We were computing this based on the max block gas, but this is
incorrect. The new value isn't entirely correct either (we should
probably compute an average of the gas used in each block in the
tipset?), but it's good enough.
fixes#10515
All these cases here are actually errors and returning `nil` makes this
hard to debug. We likely returned nil in the past to be "best effort"
but, as far as I can tell, we should only hit these error cases if
something is actually wrong.
part of #11325
After changing in prev commit to use to ethereum addresses the
comparison does not make sense against builtin actors. This
fixes that by storing also the filecoin addresses in each trace
Also renamed filecoin related fields to Filecoin prefix.
Also remove requirement call to InvokeContract needed to come
from a evm actor
Introduce nv21 skeleton for local testing:
- Use local go-state-types with actor_version_checklist changes: https://github.com/filecoin-project/go-state-types/blob/master/actors_version_checklist.md
- Imports mock v12-actors bundle
- Define upgrade heights
- Generate adapters
- Add upgrade schedule and migration
- Add actorstype to the NewActorRegistry in /chain/consensus/computestate.go
- Add upgrade field to api/types.go/ForkUpgradeParams
- Add upgrade to node/impl/full/state.go
- Add network version to chain/state/statetree.go
- make jen
- make docsgen-cli
Introduce nv21 skeleton for local testing:
- Use local go-state-types with actor_version_checklist changes: https://github.com/filecoin-project/go-state-types/blob/master/actors_version_checklist.md
- Imports mock v12-actors bundle
- Define upgrade heights
- Generate adapters
- Add upgrade schedule and migration
- Add actorstype to the NewActorRegistry in /chain/consensus/computestate.go
- Add upgrade field to api/types.go/ForkUpgradeParams
- Add upgrade to node/impl/full/state.go
- Add network version to chain/state/statetree.go
- make jen
- make docsgen-cli
Fixes: #10814
This PR updates the following RPC methods according to EIP-1898
specs.
The following RPC methods are affected:
- eth_getBalance
- eth_getStorageAt
- eth_getTransactionCount
- eth_getCode
- eth_call
Note that eth_getBlockByNumber was not included in this list in
the spec although it seems it should be affected also?
Currently these methods all accept a blkParam string which can be
one of "latest", "earliest", "pending", or a block number (decimal
or hex). The spec enables caller to additionally specify a json
hash which can include the following fields:
- blockNumber EthUint64: A block number (decimal or hex) which is
similar to the original use of the blkParam string
- blockHash EthHash: The block hash
- requireCanonical bool) If true we should make sure the block is
in the canonical chain
Since the blkParam needs to support both being a number/string and
a json hash then this to properly work we need to introduce a new
struct with pointer fields to check if they exist. This is done
in the EthBlockParamByNumberOrHash struct which first tries to
unmarshal as a json hash (according to eip-1898) and then fallback
to unmarshal as string/number.
