cmd/utils: remove jit flag handling (#3273)
The jit config options are not handled, but random selection still took place, printing confusing messages.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4dd3e7fe35
commit
a96d6c68e2
@ -22,13 +22,11 @@ import (
|
||||
"io/ioutil"
|
||||
"math"
|
||||
"math/big"
|
||||
"math/rand"
|
||||
"os"
|
||||
"path/filepath"
|
||||
"runtime"
|
||||
"strconv"
|
||||
"strings"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/ethereum/ethash"
|
||||
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/accounts"
|
||||
@ -717,16 +715,6 @@ func RegisterEthService(ctx *cli.Context, stack *node.Node, extra []byte) {
|
||||
Fatalf("The %v flags are mutually exclusive", netFlags)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// initialise new random number generator
|
||||
rand := rand.New(rand.NewSource(time.Now().UnixNano()))
|
||||
// get enabled jit flag
|
||||
jitEnabled := ctx.GlobalBool(VMEnableJitFlag.Name)
|
||||
// if the jit is not enabled enable it for 10 pct of the people
|
||||
if !jitEnabled && rand.Float64() < 0.1 {
|
||||
jitEnabled = true
|
||||
glog.V(logger.Info).Infoln("You're one of the lucky few that will try out the JIT VM (random). If you get a consensus failure please be so kind to report this incident with the block hash that failed. You can switch to the regular VM by setting --jitvm=false")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ethConf := ð.Config{
|
||||
Etherbase: MakeEtherbase(stack.AccountManager(), ctx),
|
||||
ChainConfig: MakeChainConfig(ctx, stack),
|
||||
@ -742,8 +730,6 @@ func RegisterEthService(ctx *cli.Context, stack *node.Node, extra []byte) {
|
||||
ExtraData: MakeMinerExtra(extra, ctx),
|
||||
NatSpec: ctx.GlobalBool(NatspecEnabledFlag.Name),
|
||||
DocRoot: ctx.GlobalString(DocRootFlag.Name),
|
||||
EnableJit: jitEnabled,
|
||||
ForceJit: ctx.GlobalBool(VMForceJitFlag.Name),
|
||||
GasPrice: common.String2Big(ctx.GlobalString(GasPriceFlag.Name)),
|
||||
GpoMinGasPrice: common.String2Big(ctx.GlobalString(GpoMinGasPriceFlag.Name)),
|
||||
GpoMaxGasPrice: common.String2Big(ctx.GlobalString(GpoMaxGasPriceFlag.Name)),
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user