Merge pull request #14464 from pgebal/pgebal/fix_require

SMTChecker: Fix inconsistency on constant condition check after a loop is unrolled
This commit is contained in:
pgebal 2023-08-03 16:12:02 +02:00 committed by GitHub
commit 511712570b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
17 changed files with 142 additions and 44 deletions

View File

@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Bugfixes:
* AST: Fix wrong initial ID for Yul nodes in the AST.
* NatSpec: Fix internal error when requesting userdoc or devdoc for a contract that emits an event defined in a foreign contract or interface.
* SMTChecker: Fix encoding error that causes loops to unroll after completion.
* SMTChecker: Fix inconsistency on constant condition checks when ``while`` or ``for`` loops are unrolled before the condition check.
### 0.8.21 (2023-07-19)

View File

@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
auto indicesBefore = copyVariableIndices();
_node.body().accept(*this);
auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
auto brokeInCurrentIteration = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
auto indicesBreak = copyVariableIndices();
_node.condition().accept(*this);
@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
m_loopCheckpoints.pop();
}
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
m_context.addAssertion(!loopCondition || broke);
}
else {
smtutil::Expression loopConditionOnPreviousIterations(true);
@ -348,7 +350,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
_node.body().accept(*this);
popPathCondition();
auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
auto brokeInCurrentIteration = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
// merges indices modified when accepting loop condition that no longer holds
mergeVariables(
@ -369,9 +371,21 @@ bool BMC::visit(WhileStatement const& _node)
broke = broke || brokeInCurrentIteration;
loopConditionOnPreviousIterations = loopConditionOnPreviousIterations && loopCondition;
}
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
{
//after loop iterations are done, we check the loop condition last final time
auto indices = copyVariableIndices();
_node.condition().accept(*this);
loopCondition = expr(_node.condition());
// asseert that the loop is complete
m_context.addAssertion(!loopCondition || broke || !loopConditionOnPreviousIterations);
mergeVariables(
broke || !loopConditionOnPreviousIterations,
indices,
copyVariableIndices()
);
}
}
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
m_context.addAssertion(not(loopCondition) || broke);
m_loopExecutionHappened = true;
return false;
}
@ -401,7 +415,7 @@ bool BMC::visit(ForStatement const& _node)
pushPathCondition(forCondition);
_node.body().accept(*this);
auto [continues, brokeInCurrentIteration] = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
auto brokeInCurrentIteration = mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
// accept loop expression if there was no break
if (_node.loopExpression())
@ -436,12 +450,29 @@ bool BMC::visit(ForStatement const& _node)
forConditionOnPreviousIterations = forConditionOnPreviousIterations && forCondition;
}
if (bmcLoopIterations > 0)
m_context.addAssertion(not(forCondition) || broke);
{
//after loop iterations are done, we check the loop condition last final time
auto indices = copyVariableIndices();
if (_node.condition())
{
_node.condition()->accept(*this);
forCondition = expr(*_node.condition());
}
// asseert that the loop is complete
m_context.addAssertion(!forCondition || broke || !forConditionOnPreviousIterations);
mergeVariables(
broke || !forConditionOnPreviousIterations,
indices,
copyVariableIndices()
);
}
m_loopExecutionHappened = true;
return false;
}
std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints()
// merges variables based on loop control statements
// returns expression indicating whether there was a break in current loop unroll iteration
smtutil::Expression BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints()
{
smtutil::Expression continues(false);
smtutil::Expression brokeInCurrentIteration(false);
@ -461,7 +492,7 @@ std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> BMC::mergeVariablesFromLoop
else if (loopControl.kind == LoopControlKind::Continue)
continues = continues || loopControl.pathConditions;
}
return std::pair(continues, brokeInCurrentIteration);
return brokeInCurrentIteration;
}
bool BMC::visit(TryStatement const& _tryStatement)

View File

@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ private:
smtutil::CheckResult checkSatisfiable();
//@}
std::tuple<smtutil::Expression, smtutil::Expression> mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
smtutil::Expression mergeVariablesFromLoopCheckpoints();
bool isInsideLoop() const;
std::unique_ptr<smtutil::SolverInterface> m_interface;

View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
contract C
{
uint256[] y;
function f() public view {
uint256 x = 0;
do {
++x;
} while (x < y.length);
require(x != 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 1
// ----
// Warning 6838: (124-130): BMC: Condition is always true.
// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
++x;
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
}

View File

@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
++x;
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1); // should fail, when x == 3 loop is completed
assert(y == 0);
}
}
// ====
@ -17,5 +18,5 @@ contract C {
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
// ----
// Warning 4661: (244-258): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
// Warning 4661: (223-237): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -7,9 +7,10 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
++x;
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold
assert(y == 0); // should hold
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1); // should fail
assert(y == 0);
}
}
// ====
@ -17,4 +18,5 @@ contract C {
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 5
// ----
// Warning 4661: (228-242): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ contract C {
uint x = 0;
int y = 0;
do {
++x;
++x;
if (x >= 3)
y = 1;
} while (x < 3 || y == 1);
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold
assert(y == 1); // should hold
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
contract C
{
uint256[] y;
function f() public view {
uint256 x = 0;
for (uint i = 0; i < y.length; i++) {
x = 1;
}
// tests that constant condition warning is not reported
require(x != 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 1
// ----
// Info 6002: BMC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
}
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
// BMCLoopIterations: 2
// ----
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -6,14 +6,16 @@ contract C {
if (x >= 3)
y = 1;
}
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1); // should fail
assert(y == 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
// ----
// Warning 4661: (216-230): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -6,14 +6,16 @@ contract C {
if (x >= 3)
y = 1;
}
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete loop
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1); // should fail
assert(y == 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 5
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
// ----
// Warning 4661: (221-235): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
contract C
{
uint256[] y;
function f() public view {
uint256 x = 0;
while (x < y.length) {
x = 1;
}
// tests that constant condition warning is not reported
require(x != 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 1
// ----

View File

@ -7,14 +7,14 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
++x;
}
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1);
// BMC loop iteration setting is not enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
assert(y == 0); // should hold - no assumptions on value if didn't complete the loop
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
// BMCLoopIterations: 2
// ----
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -7,15 +7,16 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
++x;
}
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold
// BMC loop iteration setting is just enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1); // should fail
assert(y == 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
// BMCLoopIterations: 3
// ----
// Warning 4661: (240-254): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
// Warning 4661: (220-234): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -7,14 +7,16 @@ contract C {
y = 1;
++x;
}
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3); // should hold
assert(y == 0); // should hold
// BMC loop iteration setting is more than enough to leave the loop
assert(x == 3);
assert(y == 1); // should fail
assert(y == 0);
}
}
// ====
// SMTEngine: bmc
// SMTSolvers: z3
// BMCLoopIterations: 5
// BMCLoopIterations: 4
// ----
// Warning 4661: (224-238): BMC: Assertion violation happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 3 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.

View File

@ -24,4 +24,4 @@ contract C {
// Info 1391: CHC: 1 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
// Warning 2661: (184-197): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
// Warning 2661: (228-244): BMC: Overflow (resulting value larger than 2**256 - 1) happens here.
// Info 6002: BMC: 2 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.
// Info 6002: BMC: 4 verification condition(s) proved safe! Enable the model checker option "show proved safe" to see all of them.