Moved a check related to constants to TypeChecker

And added a proper error message when constant types containing (nested) mapping types are used.
This commit is contained in:
hrkrshnn 2021-10-26 18:29:46 +02:00
parent 51009c005d
commit 8815d6f5f0
15 changed files with 30 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -437,14 +437,16 @@ void DeclarationTypeChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _variable)
type = TypeProvider::withLocation(ref, typeLoc, isPointer);
}
if (_variable.isConstant() && !type->isValueType())
{
bool allowed = false;
if (auto arrayType = dynamic_cast<ArrayType const*>(type))
allowed = arrayType->isByteArray();
if (!allowed)
m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(9259_error, _variable.location(), "Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.");
}
if (
_variable.isConstant() &&
!dynamic_cast<UserDefinedValueType const*>(type) &&
type->containsNestedMapping()
)
m_errorReporter.fatalDeclarationError(
3530_error,
_variable.location(),
"The type contains a (nested) mapping and therefore cannot be a constant."
);
_variable.annotation().type = type;
}

View File

@ -530,6 +530,15 @@ bool TypeChecker::visit(VariableDeclaration const& _variable)
}
if (_variable.isConstant())
{
if (!varType->isValueType())
{
bool allowed = false;
if (auto arrayType = dynamic_cast<ArrayType const*>(varType))
allowed = arrayType->isByteArray();
if (!allowed)
m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(9259_error, _variable.location(), "Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.");
}
if (!_variable.value())
m_errorReporter.typeError(4266_error, _variable.location(), "Uninitialized \"constant\" variable.");
else if (!*_variable.value()->annotation().isPure)

View File

@ -1124,6 +1124,8 @@ public:
bool containsNestedMapping() const override
{
solAssert(nameable(), "Called for a non nameable type.");
// DeclarationTypeChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclaration const&)
// assumes that this will never be true.
solAssert(!underlyingType().containsNestedMapping(), "");
return false;
}

View File

@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
int[L] constant L = 6;
// ----
// TypeError 5462: (4-5): Invalid array length, expected integer literal or constant expression.
// DeclarationError 9259: (0-21): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ contract C {
}
// ----
// TypeError 5462: (21-22): Invalid array length, expected integer literal or constant expression.
// DeclarationError 9259: (17-38): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
mapping(uint => uint) constant b = b;
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (0-36): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// DeclarationError 3530: (0-36): The type contains a (nested) mapping and therefore cannot be a constant.

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
struct S { uint x; }
S constant s;
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (21-33): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// TypeError 9259: (21-33): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ contract C {
S public constant e = 0x1212121212121212121212121212121212121212;
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (71-135): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// DeclarationError 3530: (71-135): The type contains a (nested) mapping and therefore cannot be a constant.

View File

@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ contract test {
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 1788: (31-55): The "constant" keyword can only be used for state variables or variables at file level.
// DeclarationError 9259: (31-55): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ contract C {
uint[3] constant x = [uint(1), 2, 3];
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (17-53): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// TypeError 9259: (17-53): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -3,4 +3,4 @@ contract C {
S constant x = S(5, new uint[](4));
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (52-86): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// TypeError 9259: (52-86): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
contract C {
// This should probably have a better error message at some point.
// Constant mappings should not be possible in general.
mapping(uint => uint) constant x;
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (148-180): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// DeclarationError 3530: (17-49): The type contains a (nested) mapping and therefore cannot be a constant.

View File

@ -5,4 +5,4 @@ contract C {
S public constant c;
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 9259: (71-90): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.
// DeclarationError 3530: (71-90): The type contains a (nested) mapping and therefore cannot be a constant.

View File

@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ contract Foo {
}
// ----
// DeclarationError 1788: (30-55): The "constant" keyword can only be used for state variables or variables at file level.
// DeclarationError 9259: (30-55): Constants of non-value type not yet implemented.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
MyInt constant x = MyInt.wrap(20);
type MyInt is int;