2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
###############################
|
|
|
|
Introduction to Smart Contracts
|
|
|
|
###############################
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _simple-smart-contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
***********************
|
|
|
|
A Simple Smart Contract
|
|
|
|
***********************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let us begin with the most basic example. It is fine if you do not understand everything
|
|
|
|
right now, we will go into more detail later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage
|
|
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract SimpleStorage {
|
|
|
|
uint storedData;
|
2016-05-13 18:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
function set(uint x) {
|
|
|
|
storedData = x;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-05-13 18:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
function get() constant returns (uint retVal) {
|
|
|
|
return storedData;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contract in the sense of Solidity is a collection of code (its functions) and
|
|
|
|
data (its *state*) that resides at a specific address on the Ethereum
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
blockchain. The line ``uint storedData;`` declares a state variable called ``storedData`` of
|
|
|
|
type ``uint`` (unsigned integer of 256 bits). You can think of it as a single slot
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
in a database that can be queried and altered by calling functions of the
|
|
|
|
code that manages the database. In the case of Ethereum, this is always the owning
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
contract. And in this case, the functions ``set`` and ``get`` can be used to modify
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
or retrieve the value of the variable.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
To access a state variable, you do not need the prefix ``this.`` as is common in
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
other languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This contract does not yet do much apart from (due to the infrastructure
|
|
|
|
built by Ethereum) allowing anyone to store a single number that is accessible by
|
|
|
|
anyone in the world without (feasible) a way to prevent you from publishing
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
this number. Of course, anyone could just call ``set`` again with a different value
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
and overwrite your number, but the number will still be stored in the history
|
|
|
|
of the blockchain. Later, we will see how you can impose access restrictions
|
|
|
|
so that only you can alter the number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! subcurrency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subcurrency Example
|
|
|
|
===================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following contract will implement the simplest form of a
|
|
|
|
cryptocurrency. It is possible to generate coins out of thin air, but
|
|
|
|
only the person that created the contract will be able to do that (it is trivial
|
|
|
|
to implement a different issuance scheme).
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, anyone can send coins to each other without any need for
|
|
|
|
registering with username and password - all you need is an Ethereum keypair.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contract Coin {
|
|
|
|
// The keyword "public" makes those variables
|
|
|
|
// readable from outside.
|
|
|
|
address public minter;
|
|
|
|
mapping (address => uint) public balances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Events allow light clients to react on
|
|
|
|
// changes efficiently.
|
|
|
|
event Sent(address from, address to, uint amount);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This is the constructor whose code is
|
|
|
|
// run only when the contract is created.
|
|
|
|
function Coin() {
|
|
|
|
minter = msg.sender;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-05-13 18:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
function mint(address receiver, uint amount) {
|
|
|
|
if (msg.sender != minter) return;
|
|
|
|
balances[receiver] += amount;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2016-05-13 18:06:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
function send(address receiver, uint amount) {
|
|
|
|
if (balances[msg.sender] < amount) return;
|
|
|
|
balances[msg.sender] -= amount;
|
|
|
|
balances[receiver] += amount;
|
|
|
|
Sent(msg.sender, receiver, amount);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2015-12-30 04:28:03 +00:00
|
|
|
This contract introduces some new concepts, let us go through them one by one.
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
The line ``address public minter;`` declares a state variable of type address
|
|
|
|
that is publicly accessible. The ``address`` type is a 160 bit value
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
that does not allow any arithmetic operations. It is suitable for
|
|
|
|
storing addresses of contracts or keypairs belonging to external
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
persons. The keyword ``public`` automatically generates a function that
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
allows you to access the current value of the state variable.
|
|
|
|
Without this keyword, other contracts have no way to access the variable
|
|
|
|
and only the code of this contract can write to it.
|
|
|
|
The function will look something like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function minter() returns (address) { return minter; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, adding a function exactly like that will not work
|
|
|
|
because we would have a
|
|
|
|
function and a state variable with the same name, but hopefully, you
|
|
|
|
get the idea - the compiler figures that out for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: mapping
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
The next line, ``mapping (address => uint) public balances;`` also
|
2016-04-11 22:51:28 +00:00
|
|
|
creates a public state variable, but it is a more complex datatype.
