Fix missing annotation settings because of early return

This commit is contained in:
Mathias Baumann 2020-09-28 12:12:00 +02:00
parent 858b4507e2
commit 76bb2cafe9
2 changed files with 9 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -2920,6 +2920,9 @@ bool TypeChecker::visit(IndexRangeAccess const& _access)
isPure = false;
}
_access.annotation().isLValue = isLValue;
_access.annotation().isPure = isPure;
TypePointer exprType = type(_access.baseExpression());
if (exprType->category() == Type::Category::TypeType)
{
@ -2934,14 +2937,11 @@ bool TypeChecker::visit(IndexRangeAccess const& _access)
else if (!(arrayType = dynamic_cast<ArrayType const*>(exprType)))
m_errorReporter.fatalTypeError(4781_error, _access.location(), "Index range access is only possible for arrays and array slices.");
if (arrayType->location() != DataLocation::CallData || !arrayType->isDynamicallySized())
m_errorReporter.typeError(1227_error, _access.location(), "Index range access is only supported for dynamic calldata arrays.");
else if (arrayType->baseType()->isDynamicallyEncoded())
m_errorReporter.typeError(2148_error, _access.location(), "Index range access is not supported for arrays with dynamically encoded base types.");
_access.annotation().type = TypeProvider::arraySlice(*arrayType);
_access.annotation().isLValue = isLValue;
_access.annotation().isPure = isPure;
return false;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
// Used to trigger assert
contract s{}
function f() {s[:][];}
// ----
// TypeError 1760: (53-57): Types cannot be sliced.
// TypeError 2876: (53-59): Index access for contracts or libraries is not possible.