resolved conflicts
This commit is contained in:
commit
ff2772a58c
@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ func (st *StateTree) Version() types.StateTreeVersion {
|
||||
return st.version
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func Diff(oldTree, newTree *StateTree) (map[string]types.Actor, error) {
|
||||
func Diff(ctx context.Context, oldTree, newTree *StateTree) (map[string]types.Actor, error) {
|
||||
out := map[string]types.Actor{}
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
@ -555,6 +555,10 @@ func Diff(oldTree, newTree *StateTree) (map[string]types.Actor, error) {
|
||||
buf = bytes.NewReader(nil)
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err := newTree.root.ForEach(&ncval, func(k string) error {
|
||||
select {
|
||||
case <-ctx.Done():
|
||||
return ctx.Err()
|
||||
default:
|
||||
var act types.Actor
|
||||
|
||||
addr, err := address.NewFromBytes([]byte(k))
|
||||
@ -582,6 +586,7 @@ func Diff(oldTree, newTree *StateTree) (map[string]types.Actor, error) {
|
||||
out[addr.String()] = act
|
||||
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
}); err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1031,6 +1031,8 @@ var ChainExportCmd = &cli.Command{
|
||||
Flags: []cli.Flag{
|
||||
&cli.StringFlag{
|
||||
Name: "tipset",
|
||||
Usage: "specify tipset to start the export from",
|
||||
Value: "@head",
|
||||
},
|
||||
&cli.Int64Flag{
|
||||
Name: "recent-stateroots",
|
||||
|
@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ USAGE:
|
||||
lotus chain export [command options] [outputPath]
|
||||
|
||||
OPTIONS:
|
||||
--tipset value
|
||||
--tipset value specify tipset to start the export from (default: "@head")
|
||||
--recent-stateroots value specify the number of recent state roots to include in the export (default: 0)
|
||||
--skip-old-msgs (default: false)
|
||||
--help, -h show help (default: false)
|
||||
|
2
extern/storage-sealing/checks.go
vendored
2
extern/storage-sealing/checks.go
vendored
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ func checkPieces(ctx context.Context, maddr address.Address, si SectorInfo, api
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if proposal.PieceCID != p.Piece.PieceCID {
|
||||
return &ErrInvalidDeals{xerrors.Errorf("piece %d (of %d) of sector %d refers deal %d with wrong PieceCID: %x != %x", i, len(si.Pieces), si.SectorNumber, p.DealInfo.DealID, p.Piece.PieceCID, proposal.PieceCID)}
|
||||
return &ErrInvalidDeals{xerrors.Errorf("piece %d (of %d) of sector %d refers deal %d with wrong PieceCID: %s != %s", i, len(si.Pieces), si.SectorNumber, p.DealInfo.DealID, p.Piece.PieceCID, proposal.PieceCID)}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if p.Piece.Size != proposal.PieceSize {
|
||||
|
4
extern/storage-sealing/states_failed.go
vendored
4
extern/storage-sealing/states_failed.go
vendored
@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ func (m *Sealing) handlePreCommitFailed(ctx statemachine.Context, sector SectorI
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if pci.Info.SealedCID != *sector.CommR {
|
||||
log.Warnf("sector %d is precommitted on chain, with different CommR: %x != %x", sector.SectorNumber, pci.Info.SealedCID, sector.CommR)
|
||||
log.Warnf("sector %d is precommitted on chain, with different CommR: %s != %s", sector.SectorNumber, pci.Info.SealedCID, sector.CommR)
|
||||
return nil // TODO: remove when the actor allows re-precommit
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ func (m *Sealing) handleRecoverDealIDs(ctx statemachine.Context, sector SectorIn
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if proposal.PieceCID != p.Piece.PieceCID {
|
||||
log.Warnf("piece %d (of %d) of sector %d refers deal %d with wrong PieceCID: %x != %x", i, len(sector.Pieces), sector.SectorNumber, p.DealInfo.DealID, p.Piece.PieceCID, proposal.PieceCID)
|
||||
log.Warnf("piece %d (of %d) of sector %d refers deal %d with wrong PieceCID: %s != %s", i, len(sector.Pieces), sector.SectorNumber, p.DealInfo.DealID, p.Piece.PieceCID, proposal.PieceCID)
|
||||
toFix = append(toFix, i)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
2
extern/storage-sealing/states_sealing.go
vendored
2
extern/storage-sealing/states_sealing.go
vendored
@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ func (m *Sealing) handleCommitting(ctx statemachine.Context, sector SectorInfo)
|
||||
|
||||
log.Info("scheduling seal proof computation...")