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
The type maps addresses to unsigned integers.
|
|
|
|
Mappings can be seen as hashtables which are
|
|
|
|
virtually initialized such that every possible key exists and is mapped to a
|
|
|
|
value whose byte-representation is all zeros. This analogy does not go
|
|
|
|
too far, though, as it is neither possible to obtain a list of all keys of
|
|
|
|
a mapping, nor a list of all values. So either keep in mind (or
|
|
|
|
better, keep a list or use a more advanced data type) what you
|
|
|
|
added to the mapping or use it in a context where this is not needed,
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
like this one. The accessor function created by the ``public`` keyword
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
is a bit more complex in this case. It roughly looks like the
|
|
|
|
following::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
function balances(address _account) returns (uint balance) {
|
|
|
|
return balances[_account];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you see, you can use this function to easily query the balance of a
|
|
|
|
single account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: event
|
|
|
|
|
2016-07-06 08:53:08 +00:00
|
|
|
The line ``event Sent(address from, address to, uint amount);`` declares
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
a so-called "event" which is fired in the last line of the function
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
``send``. User interfaces (as well as server appliances of course) can
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
listen for those events being fired on the blockchain without much
|
|
|
|
cost. As soon as it is fired, the listener will also receive the
|
2016-07-06 08:53:08 +00:00
|
|
|
arguments ``from``, ``to`` and ``amount``, which makes it easy to track
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
transactions. In order to listen for this event, you would use ::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coin.Sent().watch({}, '', function(error, result) {
|
|
|
|
if (!error) {
|
|
|
|
console.log("Coin transfer: " + result.args.amount +
|
|
|
|
" coins were sent from " + result.args.from +
|
|
|
|
" to " + result.args.to + ".");
|
|
|
|
console.log("Balances now:\n" +
|
|
|
|
"Sender: " + Coin.balances.call(result.args.from) +
|
|
|
|
"Receiver: " + Coin.balances.call(result.args.to));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
Note how the automatically generated function ``balances`` is called from
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
the user interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: coin
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
The special function ``Coin`` is the
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
constructor which is run during creation of the contract and
|
|
|
|
cannot be called afterwards. It permanently stores the address of the person creating the
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
contract: ``msg`` (together with ``tx`` and ``block``) is a magic global variable that
|
|
|
|
contains some properties which allow access to the blockchain. ``msg.sender`` is
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
always the address where the current (external) function call came from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, the functions that will actually end up with the contract and can be called
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
by users and contracts alike are ``mint`` and ``send``.
|
|
|
|
If ``mint`` is called by anyone except the account that created the contract,
|
|
|
|
nothing will happen. On the other hand, ``send`` can be used by anyone (who already
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
has some of these coins) to send coins to anyone else. Note that if you use
|
|
|
|
this contract to send coins to an address, you will not see anything when you
|
|
|
|
look at that address on a blockchain explorer, because the fact that you sent
|
|
|
|
coins and the changed balances are only stored in the data storage of this
|
|
|
|
particular coin contract. By the use of events it is relatively easy to create
|
|
|
|
a "blockchain explorer" that tracks transactions and balances of your new coin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _blockchain-basics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
Blockchain Basics
|
|
|
|
*****************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blockchains as a concept are not too hard to understand for programmers. The reason is that
|
|
|
|
most of the complications (mining, hashing, elliptic-curve cryptography, peer-to-peer networks, ...)
|
|
|
|
are just there to provide a certain set of features and promises. Once you accept these
|
|
|
|
features as given, you do not have to worry about the underlying technology - or do you have
|
|
|
|
to know how Amazon's AWS works internally in order to use it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A blockchain is a globally shared, transactional database.
|
|
|
|
This means that everyone can read entries in the database just by participating in the network.
|
|
|
|
If you want to change something in the database, you have to create a so-called transaction
|
|
|
|
which has to be accepted by all others.
|
|
|
|
The word transaction implies that the change you want to make (assume you want to change
|
|
|
|
two values at the same time) is either not done at all or completely applied. Furthermore,
|
|
|
|
while your transaction is applied to the database, no other transaction can alter it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As an example, imagine a table that lists the balances of all accounts in an
|
|
|
|
electronic currency. If a transfer from one account to another is requested,
|
|
|
|
the transactional nature of the database ensures that if the amount is
|
|
|
|
subtracted from one account, it is always added to the other account. If due
|
|
|
|
to whatever reason, adding the amount to the target account is not possible,
|
|
|
|
the source account is also not modified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, a transaction is always cryptographically signed by the sender (creator).
|
|
|
|
This makes it straightforward to guard access to specific modifications of the
|
|
|
|
database. In the example of the electronic currency, a simple check ensures that
|
|
|
|
only the person holding the keys to the account can transfer money from it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! block
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blocks
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One major obstacle to overcome is what in bitcoin terms is called "double-spend attack":
|
|
|
|
What happens if two transactions exist in the network that both want to empty an account,
|
|
|
|
a so-called conflict?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The abstract answer to this is that you do not have to care. An order of the transactions
|
|
|
|
will be selected for you, the transactions will be bundled into what is called a "block"
|
|
|
|
and then they will be executed and distributed among all participating nodes.
