This commit refactors the code in `invariants.go` to support state invariant checks for different actor versions. The code now includes checks for versions 10 and 11 of the actors. The `CheckStateInvariants` function is invoked based on the actor version, passing the appropriate parameters. This change ensures that state invariant checks are performed correctly for different actor versions.
The changes made are as follows:
- Added imports for actor versions 10 and 11.
- Added `case` statements for versions 10 and 11 in the switch statement.
- Invoked `CheckStateInvariants` function with the correct parameters for each version.
- Handled errors returned by the `CheckStateInvariants` function.
These changes enhance the flexibility and compatibility of the code with different actor versions, improving the accuracy of state invariant checks.
This migrates everything except the `go-car` librairy: https://github.com/ipfs/boxo/issues/218#issuecomment-1529922103
I didn't migrated everything in the previous release because all the boxo code wasn't compatible with the go-ipld-prime one due to a an in flight (/ aftermath) revert of github.com/ipfs/go-block-format. go-block-format has been unmigrated since slight bellow absolutely everything depends on it that would have required everything to be moved on boxo or everything to optin into using boxo which were all deal breakers for different groups.
This worked fine because lotus's codebase could live hapely on the first multirepo setup however boost is now trying to use boxo's code with lotus's (still on multirepo) setup: https://filecoinproject.slack.com/archives/C03AQ3QAUG1/p1685022344779649
The alternative would be for boost to write shim types which just forward calls and return with the different interface definitions.
Btw why is that an issue in the first place is because unlike what go's duck typing model suggest interfaces are not transparent https://github.com/golang/go/issues/58112, interfaces are strongly typed but they have implicit narrowing. The issue is if you return an interface from an interface Go does not have a function definition to insert the implicit conversion thus instead the type checker complains you are not returning the right type.
Stubbing types were reverted https://github.com/ipfs/boxo/issues/218#issuecomment-1478650351
Last time I only migrated `go-bitswap` to `boxo/bitswap` because of the security issues and because we never had the interface return an interface problem (we had concrete wrappers where the implicit conversion took place).
* have gas estimate call callInternal with applyTsMessages = false and other calls with applyTsMessages=true for gas caclulation optimization
* set applyTsMessages = true in CallWithGas call in shed
* update test with new callwithgas api optimization for eth call
* Update chain/stmgr/call.go
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
* env flag LOTUS_SKIP_APPLY_TS_MESSAGE_CALL_WITH_GAS must be 1 in order to have applyTsMessages change
* env flag LOTUS_SKIP_APPLY_TS_MESSAGE_CALL_WITH_GAS must be 1 in order to have applyTsMessages change
* make sure that even if we arent apply ts messages we grab ts messages from the particular user who is requesting gas estimation
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiaying Wang <42981373+jennijuju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@ip-10-0-4-29.us-east-2.compute.internal>
* have gas estimate call callInternal with applyTsMessages = false and other calls with applyTsMessages=true for gas caclulation optimization
* set applyTsMessages = true in CallWithGas call in shed
* update test with new callwithgas api optimization for eth call
* Update chain/stmgr/call.go
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
* env flag LOTUS_SKIP_APPLY_TS_MESSAGE_CALL_WITH_GAS must be 1 in order to have applyTsMessages change
* env flag LOTUS_SKIP_APPLY_TS_MESSAGE_CALL_WITH_GAS must be 1 in order to have applyTsMessages change
* make sure that even if we arent apply ts messages we grab ts messages from the particular user who is requesting gas estimation
---------
Co-authored-by: Jiaying Wang <42981373+jennijuju@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Łukasz Magiera <magik6k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ubuntu <ubuntu@ip-10-0-4-29.us-east-2.compute.internal>
