2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
.. index:: ! contract;abstract, ! abstract contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _abstract-contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
******************
|
|
|
|
Abstract Contracts
|
|
|
|
******************
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-05 13:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Contracts need to be marked as abstract when at least one of their functions is not implemented.
|
|
|
|
Contracts may be marked as abstract even though all functions are implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This can be done by using the ``abstract`` keyword as shown in the following example. Note that this contract needs to be
|
2019-09-24 02:10:29 +00:00
|
|
|
defined as abstract, because the function ``utterance()`` was defined, but no implementation was
|
|
|
|
provided (no implementation body ``{ }`` was given).::
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-03-05 17:10:09 +00:00
|
|
|
pragma solidity >=0.4.0 <0.7.0;
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-23 20:10:12 +00:00
|
|
|
abstract contract Feline {
|
2019-12-03 09:50:53 +00:00
|
|
|
function utterance() public virtual returns (bytes32);
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-09-24 02:10:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Such abstract contracts can not be instantiated directly. This is also true, if an abstract contract itself does implement
|
|
|
|
all defined functions. The usage of an abstract contract as a base class is shown in the following example::
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-12-16 16:36:44 +00:00
|
|
|
pragma solidity ^0.6.0;
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-23 20:10:12 +00:00
|
|
|
abstract contract Feline {
|
2019-11-05 17:25:34 +00:00
|
|
|
function utterance() public virtual returns (bytes32);
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract Cat is Feline {
|
2019-09-16 12:33:43 +00:00
|
|
|
function utterance() public override returns (bytes32) { return "miaow"; }
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-05 13:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
If a contract inherits from an abstract contract and does not implement all non-implemented
|
|
|
|
functions by overriding, it needs to be marked as abstract as well.
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-12-05 13:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Note that a function without implementation is different from
|
|
|
|
a :ref:`Function Type <function_types>` even though their syntax looks very similar.
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example of function without implementation (a function declaration)::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function foo(address) external returns (address);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-05 13:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Example of a declaration of a variable whose type is a function type::
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function(address) external returns (address) foo;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-12-05 13:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Abstract contracts decouple the definition of a contract from its
|
|
|
|
implementation providing better extensibility and self-documentation and
|
2019-01-07 14:45:39 +00:00
|
|
|
facilitating patterns like the `Template method <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_method_pattern>`_ and removing code duplication.
|
2019-12-05 13:54:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Abstract contracts are useful in the same way that defining methods
|
|
|
|
in an interface is useful. It is a way for the designer of the
|
|
|
|
abstract contract to say "any child of mine must implement this method".
|