|
|
|
|
If two transactions contradict each other, the one that ends up being second will
|
|
|
|
be rejected and not become part of the block.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These blocks form a linear sequence in time and that is where the word "blockchain"
|
|
|
|
derives from. Blocks are added to the chain in rather regular intervals - for
|
|
|
|
Ethereum this is roughly every 17 seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the "order selection mechanism" (which is called "mining") it may happen that
|
|
|
|
blocks are reverted from time to time, but only at the "tip" of the chain. The more
|
|
|
|
blocks are reverted the less likely it is. So it might be that your transactions
|
|
|
|
are reverted and even removed from the blockchain, but the longer you wait, the less
|
|
|
|
likely it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _the-ethereum-virtual-machine:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: !evm, ! ethereum virtual machine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
****************************
|
|
|
|
The Ethereum Virtual Machine
|
|
|
|
****************************
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ethereum Virtual Machine or EVM is the runtime environment
|
|
|
|
for smart contracts in Ethereum. It is not only sandboxed but
|
|
|
|
actually completely isolated, which means that code running
|
|
|
|
inside the EVM has no access to network, filesystem or other processes.
|
|
|
|
Smart contracts even have limited access to other smart contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! account, address, storage, balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
|
|
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two kinds of accounts in Ethereum which share the same
|
|
|
|
address space: **External accounts** that are controlled by
|
|
|
|
public-private key pairs (i.e. humans) and **contract accounts** which are
|
|
|
|
controlled by the code stored together with the account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The address of an external account is determined from
|
|
|
|
the public key while the address of a contract is
|
|
|
|
determined at the time the contract is created
|
|
|
|
(it is derived from the creator address and the number
|
|
|
|
of transactions sent from that address, the so-called "nonce").
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from the fact whether an account stores code or not,
|
|
|
|
the EVM treats the two types equally, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every account has a persistent key-value store mapping 256 bit words to 256 bit
|
|
|
|
words called **storage**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, every account has a **balance** in
|
|
|
|
Ether (in "Wei" to be exact) which can be modified by sending transactions that
|
|
|
|
include Ether.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions
|
|
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A transaction is a message that is sent from one account to another
|
|
|
|
account (which might be the same or the special zero-account, see below).
|
|
|
|
It can include binary data (its payload) and Ether.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the target account contains code, that code is executed and
|
|
|
|
the payload is provided as input data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the target account is the zero-account (the account with the
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
address ``0``), the transaction creates a **new contract**.
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
As already mentioned, the address of that contract is not
|
|
|
|
the zero address but an address derived from the sender and
|
|
|
|
its number of transaction sent (the "nonce"). The payload
|
|
|
|
of such a contract creation transaction is taken to be
|
|
|
|
EVM bytecode and executed. The output of this execution is
|
|
|
|
permanently stored as the code of the contract.
|
|
|
|
This means that in order to create a contract, you do not
|
|
|
|
send the actual code of the contract, but in fact code that
|
|
|
|
returns that code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! gas, ! gas price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
|
===
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upon creation, each transaction is charged with a certain amount of **gas**,
|
|
|
|
whose purpose is to limit the amount of work that is needed to execute
|
|
|
|
the transaction and to pay for this execution. While the EVM executes the
|
|
|
|
transaction, the gas is gradually depleted according to specific rules.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The **gas price** is a value set by the creator of the transaction, who
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
has to pay ``gas_price * gas`` up front from the sending account.
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
If some gas is left after the execution, it is refunded in the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the gas is used up at any point (i.e. it is negative),
|
|
|
|
an out-of-gas exception is triggered, which reverts all modifications
|
|
|
|
made to the state in the current call frame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! storage, ! memory, ! stack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage, Memory and the Stack
|
|
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each account has a persistent memory area which is called **storage**.
|
|
|
|
Storage is a key-value store that maps 256 bit words to 256 bit words.
|
|
|
|
It is not possible to enumerate storage from within a contract
|
|
|
|
and it is comparatively costly to read and even more so, to modify
|
|
|
|
storage. A contract can neither read nor write to any storage apart
|
|
|
|
from its own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second memory area is called **memory**, of which a contract obtains
|
|
|
|
a freshly cleared instance for each message call. Memory can be
|
|
|
|
addressed at byte level, but read and written to in 32 byte (256 bit)
|
|
|
|
chunks. Memory is more costly the larger it grows (it scales
|
|
|
|
quadratically).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The EVM is not a register machine but a stack machine, so all
|
|
|
|
computations are performed on an area called the **stack**. It has a maximum size of
|
|
|
|
1024 elements and contains words of 256 bits. Access to the stack is
|
|
|
|
limited to the top end in the following way:
|
|
|
|
It is possible to copy one of
|
|
|
|
the topmost 16 elements to the top of the stack or swap the
|
|
|
|
topmost element with one of the 16 elements below it.
