eth/downloader: handle missing withdrawals if empty list is expected (#26675)
This PR relaxes the block body ingress handling a bit: if block body withdrawals are missing (but expected to be empty), the body withdrawals are set to 'empty list' before being passed to upper layers. This fixes an issue where a block passed from EthereumJS to geth was deemed invalid.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5967a2290a
commit
7fb42e6db2
@ -465,10 +465,12 @@ func (g *Genesis) ToBlock() *types.Block {
|
||||
head.BaseFee = new(big.Int).SetUint64(params.InitialBaseFee)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
var withdrawals []*types.Withdrawal
|
||||
if g.Config != nil && g.Config.IsShanghai(g.Timestamp) {
|
||||
head.WithdrawalsHash = &types.EmptyRootHash
|
||||
withdrawals = make([]*types.Withdrawal, 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return types.NewBlock(head, nil, nil, nil, trie.NewStackTrie(nil))
|
||||
return types.NewBlock(head, nil, nil, nil, trie.NewStackTrie(nil)).WithWithdrawals(withdrawals)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Commit writes the block and state of a genesis specification to the database.
|
||||
|
@ -783,6 +783,10 @@ func (q *queue) DeliverBodies(id string, txLists [][]*types.Transaction, txListH
|
||||
if header.WithdrawalsHash == nil {
|
||||
// discard any withdrawals if we don't have a withdrawal hash set
|
||||
withdrawalLists[index] = nil
|
||||
} else if *header.WithdrawalsHash == types.EmptyRootHash && withdrawalLists[index] == nil {
|
||||
// if the withdrawal hash is the emptyRootHash,
|
||||
// we expect withdrawals to be [] instead of nil
|
||||
withdrawalLists[index] = make([]*types.Withdrawal, 0)
|
||||
} else if withdrawalListHashes[index] != *header.WithdrawalsHash {
|
||||
return errInvalidBody
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ func testGetBlockBodies(t *testing.T, protocol uint) {
|
||||
RequestId: 123,
|
||||
BlockBodiesPacket: bodies,
|
||||
}); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Errorf("test %d: bodies mismatch: %v", i, err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("test %d: bodies mismatch: %v", i, err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user