mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
Merge pull request #14464 from pgebal/pgebal/fix_require
SMTChecker: Fix inconsistency on constant condition check after a loop is unrolled
This commit is contained in:
commit
511712570b
@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Bugfixes:
|
||||
* AST: Fix wrong initial ID for Yul nodes in the AST.
|
||||
* NatSpec: Fix internal error when requesting userdoc or devdoc for a contract that emits an event defined in a foreign contract or interface.
|
||||
* SMTChecker: Fix encoding error that causes loops to unroll after completion.
|
||||
* SMTChecker: Fix inconsistency on constant condition checks when ``while`` or ``for`` loops are unrolled before the condition check.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### 0.8.21 (2023-07-19)
|
||||
|
@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
|
||||
auto indicesBefore = copyVariableIndices();
|
||||
_node.body().accept(*this);
|
||||
|
||||
auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
auto brokeInCurrentIteration = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
|
||||
auto indicesBreak = copyVariableIndices();
|
||||
_node.condition().accept(*this);
|
||||
@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
|
||||
broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
|
||||
m_loopCheckpoints.pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(!loopCondition || broke);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
smtutil::Expression loopConditionOnPreviousIterations(true);
|
||||
@ -348,7 +350,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
|
||||
_node.body().accept(*this);
|
||||
popPathCondition();
|
||||
|
||||
auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
auto brokeInCurrentIteration = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
|
||||
// merges indices modified when accepting loop condition that no longer holds
|
||||
mergeVariables(
|
||||
@ -369,9 +371,21 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
|
||||
broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
|
||||
loopConditionOnPreviousIterations = loopConditionOnPreviousIterations && loopCondition;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
//after loop iterations are done, we check the loop condition last final time
|
||||
auto indices = copyVariableIndices();
|
||||
_node.condition().accept(*this);
|
||||
loopCondition = expr(_node.condition());
|
||||
// asseert that the loop is complete
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(!loopCondition || broke || !loopConditionOnPreviousIterations);
|
||||
mergeVariables(
|
||||
broke || !loopConditionOnPreviousIterations,
|
||||
indices,
|
||||
copyVariableIndices()
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(not(loopCondition) || broke);
|
||||
m_loopExecutionHappened = true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -401,7 +415,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(ForStatement const& _node)
|
||||
pushPathCondition(forCondition);
|
||||
_node.body().accept(*this);
|
||||
|
||||
auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
auto brokeInCurrentIteration = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
|
||||
// accept loop expression if there was no break
|
||||
if (_node.loopExpression())
|
||||
@ -436,12 +450,29 @@ bool BMC::visit(ForStatement const& _node)
|
||||
forConditionOnPreviousIterations = forConditionOnPreviousIterations && forCondition;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(not(forCondition) || broke);
|
||||
{
|
||||
//after loop iterations are done, we check the loop condition last final time
|
||||
auto indices = copyVariableIndices();
|
||||
if (_node.condition())
|
||||
{
|
||||
_node.condition()->accept(*this);
|
||||
forCondition = expr(*_node.condition());
|
||||
}
|
||||
// asseert that the loop is complete
|
||||
m_context.addAssertion(!forCondition || broke || !forConditionOnPreviousIterations);
|
||||
mergeVariables(
|
||||
broke || !forConditionOnPreviousIterations,
|
||||
indices,
|
||||
copyVariableIndices()
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_loopExecutionHappened = true;
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints()
|
||||
// merges variables based on loop control statements
|
||||
// returns expression indicating whether there was a break in current loop unroll iteration
|
||||
smtutil::Expression BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints()
|
||||
{
|
||||
smtutil::Expression continues(false);
|
||||
smtutil::Expression brokeInCurrentIteration(false);
|
||||
@ -461,7 +492,7 @@ std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoop
|
||||
else if (loopControl.kind == LoopControlKind::Continue)
|
||||
continues = continues || loopControl.pathConditions;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return std::pair(continues, brokeInCurrentIteration);
|
||||
return brokeInCurrentIteration;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool BMC::visit(TryStatement const& _tryStatement)
|
||||
|
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ private:
|
||||
smtutil::CheckResult checkSatisfiable();
|
||||
//@}
|
||||
|
||||
std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
smtutil::Expression mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
|
||||
bool isInsideLoop() const;
|
||||
|
||||
std::unique_ptr<smtutil::SolverInterface> m_interface;
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
contract C
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint256[] y;
|
||||
|
||||
function f() public view {
|
||||
uint256 x = 0;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
} while (x < y.length);
|
||||
require(x != 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 1
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 6838: (124-130): BMC: Condition is always true.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should fail, when x == 3 loop is completed
|
||||
assert(y == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
@ -17,5 +18,5 @@ contract C {
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (244-258): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (223-237): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should fail
|
||||
assert(y == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
@ -17,4 +18,5 @@ contract C {
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 5
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (228-242): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ contract C {
|
||||
uint x = 0;
|
||||
int y = 0;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
if (x >= 3)
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should hold
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
|
||||
contract C
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint256[] y;
|
||||
|
||||
function f() public view {
|
||||
uint256 x = 0;
|
||||
for (uint i = 0; i < y.length; i++) {
|
||||
x = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// tests that constant condition warning is not reported
|
||||
require(x != 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 1
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 2
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -6,14 +6,16 @@ contract C {
|
||||
if (x >= 3)
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should fail
|
||||
assert(y == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (216-230): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -6,14 +6,16 @@ contract C {
|
||||
if (x >= 3)
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should fail
|
||||
assert(y == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 5
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (221-235): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
|
||||
contract C
|
||||
{
|
||||
uint256[] y;
|
||||
|
||||
function f() public view {
|
||||
uint256 x = 0;
|
||||
while (x < y.length) {
|
||||
x = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// tests that constant condition warning is not reported
|
||||
require(x != 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 1
|
||||
// ----
|
@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1);
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 2
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -7,15 +7,16 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should fail
|
||||
assert(y == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (240-254): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (220-234): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -7,14 +7,16 @@ contract C {
|
||||
y = 1;
|
||||
++x;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3); // should hold
|
||||
assert(y == 0); // should hold
|
||||
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
|
||||
assert(x == 3);
|
||||
assert(y == 1); // should fail
|
||||
assert(y == 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// ====
|
||||
// SMTEngine: bmc
|
||||
// SMTSolvers: z3
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 5
|
||||
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
|
||||
// ----
|
||||
// Warning 4661: (224-238): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ contract C {
|
||||
// Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
// Warning 2661: (184-197): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
|
||||
// Warning 2661: (228-244): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user