Merge pull request #10915 from filecoin-project/fix/upgrade-sector-selection
sealing: Improve upgrade sector selection
This commit is contained in:
Aayush Rajasekaran
GitHub
commit
ce5e242d76
@ -515,15 +515,7 @@
|
||||
# env var: LOTUS_SEALING_MINUPGRADESECTOREXPIRATION
|
||||
#MinUpgradeSectorExpiration = 0
|
||||
|
||||
# When set to a non-zero value, minimum number of epochs until sector expiration above which upgrade candidates will
|
||||
# be selected based on lowest initial pledge.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Target sector expiration is calculated by looking at the input deal queue, sorting it by deal expiration, and
|
||||
# selecting N deals from the queue up to sector size. The target expiration will be Nth deal end epoch, or in case
|
||||
# where there weren't enough deals to fill a sector, DealMaxDuration (540 days = 1555200 epochs)
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Setting this to a high value (for example to maximum deal duration - 1555200) will disable selection based on
|
||||
# initial pledge - upgrade sectors will always be chosen based on longest expiration
|
||||
# DEPRECATED: Target expiration is no longer used
|
||||
#
|
||||
# type: uint64
|
||||
# env var: LOTUS_SEALING_MINTARGETUPGRADESECTOREXPIRATION
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1106,15 +1106,7 @@ required to have expiration of at least the soonest-ending deal`,
|
||||
Name: "MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration",
|
||||
Type: "uint64",
|
||||
|
||||
Comment: `When set to a non-zero value, minimum number of epochs until sector expiration above which upgrade candidates will
|
||||
be selected based on lowest initial pledge.
|
||||
|
||||
Target sector expiration is calculated by looking at the input deal queue, sorting it by deal expiration, and
|
||||
selecting N deals from the queue up to sector size. The target expiration will be Nth deal end epoch, or in case
|
||||
where there weren't enough deals to fill a sector, DealMaxDuration (540 days = 1555200 epochs)
|
||||
|
||||
Setting this to a high value (for example to maximum deal duration - 1555200) will disable selection based on
|
||||
initial pledge - upgrade sectors will always be chosen based on longest expiration`,
|
||||
Comment: `DEPRECATED: Target expiration is no longer used`,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
Name: "CommittedCapacitySectorLifetime",
|
||||
|
||||
@ -352,15 +352,7 @@ type SealingConfig struct {
|
||||
// required to have expiration of at least the soonest-ending deal
|
||||
MinUpgradeSectorExpiration uint64
|
||||
|
||||
// When set to a non-zero value, minimum number of epochs until sector expiration above which upgrade candidates will
|
||||
// be selected based on lowest initial pledge.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Target sector expiration is calculated by looking at the input deal queue, sorting it by deal expiration, and
|
||||
// selecting N deals from the queue up to sector size. The target expiration will be Nth deal end epoch, or in case
|
||||
// where there weren't enough deals to fill a sector, DealMaxDuration (540 days = 1555200 epochs)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Setting this to a high value (for example to maximum deal duration - 1555200) will disable selection based on
|
||||
// initial pledge - upgrade sectors will always be chosen based on longest expiration
|
||||
// DEPRECATED: Target expiration is no longer used
|
||||
MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration uint64
|
||||
|
||||
// CommittedCapacitySectorLifetime is the duration a Committed Capacity (CC) sector will
|
||||
|
||||
@ -992,7 +992,6 @@ func NewSetSealConfigFunc(r repo.LockedRepo) (dtypes.SetSealingConfigFunc, error
|
||||
WaitDealsDelay: config.Duration(cfg.WaitDealsDelay),
|
||||
MakeNewSectorForDeals: cfg.MakeNewSectorForDeals,
|
||||
MinUpgradeSectorExpiration: cfg.MinUpgradeSectorExpiration,
|
||||
MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration: cfg.MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration,
|
||||
MakeCCSectorsAvailable: cfg.MakeCCSectorsAvailable,
|
||||
AlwaysKeepUnsealedCopy: cfg.AlwaysKeepUnsealedCopy,
|
||||
FinalizeEarly: cfg.FinalizeEarly,
|
||||
@ -1032,7 +1031,6 @@ func ToSealingConfig(dealmakingCfg config.DealmakingConfig, sealingCfg config.Se
|
||||
MaxSealingSectorsForDeals: sealingCfg.MaxSealingSectorsForDeals,
|
||||
PreferNewSectorsForDeals: sealingCfg.PreferNewSectorsForDeals,
|
||||
MinUpgradeSectorExpiration: sealingCfg.MinUpgradeSectorExpiration,
|
||||
MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration: sealingCfg.MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration,
|
||||
MaxUpgradingSectors: sealingCfg.MaxUpgradingSectors,
|
||||
|
||||
StartEpochSealingBuffer: abi.ChainEpoch(dealmakingCfg.StartEpochSealingBuffer),
|
||||
|
||||
