mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
fixup! README describing the workflow around external tests and their repositories
This commit is contained in:
parent
12418c533b
commit
747e1709ff
@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ at https://github.com/solidity-external-tests/. If changes are needed to make a
|
||||
latest version of the compiler, they are maintained as a branch on top of the upstream master branch.
|
||||
This is especially important for testing our `breaking` branch because we can not realistically expect
|
||||
external projects to be instantly compatible with a compiler version that has not been released yet.
|
||||
It also isolates us from upstream changes to some degree - their changes will not affect our test suite
|
||||
until we explicitly pull them.
|
||||
Applying necessary changes ourselves gives us confidence that breaking changes are sane and that
|
||||
these projects *can* be upgraded at all.
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended workflow
|
||||
|
||||
@ -18,49 +18,75 @@ until we explicitly pull them.
|
||||
2. Remove all the branches except for main one (`master`, `develop`, `main`, etc). This branch is
|
||||
going to be always kept up to date with the upstream repository and should not contain any extra
|
||||
commits.
|
||||
3. Create two new versions of the main branch, representing versions of the compiler currently in
|
||||
`develop` and `breaking`. E.g. if the latest Solidity version is 0.7.5 and the main branch of the
|
||||
external project is called `master`, create `master_070` and `master_080`. This is where we will
|
||||
be adding our own commits. The one corresponding to the newer Solidity version should always be
|
||||
rebased on top of the older one. E.g. if a change is needed to keep the project
|
||||
compilable using Solidity 0.7.x, add it in `master_070` and rebase `master_080` on top of it.
|
||||
If it is only needed for the compiler from its `breaking` branch, add it only in `master_080`.
|
||||
- The fewer commits in these branches, the better. Ideally, any changes needed to make the compiler
|
||||
work should be submitted upstream and the branches should just be tracking the upstream
|
||||
one without any extra commits.
|
||||
- If the project is not up to date with the latest compiler version but has a branch that is,
|
||||
try to use that branch instead.
|
||||
3. Create a new branch named after the main branch and the compiler version from our `develop`
|
||||
branch. E.g. if the latest Solidity version is 0.7.5 and the main branch of the external project
|
||||
is called `master`, create `master_070`. This is where we will be adding our own commits.
|
||||
4. Create a script for compiling/testing the project and put it in `test/externalTests/` in the
|
||||
Solidity repository.
|
||||
- The script should apply workarounds necessary to make the project actually use the compiler
|
||||
binary it receives as a parameter and possibly apply some generic workarounds that should
|
||||
work across different versions of the upstream project. Very specific workarounds that may
|
||||
easily break with every upstream change are better done as commits in the fork.
|
||||
5. Add the script to `tests/externalTests.sh`.
|
||||
6. Add the test to CircleCI configuration. Make sure to add both a compilation-only run and one that
|
||||
also executes the test suite. If the latter takes a significant amount of time (say, more
|
||||
than 15 minutes) make it run nightly rather than on every PR.
|
||||
binary it receives as a parameter and possibly add generic workarounds that should
|
||||
work across different versions of the upstream project.
|
||||
- Very specific workarounds that may easily break with every upstream change are better done as
|
||||
commits in the newly added branch in the fork instead.
|
||||
5. List the script in `test/externalTests.sh`.
|
||||
6. Add the script to CircleCI configuration. Make sure to add both a compilation-only run and one that
|
||||
also executes the test suite. If the latter takes a significant amount of time (say, more than
|
||||
15 minutes) make it run nightly rather than on every PR.
|
||||
7. Make sure that tests pass both on `develop` and on `breaking`. If the compiler from `breaking`
|
||||
branch will not work without additional changes, add another branch, called after it in turn,
|
||||
and add necessary workarounds there. Continuing the example above, the new branch would be
|
||||
called `master_080` and should be rebased on top of `master_070`.
|
||||
- The fewer commits in these branches, the better. Ideally, any changes needed to make the compiler
|
||||
work should be submitted upstream and our branches should just be tracking the main upstream
|
||||
branch without any extra commits.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Updating external projects for a PR that introduces breaking changes in the compiler
|
||||
If a PR to our `breaking` branch introduces changes that will make an external project no longer
|
||||
compile or pass its tests, the fork needs to be modified:
|
||||
- If a branch specific to the compiler version from `breaking` does not exist yet:
|
||||
1. Create the branch. It should be based on the version-specific branch used on `develop`.
|
||||
2. Make your PR modify the project script in `test/externalScripts/` to use the new branch.
|
||||
3. You are free to add any changes you need in the new branch since it will not interfere with
|
||||
tests on `breaking`.
