mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
Insert abstraction layer.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include <libsolidity/formal/SMTChecker.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <libsolidity/formal/SMTLib2Interface.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <libsolidity/interface/ErrorReporter.h>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,7 +26,7 @@ using namespace dev;
|
||||
using namespace dev::solidity;
|
||||
|
||||
SMTChecker::SMTChecker(ErrorReporter& _errorReporter, ReadFile::Callback const& _readFileCallback):
|
||||
m_interface(_readFileCallback),
|
||||
m_interface(make_shared<smt::SMTLib2Interface>(_readFileCallback)),
|
||||
m_errorReporter(_errorReporter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -39,7 +40,7 @@ void SMTChecker::analyze(SourceUnit const& _source)
|
||||
pragmaFound = true;
|
||||
if (pragmaFound)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_interface.reset();
|
||||
m_interface->reset();
|
||||
m_currentSequenceCounter.clear();
|
||||
_source.accept(*this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -69,7 +70,7 @@ bool SMTChecker::visit(FunctionDefinition const& _function)
|
||||
);
|
||||
// TODO actually we probably also have to reset all local variables and similar things.
|
||||
m_currentFunction = &_function;
|
||||
m_interface.push();
|
||||
m_interface->push();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(FunctionDefinition const&)
|
||||
// We only handle local variables, so we clear everything.
|
||||
// If we add storage variables, those should be cleared differently.
|
||||
m_currentSequenceCounter.clear();
|
||||
m_interface.pop();
|
||||
m_interface->pop();
|
||||
m_currentFunction = nullptr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclarationStatement const& _varDecl)
|
||||
else if (knownVariable(*_varDecl.declarations()[0]) && _varDecl.initialValue())
|
||||
// TODO more checks?
|
||||
// TODO add restrictions about type (might be assignment from smaller type)
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(newValue(*_varDecl.declarations()[0]) == expr(*_varDecl.initialValue()));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(newValue(*_varDecl.declarations()[0]) == expr(*_varDecl.initialValue()));
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
_varDecl.location(),
|
||||
@@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(Assignment const& _assignment)
|
||||
if (knownVariable(*decl))
|
||||
// TODO more checks?
|
||||
// TODO add restrictions about type (might be assignment from smaller type)
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(newValue(*decl) == expr(_assignment.rightHandSide()));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(newValue(*decl) == expr(_assignment.rightHandSide()));
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
_assignment.location(),
|
||||
@@ -145,7 +146,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(TupleExpression const& _tuple)
|
||||
"Assertion checker does not yet implement tules and inline arrays."
|
||||
);
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_tuple) == expr(*_tuple.components()[0]));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_tuple) == expr(*_tuple.components()[0]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void SMTChecker::endVisit(BinaryOperation const& _op)
|
||||
@@ -173,13 +174,13 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(FunctionCall const& _funCall)
|
||||
solAssert(args.size() == 1, "");
|
||||
solAssert(args[0]->annotation().type->category() == Type::Category::Bool, "");
|
||||
checkCondition(!(expr(*args[0])), _funCall.location(), "Assertion violation");
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(*args[0]));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(*args[0]));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (funType.kind() == FunctionType::Kind::Require)
|
||||
{
|
||||
solAssert(args.size() == 1, "");
|
||||
solAssert(args[0]->annotation().type->category() == Type::Category::Bool, "");
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(*args[0]));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(*args[0]));
|
||||
checkCondition(!(expr(*args[0])), _funCall.location(), "Unreachable code");
|
||||
// TODO is there something meaningful we can check here?
|
||||
// We can check whether the condition is always fulfilled or never fulfilled.
|
||||
@@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(Identifier const& _identifier)
|
||||
solAssert(decl, "");
|
||||
if (dynamic_cast<IntegerType const*>(_identifier.annotation().type.get()))
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_identifier) == currentValue(*decl));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_identifier) == currentValue(*decl));
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (FunctionType const* fun = dynamic_cast<FunctionType const*>(_identifier.annotation().type.get()))
|
||||
@@ -217,7 +218,7 @@ void SMTChecker::endVisit(Literal const& _literal)
|
||||
if (RationalNumberType const* rational = dynamic_cast<RationalNumberType const*>(&type))
|
||||
solAssert(!rational->isFractional(), "");
|
||||
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_literal) == smt::Expression(type.literalValue(&_literal)));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_literal) == smt::Expression(type.literalValue(&_literal)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
@@ -264,7 +265,7 @@ void SMTChecker::arithmeticOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
|
||||
&value
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_op) == value);
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_op) == value);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
default:
|
||||
@@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ void SMTChecker::compareOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
|
||||
/*op == Token::GreaterThanOrEqual*/ (left >= right)
|
||||
);
|
||||
// TODO: check that other values for op are not possible.
