobalSymbol(_name, _expr);
 		if (abstract)
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				1695_error,
 				_expr.location(),
 				"Assertion checker does not yet support this global variable."
 			);
@@ -1087,6 +1106,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::arithmeticOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
 		}
 		default:
 			m_errorReporter.warning(
+				5188_error,
 				_op.location(),
 				"Assertion checker does not yet implement this operator."
 			);
@@ -1094,6 +1114,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::arithmeticOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
 	}
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			9011_error,
 			_op.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement this operator for type " + type->richIdentifier() + "."
 		);
@@ -1185,6 +1206,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::compareOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
 	}
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			7229_error,
 			_op.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement the type " + _op.annotation().commonType->toString() + " for comparisons"
 		);
@@ -1213,6 +1235,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::booleanOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
 	}
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			3263_error,
 			_op.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement the type " + _op.annotation().commonType->toString() + " for boolean operations"
 		);
@@ -1245,6 +1268,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::assignment(
 			m_context.newValue(*varDecl);
 
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			6191_error,
 			_location,
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement type " + _type->toString()
 		);
@@ -1272,6 +1296,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::assignment(
 	}
 	else
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			8182_error,
 			_location,
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement such assignments."
 		);
@@ -1482,6 +1507,7 @@ bool SMTEncoder::createVariable(VariableDeclaration const& _varDecl)
 	if (abstract)
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			8115_error,
 			_varDecl.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet support the type of this variable."
 		);
@@ -1494,7 +1520,7 @@ smt::Expression SMTEncoder::expr(Expression const& _e, TypePointer _targetType)
 {
 	if (!m_context.knownExpression(_e))
 	{
-		m_errorReporter.warning(_e.location(), "Internal error: Expression undefined for SMT solver." );
+		m_errorReporter.warning(6031_error, _e.location(), "Internal error: Expression undefined for SMT solver." );
 		createExpr(_e);
 	}
 
@@ -1506,6 +1532,7 @@ void SMTEncoder::createExpr(Expression const& _e)
 	bool abstract = m_context.createExpression(_e);
 	if (abstract)
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			8364_error,
 			_e.location(),
 			"Assertion checker does not yet implement type " + _e.annotation().type->toString()
 		);

libsolidity/interface/CompilerStack.cpp

@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ bool CompilerStack::parse()
 	m_errorReporter.clear();
 
 	if (SemVerVersion{string(VersionString)}.isPrerelease())
-		m_errorReporter.warning("This is a pre-release compiler version, please do not use it in production.");
+		m_errorReporter.warning(3805_error, "This is a pre-release compiler version, please do not use it in production.");
 
 	Parser parser{m_errorReporter, m_evmVersion, m_parserErrorRecovery};
 
@@ -949,6 +949,7 @@ StringMap CompilerStack::loadMissingSources(SourceUnit const& _ast, std::string
 				else
 				{
 					m_errorReporter.parserError(
+						6275_error,
 						import->location(),
 						string("Source \"" + importPath + "\" not found: " + result.responseOrErrorMessage)
 					);
@@ -1110,6 +1111,7 @@ void CompilerStack::compileContract(
 		compiledContract.runtimeObject.bytecode.size() > 0x6000
 	)
 		m_errorReporter.warning(
+			5574_error,
 			_contract.location(),
 			"Contract code size exceeds 24576 bytes (a limit introduced in Spurious Dragon). "
 			"This contract may not be deployable on mainnet. "

libsolidity/parsing/DocStringParser.cpp

@@ -195,5 +195,5 @@ void DocStringParser::newTag(string const& _tagName)
 void DocStringParser::appendError(string const& _description)
 {
 	m_errorsOccurred = true;
-	m_errorReporter->docstringParsingError(_description);
+	m_errorReporter->docstringParsingError(9440_error, _description);
 }

libsolidity/parsing/Parser.cpp

@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ void Parser::parsePragmaVersion(SourceLocation const& _location, vector<Token> c
 		// so we don't need to report anything here.
 		if (!m_parserErrorRecovery)
 			m_errorReporter.fatalParserError(
+				5333_error,
 				_location,
 				"Source file requires different compiler version (current compiler is " +
 				string(VersionString) + ") - note that nightly builds are considered to be "

libyul/AsmAnalysis.cpp

@@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ bool AsmAnalyzer::warnOnInstructions(evmasm::Instruction _instr, SourceLocation
 	)
 	{
 		m_errorReporter.error(
+			4316_error,
 			Error::Type::SyntaxError,
 			_location,
 			"Jump instructions and labels are low-level EVM features that can lead to "
@@ -599,13 +600,13 @@ bool AsmAnalyzer::warnOnInstructions(evmasm::Instruction _instr, SourceLocation
 
 void AsmAnalyzer::typeError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
-	m_errorReporter.typeError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.typeError(7569_error, _location, _description);
 	m_success = false;
 }
 
 void AsmAnalyzer::declarationError(SourceLocation const& _location, string const& _description)
 {
-	m_errorReporter.declarationError(_location, _description);
+	m_errorReporter.declarationError(9595_error, _location, _description);
 	m_success = false;
 }
 

libyul/AsmParser.cpp

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Statement Parser::parseStatement()
 		{
 			Statement stmt{createWithLocation<Leave>()};
 			if (!m_insideFunction)
-				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(currentLocation(), "Keyword \"leave\" can only be used inside a function.");
+				m_errorReporter.syntaxError(8149_error, currentLocation(), "Keyword \"leave\" can only be used inside a function.");
 			m_scanner->next();
 			return stmt;
 		}
@@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ FunctionDefinition Parser::parseFunctionDefinition()
 
 	if (m_currentForLoopComponent == ForLoopComponent::ForLoopPre)
 		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(
+			3441_error,
 			currentLocation(),
 			"Functions cannot be defined inside a for-loop init block."
 		);
@@ -534,13 +535,13 @@ void Parser::checkBreakContinuePosition(string const& _which)
 	switch (m_currentForLoopComponent)
 	{
 	case ForLoopComponent::None:
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(currentLocation(), "Keyword \"" + _which + "\" needs to be inside a for-loop body.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(2592_error, currentLocation(), "Keyword \"" + _which + "\" needs to be inside a for-loop body.");
 		break;
 	case ForLoopComponent::ForLoopPre:
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(currentLocation(), "Keyword \"" + _which + "\" in for-loop init block is not allowed.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(9615_error, currentLocation(), "Keyword \"" + _which + "\" in for-loop init block is not allowed.");
 		break;
 	case ForLoopComponent::ForLoopPost:
-		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(currentLocation(), "Keyword \"" + _which + "\" in for-loop post block is not allowed.");
+		m_errorReporter.syntaxError(2461_error, currentLocation(), "Keyword \"" + _which + "\" in for-loop post block is not allowed.");
 		break;
 	case ForLoopComponent::ForLoopBody:
 		break;

libyul/AsmScopeFiller.cpp

@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ bool ScopeFiller::registerVariable(TypedName const& _name, SourceLocation const&
 	{
 		//@TODO secondary location
 		m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+			1395_error,
 			_location,
 			"Variable name " + _name.name.str() + " already taken in this scope."
 		);
@@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ bool ScopeFiller::registerFunction(FunctionDefinition const& _funDef)
 	{
 		//@TODO secondary location
 		m_errorReporter.declarationError(
+			6052_error,
 			_funDef.location,
 			"Function name " + _funDef.name.str() + " already taken in this scope."
 		);