mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
[SMTChecker] Add CheckResult::CONFLICTING
This commit is contained in:
parent
87a38e1abe
commit
55c1fb60b4
@ -617,6 +617,9 @@ void SMTChecker::checkCondition(
|
||||
case smt::CheckResult::UNKNOWN:
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(_location, _description + " might happen here." + loopComment);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING:
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(_location, "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case smt::CheckResult::ERROR:
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(_location, "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -644,6 +647,8 @@ void SMTChecker::checkBooleanNotConstant(Expression const& _condition, string co
|
||||
|
||||
if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::ERROR || negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::ERROR)
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(_condition.location(), "Error trying to invoke SMT solver.");
|
||||
else if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING || negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::CONFLICTING)
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(_condition.location(), "At least two SMT solvers provided conflicting answers. Results might not be sound.");
|
||||
else if (positiveResult == smt::CheckResult::SATISFIABLE && negatedResult == smt::CheckResult::SATISFIABLE)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// everything fine.
|
||||
|
@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ void SMTPortfolio::addAssertion(Expression const& _expr)
|
||||
* This comment explains how this result is decided.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When a solver is queried, there are four possible answers:
|
||||
* SATISFIABLE (SAT), UNSATISFIABLE (UNSAT), UNKNOWN, ERROR
|
||||
* SATISFIABLE (SAT), UNSATISFIABLE (UNSAT), UNKNOWN, CONFLICTING, ERROR
|
||||
* We say that a solver _answered_ the query if it returns either:
|
||||
* SAT or UNSAT
|
||||
* A solver did not answer the query if it returns either:
|
||||
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ void SMTPortfolio::addAssertion(Expression const& _expr)
|
||||
* because one buggy solver/integration shouldn't break the portfolio.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2) If at least one solver answers SAT and at least one answers UNSAT, at least one of them is buggy
|
||||
* and the result is conflicting and we abort.
|
||||
* and the result is CONFLICTING.
|
||||
* In the future if we have more than 2 solvers enabled we could go with the majority.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 3) If NO solver answers the query:
|
||||
@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ pair<CheckResult, vector<string>> SMTPortfolio::check(vector<Expression> const&
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (lastResult != result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
solAssert(false, "At least two SMT solvers gave opposing results.");
|
||||
lastResult = CheckResult::CONFLICTING;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (result == CheckResult::UNKNOWN && lastResult == CheckResult::ERROR)
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ namespace smt
|
||||
|
||||
enum class CheckResult
|
||||
{
|
||||
SATISFIABLE, UNSATISFIABLE, UNKNOWN, ERROR
|
||||
SATISFIABLE, UNSATISFIABLE, UNKNOWN, CONFLICTING, ERROR
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
enum class Sort
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user