|
||||
4. Work on your PR until it is approved and merged into `breaking`.
|
||||
- If the branch already exists and our CI depends on it:
|
||||
1. If the external project after your changes can still work with `breaking` even without your PR or
|
||||
if you know that the PR is straightforward and will be merged immediately without interfering
|
||||
with tests on `breaking` for a significant amount of time, you can just push your modifications
|
||||
to the branch directly and skip straight to steps 4. and 6.
|
||||
2. Create a PR in the fork, targeting the existing version-specific branch.
|
||||
3. In your PR to `breaking`, modify the corresponding script in `test/externalScripts/` to
|
||||
use the branch from your PR in the fork.
|
||||
4. Work on your PR until it is approved and ready to merge.
|
||||
5. Merge the PR in the fork.
|
||||
6. Discard your changes to the script and merge your PR into `breaking`.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Pulling upstream changes into a fork
|
||||
1. Pull changes directly into the main branch in the fork. This should be straightforward thanks to
|
||||
it not containing any of our customizations.
|
||||
2. If the update is straightforward and looks safe, go straight to point 5. Otherwise you need to
|
||||
test it first.
|
||||
3. Create new branches corresponding to the two versioned ones but suffixed with `_new`. E.g.
|
||||
`master_070_new` and `master_080_new`. Then rebase them so that they are on top of the updated
|
||||
main branch. This may require tweaking some of the commits to apply our fixes in new places.
|
||||
4. Create PRs on `develop` and `breaking` in Solidity repo which modify the script to use the new
|
||||
branches instead of `master_070`/`master_080`. Tweak the new branches until external tests
|
||||
in CI pass in the PRs.
|
||||
5. Discard the PRs and move the original branches to the place where the `_new` ones are and remove
|
||||
the `_new` branches.
|
||||
2. If the project has been updated to a newer Solidity version, abandon the current version-specific
|
||||
branch used on `develop` (but do not delete it) and create a new one corresponding to the newer
|
||||
version. Then update project script in `test/externalTests/` to use the new branch. E.g. if `develop` uses
|
||||
`master_050` and the project has been updated to use Solidity 0.7.3, create `master_070`.
|
||||
3. Otherwise, rebase the current version-specific branch on the main branch of the fork. This may require
|
||||
tweaking some of the commits to apply our fixes in new places.
|
||||
4. If we have a separate branch for `breaking`, rebase it on top of the one used on `develop`.
|
||||
|
||||
The above is the workflow to use when the update is straightforward and looks safe. In that case it is
|
||||
fine to just modify the branches directly. If this is not the case, it is recommended to first perform the
|
||||
operation on copies of these version-specific branches and test them by creating PRs on `develop` and
|
||||
`breaking` to see if tests pass. The PRs should just modify project scripts in `test/externalScripts/`
|
||||
to use the updated copies of the branches and can be discarded aferwards without being merged.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Changes needed after a breaking release of the compiler
|
||||
When a breaking version of the compiler gets released and becomes the most recent release, the scripts
|
||||
and the branches in the forks need to be updated:
|
||||
- In each fork create a branch corresponding to the new breaking version. E.g. if the current
|
||||
branches are `master_070` and `master_080` the new one should be called `master_090`.
|
||||
- Leave the oldest (i.e. `master_070`) branch as is. We will not be updating it any more but there is no
|
||||
need to remove it.
|
||||
- Update scripts on `develop` to now refer to the branch that used to be breaking (i.e. `master_080`)
|
||||
and on `breaking` to refer to the newly added branch (i.e. `master_090`).
|
||||
- Take care not to overwrite these changes when merging `develop` into breaking. Each branch
|
||||
should always use the branches from the external repos that correspond to it.
|
||||
When a non-backwards-compatible version becomes the most recent release, `breaking` branch
|
||||
gets merged into `develop` which automatically results in a switch to the newer version-specific
|
||||
branches if they exist. If no changes on our part were necessary, it is completely fine to keep using
|
||||
e.g. the `master_060` of an external project in in Solidity 0.8.x.
|
||||
|
||||
Since each project is handled separately, this approach may result in a mix of version-specific branches
|
||||
between different external projects. For example, in one project we could could have `master_050` on
|
||||
both `develop` and `breaking` and in another `breaking` could use `master_080` while `develop` still
|
||||
uses `master_060`.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user