* have gas estimate call callInternal with applyTsMessages = false and other calls with applyTsMessages=true for gas caclulation optimization
* set applyTsMessages = true in CallWithGas call in shed
* update test with new callwithgas api optimization for eth call
* Update chain/stmgr/call.go
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
* env flag LOTUS_SKIP_APPLY_TS_MESSAGE_CALL_WITH_GAS must be 1 in order to have applyTsMessages change
* env flag LOTUS_SKIP_APPLY_TS_MESSAGE_CALL_WITH_GAS must be 1 in order to have applyTsMessages change
* make sure that even if we arent apply ts messages we grab ts messages from the particular user who is requesting gas estimation
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiaying Wang <42981373+jennijuju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@ip-10-0-4-29.us-east-2.compute.internal>
* fix: stmgr: make the tipset and height agree when estimating gas
Specifically re-execute all messages in the current tipset, tacking the new
message onto the end. That way, the epoch is the epoch of the current tipset.
We could try to "make" a fake block and use that, but that's unlikely to
work well.
* fix: stmgr: only apply tipset messages for CallWithGas
* fix: itest: window post dispute
* feat: add support for generating tipset CIDs
(cherry-picked from feat/nv18-fevm)
* feat: fvm: add support for looking up past tipset CIDs
We do this by adding yet another "getter" to the VM that resolves an
epoch into a TipSetKey.
Co-authored-by: Kevin Li <ychiaoli18@users.noreply.github.com>
Otherwise, an account will need funds to estimate the max possible gas a
message could take (which is usually the block gas limit).
This does mean gas estimation no longer checks if the sending account
has enough funds to cover the message cost, but MpoolPush will now do
this.
The next FVM version will only support nv15+.
This change also disables the FVM before nv15, even if enabled through
the environment variable. This allows "catching up" from before nv15.
This paves the way for better object lifetime management.
Concretely, it makes it possible to:
- have different stores backing chain and state data.
- having the same datastore library, but using different parameters.
- attach different caching layers/policies to each class of data, e.g.
sizing caches differently.
- specifying different retention policies for chain and state data.
This separation is important because:
- access patterns/frequency of chain and state data are different.
- state is derivable from chain, so one could never expunge the chain
store, and only retain state objects reachable from the last finality
in the state store.
