mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
Merge pull request #6846 from ethereum/docs-require-vs-revert
[DOCS] Require, revert, assert clarification
This commit is contained in:
commit
58753e5883
@ -66,28 +66,6 @@ as the actual contract has not been created yet.
|
||||
Functions of other contracts have to be called externally. For an external call,
|
||||
all function arguments have to be copied to memory.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Be careful that ``feed.info.value(10).gas(800)`` only locally sets the ``value`` and amount of ``gas`` sent with the function call, and the parentheses at the end perform the actual call. So in this case, the function is not called and the ``value`` and ``gas`` settings are lost.
|
||||
|
||||
Function calls cause exceptions if the called contract does not exist (in the
|
||||
sense that the account does not contain code) or if the called contract itself
|
||||
throws an exception or goes out of gas.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Any interaction with another contract imposes a potential danger, especially
|
||||
if the source code of the contract is not known in advance. The
|
||||
current contract hands over control to the called contract and that may potentially
|
||||
do just about anything. Even if the called contract inherits from a known parent contract,
|
||||
the inheriting contract is only required to have a correct interface. The
|
||||
implementation of the contract, however, can be completely arbitrary and thus,
|
||||
pose a danger. In addition, be prepared in case it calls into other contracts of
|
||||
your system or even back into the calling contract before the first
|
||||
call returns. This means
|
||||
that the called contract can change state variables of the calling contract
|
||||
via its functions. Write your functions in a way that, for example, calls to
|
||||
external functions happen after any changes to state variables in your contract
|
||||
so your contract is not vulnerable to a reentrancy exploit.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
A function call from one contract to another does not create its own transaction,
|
||||
it is a message call as part of the overall transaction.
|
||||
@ -111,6 +89,28 @@ When calling functions of other contracts, you can specify the amount of Wei or
|
||||
You need to use the modifier ``payable`` with the ``info`` function because
|
||||
otherwise, the ``.value()`` option would not be available.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Be careful that ``feed.info.value(10).gas(800)`` only locally sets the ``value`` and amount of ``gas`` sent with the function call, and the parentheses at the end perform the actual call. So in this case, the function is not called and the ``value`` and ``gas`` settings are lost.
|
||||
|
||||
Function calls cause exceptions if the called contract does not exist (in the
|
||||
sense that the account does not contain code) or if the called contract itself
|
||||
throws an exception or goes out of gas.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Any interaction with another contract imposes a potential danger, especially
|
||||
if the source code of the contract is not known in advance. The
|
||||
current contract hands over control to the called contract and that may potentially
|
||||
do just about anything. Even if the called contract inherits from a known parent contract,
|
||||
the inheriting contract is only required to have a correct interface. The
|
||||
implementation of the contract, however, can be completely arbitrary and thus,
|
||||
pose a danger. In addition, be prepared in case it calls into other contracts of
|
||||
your system or even back into the calling contract before the first
|
||||
call returns. This means
|
||||
that the called contract can change state variables of the calling contract
|
||||
via its functions. Write your functions in a way that, for example, calls to
|
||||
external functions happen after any changes to state variables in your contract
|
||||
so your contract is not vulnerable to a reentrancy exploit.
|
||||
|
||||
Named Calls and Anonymous Function Parameters
|
||||
---------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@ -247,16 +247,16 @@ groupings of expressions.
|
||||
It is not possible to mix variable declarations and non-declaration assignments,
|
||||
i.e. the following is not valid: ``(x, uint y) = (1, 2);``
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Be careful when assigning to multiple variables at the same time when
|
||||
reference types are involved, because it could lead to unexpected
|
||||
copying behaviour.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
Prior to version 0.5.0 it was possible to assign to tuples of smaller size, either
|
||||
filling up on the left or on the right side (which ever was empty). This is
|
||||
now disallowed, so both sides have to have the same number of components.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
Be careful when assigning to multiple variables at the same time when
|
||||
reference types are involved, because it could lead to unexpected
|
||||
copying behaviour.
|
||||
|
||||
Complications for Arrays and Structs
|
||||
------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@ -271,20 +271,19 @@ because only a reference and not a copy is passed.
|
||||
|
||||
pragma solidity >=0.4.16 <0.7.0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
contract C {
|
||||
contract C {
|
||||
uint[20] x;
|
||||
|
||||
function f() public {
|
||||
function f() public {
|
||||
g(x);
|
||||
h(x);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function g(uint[20] memory y) internal pure {
|
||||
function g(uint[20] memory y) internal pure {
|
||||
y[2] = 3;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function h(uint[20] storage y) internal {
|
||||
function h(uint[20] storage y) internal {
|
||||
y[3] = 4;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -355,7 +354,7 @@ In any case, you will get a warning about the outer variable being shadowed.
|
||||
for the entire function, regardless where it was declared. The following example shows a code snippet that used
|
||||
to compile but leads to an error starting from version 0.5.0.