|
|
|
|
All other operations take the topmost two (or one, or more, depending on
|
|
|
|
the operation) elements from the stack and push the result onto the stack.
|
|
|
|
Of course it is possible to move stack elements to storage or memory,
|
|
|
|
but it is not possible to just access arbitrary elements deeper in the stack
|
|
|
|
without first removing the top of the stack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! instruction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruction Set
|
|
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The instruction set of the EVM is kept minimal in order to avoid
|
|
|
|
incorrect implementations which could cause consensus problems.
|
|
|
|
All instructions operate on the basic data type, 256 bit words.
|
|
|
|
The usual arithmetic, bit, logical and comparison operations are present.
|
|
|
|
Conditional and unconditional jumps are possible. Furthermore,
|
|
|
|
contracts can access relevant properties of the current block
|
|
|
|
like its number and timestamp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: ! message call, function;call
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message Calls
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts can call other contracts or send Ether to non-contract
|
|
|
|
accounts by the means of message calls. Message calls are similar
|
|
|
|
to transactions, in that they have a source, a target, data payload,
|
|
|
|
Ether, gas and return data. In fact, every transaction consists of
|
|
|
|
a top-level message call which in turn can create further message calls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contract can decide how much of its remaining **gas** should be sent
|
|
|
|
with the inner message call and how much it wants to retain.
|
|
|
|
If an out-of-gas exception happens in the inner call (or any
|
|
|
|
other exception), this will be signalled by an error value put onto the stack.
|
|
|
|
In this case, only the gas sent together with the call is used up.
|
|
|
|
In Solidity, the calling contract causes a manual exception by default in
|
|
|
|
such situations, so that exceptions "bubble up" the call stack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As already said, the called contract (which can be the same as the caller)
|
|
|
|
will receive a freshly cleared instance of memory and has access to the
|
|
|
|
call payload - which will be provided in a separate area called the **calldata**.
|
|
|
|
After it finished execution, it can return data which will be stored at
|
|
|
|
a location in the caller's memory preallocated by the caller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calls are **limited** to a depth of 1024, which means that for more complex
|
|
|
|
operations, loops should be preferred over recursive calls.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-10 14:56:25 +00:00
|
|
|
.. index:: delegatecall, callcode, library
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-10 14:56:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Delegatecall / Callcode and Libraries
|
|
|
|
=====================================
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-10 14:56:25 +00:00
|
|
|
There exists a special variant of a message call, named **delegatecall**
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
which is identical to a message call apart from the fact that
|
|
|
|
the code at the target address is executed in the context of the calling
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
contract and ``msg.sender`` and ``msg.value`` do not change their values.
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that a contract can dynamically load code from a different
|
|
|
|
address at runtime. Storage, current address and balance still
|
|
|
|
refer to the calling contract, only the code is taken from the called address.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This makes it possible to implement the "library" feature in Solidity:
|
|
|
|
Reusable library code that can be applied to a contract's storage in
|
|
|
|
order to e.g. implement a complex data structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: log
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logs
|
|
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible to store data in a specially indexed data structure
|
|
|
|
that maps all they way up to the block level. This feature called **logs**
|
|
|
|
is used by Solidity in order to implement **events**.
|
|
|
|
Contracts cannot access log data after it has been created, but they
|
|
|
|
can be efficiently accessed from outside the blockchain.
|
|
|
|
Since some part of the log data is stored in bloom filters, it is
|
|
|
|
possible to search for this data in an efficient and cryptographically
|
|
|
|
secure way, so network peers that do not download the whole blockchain
|
|
|
|
("light clients") can still find these logs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: contract creation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Create
|
|
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts can even create other contracts using a special opcode (i.e.
|
|
|
|
they do not simply call the zero address). The only difference between
|
|
|
|
these **create calls** and normal message calls is that the payload data is
|
|
|
|
executed and the result stored as code and the caller / creator
|
|
|
|
receives the address of the new contract on the stack.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. index:: selfdestruct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selfdestruct
|
|
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only possibility that code is removed from the blockchain is
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
when a contract at that address performs the ``SELFDESTRUCT`` operation.
|
2015-12-07 20:16:25 +00:00
|
|
|
The remaining Ether stored at that address is sent to a designated
|
|
|
|
target and then the storage and code is removed.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-05-24 17:57:36 +00:00
|
|
|
Note that even if a contract's code does not contain the ``SELFDESTRUCT``
|
2016-03-10 14:56:25 +00:00
|
|
|
opcode, it can still perform that operation using delegatecall or callcode.
|