core: add testcase for txpool
This commit is contained in:
parent
58a1e13e6d
commit
b0b3cf2eeb
@ -301,6 +301,19 @@ func (pool *TxPool) Stats() (int, int) {
|
||||
return pool.stats()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validateInternals checks if the content in pool.all
|
||||
// is consistent with the numbers reported in pending and queued
|
||||
func (pool *TxPool) validateInternals() error {
|
||||
pool.mu.RLock()
|
||||
defer pool.mu.RUnlock()
|
||||
p, q := pool.stats()
|
||||
a := len(pool.all)
|
||||
if a != p+q {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("Pool.all size %d != %d pending + %d queued", a, p, q)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// stats retrieves the current pool stats, namely the number of pending and the
|
||||
// number of queued (non-executable) transactions.
|
||||
func (pool *TxPool) stats() (int, int) {
|
||||
|
@ -719,6 +719,12 @@ func testTransactionLimitingEquivalency(t *testing.T, origin uint64) {
|
||||
txns = append(txns, transaction(origin+i, big.NewInt(100000), key2))
|
||||
}
|
||||
pool2.AddBatch(txns)
|
||||
if err := pool2.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := pool1.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Ensure the batch optimization honors the same pool mechanics
|
||||
if len(pool1.pending) != len(pool2.pending) {
|
||||
@ -769,6 +775,9 @@ func TestTransactionPendingGlobalLimiting(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Import the batch and verify that limits have been enforced
|
||||
pool.AddBatch(txs)
|
||||
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
pending := 0
|
||||
for _, list := range pool.pending {
|
||||
pending += list.Len()
|
||||
@ -778,6 +787,42 @@ func TestTransactionPendingGlobalLimiting(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that if transactions start being capped, transasctions are also removed from 'all'
|
||||
func TestTransactionCapClearsFromAll(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Reduce the queue limits to shorten test time
|
||||
defer func(old uint64) { DefaultTxPoolConfig.GlobalSlots = old }(DefaultTxPoolConfig.GlobalSlots)
|
||||
DefaultTxPoolConfig.AccountSlots = 2
|
||||
DefaultTxPoolConfig.AccountQueue = 2
|
||||
DefaultTxPoolConfig.GlobalSlots = 8
|
||||
|
||||
// Create the pool to test the limit enforcement with
|
||||
db, _ := ethdb.NewMemDatabase()
|
||||
statedb, _ := state.New(common.Hash{}, db)
|
||||
|
||||
pool := NewTxPool(DefaultTxPoolConfig, params.TestChainConfig, new(event.TypeMux), func() (*state.StateDB, error) { return statedb, nil }, func() *big.Int { return big.NewInt(1000000) })
|
||||
pool.resetState()
|
||||
|
||||
// Create a number of test accounts and fund them
|
||||
state, _ := pool.currentState()
|
||||
|
||||
key, _ := crypto.GenerateKey()
|
||||
addr := crypto.PubkeyToAddress(key.PublicKey)
|
||||
state.AddBalance(addr, big.NewInt(1000000))
|
||||
|
||||
txs := types.Transactions{}
|
||||
nonce := uint64(0)
|
||||
for j := 0; j < int(DefaultTxPoolConfig.GlobalSlots)*2; j++ {
|
||||
tx := transaction(nonce, big.NewInt(100000), key)
|
||||
txs = append(txs, tx)
|
||||
nonce++
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Import the batch and verify that limits have been enforced
|
||||
pool.AddBatch(txs)
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that if the transaction count belonging to multiple accounts go above
|
||||
// some hard threshold, if they are under the minimum guaranteed slot count then
|
||||
// the transactions are still kept.
|
||||
@ -815,6 +860,10 @@ func TestTransactionPendingMinimumAllowance(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Import the batch and verify that limits have been enforced
|
||||
pool.AddBatch(txs)
|
||||
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for addr, list := range pool.pending {
|
||||
if list.Len() != int(DefaultTxPoolConfig.AccountSlots) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("addr %x: total pending transactions mismatch: have %d, want %d", addr, list.Len(), DefaultTxPoolConfig.AccountSlots)
|
||||
@ -860,6 +909,10 @@ func TestTransactionPoolRepricing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Import the batch and that both pending and queued transactions match up
|
||||
pool.AddBatch(txs)
|
||||
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pending, queued := pool.stats()
|
||||
if pending != 4 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("pending transactions mismatched: have %d, want %d", pending, 4)
|
||||
@ -894,6 +947,10 @@ func TestTransactionPoolRepricing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if pending, _ = pool.stats(); pending != 3 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("pending transactions mismatched: have %d, want %d", pending, 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that when the pool reaches its global transaction limit, underpriced
|
||||
@ -937,6 +994,9 @@ func TestTransactionPoolUnderpricing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Import the batch and that both pending and queued transactions match up
|
||||
pool.AddBatch(txs)
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pending, queued := pool.stats()
|
||||
if pending != 3 {
|
||||
@ -980,6 +1040,9 @@ func TestTransactionPoolUnderpricing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if queued != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("queued transactions mismatched: have %d, want %d", queued, 2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Tests that the pool rejects replacement transactions that don't meet the minimum
|
||||
@ -1041,6 +1104,9 @@ func TestTransactionReplacement(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if err := pool.Add(pricedTransaction(2, big.NewInt(100000), big.NewInt(threshold+1), key)); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("failed to replace original queued transaction: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := pool.validateInternals(); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Error(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Benchmarks the speed of validating the contents of the pending queue of the
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user