mirror of
https://github.com/ethereum/solidity
synced 2023-10-03 13:03:40 +00:00
[SMTChecker] Declaring all state vars before any function is visited
This commit is contained in:
parent
2dbb35d4a8
commit
4117e859eb
@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Features:
|
||||
* Optimizer: Remove unnecessary masking of the result of known short instructions (``ADDRESS``, ``CALLER``, ``ORIGIN`` and ``COINBASE``).
|
||||
* Parser: Display nicer error messages by showing the actual tokens and not internal names.
|
||||
* Parser: Use the entire location of the token instead of only its starting position as source location for parser errors.
|
||||
* SMT Checker: Support state variables of integer and bool type.
|
||||
* Type Checker: Deprecate the ``years`` unit denomination and raise a warning for it (or an error as experimental 0.5.0 feature).
|
||||
* Type Checker: Make literals (without explicit type casting) an error for tight packing as experimental 0.5.0 feature.
|
||||
* Type Checker: Warn about wildcard tuple assignments (this will turn into an error with version 0.5.0).
|
||||
@ -25,7 +26,6 @@ Features:
|
||||
* Build system: Support Ubuntu Bionic.
|
||||
* SMTChecker: Integration with CVC4 SMT solver
|
||||
* Syntax Checker: Warn about functions named "constructor".
|
||||
* SMTChecker: Support to integer and Bool state variables
|
||||
|
||||
Bugfixes:
|
||||
* Type Checker: Improve error message for failed function overload resolution.
|
||||
|
@ -58,12 +58,23 @@ void SMTChecker::analyze(SourceUnit const& _source)
|
||||
_source.accept(*this);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool SMTChecker::visit(ContractDefinition const& _contract)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (auto _var : _contract.stateVariables())
|
||||
if (_var->type()->isValueType())
|
||||
createVariable(*_var);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void SMTChecker::endVisit(ContractDefinition const&)
|
||||
{
|
||||
m_stateVariables.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void SMTChecker::endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _varDecl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (_varDecl.isLocalVariable() && _varDecl.type()->isValueType() &&_varDecl.value())
|
||||
assignment(_varDecl, *_varDecl.value(), _varDecl.location());
|
||||
else if (_varDecl.isStateVariable() && _varDecl.type()->isValueType())
|
||||
createVariable(_varDecl);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool SMTChecker::visit(FunctionDefinition const& _function)
|
||||
|
@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ private:
|
||||
// because the order of expression evaluation is undefined
|
||||
// TODO: or just force a certain order, but people might have a different idea about that.
|
||||
|
||||
virtual bool visit(ContractDefinition const& _node) override;
|
||||
virtual void endVisit(ContractDefinition const& _node) override;
|
||||
virtual void endVisit(VariableDeclaration const& _node) override;
|
||||
virtual bool visit(FunctionDefinition const& _node) override;
|
||||
virtual void endVisit(FunctionDefinition const& _node) override;
|
||||
|
@ -531,6 +531,17 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(storage_value_vars)
|
||||
}
|
||||
)";
|
||||
CHECK_SUCCESS_NO_WARNINGS(text);
|
||||
text = R"(
|
||||
contract C
|
||||
{
|
||||
function f() public view {
|
||||
assert(c > 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
uint c;
|
||||
}
|
||||
)";
|
||||
CHECK_WARNING(text, "Assertion violation happens here");
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(while_loop_simple)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user