mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
[SMTChecker] Fix ice in unsupported functions with multi return values
This commit is contained in:
@@ -335,7 +335,9 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclarationStatement const& _varDecl)
|
||||
solAssert(symbTuple, "");
|
||||
auto const& components = symbTuple->components();
|
||||
auto const& declarations = _varDecl.declarations();
|
||||
if (components.size() == declarations.size())
|
||||
if (!components.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
solAssert(components.size() == declarations.size(), "");
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < declarations.size(); ++i)
|
||||
if (
|
||||
components.at(i) &&
|
||||
@@ -343,6 +345,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclarationStatement const& _varDecl)
|
||||
m_context.knownVariable(*declarations.at(i))
|
||||
)
|
||||
assignment(*declarations.at(i), components.at(i)->currentValue(), declarations.at(i)->location());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (m_context.knownVariable(*_varDecl.declarations().front()))
|
||||
@@ -633,6 +636,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(BinaryOperation const& _op)
|
||||
void SMTChecker::endVisit(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
solAssert(_funCall.annotation().kind != FunctionCallKind::Unset, "");
|
||||
createExpr(_funCall);
|
||||
if (_funCall.annotation().kind == FunctionCallKind::StructConstructorCall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
@@ -694,7 +698,6 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
checkCondition(thisBalance < expr(*value), _funCall.location(), "Insufficient funds", "address(this).balance", &thisBalance);
|
||||
|
||||
m_context.transfer(m_context.thisAddress(), expr(address), expr(*value));
|
||||
createExpr(_funCall);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
@@ -741,14 +744,8 @@ void SMTChecker::visitGasLeft(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
void SMTChecker::inlineFunctionCall(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
{
|
||||
FunctionDefinition const* funDef = inlinedFunctionCallToDefinition(_funCall);
|
||||
if (!funDef)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
_funCall.location(),
|
||||
"Assertion checker does not yet implement this type of function call."
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (visitedFunction(funDef))
|
||||
solAssert(funDef, "");
|
||||
if (visitedFunction(funDef))
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
_funCall.location(),
|
||||
"Assertion checker does not support recursive function calls.",
|
||||
@@ -779,7 +776,6 @@ void SMTChecker::inlineFunctionCall(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
// The callstack entry is popped only in endVisit(FunctionDefinition) instead of here
|
||||
// as well to avoid code duplication (not all entries are from inlined function calls).
|
||||
|
||||
createExpr(_funCall);
|
||||
auto const& returnParams = funDef->returnParameters();
|
||||
if (returnParams.size() > 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -866,7 +862,6 @@ void SMTChecker::visitTypeConversion(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
defineExpr(_funCall, expr(*argument));
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
createExpr(_funCall);
|
||||
m_context.setUnknownValue(*m_context.expression(_funCall));
|
||||
auto const& funCallCategory = _funCall.annotation().type->category();
|
||||
// TODO: truncating and bytesX needs a different approach because of right padding.
|
||||
@@ -1365,10 +1360,13 @@ void SMTChecker::assignment(
|
||||
else if (auto tuple = dynamic_cast<TupleExpression const*>(&_left))
|
||||
{
|
||||
auto const& components = tuple->components();
|
||||
solAssert(_right.size() == components.size(), "");
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < _right.size(); ++i)
|
||||
if (auto component = components.at(i))
|
||||
assignment(*component, {_right.at(i)}, component->annotation().type, component->location());
|
||||
if (!_right.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
solAssert(_right.size() == components.size(), "");
|
||||
for (unsigned i = 0; i < _right.size(); ++i)
|
||||
if (auto component = components.at(i))
|
||||
assignment(*component, {_right.at(i)}, component->annotation().type, component->location());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user