Assert that address members are not present on contract types in 0.5.0.

This commit is contained in:
chriseth 2018-03-05 15:55:02 +01:00
parent fd60c1cf86
commit 1ceb0b04c1

View File

@ -1832,13 +1832,17 @@ bool TypeChecker::visit(MemberAccess const& _memberAccess)
if (exprType->category() == Type::Category::Contract)
{
// Warn about using address members on contracts
bool v050 = m_scope->sourceUnit().annotation().experimentalFeatures.count(ExperimentalFeature::V050);
for (auto const& addressMember: IntegerType(160, IntegerType::Modifier::Address).nativeMembers(nullptr))
if (addressMember.name == memberName && *annotation.type == *addressMember.type)
{
solAssert(!v050, "Address member still present on contract in v0.5.0.");
m_errorReporter.warning(
_memberAccess.location(),
"Using contract member \"" + memberName +"\" inherited from the address type is deprecated." +
" Convert the contract to \"address\" type to access the member."
);
}
// Warn about using send or transfer with a non-payable fallback function.
if (auto callType = dynamic_cast<FunctionType const*>(type(_memberAccess).get()))