@ -417,6 +417,13 @@ func (m *Sealing) addPendingPiece(ctx context.Context, size abi.UnpaddedPieceSiz
|
||||
close(pp.doneCh)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
log.Debugw("new pending piece", "dealId", deal.DealID,
|
||||
"piece", deal.DealProposal.PieceCID,
|
||||
"size", size,
|
||||
"dealStart", deal.DealSchedule.StartEpoch,
|
||||
"dealEnd", deal.DealSchedule.EndEpoch,
|
||||
"termEnd", ct.claimTermEnd)
|
||||
|
||||
m.pendingPieces[proposalCID(deal)] = pp
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
defer m.inputLk.Unlock()
|
||||
@ -694,7 +701,6 @@ func (m *Sealing) maybeUpgradeSector(ctx context.Context, sp abi.RegisteredSealP
|
||||
return &pieceBounds[f-1]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
targetExpirationEpoch := ts.Height() + abi.ChainEpoch(cfg.MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration)
|
||||
minExpirationEpoch := ts.Height() + abi.ChainEpoch(cfg.MinUpgradeSectorExpiration)
|
||||
|
||||
var candidate abi.SectorID
|
||||
@ -732,33 +738,25 @@ func (m *Sealing) maybeUpgradeSector(ctx context.Context, sp abi.RegisteredSealP
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded() == 0 {
|
||||
log.Debugw("skipping available sector", "sector", s.Number, "reason", "no deals in expiration bounds", "expiration", expirationEpoch)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if the sector has less than one sector worth of candidate deals, and
|
||||
// the best candidate has more candidate deals, this sector isn't better
|
||||
if pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded() < abi.PaddedPieceSize(ssize) {
|
||||
if bestDealBytes > pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded() {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// if best is below target, we want larger expirations
|
||||
// if best is above target, we want lower pledge, but only if still above target
|
||||
lessThanSectorOfData := pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded() < abi.PaddedPieceSize(ssize)
|
||||
moreDealsThanBest := pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded() > bestDealBytes
|
||||
|
||||
// todo: after nv17 "target expiration" doesn't really make that much sense
|
||||
// (tho to be fair it doesn't make too much sense now either)
|
||||
// we probably want the lowest expiration that's still above the configured
|
||||
// minimum, and can fit most candidate deals
|
||||
// we want lower pledge, but only if we have more than one sector worth of deals
|
||||
|
||||
if bestExpiration < targetExpirationEpoch {
|
||||
if expirationEpoch > bestExpiration && slowChecks(s.Number) {
|
||||
bestExpiration = expirationEpoch
|
||||
bestPledge = pledge
|
||||
bestDealBytes = pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded()
|
||||
candidate = s
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
preferDueToDealSize := lessThanSectorOfData && moreDealsThanBest
|
||||
preferDueToPledge := pledge.LessThan(bestPledge) && !lessThanSectorOfData
|
||||
|
||||
if expirationEpoch >= targetExpirationEpoch && pledge.LessThan(bestPledge) && slowChecks(s.Number) {
|
||||
prefer := preferDueToDealSize || preferDueToPledge
|
||||
|
||||
if prefer && slowChecks(s.Number) {
|
||||
bestExpiration = expirationEpoch
|
||||
bestPledge = pledge
|
||||
bestDealBytes = pb.dealBytesInBound.Padded()
|
||||
@ -767,12 +765,12 @@ func (m *Sealing) maybeUpgradeSector(ctx context.Context, sp abi.RegisteredSealP
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if bestExpiration < minExpirationEpoch {
|
||||
log.Infow("Not upgrading any sectors", "available", len(m.available), "pieces", len(m.pendingPieces), "bestExp", bestExpiration, "target", targetExpirationEpoch, "min", minExpirationEpoch, "candidate", candidate)
|
||||
log.Infow("Not upgrading any sectors", "available", len(m.available), "pieces", len(m.pendingPieces), "bestExp", bestExpiration, "min", minExpirationEpoch, "candidate", candidate)
|
||||
// didn't find a good sector / no sectors were available
|
||||
return false, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
log.Infow("Upgrading sector", "number", candidate.Number, "type", "deal", "proofType", sp, "expiration", bestExpiration, "pledge", types.FIL(bestPledge))
|
||||
log.Infow("Upgrading sector", "number", candidate.Number, "type", "deal", "proofType", sp, "expiration", bestExpiration, "pledge", types.FIL(bestPledge), "pieces", len(m.pendingPieces), "dealBytesAtExp", bestDealBytes)
|
||||
delete(m.available, candidate)
|
||||
m.nextDealSector = &candidate.Number
|
||||
return true, m.sectors.Send(uint64(candidate.Number), SectorStartCCUpdate{})
|
||||
|
||||
@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ type Config struct {
|
||||
|
||||
MinUpgradeSectorExpiration uint64
|
||||
|
||||
MinTargetUpgradeSectorExpiration uint64
|
||||
|
||||
MaxUpgradingSectors uint64
|
||||
|
||||
MakeNewSectorForDeals bool
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user