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
pragma solidity >=0.5.0 <0.7.0;
|
||||
// This will not compile
|
||||
@ -374,33 +373,53 @@ In any case, you will get a warning about the outer variable being shadowed.
|
||||
Error handling: Assert, Require, Revert and Exceptions
|
||||
======================================================
|
||||
|
||||
Solidity uses state-reverting exceptions to handle errors. Such an exception will undo all changes made to the
|
||||
state in the current call (and all its sub-calls) and also flag an error to the caller.
|
||||
The convenience functions ``assert`` and ``require`` can be used to check for conditions and throw an exception
|
||||
if the condition is not met. The ``assert`` function should only be used to test for internal errors, and to check invariants.
|
||||
The ``require`` function should be used to ensure valid conditions, such as inputs, or contract state variables are met, or to validate return values from calls to external contracts.
|
||||
If used properly, analysis tools can evaluate your contract to identify the conditions and function calls which will reach a failing ``assert``. Properly functioning code should never reach a failing assert statement; if this happens there is a bug in your contract which you should fix.
|
||||
Solidity uses state-reverting exceptions to handle errors. Such an exception undoes all changes made to the
|
||||
state in the current call (and all its sub-calls) and flags an error to the caller.
|
||||
|
||||
There are two other ways to trigger exceptions: The ``revert`` function can be used to flag an error and
|
||||
revert the current call. It is possible to provide a string message containing details about the error
|
||||
that will be passed back to the caller.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
The low-level functions ``call``, ``delegatecall`` and ``staticcall`` return ``true`` as their first return value if the called account is non-existent, as part of the design of EVM. Existence must be checked prior to calling if desired.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
There used to be a keyword called ``throw`` with the same semantics as ``revert()`` which
|
||||
was deprecated in version 0.4.13 and removed in version 0.5.0.
|
||||
|
||||
When exceptions happen in a sub-call, they "bubble up" (i.e. exceptions are rethrown) automatically. Exceptions to this rule are ``send``
|
||||
and the low-level functions ``call``, ``delegatecall`` and ``staticcall`` -- those return ``false`` as their first return value in case
|
||||
When exceptions happen in a sub-call, they "bubble up" (i.e., exceptions are rethrown) automatically. Exceptions to this rule are ``send``
|
||||
and the low-level functions ``call``, ``delegatecall`` and ``staticcall``, they return ``false`` as their first return value in case
|
||||
of an exception instead of "bubbling up".
|
||||
|
||||
Catching exceptions is not yet possible.
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
The low-level functions ``call``, ``delegatecall`` and ``staticcall`` return ``true`` as their first return value if the account called is non-existent, as part of the design of EVM. Existence must be checked prior to calling if needed.
|
||||
|
||||
In the following example, you can see how ``require`` can be used to easily check conditions on inputs
|
||||
and how ``assert`` can be used for internal error checking. Note that you can optionally provide
|
||||
a message string for ``require``, but not for ``assert``.
|
||||
It is not yet possible to catch exceptions with Solidity.
|
||||
|
||||
``assert`` and ``require``
|
||||
--------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
The convenience functions ``assert`` and ``require`` can be used to check for conditions and throw an exception
|
||||
if the condition is not met.
|
||||
|
||||
The ``assert`` function should only be used to test for internal errors, and to check invariants. Properly functioning code should never reach a failing ``assert`` statement; if this happens there is a bug in your contract which you should fix. Language analysis tools can evaluate your contract to identify the conditions and function calls which will reach a failing ``assert``.
|
||||
|
||||
An ``assert``-style exception is generated in the following situations:
|
||||
|
||||
#. If you access an array at a too large or negative index (i.e. ``x[i]`` where ``i >= x.length`` or ``i < 0``).
|
||||
#. If you access a fixed-length ``bytesN`` at a too large or negative index.
|
||||
#. If you divide or modulo by zero (e.g. ``5 / 0`` or ``23 % 0``).
|
||||
#. If you shift by a negative amount.
|
||||
#. If you convert a value too big or negative into an enum type.
|
||||
#. If you call a zero-initialized variable of internal function type.
|
||||
#. If you call ``assert`` with an argument that evaluates to false.
|
||||
|
||||
The ``require`` function should be used to ensure valid conditions that cannot be detected until execution time.
|
||||
These conditions include inputs, or contract state variables are met, or to validate return values from calls to external contracts.
|
||||
|
||||
A ``require``-style exception is generated in the following situations:
|
||||
|
||||
#. Calling ``require`` with an argument that evaluates to ``false``.
|
||||
#. If you call a function via a message call but it does not finish properly (i.e., it runs out of gas, has no matching function, or throws an exception itself), except when a low level operation ``call``, ``send``, ``delegatecall``, ``callcode`` or ``staticcall`` is used. The low level operations never throw exceptions but indicate failures by returning ``false``.