|
||||
|
||||
log.Infof("KOMIT %d %x(%d); %x(%d); %v; r:%x; d:%x", sector.SectorNumber, sector.TicketValue, sector.TicketEpoch, sector.SeedValue, sector.SeedEpoch, sector.pieceInfos(), sector.CommR, sector.CommD)
|
||||
log.Infof("KOMIT %d %x(%d); %x(%d); %v; r:%s; d:%s", sector.SectorNumber, sector.TicketValue, sector.TicketEpoch, sector.SeedValue, sector.SeedEpoch, sector.pieceInfos(), sector.CommR, sector.CommD)
|
||||
|
||||
if sector.CommD == nil || sector.CommR == nil {
|
||||
return ctx.Send(SectorCommitFailed{xerrors.Errorf("sector had nil commR or commD")})
|
||||
|
@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/api/v1api"
|
||||
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/node/modules/dtypes"
|
||||
"github.com/filecoin-project/lotus/storage/sectorblocks"
|
||||
"github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror"
|
||||
"golang.org/x/xerrors"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/ipfs/go-cid"
|
||||
@ -139,10 +140,14 @@ func (rpn *retrievalProviderNode) GetRetrievalPricingInput(ctx context.Context,
|
||||
}
|
||||
tsk := head.Key()
|
||||
|
||||
var mErr error
|
||||
|
||||
for _, dealID := range storageDeals {
|
||||
ds, err := rpn.full.StateMarketStorageDeal(ctx, dealID, tsk)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return resp, xerrors.Errorf("failed to look up deal %d on chain: err=%w", dealID, err)
|
||||
log.Warnf("failed to look up deal %d on chain: err=%w", dealID, err)
|
||||
mErr = multierror.Append(mErr, err)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ds.Proposal.VerifiedDeal {
|
||||
resp.VerifiedDeal = true
|
||||
@ -162,9 +167,13 @@ func (rpn *retrievalProviderNode) GetRetrievalPricingInput(ctx context.Context,
|
||||
// Note: The piece size can never actually be zero. We only use it to here
|
||||
// to assert that we didn't find a matching piece.
|
||||
if resp.PieceSize == 0 {
|
||||
if mErr == nil {
|
||||
return resp, xerrors.New("failed to find matching piece")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return resp, xerrors.Errorf("failed to fetch storage deal state: %w", mErr)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return resp, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -66,6 +66,31 @@ func TestGetPricingInput(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
expectedErrorStr: "failed to find matching piece",
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"error when fails to fetch deal state": {
|
||||
fFnc: func(n *mocks.MockFullNode) {
|
||||
out1 := &api.MarketDeal{
|
||||
Proposal: market.DealProposal{
|
||||
PieceCID: pcid,
|
||||
PieceSize: paddedSize,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
out2 := &api.MarketDeal{
|
||||
Proposal: market.DealProposal{
|
||||
PieceCID: testnet.GenerateCids(1)[0],
|
||||
VerifiedDeal: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
n.EXPECT().ChainHead(gomock.Any()).Return(tsk, nil).Times(1)
|
||||
gomock.InOrder(
|
||||
n.EXPECT().StateMarketStorageDeal(gomock.Any(), deals[0], key).Return(out1, xerrors.New("error 1")),
|
||||
n.EXPECT().StateMarketStorageDeal(gomock.Any(), deals[1], key).Return(out2, xerrors.New("error 2")),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
},
|
||||
expectedErrorStr: "failed to fetch storage deal state",
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"verified is true even if one deal is verified and we get the correct piecesize": {
|
||||
fFnc: func(n *mocks.MockFullNode) {
|
||||
out1 := &api.MarketDeal{
|
||||
@ -92,6 +117,32 @@ func TestGetPricingInput(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
expectedVerified: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"success even if one deal state fetch errors out but the other deal is verified and has the required piececid": {
|
||||
fFnc: func(n *mocks.MockFullNode) {
|
||||
out1 := &api.MarketDeal{
|
||||
Proposal: market.DealProposal{
|
||||
PieceCID: testnet.GenerateCids(1)[0],
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
out2 := &api.MarketDeal{
|
||||
Proposal: market.DealProposal{
|
||||
PieceCID: pcid,
|
||||
PieceSize: paddedSize,
|
||||
VerifiedDeal: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
n.EXPECT().ChainHead(gomock.Any()).Return(tsk, nil).Times(1)
|
||||
gomock.InOrder(
|
||||
n.EXPECT().StateMarketStorageDeal(gomock.Any(), deals[0], key).Return(out1, xerrors.New("some error")),
|
||||
n.EXPECT().StateMarketStorageDeal(gomock.Any(), deals[1], key).Return(out2, nil),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
},
|
||||
expectedPieceSize: unpaddedSize,
|
||||
expectedVerified: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
"verified is false if both deals are unverified and we get the correct piece size": {
|
||||
fFnc: func(n *mocks.MockFullNode) {
|
||||
out1 := &api.MarketDeal{
|
||||
|
@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ func (a *StateAPI) StateChangedActors(ctx context.Context, old cid.Cid, new cid.
|
||||
return nil, xerrors.Errorf("failed to load new state tree: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return state.Diff(oldTree, newTree)
|
||||
return state.Diff(ctx, oldTree, newTree)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func (a *StateAPI) StateMinerSectorCount(ctx context.Context, addr address.Address, tsk types.TipSetKey) (api.MinerSectors, error) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user