Update types.rst

This commit is contained in:
James Ray 2017-07-01 13:31:31 +10:00 committed by GitHub
parent 77e4f9c8fc
commit 3594f973df

View File

@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ So ``bytes`` should always be preferred over ``byte[]`` because it is cheaper.
that you are accessing the low-level bytes of the UTF-8 representation,
and not the individual characters!
It is possible to mark arrays ``public`` and have Solidity create a :ref:`getters <visibility-and-getters>`.
It is possible to mark arrays ``public`` and have Solidity create a :ref:`getter <visibility-and-getters>`.
The numeric index will become a required parameter for the getter.
.. index:: ! array;allocating, new
@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ Because of this, mappings do not have a length or a concept of a key or value be
Mappings are only allowed for state variables (or as storage reference types
in internal functions).
It is possible to mark mappings ``public`` and have Solidity create a :ref:`getters <visibility-and-getters>`.
It is possible to mark mappings ``public`` and have Solidity create a :ref:`getter <visibility-and-getters>`.
The ``_KeyType`` will become a required parameter for the getter and it will
return ``_ValueType``.