|
||||
#. If you create a contract using the ``new`` keyword but the contract creation :ref:`does not finish properly<creating-contracts>`.
|
||||
#. If you perform an external function call targeting a contract that contains no code.
|
||||
#. If your contract receives Ether via a public function without ``payable`` modifier (including the constructor and the fallback function).
|
||||
#. If your contract receives Ether via a public getter function.
|
||||
#. If a ``.transfer()`` fails.
|
||||
|
||||
You can optionally provide a message string for ``require``, but not for ``assert``.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how you can use ``require`` to check conditions on inputs
|
||||
and ``assert`` for internal error checking.
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
@ -419,34 +438,23 @@ a message string for ``require``, but not for ``assert``.
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
An ``assert``-style exception is generated in the following situations:
|
||||
|
||||
#. If you access an array at a too large or negative index (i.e. ``x[i]`` where ``i >= x.length`` or ``i < 0``).
|
||||
#. If you access a fixed-length ``bytesN`` at a too large or negative index.
|
||||
#. If you divide or modulo by zero (e.g. ``5 / 0`` or ``23 % 0``).
|
||||
#. If you shift by a negative amount.
|
||||
#. If you convert a value too big or negative into an enum type.
|
||||
#. If you call a zero-initialized variable of internal function type.
|
||||
#. If you call ``assert`` with an argument that evaluates to false.
|
||||
|
||||
A ``require``-style exception is generated in the following situations:
|
||||
|
||||
#. Calling ``require`` with an argument that evaluates to ``false``.
|
||||
#. If you call a function via a message call but it does not finish properly (i.e. it runs out of gas, has no matching function, or throws an exception itself), except when a low level operation ``call``, ``send``, ``delegatecall``, ``callcode`` or ``staticcall`` is used. The low level operations never throw exceptions but indicate failures by returning ``false``.
|
||||
#. If you create a contract using the ``new`` keyword but the contract creation does not finish properly (see above for the definition of "not finish properly").
|
||||
#. If you perform an external function call targeting a contract that contains no code.
|
||||
#. If your contract receives Ether via a public function without ``payable`` modifier (including the constructor and the fallback function).
|
||||
#. If your contract receives Ether via a public getter function.
|
||||
#. If a ``.transfer()`` fails.
|
||||
|
||||
Internally, Solidity performs a revert operation (instruction ``0xfd``) for a ``require``-style exception and executes an invalid operation
|
||||
(instruction ``0xfe``) to throw an ``assert``-style exception. In both cases, this causes
|
||||
the EVM to revert all changes made to the state. The reason for reverting is that there is no safe way to continue execution, because an expected effect
|
||||
did not occur. Because we want to retain the atomicity of transactions, the safest thing to do is to revert all changes and make the whole transaction
|
||||
(or at least call) without effect. Note that ``assert``-style exceptions consume all gas available to the call, while
|
||||
``require``-style exceptions will not consume any gas starting from the Metropolis release.
|
||||
did not occur. Because we want to keep the atomicity of transactions, the safest action is to revert all changes and make the whole transaction
|
||||
(or at least call) without effect.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how an error string can be used together with revert and require:
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
``assert``-style exceptions consume all gas available to the call, while ``require``-style exceptions do not consume any gas starting from the Metropolis release.
|
||||
|
||||
``revert``
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
||||
The ``revert`` function is another way to trigger exceptions from within other code blocks to flag an error and
|
||||
revert the current call. The function takes an optional string message containing details about the error that is passed back to the caller.
|
||||
|
||||
The following example shows how to use an error string together with ``revert`` and the equivalent ``require``:
|
||||
|
||||
::
|
||||
|
||||
@ -465,9 +473,10 @@ The following example shows how an error string can be used together with revert
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
The provided string will be :ref:`abi-encoded <ABI>` as if it were a call to a function ``Error(string)``.
|
||||
In the above example, ``revert("Not enough Ether provided.");`` will cause the following hexadecimal data be
|
||||
set as error return data:
|
||||
The two syntax options are equivalent, it's developer preference which to use.
|
||||
|
||||
The provided string is :ref:`abi-encoded <ABI>` as if it were a call to a function ``Error(string)``.
|
||||
In the above example, ``revert("Not enough Ether provided.");`` returns the following hexadecimal as error return data:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code::
|
||||
|
||||
@ -475,3 +484,7 @@ set as error return data:
|
||||
0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020 // Data offset
|
||||
0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001a // String length
|
||||
0x4e6f7420656e6f7567682045746865722070726f76696465642e000000000000 // String data
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
There used to be a keyword called ``throw`` with the same semantics as ``revert()`` which
|
||||
was deprecated in version 0.4.13 and removed in version 0.5.0.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user