Buglist check script supports json paths

This commit is contained in:
Leonardo Alt
2018-09-10 16:45:56 +02:00
committed by chriseth
parent 6402b83826
commit 69320472af
5 changed files with 228 additions and 18 deletions
+18 -8
View File
@@ -1,12 +1,4 @@
[
{
"name": "EventStructWrongData",
"summary": "Using structs in events logged wrong data.",
"description": "If a struct is used in an event, the address of the struct is logged instead of the actual data.",
"introduced": "0.4.17",
"fixed": "0.4.25",
"severity": "very low"
},
{
"name": "ExpExponentCleanup",
"summary": "Using the ** operator with an exponent of type shorter than 256 bits can result in unexpected values.",
@@ -15,6 +7,24 @@
"severity": "medium/high",
"check": {"regex-source": "[^/]\\*\\* *[^/0-9 ]"}
},
{
"name": "EventStructWrongData",
"summary": "Using structs in events logged wrong data.",
"description": "If a struct is used in an event, the address of the struct is logged instead of the actual data.",
"introduced": "0.4.17",
"fixed": "0.4.25",
"severity": "very low",
"check": {"ast-compact-json-path": "$..[?(@.nodeType === 'EventDefinition')]..[?(@.nodeType === 'UserDefinedTypeName' && @.typeDescriptions.typeString.startsWith('struct'))]"}
},
{
"name": "NestedArrayFunctionCallDecoder",
"summary": "Calling functions that return multi-dimensional fixed-size arrays can result in memory corruption.",
"description": "If Solidity code calls a function that returns a multi-dimensional fixed-size array, array elements are incorrectly interpreted as memory pointers and thus can cause memory corruption if the return values are accessed. Calling functions with multi-dimensional fixed-size arrays is unaffected as is returning fixed-size arrays from function calls. The regular expression only checks if such functions are present, not if they are called, which is required for the contract to be affected.",
"introduced": "0.1.4",
"fixed": "0.4.22",
"severity": "medium",
"check": {"regex-source": "returns[^;{]*\\[\\s*[^\\] \\t\\r\\n\\v\\f][^\\]]*\\]\\s*\\[\\s*[^\\] \\t\\r\\n\\v\\f][^\\]]*\\][^{;]*[;{]"}
},
{
"name": "OneOfTwoConstructorsSkipped",
"summary": "If a contract has both a new-style constructor (using the constructor keyword) and an old-style constructor (a function with the same name as the contract) at the same time, one of them will be ignored.",