lotus/itests/deals_concurrent_test.go

217 lines
6.8 KiB
Go

package itests
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"sync"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
datatransfer "github.com/filecoin-project/go-data-transfer"
"github.com/filecoin-project/go-fil-markets/shared_testutil"
"github.com/filecoin-project/go-state-types/abi"
provider "github.com/filecoin-project/index-provider"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/api"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/chain/actors/policy"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/itests/kit"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/node"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/node/modules"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/node/modules/dtypes"
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/node/repo"
)
// TestDealWithMarketAndMinerNode is running concurrently a number of storage and retrieval deals towards a miner
// architecture where the `mining/sealing/proving` node is a separate process from the `markets` node
func TestDealWithMarketAndMinerNode(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("skipping test in short mode")
}
t.Skip("skipping due to flakiness: see #6956")
kit.QuietMiningLogs()
oldDelay := policy.GetPreCommitChallengeDelay()
policy.SetPreCommitChallengeDelay(5)
t.Cleanup(func() {
policy.SetPreCommitChallengeDelay(oldDelay)
})
// For these tests where the block time is artificially short, just use
// a deal start epoch that is guaranteed to be far enough in the future
// so that the deal starts sealing in time
startEpoch := abi.ChainEpoch(8 << 10)
runTest := func(t *testing.T, n int, fastRetrieval bool, carExport bool) {
api.RunningNodeType = api.NodeMiner // TODO(anteva): fix me
idxProv := shared_testutil.NewMockIndexProvider()
idxProvOpt := kit.ConstructorOpts(node.Override(new(provider.Interface), idxProv))
client, main, market, _ := kit.EnsembleWithMinerAndMarketNodes(t, kit.ThroughRPC(), idxProvOpt)
dh := kit.NewDealHarness(t, client, main, market)
dh.RunConcurrentDeals(kit.RunConcurrentDealsOpts{
N: n,
FastRetrieval: fastRetrieval,
CarExport: carExport,
StartEpoch: startEpoch,
IndexProvider: idxProv,
})
}
// this test is expensive because we don't use mock proofs; do a single cycle.
cycles := []int{4}
for _, n := range cycles {
n := n
ns := fmt.Sprintf("%d", n)
t.Run(ns+"-fastretrieval-CAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, true, true) })
t.Run(ns+"-fastretrieval-NoCAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, true, false) })
t.Run(ns+"-stdretrieval-CAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, false, true) })
t.Run(ns+"-stdretrieval-NoCAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, false, false) })
}
}
func TestDealCyclesConcurrent(t *testing.T) {
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("skipping test in short mode")
}
oldDelay := policy.GetPreCommitChallengeDelay()
policy.SetPreCommitChallengeDelay(5)
t.Cleanup(func() {
policy.SetPreCommitChallengeDelay(oldDelay)
})
kit.QuietMiningLogs()
// For these tests where the block time is artificially short, just use
// a deal start epoch that is guaranteed to be far enough in the future
// so that the deal starts sealing in time
startEpoch := abi.ChainEpoch(2 << 12)
runTest := func(t *testing.T, n int, fastRetrieval bool, carExport bool) {
client, miner, ens := kit.EnsembleMinimal(t, kit.MockProofs())
ens.InterconnectAll().BeginMining(250 * time.Millisecond)
dh := kit.NewDealHarness(t, client, miner, miner)
dh.RunConcurrentDeals(kit.RunConcurrentDealsOpts{
N: n,
FastRetrieval: fastRetrieval,
CarExport: carExport,
StartEpoch: startEpoch,
})
}
// this test is cheap because we use mock proofs, do various cycles
cycles := []int{2, 4, 8, 16}
for _, n := range cycles {
n := n
ns := fmt.Sprintf("%d", n)
t.Run(ns+"-fastretrieval-CAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, true, true) })
t.Run(ns+"-fastretrieval-NoCAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, true, false) })
t.Run(ns+"-stdretrieval-CAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, false, true) })
t.Run(ns+"-stdretrieval-NoCAR", func(t *testing.T) { runTest(t, n, false, false) })
}
}
func TestSimultanenousTransferLimit(t *testing.T) {
t.Skip("skipping as flaky #7152")
if testing.Short() {
t.Skip("skipping test in short mode")
}
kit.QuietMiningLogs()
oldDelay := policy.GetPreCommitChallengeDelay()
policy.SetPreCommitChallengeDelay(5)
t.Cleanup(func() {
policy.SetPreCommitChallengeDelay(oldDelay)
})
// For these tests where the block time is artificially short, just use
// a deal start epoch that is guaranteed to be far enough in the future
// so that the deal starts sealing in time
startEpoch := abi.ChainEpoch(2 << 12)
const (
graphsyncThrottle = 2
concurrency = 20
)
runTest := func(t *testing.T) {
client, miner, ens := kit.EnsembleMinimal(t, kit.MockProofs(), kit.ConstructorOpts(
node.ApplyIf(node.IsType(repo.StorageMiner), node.Override(new(dtypes.StagingGraphsync), modules.StagingGraphsync(graphsyncThrottle, 0, graphsyncThrottle))),
node.Override(new(dtypes.Graphsync), modules.Graphsync(graphsyncThrottle, graphsyncThrottle)),
))
ens.InterconnectAll().BeginMining(250 * time.Millisecond)
dh := kit.NewDealHarness(t, client, miner, miner)
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
du, err := miner.MarketDataTransferUpdates(ctx)
require.NoError(t, err)
var maxOngoing int
var wg sync.WaitGroup
wg.Add(1)
go func() {
defer wg.Done()
ongoing := map[datatransfer.TransferID]struct{}{}
for {
select {
case u := <-du:
t.Logf("%d - %s", u.TransferID, datatransfer.Statuses[u.Status])
if u.Status == datatransfer.Ongoing && u.Transferred > 0 {
ongoing[u.TransferID] = struct{}{}
} else {
delete(ongoing, u.TransferID)
}
if len(ongoing) > maxOngoing {
maxOngoing = len(ongoing)
}
case <-ctx.Done():
return
}
}
}()
t.Logf("running concurrent deals: %d", concurrency)
dh.RunConcurrentDeals(kit.RunConcurrentDealsOpts{
N: concurrency,
FastRetrieval: true,
StartEpoch: startEpoch,
})
t.Logf("all deals finished")
cancel()
wg.Wait()
// The eventing systems across go-data-transfer and go-graphsync
// are racy, and that's why we can't enforce graphsyncThrottle exactly,
// without making this test racy.
//
// Essentially what could happen is that the graphsync layer starts the
// next transfer before the go-data-transfer FSM has the opportunity to
// move the previously completed transfer to the next stage, thus giving
// the appearance that more than graphsyncThrottle transfers are
// in progress.
//
// Concurrency (20) is x10 higher than graphsyncThrottle (2), so if all
// 20 transfers are not happening at once, we know the throttle is
// in effect. Thus we are a little bit lenient here to account for the
// above races and allow up to graphsyncThrottle*2.
require.LessOrEqual(t, maxOngoing, graphsyncThrottle*2)
}
runTest(t)
}