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_op) == value);
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_op) == value);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
@@ -308,9 +309,9 @@ void SMTChecker::booleanOperation(BinaryOperation const& _op)
|
||||
if (_op.annotation().commonType->category() == Type::Category::Bool)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (_op.getOperator() == Token::And)
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_op) == expr(_op.leftExpression()) && expr(_op.rightExpression()));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_op) == expr(_op.leftExpression()) && expr(_op.rightExpression()));
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(expr(_op) == expr(_op.leftExpression()) || expr(_op.rightExpression()));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(expr(_op) == expr(_op.leftExpression()) || expr(_op.rightExpression()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
m_errorReporter.warning(
|
||||
@@ -327,8 +328,8 @@ void SMTChecker::checkCondition(
|
||||
smt::Expression* _additionalValue
|
||||
)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_interface.push();
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(_condition);
|
||||
m_interface->push();
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(_condition);
|
||||
|
||||
vector<smt::Expression> expressionsToEvaluate;
|
||||
if (m_currentFunction)
|
||||
@@ -344,7 +345,7 @@ void SMTChecker::checkCondition(
|
||||
}
|
||||
smt::CheckResult result;
|
||||
vector<string> values;
|
||||
tie(result, values) = m_interface.check(expressionsToEvaluate);
|
||||
tie(result, values) = m_interface->check(expressionsToEvaluate);
|
||||
switch (result)
|
||||
{
|
||||
case smt::CheckResult::SAT:
|
||||
@@ -380,7 +381,7 @@ void SMTChecker::checkCondition(
|
||||
default:
|
||||
solAssert(false, "");
|
||||
}
|
||||
m_interface.pop();
|
||||
m_interface->pop();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void SMTChecker::createVariable(VariableDeclaration const& _varDecl, bool _setToZero)
|
||||
@@ -390,13 +391,13 @@ void SMTChecker::createVariable(VariableDeclaration const& _varDecl, bool _setTo
|
||||
solAssert(m_currentSequenceCounter.count(&_varDecl) == 0, "");
|
||||
solAssert(m_z3Variables.count(&_varDecl) == 0, "");
|
||||
m_currentSequenceCounter[&_varDecl] = 0;
|
||||
m_z3Variables.emplace(&_varDecl, m_interface.newFunction(uniqueSymbol(_varDecl), smt::Sort::Int, smt::Sort::Int));
|
||||
m_z3Variables.emplace(&_varDecl, m_interface->newFunction(uniqueSymbol(_varDecl), smt::Sort::Int, smt::Sort::Int));
|
||||
if (_setToZero)
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(currentValue(_varDecl) == 0);
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(currentValue(_varDecl) == 0);
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(currentValue(_varDecl) >= minValue(*intType));
|
||||
m_interface.addAssertion(currentValue(_varDecl) <= maxValue(*intType));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(currentValue(_varDecl) >= minValue(*intType));
|
||||
m_interface->addAssertion(currentValue(_varDecl) <= maxValue(*intType));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
@@ -455,14 +456,14 @@ smt::Expression SMTChecker::expr(Expression const& _e)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (RationalNumberType const* rational = dynamic_cast<RationalNumberType const*>(_e.annotation().type.get()))
|
||||
solAssert(!rational->isFractional(), "");
|
||||
m_z3Expressions.emplace(&_e, m_interface.newInteger(uniqueSymbol(_e)));
|
||||
m_z3Expressions.emplace(&_e, m_interface->newInteger(uniqueSymbol(_e)));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
case Type::Category::Integer:
|
||||
m_z3Expressions.emplace(&_e, m_interface.newInteger(uniqueSymbol(_e)));
|
||||
m_z3Expressions.emplace(&_e, m_interface->newInteger(uniqueSymbol(_e)));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case Type::Category::Bool:
|
||||
m_z3Expressions.emplace(&_e, m_interface.newBool(uniqueSymbol(_e)));
|
||||
m_z3Expressions.emplace(&_e, m_interface->newBool(uniqueSymbol(_e)));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
solAssert(false, "Type not implemented.");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user