unify the two marksets

really, it's concurrent marking and there is no reason to have two different marksets
This commit is contained in:
vyzo 2021-07-05 20:10:47 +03:00
parent 73d07999bf
commit 3477d265c6

View File

@ -145,9 +145,7 @@ type SplitStore struct {
txnLk sync.RWMutex
txnActive bool
txnLookbackEpoch abi.ChainEpoch
txnEnv MarkSetEnv
txnProtect MarkSet
txnMarkSet MarkSet
txnRefsMx sync.Mutex
txnRefs map[cid.Cid]struct{}
txnMissing map[cid.Cid]struct{}
@ -170,13 +168,6 @@ func Open(path string, ds dstore.Datastore, hot, cold bstore.Blockstore, cfg *Co
return nil, err
}
// the txn markset env
txnEnv, err := OpenMarkSetEnv(path, cfg.MarkSetType)
if err != nil {
_ = markSetEnv.Close()
return nil, err
}
// and now we can make a SplitStore
ss := &SplitStore{
cfg: cfg,
@ -184,7 +175,6 @@ func Open(path string, ds dstore.Datastore, hot, cold bstore.Blockstore, cfg *Co
hot: hot,
cold: cold,
markSetEnv: markSetEnv,
txnEnv: txnEnv,
coldPurgeSize: defaultColdPurgeSize,
}
@ -644,7 +634,7 @@ func (s *SplitStore) doTxnProtect(root cid.Cid, batch map[cid.Cid]struct{}) erro
}
}
mark, err := s.txnMarkSet.Has(c)
mark, err := s.txnProtect.Has(c)
if err != nil {
return xerrors.Errorf("error checking mark set for %s: %w", c, err)
}
@ -654,16 +644,6 @@ func (s *SplitStore) doTxnProtect(root cid.Cid, batch map[cid.Cid]struct{}) erro
return errStopWalk
}
mark, err = s.txnProtect.Has(c)
if err != nil {
return xerrors.Errorf("error checking mark set for %s: %w", c, err)
}
// it's protected, nothing to do
if mark {
return errStopWalk
}
// old block reference -- see comment in doCompact about the necessity of this
isOldBlock, err := s.isOldBlockHeader(c, s.txnLookbackEpoch)
if err != nil {
@ -852,12 +832,7 @@ func (s *SplitStore) doCompact(curTs *types.TipSet) error {
txnRefs := s.txnRefs
s.txnRefs = nil
s.txnMissing = make(map[cid.Cid]struct{})
s.txnProtect, err = s.txnEnv.Create("protected", 0)
if err != nil {
s.txnLk.Unlock()
return xerrors.Errorf("error creating transactional mark set: %w", err)
}
s.txnMarkSet = markSet
s.txnProtect = markSet
s.txnLk.Unlock()
defer func() {
@ -865,7 +840,6 @@ func (s *SplitStore) doCompact(curTs *types.TipSet) error {
_ = s.txnProtect.Close()
s.txnActive = false
s.txnProtect = nil
s.txnMarkSet = nil
s.txnMissing = nil
s.txnLk.Unlock()
}()
@ -985,7 +959,7 @@ func (s *SplitStore) doCompact(curTs *types.TipSet) error {
// now that we have collected cold objects, check for missing references from transactional i/o
// and disable further collection of such references (they will not be acted upon)
s.waitForMissingRefs(markSet)
s.waitForMissingRefs()
// 3. copy the cold objects to the coldstore -- if we have one
if !s.cfg.DiscardColdBlocks {
@ -1388,7 +1362,7 @@ func (s *SplitStore) purge(curTs *types.TipSet, cids []cid.Cid) error {
// We need to figure out where they are coming from and eliminate that vector, but until then we
// have this gem[TM].
// My best guess is that they are parent message receipts or yet to be computed state roots.
func (s *SplitStore) waitForMissingRefs(markSet MarkSet) {
func (s *SplitStore) waitForMissingRefs() {
s.txnLk.Lock()
missing := s.txnMissing
s.txnMissing = nil
@ -1423,16 +1397,7 @@ func (s *SplitStore) waitForMissingRefs(markSet MarkSet) {
return errStopWalk
}
mark, err := markSet.Has(c)
if err != nil {
return xerrors.Errorf("error checking markset for %s: %w", c, err)
}
if mark {
return errStopWalk
}
mark, err = s.txnProtect.Has(c)
mark, err := s.txnProtect.Has(c)
if err != nil {
return xerrors.Errorf("error checking markset for %s: %w", c, err)
}