mirror of
				https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
				synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	[SMTChecker] Declaring all state vars before any function is visited
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									2dbb35d4a8
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						4117e859eb
					
				| @ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Features: | ||||
|  * Optimizer: Remove unnecessary masking of the result of known short instructions (``ADDRESS``, ``CALLER``, ``ORIGIN`` and ``COINBASE``). | ||||
|  * Parser: Display nicer error messages by showing the actual tokens and not internal names. | ||||
|  * Parser: Use the entire location of the token instead of only its starting position as source location for parser errors. | ||||
|  * SMT Checker: Support state variables of integer and bool type. | ||||
|  * Type Checker: Deprecate the ``years`` unit denomination and raise a warning for it (or an error as experimental 0.5.0 feature). | ||||
|  * Type Checker: Make literals (without explicit type casting) an error for tight packing as experimental 0.5.0 feature. | ||||
|  * Type Checker: Warn about wildcard tuple assignments (this will turn into an error with version 0.5.0). | ||||
| @ -25,7 +26,6 @@ Features: | ||||
|  * Build system: Support Ubuntu Bionic. | ||||
|  * SMTChecker: Integration with CVC4 SMT solver | ||||
|  * Syntax Checker: Warn about functions named "constructor". | ||||
|  * SMTChecker: Support to integer and Bool state variables | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Bugfixes: | ||||
|  * Type Checker: Improve error message for failed function overload resolution. | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -58,12 +58,23 @@ void SMTChecker::analyze(SourceUnit const& _source) | ||||
| 		_source.accept(*this); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| bool SMTChecker::visit(ContractDefinition const& _contract) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	for (auto _var : _contract.stateVariables()) | ||||
| 		if (_var->type()->isValueType()) | ||||
| 			createVariable(*_var); | ||||
| 	return true; | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void SMTChecker::endVisit(ContractDefinition const&) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	m_stateVariables.clear(); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| void SMTChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _varDecl) | ||||
| { | ||||
| 	if (_varDecl.isLocalVariable() && _varDecl.type()->isValueType() &&_varDecl.value()) | ||||
| 		assignment(_varDecl, *_varDecl.value(), _varDecl.location()); | ||||
| 	else if (_varDecl.isStateVariable() && _varDecl.type()->isValueType()) | ||||
| 		createVariable(_varDecl); | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| bool SMTChecker::visit(FunctionDefinition const& _function) | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -50,6 +50,8 @@ private: | ||||
| 	// because the order of expression evaluation is undefined
 | ||||
| 	// TODO: or just force a certain order, but people might have a different idea about that.
 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| 	virtual bool visit(ContractDefinition const& _node) override; | ||||
| 	virtual void endVisit(ContractDefinition const& _node) override; | ||||
| 	virtual void endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _node) override; | ||||
| 	virtual bool visit(FunctionDefinition const& _node) override; | ||||
| 	virtual void endVisit(FunctionDefinition const& _node) override; | ||||
|  | ||||
| @ -531,6 +531,17 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(storage_value_vars) | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	)"; | ||||
| 	CHECK_SUCCESS_NO_WARNINGS(text); | ||||
| 	text = R"( | ||||
| 		contract C | ||||
| 		{ | ||||
| 			function f() public view { | ||||
| 				assert(c > 0); | ||||
| 			} | ||||
| 			uint c; | ||||
| 		} | ||||
| 	)"; | ||||
| 	CHECK_WARNING(text, "Assertion violation happens here"); | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| } | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(while_loop_simple) | ||||
|  | ||||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user